Bridging Science to Practice: Achieving Prevention Program Implementation Fidelity in the Community Youth Development Study

  • Abigail A. FaganEmail author
  • Koren Hanson
  • J. David Hawkins
  • Michael W. Arthur
Original Paper


This paper describes the development, application, and results of an implementation monitoring component of the Communities That Care (CTC) prevention framework used in the Community Youth Development Study (CYDS) to ensure high-fidelity prevention program implementation. This system was created based on research that community-based implementation of evidence-based prevention programs often includes adaptations in program design, content, or manner of delivery (Gottfredson and Gottfredson, Journal of research in crime and delinquency, 39, 3–35, 2002; Hallfors and Godette, Health Education Research, 17, 461–470, 2002; Wandersman and Florin, American Psychologist, 58, 441–448, 2003). A lack of fidelity to the implementation standards delineated by program designers is one indicator of a gap between prevention science and practice which can lessen the likelihood that communities will realize the positive participant effects demonstrated in research trials. By using the CTC model to select and monitor the quality of prevention activities, the 12 CYDS communities replicated 13 prevention programs with high rates of adherence to the programs’ core components and in accordance with dosage requirements regarding the number, length, and frequency of sessions. This success indicates the potential of the CTC program implementation monitoring system to enhance community Prevention Delivery Systems (Wandersman et al. American Journal of Community Psychology, this issue) and improve the likelihood of desired participant changes.


Prevention Implementation fidelity Community coalitions Dissemination 



This work was supported by a research grant from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01 DA015183-01A1) with co-funding from the National Cancer Institute, the National Institute of Child Health and Development, the National Institute of Mental Health, and the Center for Substance Abuse Prevention. The authors wish to acknowledge the contributions of the communities participating in the Community Youth Development Study. An earlier version of this paper was presented in November 2005 at the American Society of Criminology conference held in Toronto, Ontario, Canada.


