Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

The evolution of donators in a common-pool resource problem

  • 74 Accesses

Abstract

Issues regarding foraging in groups have been addressed and researched in a range of domains. Questions arise regarding the benefits to the group as a whole and the cost placed upon individual group members. In this paper, we model the foraging problem as a common resource pool problem and evolve populations in a range of scenarios. In these simulations, agents (group members) forage for food, may contribute to a common pool resource and may benefit from this group resource. We present and discuss results illustrating the scenarios under which agents evolve to behave for the common good of the group and its effect on the survival and the fitness of the population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Andrews R, Belknap R (1986) Bioenergetic benefits of huddling in deer mice (peromyscus maniculatus). Comp Biochem Physiol A 85: 775–778

  2. Broom M, Ruxton GD (2003) Evolutionarily stable kleptoparasitism: consequences of different prey types. Behav Ecol 14(1): 23–33

  3. Creel S (1997) Cooperative hunting and group size: assumptions and currencies. Anim Behav 54: 1319–1324

  4. Creel S, Creel N (1995) Communal hunting and pack size in African wild dogs. Anim Behav 50: 1325–1339

  5. Dieckmann U, Law R, Metz J (eds) (2000) Games on grids. Cambridge University Press

  6. Gurven M (2004) Reciprocal altruism and food sharing decisions among Hiwi and Ache huntergatherers. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 56(4): 366–380

  7. Hardin G (1968) The tragedy of the commons. Science 162: 1243–1248

  8. Hauert C (2006) Spatial effects in social dilemmas. J Theor Biol 240(4): 627–636

  9. Lindgren K, Nordahl MG (1994) Evolutionary dynamics of spatial games. Phisica D 75: 292–309

  10. Ramchurn S, Huynh D, Jennings N (2004) Trust in multi-agent systems. Knowl Eng Rev 19(1): 1–25

  11. Riolo RL (1997) The effects of tag-mediated selection of partners in evolving populations playing the iterated prisoner’s dilemma. Tech. rep., Santa Fe Institute Working Paper 97-02-016

  12. Ruxton G (1993) Foraging in flock-nonspatial models may neglect important costs. Ecol Modell 82: 235–253

  13. Schmitt R, Strand S (1982) Cooperative foraging by yellowtail (seriola lalandei) on two species of fish. Copeia 3: 714–717

  14. Treherne J, Foster W (1980) Group transmission of predator avoidance behaviour in a marine insect. Anim Behav 28: 1119–1122

  15. Turner G, Pitcher T (1986) Attack abatement: a model of group protection by combined avoidance and dilution. Am Nat 35: 228–240

  16. Valone T (1989) Group foraging, public information and patch estimation. Oikos 56: 357–363

  17. Wilkinson GS (1984) Reciprocal food sharing in the vampire bat. Nature 308: 181–184

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Dara Curran.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Curran, D., O’Riordan, C. & Sorensen, H. The evolution of donators in a common-pool resource problem. Artif Intell Rev 27, 245–256 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-008-9077-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Evolutionary computation
  • Cooperation
  • Foraging
  • Common pool resource problems
  • Artificial life