Advertisement

Linguistic neutrosophic partitioned Maclaurin symmetric mean operators based on clustering algorithm and their application to multi-criteria group decision-making

  • Peide LiuEmail author
  • Xinli You
Article
  • 54 Downloads

Abstract

Linguistic neutrosophic number (LNN) can describe evaluation information by three linguistic variables indicating truth-membership, indeterminacy-membership and falsity-membership respectively, which is an effective tool to represent uncertainty, the partitioned Maclaurin symmetric mean (PMSM) operator can reflect the interrelationships among criteria where there are interrelationships among criteria in the same partition, but the criteria in different partitions are irrelevant, so, in this paper, we extend the PMSM operator to LNNs, define linguistic neutrosophic partitioned Maclaurin symmetric mean operator and linguistic neutrosophic weighted partitioned Maclaurin symmetric mean (LNWPMSM) operator, and discuss the properties and theorems of the proposed operators. Then we propose a clustering algorithm for linguistic neutrosophic sets based on the similarity measure to give some objective and reasonable partitions among criteria, and based on the LNWPMSM operator and the objective partition structure of the criteria, a novel multi-criteria group decision-making method is developed for linguistic neutrosophic environment. Finally, one practical example is presented to illustrate the applicability of the proposed method, and a comparison analysis is to show the advantages of the proposed method compared with the existing methods.

Keywords

LNNs LNWPMSM operator Similarity measures Clustering algorithm MCGDM 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This paper is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 71771140 and 71471172), and the Special Funds of Taishan Scholars Project of Shandong Province (No. ts201511045).