  1. Abbott, R. D., O’Donnell, J., Hawkins, J. D., Hill, K. G., Kosterman, R., & Catalano, R. F. (1998). Changing teaching practices to promote achievement and bonding to school. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 68, 542–552.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bauman, K. E., Ennett, S. T., Foshee, V. A., Pemberton, M., & Hicks, K. (2001). Correlates of participation in a family-directed tobacco and alcohol prevention program for adolescents. Health Education and Behavior, 28, 440–461.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bodisch Lynch, K., Geller, S. R., Hunt, D. R., Galano, J., & Semon Dubas, J. (1998). Successful program development using implementation evaluation. Journal of Prevention and Intervention in the Community, 17, 51–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Botvin, G. J., Mihalic, S. F., & Grotpeter, J. K. (1998). Blueprints for Violence Prevention, Book 5: Life Skills Training. Boulder, CO: Center for the Study and Prevention of Violence, Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado.Google Scholar
  5. Center for Substance Abuse Prevention (2000). CSAP’s model programs. Available on the World Wide Web: Accessed 13 Feb 2007.
  6. Chinman, M., Hannah, G., Wandersman, A., Ebener, P., Hunter, S. B., Imm, P., et al. (2005). Developing a community science research agenda for building community capacity for effective preventive interventions. American Journal of Community Psychology, 35, 143–157.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dumas, J. E., Lynch, A. M., Laughlin, J. E., Smith, E. P., & Printz, R. J. (2001). Promoting intervention fidelity: Conceptual issues, methods, and preliminary results from the Early Alliance Prevention Trial. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 20, 38–47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dumka, L. E., Garza, C. A., Roosa, M. W., & Stoerzinger, H. D. (1997). Recruitment and retention of high-risk families into a preventive parent training intervention. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 18, 25–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Durlak, J. A. (1998). Common risk and protective factors in successful prevention programs. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 68, 512–520.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dusenbury, L., Brannigan, R., Falco, M., & Hansen, W. B. (2003). A review of research on fidelity of implementation: Implications for drug abuse prevention in school settings. Health Education Research, 18, 237–256.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Elliott, D. S. (1997). Blueprints for Violence Prevention. Boulder, CO: University of Colorado, Institute of Behavioral Science, Center for the Study and Prevention of Violence.Google Scholar
  12. Elliott, D. S., & Mihalic, S. (2004). Issues in disseminating and replicating effective prevention programs. Prevention Science, 5, 47–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ennett, S. T., Ringwalt, C., Thorne, J., Rohrbach, L. A., Vincus, A. A., Simons-Rudolph, A., et al. (2003). A comparison of current practice in school-based substance use prevention programs with meta-analysis findings. Prevention Science, 4, 1–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fagan, A. A., & Mihalic, S. (2003). Strategies for enhancing the adoption of school-based prevention programs: Lessons learned from the Blueprints for Violence Prevention replications of the Life Skills Training Program. Journal of Community Psychology, 31, 235–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., Friedman, R. M., & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research Network (FMHI Publication #231).Google Scholar
  16. Gottfredson, D. C., & Gottfredson, G. D. (2002). Quality of school-based prevention programs: Results from a national survey. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 39, 3–35.Google Scholar
  17. Greenberg, M. T., Feinberg, M. E., Gomez, B. J., & Osgood, D. W. (2005). Testing a community prevention focused model of coalition functioning and sustainability: A comprehensive study of Communities That Care in Pennsylvania. In T. Stockwell, P. Gruenewald, J. Toumbourou, & W. Loxley (Eds.), Preventing harmful substance use: The evidence base for policy and practice (pp. 129–142). West Sussex, England: Wiley.Google Scholar
  18. Hallfors, D., & Godette, D. (2002). Will the “Principles of Effectiveness” improve prevention practice? Early findings from a diffusion study. Health Education Research, 17, 461–470.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hawkins, J. D., & Catalano, R. F. (1992). Communities That Care: Action for drug abuse prevention. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  20. Hawkins, J. D., & Catalano, R. F. (2004). Communities That Care Prevention strategies guide. South Deerfield, MA: Channing Bete Company, Inc.
  21. Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., & Arthur, M. W. (2002). Promoting science-based prevention in communities. Addictive Behaviors, 27, 951–976.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Heinrichs, N., Bertram, H., Kuschel, A., & Hahlweg, K. (2005). Parent recruitment and retention in a universal prevention program for child behavior and emotional problems: Barriers to research and program participation. Prevention Science, 6, 276–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Henggeler, S. W., Melton, G. B., Brondino, M. J., Scherer, D. G., & Hanley, J. H. (1997). Multisystemic therapy with violence and chronic juvenile offenders and their families: The role of treatment fidelity in successful dissemination. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 821–833.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kam, C.-M., Greenberg, M. T., & Walls, C. T. (2003). Examining the role of implementation quality in school-based prevention using the PATHS curriculum. Prevention Science, 4, 55–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kealey, K. A., Peterson, A. V. J., Gaul, M. A., & Dinh, K. T. (2000). Teacher training as a behavior change process: Principles and results from a longitudinal study. Health Education and Behavior, 27, 64–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mihalic, S., Fagan, A. A., Irwin, K., Ballard, D., & Elliott, D. (2004). Blueprints for violence prevention. Washington, D.C.: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.Google Scholar
  27. Mihalic, S., & Irwin, K. (2003). Blueprints for Violence Prevention: From research to real world settings—factors influencing the successful replication of model programs. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 1, 307–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mitchell, R., Florin, P., & Stevenson, J. F. (2002). Supporting community-based prevention and health promotion initiatives: Developing effective technical assistance systems. Health Education and Behavior, 29, 620–639.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mowbray, C. T., Holter, M. C., Teague, G. B., & Bybee, D. (2003). Fidelity criteria: Development, measurement and validation. American Journal of Evaluation, 24, 315–340.Google Scholar
  30. Olweus, D., Limber, S., & Mihalic, S. F. (1999). Blueprints for Violence Prevention, Book 9: Bullying Prevention program. Boulder, CO: Center for the Study and Prevention of Violence, Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado.Google Scholar
  31. Paulsell, D., Kisker, E. E., Love, J. M., & Raikes, H. H. (2002). Understanding implementation in early Head Start programs: Implications for policy and practice. Infant Mental Health Journal, 23, 14–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Quinby, R., Fagan, A. A., Hanson, K., Brooke-Weiss, B., Arthur, M. W., & Hawkins, J. D. (2008). Installing the Communities That Care prevention system: Implementation progress and fidelity in a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Community Psychology, 36(3), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rohrbach, L. A., Graham, J. W., & Hansen, W. B. (1993). Diffusion of a school-based substance abuse prevention program: predictors of program implementation. Preventive Medicine, 22, 237–260.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Roth, D., Panzano, P. C., Crane-Ross, D., Massatti, R., Carstens, C., Seffrin, B., et al. (2005). The innovation diffusion and adoption research project (IDARP): Moving from the diffusion of research results to promoting the adoption of evidence-based innovations in the Ohio mental health system. In D. Roth & W. J. Lutz (Eds.), New research in mental health (Vol. 16, pp. 78–89). Columbus, OH: Ohio Department of Mental Health.Google Scholar
  35. Schoenwald, S. K., Sheidow, A. J., & Letourneau, E. J. (2004). Toward effective quality assurance in evidence-based practice: Links between expert consultation, therapist fidelity, and child outcomes. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 33, 94–104.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sherman, L. W., Gottfredson, D. C., MacKenzie, D., Eck, J., Reuter, P., & Bushway, S. (Eds.) (1997). Preventing crime: What works, what doesn’t, what’s promising: A report to the United States Congress. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.Google Scholar
  37. Spoth, R. L., Guyll, M., Trudeau, L., & Goldberg-Lillehoj, C. (2002). Two studies of proximal outcomes and implementation quality of universal preventive interventions in a community-university collaboration context. Journal of Community Psychology, 30, 499–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Spoth, R. L., & Redmond, C. (2002). Project Family prevention trials based in community–university partnerships: Toward scaled-up preventive interventions. Prevention Science, 3, 203–222.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Taggart, V. S., Bush, P. J., Zuckerman, A. E., & Theiss, P. K. (1990). A process evaluation of the District of Columbia “Know Your Body” project. Journal of School Health, 60, 60–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2001). Youth violence: A report of the Surgeon General. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control; Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Center for Mental Health Services; National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Mental Health.Google Scholar
  41. Wandersman, A., Duffy, J., Flaspohler, P., Noonan, R., Lubell, K., Stillman, L., et al. (this issue). Bridging the gap between prevention research and practice: An interactive systems framework for building capacity to disseminate and implement innovations. American Journal of Community Psychology.Google Scholar
  42. Wandersman, A., & Florin, P. (2003). Community intervention and effective prevention. American Psychologist, 58, 441–448.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Welsh, B., & Farrington, D. P. (Eds.) (2006). Preventing crime: What works for children, offenders, victims and places. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Abigail A. Fagan
    • 1
    Email author
  • Koren Hanson
    • 2
  • J. David Hawkins
    • 2
  • Michael W. Arthur
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Criminology and Criminal JusticeUniversity of South CarolinaColumbiaUSA
  2. 2.Social Development Research GroupUniversity of Washington School of Social WorkSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations