The ongoing surge in the amount of online information has made the process of accurate retrieval much more difficult. Providers of information retrieval systems have come under a lot of pressure to improve their techniques to cater for the modern user. Conventional systems are often limited as they fail to understand the true search intent of the user. This is usually a result of both poor query formulation by the user and an inability of the search engine to process the query adequately. In this paper, an approach is presented that attempts to learn a user’s short-term interests through the clustering of their search results. A profile is maintained for each user to assist in the process of context resolution for a given query. The details of such an approach and experimental results to evaluate its effectiveness are presented in this paper.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Baeza-Yates R and Ribeiro-Neto B (1999). Modern information retrieval. ACM Press, Addison-Wesley
Buckley C, Mitra M, Walz JA and Cardie C (2000). Using clustering and super Concepts within SMART: TREC 6. Inform Process Manage 36(1): 109–131
Dumais S, Joachims T, Bharat K and Weigend A (2003). SIGIR 2003 workshop report: implicit measures of user interests and preferences. SIGIR Forum 37(2): 50–54
Fitzpatrick L, Dent M (1997) Automatic feedback using past queries: social searching?. In: SIGIR ’97: proceedings of the 20th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval. New York, NY, USA, ACM Press, pp 306–313
Hearst M, Pedersen J (1996) Reexamining the cluster hypothesis: scatter/gather on retrieval results. In: Proceedings of SIGIR-96, 19th ACM international conference on research and development in information retrieval. Zürich, CH, pp 76–84.
Kelly D, Belkin N J (2001) Reading time, scrolling and interaction: exploring implicit sources of user preferences for relevant feedback. In: Procedings fo the 24th annual international ACM conference on research and development in information retrieval. pp 408–409
Lu XA, Ayoub M, Dong J (1996) Ad hoc experiments using EUREKA. In: TREC
Porter MF (1997) An algorithm for suffix stripping. In: Sparck Jones K, Willett P (eds) Readings in Information Retrieval Morgon Kaufmann, Son Franciso pp 313–316
Rocchio J (1971) Relevance feedback in information retrieval, Prentice-Hall, pp 313–323
Ruthven I (2004) ‘and this set of words represents the user’s context...’. In: Workshop on information retrieval in context at the ACM SIGIR 2004 conference
Salton G, MacGill M (1983) Introduction to modern information retreival. McGraw-Hill
Sieg A, Mobasher B, Lytinen S, Burke R (2003) Concept based query enhancement in the arch search agent. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Internet computing. Las Vegas, NV
Sugiyama K, Hatano K, Yoshikawa M (2004) Adaptive web search based on user profile constructed without any effort from users. In: WWW ’04: proceedings of the 13th international conference on World Wide Web. New York, NY, USA, ACM Press, pp 675–684
Xu J, Croft WB (1996) Query expansion using local and global document analysis’. In: SIGIR ’96: proceedings of the 19th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval. New York, NY, USA, ACM Press, pp 4–11
Xu J and Croft W (2000). Improving the effectiveness of information retrieval with local context analysis. ACM Trans Inf Syst 18(1): 79–112
About this article
Cite this article
Smullen, M., O’Riordan, C. An attempt to enhance performance in user session based information retrieval. Artif Intell Rev 26, 11–21 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-007-9040-7
- Query re-formulation
- Information retrieval