References

  1. Bai KY, Zhu X, Wang J, Zhang R (2018) Some partitioned maclaurin symmetric mean based on q-rung orthopair fuzzy information for dealing with multi-attribute group decision making. Symmetry 10(9):383zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bouraoui A, Jamoussi S, BenAyed Y (2018) A multi-objective genetic algorithm for simultaneous model and feature selection for support vector machines. Artif Intell Rev 50(2):261–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen SM (1988) A new approach to handling fuzzy decision making problems. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 18(6):1012–1016zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen SM, Hsiao PH (1995) A comparison of similarity measures of fuzzy values. Fuzzy Sets Syst 72:79–89MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen ZC, Liu PH, Pei Z (2015) An approach to multiple attribute group decision making based on linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy numbers. Int J Comput Intell Syst 8(4):747–760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Deng G, Jiang Y, Fu J (2015) Monotonic similarity measures between intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their relationship with entropy and inclusion measure. Inf Sci 316:348–369zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dutta B, Guha D (2015) Partitioned Bonferroni mean based on linguistic 2-tuple for dealing with multi-attribute group decision making. Appl Soft Comput 37:166–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fang ZB, Ye J (2017) Multiple attribute group decision-making method based on linguistic neutrosophic numbers. Symmetry 9(7):111MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Harsanyi JC (1955) Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics, and interpersonal comparisons of utility. J Polit Econ 63(4):309–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jin L, Mesiar R, Qian G (2018) Weighting models to generate weights and capacities in multicriteria group decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 26(4):2225–2236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Li C, Wang K, Xu N (2019) A survey for the applications of content-based microscopic image analysis in microorganism classification domains. Artif Intell Rev 51(4):577–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Liang WZ, Zhao GY, Wu H (2017) Evaluating investment risks of metallic mines using an extended TOPSIS method with linguistic neutrosophic numbers. Symmetry 9(8):149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Liu PD, Chen SM (2017) Group decision making based on Heronian aggregation operators of intuitionistic fuzzy numbers. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 47(9):2514–2530Google Scholar
  14. Liu P, Liu J (2018) Some q-rung Orthopai fuzzy Bonferroni mean operators and their application to multi-attribute group decision making. Int J Intell Syst 33(2):315–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Liu P, Tang G (2019) Some intuitionistic fuzzy prioritized interactive Einstein Choquet operators and their application in decision making. IEEE ACCESS 6:72357–72371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Liu PD, Wang P (2018) Multiple-attribute decision making based on archimedean Bonferroni operators of q-rung orthopair fuzzy numbers. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst.  https://doi.org/10.1109/tfuzz.2018.2826452 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Liu P, Zhang X (2018) Approach to multi-attributes decision making with intuitionistic linguistic information based on Dempster–Shafer evidence theory. IEEE ACCESS 6(1):52969–52981MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Liu PD, Chen SM, Wang P (2018a) Multiple-attribute group decision-making based on q-rung orthopair fuzzy power maclaurin symmetric mean operators. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern.  https://doi.org/10.1109/tsmc.2018.2852948 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Liu PD, Liu J, Merigó JM (2018b) Partitioned Heronian means based on linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy numbers for dealing with multi-attribute group decision making. Appl Soft Comput 62:395–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Liu PD, Mahmood T, Khan Q (2018c) group decision making based on power Heronian aggregation operators under linguistic neutrosophic environment. Int J Fuzzy Syst 20(3):1–16MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Maclaurin C (1729) A second letter to Martin Folkes, Esq concerning the roots of equations, with demonstration of other rules of algebra. Philos Trans Roy Soc London Ser A 36:59–96Google Scholar
  22. Majumdar P, Samanta SK (2014) On similarity and entropy of neutrosophic sets. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 26(3):1245–1252MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mann S, Singh S (2019) Improved artificial bee colony metaheuristic for energy-efficient clustering in wireless sensor networks. Artif Intell Rev 51(3):329–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Melin P, Sanchez D (2018) Multi-objective optimization for modular granular neural networks applied to pattern recognition. Inf Sci 460:594–610MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Meng F, Tang J, Fujita H (2019) Linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations and their application to multi-criteria decision making. Inf Fusion 46:76–90Google Scholar
  26. Morente-Molinera JA, Kou G, Gonzalez-Crespo R, Corchado JM, Herrera-Viedma E (2017) Solving multi-criteria group decision making problems under environments with a high number of alternatives using fuzzy ontologies and multi-granular linguistic modelling methods. Knowl Based Syst 137:54–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pecaric J, Wen J, Wang WL, Lu T (2005) A generalization of Maclaurin’s inequalities and its applications. Math Inequal Appl 8(4):583–598MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. Pedrino EC, Yamada T, Lunardi TR, Vieira JCD (2019) Islanding detection of distributed generation by using multi-gene genetic programming based classifier. Appl Soft Comput 74:206–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Qin J, Liu X (2014) An approach to intuitionistic fuzzy multiple attribute decision making based on Maclaurin symmetric mean operators. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 27(5):2177–2190MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Safdar S, Zafar S, Zafar N, Khan NF (2018) Machine learning based decision support systems (DSS) for heart disease diagnosis: a review. Artif Intell Rev 50(4):597–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Salabun W, Piegat A (2017) Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for the assessment of mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Artif Intell Rev 48(4):557–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wang WJ (1997) New similarity measure on fuzzy sets and on elements. Fuzzy Sets Syst 85(3):305–309MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wang Y, Liu PD (2018) Linguistic neutrosophic generalized partitioned Bonferroni mean operators and their application to multi-attribute group decision making. Symmetry 10(5):160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wu X, Liao H, Xu Z, Hafezalkotob A, Herrera F (2018) Probabilistic linguistic MULTIMOORA: a multi-criteria decision making method based on the probabilistic linguistic expectation function and the improved Borda rule. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 26(6):3688–3702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Xu ZS (2006a) Induced uncertain linguistic OWA operators applied to group decision making. Inf Fusion 7:231–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Xu ZS (2006b) Dependent uncertain ordered weighted aggregation operators. Inf Fusion 9(2):310–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Xu ZS (2007) Intuitionistic preference relations and their application in group decision making. Inf Sci 177:2363–2379MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Xu ZS, Xia M (2011) Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy sets. Inf Sci 181:2128–2138MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Xu ZS, Chen J, Wu JJ (2008) Clustering algorithm for intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Inf Sci 178:3775–3790MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yager RR (1988) On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multi-criteria decision making. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 18(1):183–190zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yager RR (2001) The power average operator. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern A Syst Hum 31(6):724–731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yang W, Pang Y (2018) New pythagorean fuzzy interaction Maclaurin symmetric mean operators and their application in multiple attribute decision making. IEEE Access 6:39241–39260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8(3):338–356zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zadeh LA (1975) The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning, part I. Inf Sci 8(3):199–249zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zhang Y, Bai X, Fan R, Wang Z (2019) Deviation-sparse fuzzy C-means with neighbor information constraint. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 27(1):185–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Management Science and EngineeringShandong University of Finance and EconomicsJinanChina

Personalised recommendations