Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Living at the Confluence of Stigmas: PrEP Awareness and Feasibility Among People Who Inject Drugs in Two Predominantly Rural States

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
AIDS and Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We explored knowledge, beliefs, and acceptability of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention with reference to stigma among people who inject drugs (PWID) in two predominately rural U.S. states. We conducted interviews with 65 current or former PWID aged 18 years or older and living in Arizona or Indiana. Most (63%) of the interviewees were not aware of PrEP. They often confused PrEP with HIV treatment, and many believed that PrEP was only for sexual risk or gay sexual risk. Once they understood that PrEP was recommended for PWID, the participants held a positive view of PrEP and felt that a once-daily pill was feasible. Experiences of stigma about drug use remained a crucial barrier to accessing healthcare and PrEP. This was often linked with anticipated or expressed homophobia. PrEP interventions among PWID must focus on education and the confluence of stigmas in which PWID find themselves when considering PrEP.

Resumen

Exploramos el conocimiento, las creencias y la aceptabilidad de la profilaxis previa a la exposición (PrEP) para la prevención del VIH con referencia al estigma entre las personas que inyectan drogas (PWID) en dos Estados Unidos predominantemente rurales. estados. Realizamos entrevistas con 65 PWID actuales o anteriores de 18 años o más y viviendo en Arizona o Indiana. Más (63%) de los entrevistados no estaban al tanto de la PrEP. A menudo confundieron la PrEP con el tratamiento del VIH, y muchos creían que la PrEP era sólo por riesgo sexual o riesgo sexual gay. Una vez que entendieron que la PrEP se recomendaba para PWID, los participantes tenían una visión positiva de la PrEP y sentían que una vez-píldora diaria era factible. Las experiencias de estigma sobre el consumo de drogas siguieron siendo una barrera crucial para acceder a la atención médica y a la PrEP. Esto a menudo estaba relacionado con la homofobia anticipada o expresada. Las intervenciones de la PrEP entre PWID deben centrarse en la educación y la confluencia de estigmas en los que PWID se encuentra al considerar la PrEP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fonner VA, Dalglish SL, Kennedy CE, et al. Effectiveness and safety of oral HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis for all populations. AIDS. 2016;30(12):1973–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Choopanya K, Martin M, Suntharasamai P, et al. Antiretroviral prophylaxis for HIV infection in injecting drug users in Bangkok, Thailand (the Bangkok tenofovir study): a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2013;381(9883):2083–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Martin M, Vanichseni S, Suntharasamai P, et al. Renal function of participants in the Bangkok tenofovir study—Thailand, 2005–2012. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59(5):716–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: U.S. Public Health Service: Pre-exposure prophylaxis for the prevention of HIV infection in the united states-2017 a clinical practice guideline. 2018. https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/risk/prep/cdc-hiv-prep-guidelines-2017.pdf. 2018.  Accessed 17 Jan 2021.

  5. Calabrese SK, Krakower DS, Mayer KH. Integrating HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) into routine preventive health care to avoid exacerbating disparities. Am J Public Health. 2017;107(12):1883–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Krakower DS, Mayer KH. The role of healthcare providers in the roll out of pre-exposure prophylaxis. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2016;11(1):41–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Petroll AE, Walsh JL, Owczarzak JL, McAuliffe TL, Bogart LM, Kelly JA. PrEP Awareness, familiarity, comfort, and prescribing experience among U.S. primary care providers and HIV specialists. AIDS Behav. 2017;21(5):1256–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mathers BM, Degenhardt L, Phillips B, et al. Global epidemiology of injecting drug use and HIV among people who inject drugs: a systematic review. Lancet. 2008;372(9651):1733–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bazzi AR, Biancarelli DL, Childs E, et al. Limited knowledge and mixed interest in pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention among people who inject drugs. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2018;32(12):529–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV in the United States and dependent areas 2019. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/statistics/overview/ataglance.html.

  11. Van Handel MM, Rose CE, Hallisey EJ, et al. County-level vulnerability assessment for rapid dissemination of HIV or HCV infections among persons who inject drugs, United States. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2016;73(3):323–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Peters PJ, Pontones P, Hoover KW, et al. HIV infection linked to injection use of oxymorphone in Indiana, 2014–2015. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(3):229–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Pitasi MA, Delaney KP, Brooks JT, DiNenno EA, Johnson SD, Prejean J. HIV Testing in 50 local jurisdictions accounting for the majority of new HIV diagnoses and seven states with disproportionate occurrence of HIV in rural areas, 2016–2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019;68(25):561–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Evans ME, Labuda SM, Hogan V, et al. Notes from the field: HIV infection investigation in a rural area–West Virginia, 2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018;67(8):257–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fauci AS, Redfield RR, Sigounas G, Weahkee MD, Giroir BP. Ending the HIV epidemic: a plan for the United States. JAMA. 2019;321(9):844–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Walters SM, Rivera AV, Starbuck L, et al. Differences in awareness of pre-exposure prophylaxis and post-exposure prophylaxis among groups at-risk for HIV in New York state: New York city and Long Island, NY, 2011–2013. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2017;75(Suppl 3):S383–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Stein M, Thurmond P, Bailey G. Willingness to use HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis among opiate users. AIDS Behav. 2014;18(9):1694–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Walters SM, Reilly KH, Neaigus A, Braunstein S. Awareness of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among women who inject drugs in NYC: the importance of networks and syringe exchange programs for HIV prevention. Harm Reduct J. 2017;14(1):40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cáceres CF, Koechlin F, Goicochea P, et al. The promises and challenges of pre-exposure prophylaxis as part of the emerging paradigm of combination HIV prevention. J Int AIDS Soc. 2015;18(4 Suppl 3):19949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Escudero DJ, Kerr T, Wood E, Nguyen P, Lurie MN, Sued O, et al. Acceptability of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PREP) among people who inject drugs (PWID) in a Canadian setting. AIDS Behav. 2015;19(5):752–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bernard CL, Brandeau ML, Humphreys K, Bendavid E, Holodniy M, Weyant C, et al. Cost-effectiveness of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis for people who inject drugs in the United States. Ann Intern Med. 2016;165(1):10–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Shrestha R, Altice FL, Karki P, Copenhaver MM. Integrated bio-behavioral approach to improve adherence to pre-exposure prophylaxis and reduce HIV risk in people who use drugs: a pilot feasibility study. AIDS Behav. 2018;22(8):2640–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sherman SG, Schneider KE, Nyeong Park J, et al. PrEP awareness, eligibility, and interest among people who inject drugs in Baltimore, Maryland. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018;195:148–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fisher JD, Fisher WA, Williams SS, Malloy TE. Empirical tests of an information-motivation-behavioral skills model of AIDS-preventive behavior with gay men and heterosexual university students. Health Psychol. 1994;13(3):238–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Bartholmae MM. The information-motivation-behavioral skills model: an examination of obesity prevention behavioral change in children who participated in the afterschool program Virginia beach let’s move. In: Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), dissertation, Health Services Research, Old Dominion University. 2016. https://doi.org/10.25777/xv08-0b09.

