Advertisement

Springer Nature is making Coronavirus research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Measuring HIV Risk Perception and Behavior: Results from Round 1 of the Cognitive Interviewing Project with young women and men who have sex with men in South Africa

Abstract

Self-reported HIV risk perception and behaviors are used in a variety of settings for diverse purposes, such as HIV prevention program planning and screening. Careful consideration of how youth in high HIV prevalence areas interpret these kinds of questions warrants attention. The Cognitive Interviewing Project (CIP) conducted cognitive interviews on common risk survey items with 30 cis-female and 20 MSM youth (18 to 24), who had recent sex with a male partner, in Cape Town and Vulindlela, South Africa. Results identified a number of potential issues including (1) confusing text; (2) mismatches of terms with local usage; (3) confusion with items requiring self-tailoring; (4) presentation concerns limiting selection of full range of answers; and (5) challenges reporting on information dependent on partner (eg., HIV risk, HIV status of partner). Self-report Items used to identify those at elevated risk for HIV should be evaluated with local populations to optimize shared understanding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.

    Mirzaei M, Ahmadi K, Saadat SH, Ramezani MA. Instruments of high risk sexual behavior assessment: a systematic review. Mater Socio-med. 2016;28(1):46–50.

  2. 2.

    Rao A, Tobin K, Davey-Rothwell M, Latkin CA. Social desirability bias and prevalence of sexual HIV risk behaviors among people who use drugs in Baltimore, Maryland: implications for identifying individuals prone to underreporting sexual risk behaviors. AIDS Behav. 2017;21(7):2207–14.

  3. 3.

    Gallo MF, Warner L, Hobbs MM, Jamieson DJ, Hylton-Kong T, Steiner MJ. Differences in misreporting of sexual behavior over time: implications for HIV trials. Sex Transm Dis. 2015;42(3):160–1.

  4. 4.

    Binson D, Catania JA. Respondents' understanding of the words used in sexual behavior questions. Public Opin Q. 1998;1998:190–208.

  5. 5.

    Ndinda C, Chimbwete C, McGrath N, Pool R. Perceptions of anal sex in rural South Africa. Cult Health Sex. 2008;10(2):205–12.

  6. 6.

    Drennan J. Cognitive interviewing: verbal data in the design and pretesting of questionnaires. J Adv Nurs. 2003;42(1):57–63.

  7. 7.

    Willis GB. Cognitive interviewing: a tool for improving questionnaire design. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2004.

  8. 8.

    Collins D. Pretesting survey instruments: an overview of cognitive methods. Qual Life Res. 2003;12(3):229–38.

  9. 9.

    Tourangeau R, Rasinski KA. Cognitive processes underlying context effects in attitude measurement. Psychol Bull. 1988;103(3):299.

  10. 10.

    Tourangeau R. Cognitive aspects of survey measurement and mismeasurement. Int J Public Opin Res. 2003;15(1):3–7.

  11. 11.

    Mavhu W, Langhaug L, Manyonga B, Power R, Cowan F. What is ‘sex’exactly? Using cognitive interviewing to improve the validity of sexual behaviour reporting among young people in rural Zimbabwe. Cult Health Sex. 2008;10(6):563–72.

  12. 12.

    Vreeman RC, Nyandiko WM, Ayaya SO, Walumbe EG, Inui TS. Cognitive interviewing for cross-cultural adaptation of pediatric antiretroviral therapy adherence measurement items. Int J Behav Med. 2014;21(1):186–96.

  13. 13.

    Lee J. Conducting cognitive interviews in cross-national settings. Assessment. 2014;21(2):227–40.

  14. 14.

    Presser S, Couper MP, Lessler JT, et al. Methods for testing and evaluating survey questions. Public Opin Q. 2004;68(1):109–30.

  15. 15.

    Gill K, Dietrich J, Gray G, et al. Pluspills: an open-label, safety and feasibility study of oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in 15–19-year-old adolescents in two sites in South Africa. Paper presented at: Journal of the international aids society 2017.

  16. 16.

    Network HPT. HPTN 067–the ADAPT study: a phase II, randomized, open-label, pharmacokinetic and behavioral study of the use of intermittent oral emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Durham NC: HPTN; 2011.

  17. 17.

    Bekker L-G, Roux S, Sebastien E, et al. Daily and non-daily pre-exposure prophylaxis in African women (HPTN 067/ADAPT Cape Town Trial): a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet HIV. 2018;5(2):e68–e78.

  18. 18.

    Willis G. Cognitive interviewing revisited: a useful technique, in theory. Methods Test Eval Surv Quest. 2004. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471654728.ch2.

  19. 19.

    Fereday J, Muir-Cochrane E. Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: a hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. Int J Qual Methods. 2006;5(1):80–92.

  20. 20.

