# The uniqueness of the Fisher metric as information metric

## Abstract

We define a mixed topology on the fiber space \(\cup _\mu \oplus ^n L^n(\mu )\) over the space \({\mathcal M}({\Omega })\) of all finite non-negative measures \(\mu \) on a separable metric space \({\Omega }\) provided with Borel \(\sigma \)-algebra. We define a notion of strong continuity of a covariant *n*-tensor field on \({\mathcal M}({\Omega })\). Under the assumption of strong continuity of an information metric, we prove the uniqueness of the Fisher metric as information metric on statistical models associated with \({\Omega }\). Our proof realizes a suggestion due to Amari and Nagaoka to derive the uniqueness of the Fisher metric from the special case proved by Chentsov by using a special kind of limiting procedure. The obtained result extends the monotonicity characterization of the Fisher metric on statistical models associated with finite sample spaces and complement the uniqueness theorem by Ay–Jost–Lê–Schwachhöfer that characterizes the Fisher metric by its invariance under sufficient statistics.

## Keywords

Monotonicity of the Fisher metric Chentsov’s theorem Mixed topology## Notes

### Acknowledgments

The author thanks Shun-ichi Amari, Nihat Ay, Lorenz Schwachhöfer and Alesha Tuzhilin for valuable conversations. She is grateful to Vladimir Bogachev and Jürgen Jost for their helpful comments and suggestions. The final version of this manuscript is greatly improved thanks to critical helpful suggestions of the anonymous referees. She acknowledges the VNU for Sciences in Hanoi for excellent working conditions and financial support during her visit when a part of this note has been done.

## References

- Adams, R.A., Fournier, J.J.F. (2006).
*Sobolev spaces*. Amsterdam: Elsevier/Academic Press.Google Scholar - Amari, S. (1987). Differential geometrical theory of statistics. In:
*Differential geometry in statistical inference. Lecture note-monograph series*, (Vol. 10). California: Institute of Mathematical Statistics.Google Scholar - Amari, S., Nagaoka, H. (2000).
*Methods of information geometry. Translations of mathematical monographs*(Vol. 191). Providence/Oxford: American Mathematical Society/Oxford University Press.Google Scholar - Ay, N., Jost, J., Lê, H. V., Schwachhöfer, L. (2015). Information geometry and sufficient statistics.
*Probability Theory and related Fields*,*162*, 327–364. arXiv:1207.6736. - Ay, N., Jost, J., Lê, H. V. and Schwachhöfer, L.,
*Information geometry*(book in preparation).Google Scholar - Ay, N., Olbrich, E., Bertschinger, N., Jost, J. (2011). A geometric approach to complexity.
*Chaos*,*21*, 37–103.Google Scholar - Billingsley, P. (1999).
*Convergence of probability measures*. New York: Wiley.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar - Bogachev, V.I. (2007).
*Measure Theory*(Vol. I, II). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar - Campbell, L. L. (1986). An extended Chentsov characterization of a Riemannian metric.
*Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society*,*98*, 135–141.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar - Chentsov, N. (1978). Algebraic foundation of mathematical statistics.
*Mathematische Operationsforschung und Statistik Serie Statistics*,*9*, 267–276.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar - Chentsov, N. (1982).
*Statistical decision rules and optimal inference. Translation of mathematical monographs*(Vol. 53). Providence: American Mathematical Society.Google Scholar - Hamilton, R. (1982). The inverse function theorem of Nash and Moser.
*Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society*,*7*, 65–222.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar - Jost, J. (2005).
*Postmodern analysis*. Berlin: Springer.MATHGoogle Scholar - Morozova, E., Chentsov, N. (1991).
*Natural geometry of families of probability laws*, Itogi Nauki i Techniki, Current problems of mathematics, Fundamental directions 83 (pp. 133–265). Moscow.Google Scholar - Neveu, J. (1965).
*Mathematical foundations of the calculus of probability*. San Francisco: Holden-Day Inc.MATHGoogle Scholar - Shahshahani, S. (1979). A new mathematical framework for the study of linkage and selection.
*Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society*, volume 17, Nr. 211.Google Scholar