  26. Fisher JD, Fisher WA. Changing AIDS-risk behavior. Psychol Bull. 1992;111(3):455–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Fisher JD, Fisher WA, Amico KR, Harman JJ. An information-motivation-behavioral skills model of adherence to antiretroviral therapy. Health Psychol. 2006;25(4):462–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Fisher WA, Fisher JD, Harman J. The information-motivation-behavioral skills model: a general social psychological approach to understanding and promoting health behavior. Soc Psychol Found Health Illn. 2003;82–106.

  29. Shrestha R, Altice FL, Huedo-Medina TB, Karki P, Copenhaver M. Willingness to use pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP): an empirical test of the information-motivation-behavioral skills (IMB) model among high-risk drug users in treatment. AIDS Behav. 2017;21(5):1299–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Cahill S, Taylor SW, Elsesser SA, Mena L, Hickson D, Mayer KH. Stigma, medical mistrust, and perceived racism may affect PrEP awareness and uptake in black compared to white gay and bisexual men in Jackson, Mississippi and Boston Massachusetts. AIDS Care. 2017;29(11):1351–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Herek GM, Capitanio JP, Widaman KF. Stigma, social risk, and health policy: public attitudes toward HIV surveillance policies and the social construction of illness. Health Psychol. 2003;22(5):533–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Vincent W, Peterson JL, Parrott DJ. The association between AIDS-related stigma and aggression toward gay men and lesbians. Aggress Behav. 2016;42(6):542–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Allen ST, O’Rourke A, White RH, Smith KC, Weir B, Lucas GM, Sherman SG, Grieb SM. Barriers and facilitators to PrEP use among people who inject drugs in rural Appalachia: a qualitative study. AIDS Behav. 2019;18:1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Zibbell JE, Iqbal K, Patel RC, Suryaprasad A, Sanders KJ, Moore-Moravian L, Serrecchia J, Blankenship S, Ward JW, Holtzman D. Increases in hepatitis C virus infection related to injection drug use among persons aged≤ 30 years—Kentucky, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia, 2006–2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015;64(17):453.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Atav S. Health risk behaviors among adolescents attending rural, suburban, and urban schools: a comparative study. Fam Community Health. 2002;25(2):53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Valdiserri R, Khalsa J, Dan C, Holmberg S, Zibbell J, Holtzman D, Compton W. Confronting the emerging epidemic of HCV infection Among young injection drug users. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(5):816–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Zibbell JE, Asher AK, Patel RC, Kupronis B, Iqbal K, Ward JW, Holtzman D. Increases in acute hepatitis C virus infection related to a growing opioid epidemic and associated injection drug use, United States, 2004 to 2014. Am J Public Health. 2018;108(2):175–81. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2017.304132.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Laurel Wamsley. California to make HIV prevention drugs available without a prescription. NPR: Web Edition Articles [Internet]. 2019. Accesed on 8 Oct 2019. Available from: https://petrieflom.law.harvard.edu/resources/article/california-to-make-hiv-prevention-drugs-available-without-a-prescription.

  39. Blackstock OJ, Moore BA, Berkenblit GV, et al. A cross-sectional online survey of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis adoption among primary care physicians. J Gen Intern Med. 2017;32(1):62–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Mullins TL, Lally M, Zimet G, Kahn JA. Clinician attitudes toward CDC interim pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) guidance and operationalizing PrEP for adolescents. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2015;29(4):193–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Silapaswan A, Krakower D, Mayer KH. Pre-exposure prophylaxis: a narrative review of provider behavior and interventions to increase PrEP implementation in primary care. J Gen Intern Med. 2017;32(2):192–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Spinelli MA, Scott HM, Vittinghoff E, et al. Brief report: a panel management and patient navigation intervention is associated with earlier PrEP initiation in a safety-net primary care health system. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2018;79(3):347–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded in part by the Indiana University Addictions Crisis Grand Challenge Initiative.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation and analysis were performed by GC, BM, CL, CA, WM, BT, RC, PR. The first draft of the manuscript was written by GC and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gregory Carter.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Ethics Approval

Approval was obtained from the University of Arizona Institutional Review Board.

Consent to Participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carter, G., Meyerson, B., Rivers, P. et al. Living at the Confluence of Stigmas: PrEP Awareness and Feasibility Among People Who Inject Drugs in Two Predominantly Rural States. AIDS Behav 25, 3085–3096 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-021-03304-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-021-03304-x

Keywords

Navigation