American Journal of Community Psychology

, Volume 38, Issue 3–4, pp 165–173 | Cite as

Applying a Theory of Change Approach to Interagency Planning in Child Mental Health

ORIGINAL PAPER

Abstract

This paper describes the use of a theory of change approach to community-based cross-agency service planning for children with serious emotional disturbance and their families. Public agency planners in Contra Costa County, California used the theory of change approach to organize service planning for a population of youth who had been arrested and involved with juvenile probation. The theory of change process described in this paper links community outcomes with planned activities with the assumptions or principles that underlie the community planning efforts. When complete, a theory of change logic model can serve as a guide for implementation, ensuring that community plans for service delivery remain true to their intent. The theory of change development process includes twelve stages and is based on a step-by-step approach. Theory of change logic models establish a context for articulating a community's shared beliefs and prompt local stakeholders to establish logical connections between the population to be served, expected results, and strategies intended to achieve those results.

Keywords

Theory of change Logic model Interagency planning Child mental health Juvenile probation Serious emotional disturbance 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Work on this manuscript was supported by the National Evaluation of the Comprehensive Community Mental Health Services for Children and Their Families Program in partnership with the Department of Child and Family Studies, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, University of South Florida (sub-contract #35049-0S-275) with financial support from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (SAMHSA Phase III Contract #280-99-8023).

References

  1. Alter, C., & Murty, S. (1997). Logic modeling: A tool for teaching practice evaluation. Journal of Social Work Education, 33(1), 103–117.Google Scholar
  2. Connell, J. P., & Kubisch, A. C. (1998). Applying a theory of change approach to the evaluation of comprehensive community initiatives: Progress, prospects, and problems. In K. Fulbright-Anderson, A. Kubisch, & J. P. Connell (Eds.), New approaches to evaluating community initiatives: Theory, measurement, and analysis (pp. 15–44). Washington, DC: The Aspen Institute.Google Scholar
  3. Contra Costa. (2002). Retrieved November 24, 2002, from http://www.co.contra-costa.ca.us.Google Scholar
  4. Cross, T., Bazron, B., Dennis, K., & Issacs, M. R. (1989). Towards a culturally competent system of care. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Child Development Center, Child and Adolescent Service System Program (CASSP) Technical Assistance Center.Google Scholar
  5. Duchnowski, A., & Friedman, R. (1990). Children's mental health: Challenges for the nineties. Journal of Mental Health Administration, 13, 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Friesen, B., & Koroloff, N. (1990). Challenges for child and adolescent mental health. Health Affairs, 11, 125–136.Google Scholar
  7. Hernandez, M., & Hodges, S. (2001). Theory-based accountability. In M. Hernandez, & S. Hodges (Eds.), Developing outcome strategies in children's mental health (pp. 21–40). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  8. Hernandez, M., & Hodges, S. (2003a). Building upon the theory of change for systems of care. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 11(1), 19–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hernandez, M., & Hodges, S. (2003b). Crafting logic models for systems of care: Ideas into action. Tampa: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, Department of Child and Family Studies.Google Scholar
  10. Hodges, S., Woodbridge, M., & Huang, L. N. (2001). Creating useful information in data-rich environments. In M. Hernandez & S. Hodges (Eds.), Developing outcome strategies in children's mental health. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  11. Julian, D. A., & Lyons, T. S. (1992). A strategic planning model for human services: Problem solving at the local level. Evaluation and Program Planning, 15, 247–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Julian, D. A., Jones, A., & Deyo, D. (1995). Open systems evaluation and the logic model: Program planning and evaluation tools. Evaluation and Program Planning, 18(4), 333–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lourie, I. (1994). Principles of local system development for children, adolescents, and their families. Chicago: Kaleidoscope.Google Scholar
  14. Mayer, R. R. (1985). Policy and program planning: A developmental perspective. NJ: Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs.Google Scholar
  15. Nichols, L. (2002). Participatory program planning: Including program participants and evaluators. Evaluation and Program Planning, 25(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Prilletensky, I., Peirson, L., Gould, J., & Nelson, G. (1997). Planning mental health services for children and youth: Part I-a value-based approach. Evaluation and Program Planning, 20(2), 163–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Public Law 102–321. (July 10, 1992). p. 106 STAT 347.Google Scholar
  18. Rosenblatt, A. (1998). Assessing the child and family outcomes of systems of care for youth with serious emotional disturbance. In M. Epstein, K. Kutash, & A. Duchnowski (Eds.), Outcomes for children and youth with behavioral and emotional disorders and their families (pp. 329–362). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.Google Scholar
  19. Rosenheck, R. (2000). The delivery of mental health Services in the 21st Century: Bringing the community back in. Community Mental Health Journal, 36(1), 107–123.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Stroul, B., & Friedman, R. (1986). A system of care for severely disturbed children and youth (Revised edn.). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Child Development Center.Google Scholar
  21. Using logic models to bring together planning, evaluation, & action: Logic model development guide. (2000). Battle Creek, Michigan: W. K. Kellogg Foundation.Google Scholar
  22. Wandersman, A. (1984). Citizen participation. In R. H. P. K. Heller, S. Reinharz, S. Riger, & A. Wandersman (Eds.), Psychology and community change: Challenges of the future (pp. 337–379). Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.Google Scholar
  23. Wandersman, A., & Florin, P. (2003). Community interventions and effective prevention. American Psychologist, 58(6/7), 441–448.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Weiss, C. H. (1995). Nothing as practical as good theory: Exploring theory-based evaluation for comprehensive community initiatives. In J. P. Connell, A. C. Kubisch, L. B. Schorr, & C. H. Weiss (Eds.), New approaches to evaluating community initiatives (pp. 65–92). Washington, DC: The Aspen Institute.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Child and Family StudiesLouis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, University of South FloridaTampaUSA

Personalised recommendations