    Srivastava P, Hopwood N. A practical iterative framework for qualitative data analysis. Int J Qual Methods. 2009;8(1):76–84.

  21. 21.

    Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.

  22. 22.

    Guest G, MacQueen KM, Namey EE. Applied thematic analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2011.

  23. 23.

    Knafl K, Deatrick J, Gallo A, et al. The analysis and interpretation of cognitive interviews for instrument development. Res Nurs Health. 2007;30(2):224–34.

  24. 24.

    Garrison DR, Cleveland-Innes M, Koole M, Kappelman J. Revisiting methodological issues in transcript analysis: negotiated coding and reliability. Internet High Educ. 2006;9(1):1–8.

  25. 25.

    Menza TW, Hughes JP, Celum CL, Golden MR. Prediction of HIV acquisition among men who have sex with men. Sex Transm Dis. 2009;36(9):547.

  26. 26.

    Koblin BA, Husnik MJ, Colfax G, et al. Risk factors for HIV infection among men who have sex with men. AIDS. 2006;20(5):731–9.

  27. 27.

    Hoenigl M, Weibel N, Mehta SR, et al. Development and validation of the San Diego Early Test Score to predict acute and early HIV infection risk in men who have sex with men. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;61(3):468–75.

  28. 28.

    Kahle EM, Hughes JP, Lingappa JR, et al. An empiric risk scoring tool for identifying high-risk heterosexual HIV-1 serodiscordant couples for targeted HIV-1 prevention. J Acquir Immun Defic Syndr. 1999;62(3):339.

  29. 29.

    Mirzaei M, Ahmadi K, Saadat S-H, Ramezani MA. Instruments of high risk sexual behavior assessment: a systematic review. Mater Socio-medica. 2016;28(1):46.

  30. 30.

    Norwood MS, Hughes JP, Amico KR. The validity of self-reported behaviors: methods for estimating underreporting of risk behaviors. Ann Epidemiol. 2016;26(9):612–618.e612.

  31. 31.

    Sudman S, Bradburn NM, Schwarz N. Thinking about answers: the application of cognitive processes to survey methodology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.; 1996.

  32. 32.

    Aicken CR, Gray M, Clifton S, et al. Improving questions on sexual partnerships: lessons learned from cognitive interviews for Britain's third National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles ("Natsal-3"). Arch Sex Behav. 2013;42(2):173–85.

  33. 33.

    Maughan-Brown B, Venkataramani AS. Accuracy and determinants of perceived HIV risk among young women in South Africa. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):42.

  34. 34.

    Brener ND, Billy JO, Grady WR. Assessment of factors affecting the validity of self-reported health-risk behavior among adolescents: evidence from the scientific literature. J Adolesc Health. 2003;33(6):436–57.

  35. 35.

    Balkus JE, Brown E, Palanee T, et al. An empiric HIV risk scoring tool to predict HIV-1 acquisition in African women. J Acquir Immun Defic Syndr. 2016;72(3):333.

  36. 36.

    Pettifor A, MacPhail C, Hughes JP, et al. The effect of a conditional cash transfer on HIV incidence in young women in rural South Africa (HPTN 068): a phase 3, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Glob Health. 2016;4(12):e978–e988988.

  37. 37.

    Giovenco D, Pettifor A, MacPhail C, et al. Assessing risk for HIV infection among adolescent girls in South Africa: an evaluation of the VOICE risk score (HPTN 068). J Int AIDS Soc. 2019;22(7):e25359.

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors thank the participants, their partners and families, other members of the study team (Sithembile Phakathi, Makhosazana Mdladla, Nangamso Ngcwayi, Thando Wonxie, Thola Bennie), and leadership at sites (Linda-Gail Bekker, Quarraisha Abdool Karim) and FHI360/HPTN (Wafaa El-Sadr).

Funding

The Cognitive Interviewing Project (CIP) was supported by the HIV Prevention Trials Network (UM1-AI068619, UM1-AI068613, and UM1-AI068617) which received support from the Division of AIDS, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health.

Author information

KRA chaired the CIP and led protocol development and analyses, HH and MA served as site PIs contributing to all aspects of protocol development, data collection and interpretation of findings, JM and HB conducting coding, analyses, interpretation of findings and write up. TS contributed to protocols, oversight of project implementation, and interpretation of findings. All authors contributed to manuscript finalization.

Correspondence to K Rivet Amico.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Dr. Amico reports a grant from Gilead Sciences (ended in December 2017) outside the submitted work. Authors not named here have disclosed no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Milne, J., Brady, H., Shato, T. et al. Measuring HIV Risk Perception and Behavior: Results from Round 1 of the Cognitive Interviewing Project with young women and men who have sex with men in South Africa. AIDS Behav (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-020-02790-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Survey development
  • Cognitive interviewing
  • HIV risk perception
  • HIV risk behavior
  • Youth