The Unanticipated Benefits of PrEP for Young Black Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex with Men

  • Katherine G. QuinnEmail author
  • Erika Christenson
  • Mark T. Sawkin
  • Elizabeth Hacker
  • Jennifer L. Walsh
Original Paper


Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is effective at reducing new HIV infections among adherent users. However, there are potential benefits of PrEP beyond HIV prevention that remain understudied, particularly among young Black gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM). In 2018, we conducted six focus groups (n = 36) in four midwestern cities: Milwaukee, WI; Minneapolis, MN; Detroit, MI; and Kansas City, MO with current and former PrEP users who identified as Black MSM. The focus groups covered medical care and provider experiences, patterns of PrEP use and adherence, relationships while on PrEP, and PrEP stigma. Results revealed four unanticipated benefits of PrEP for young Black MSM: (1) improved engagement in medical care, (2) reduced sexual and HIV anxiety, (3) increased sexual comfort and freedom, and (4) positive sexual relationships with people living with HIV. Findings from this study fill a gap in our understanding of the potential benefits of PrEP beyond HIV prevention. Public health campaigns and messaging around PrEP should incorporate such benefits to reach young Black MSM who may be motivated by benefits beyond HIV prevention.


Pre-exposure prophylaxis Young Black MSM Sexual anxiety Engagement in medical care Focus groups 



Funding support was provided by the National Institute of Mental Health (R01-MH115764; PI: Walsh; P30-MH052776, PI: Jeffrey A. Kelly; K01-MH112412; PI: Quinn). The Authors would like to acknowledge the support and collaboration of our community partner agencies in Milwaukee, Minneapolis, Kansas City, and Detroit. Special Thanks to the Red Door Clinic in Minneapolis, the Detroit Public Health STD Clinic, Wayne State University, and University of Missouri-Kansas City, and all of the staff at the Center for AIDS Intervention Research (CAIR) who were instrumental in this research.


  1. 1.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). HIV and African American gay and bisexual men. Atlanta, GA; 2019. Accessed 24 Nov 2019.
  2. 2.
    Mustanski B, Morgan E, D’Augelli AR, Brikett M, Janulis P, Newcomb ME. Individual and network factors associated with racial disparities in HIV among young men who have sex with men: results from the Radar cohort study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2018. Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hess K, Hu X, Lansky A, Mermin J, Hall HI. Lifetime risk of a diagnosis of HIV infection in the United States. Ann Epidemiol. 2017;27(4):238–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Anderson PL, Glidden DV, Liu A, et al. Emtricitabine–tenofovir concentrations and pre-exposure prophylaxis efficacy in men who have sex with men. Sci Transl Med. 2012;4(151):151ra125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Donnell D, Baeten JM, Bumpus NN, et al. HIV protective efficacy and correlates of tenofovir blood concentrations in a clinical trial of PrEP for HIV prevention. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2014;66(3):340–8. Scholar
  6. 6.
    Whitfield THF, Jones SS, Wachman M, Grov C, Parsons JT, Rendina HJ. The impact of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use on sexual anxiety, satisfaction, and esteem among gay and bisexual men. J Sex Res. 2019. Scholar
  7. 7.
    Golub S, Radix A, Hilley A. Developing and implementing a PrEP Demonstration/implementation hybrid in a community-based health center. In: IAPAC adherence. Miami, FL; 2014. Accessed 24 Nov 2019.
  8. 8.
    Koester KA, Erguera XA, Kang Dufour M-S, et al. “Losing the Phobia:” understanding how HIV Pre-exposure prophylaxis facilitates bridging the serodivide among men who have sex with men. Front Public Health. 2018. Scholar
  9. 9.
    Carlo Hojilla J, Koester KA, Cohen SE, et al. Sexual behavior, risk compensation, and HIV prevention strategies among participants in the San Francisco PrEP demonstration project: a qualitative analysis of counseling notes. AIDS Behav. 2016. Scholar
  10. 10.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Preexposure prophylaxis for the prevention of HIV infection in the United States-2017 update: a clinical practice guideline. 2017. Accessed 24 Nov 2019.
  11. 11.
    Sullivan PS, Peterson J, Rosenberg ES, et al. Understanding racial HIV/STI disparities in black and white men who have sex with men: a multilevel approach. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(3):e90514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Harawa NT, Greenland S, Bingham TA, et al. Associations of race/ethnicity with HIV prevalence and HIV-related behaviors among young men who have sex with men in 7 urban centers in the United States. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2004;35(5):526–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sullivan PS, Purcell DW, Grey JA, et al. Patterns of racial/ethnic disparities and prevalence in HIV and syphilis diagnoses among men who have sex with men, 2016: a novel data visualization. Am J Public Health. 2016. Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bauermeister JA, Carballo-Diéguez A, Ventuneac A, Dolezal C. Assessing motivations to engage in intentional condomless anal intercourse in HIV risk contexts (“bareback sex”) among men who have sex with men. AIDS Educ Prev. 2009. Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gamarel KE, Golub SA. Intimacy motivations and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) adoption intentions among HIV-negative men who have sex with men (MSM) in romantic relationships. Ann Behav Med. 2014;49(2):177–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Malebranche DJ, Fields EL, Bryant LO, Harper SR. Masculine socialization and sexual risk behaviors among Black men who have sex with men: a qualitative exploration. Men Masculinities. 2009;12(1):90–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Clark A, Mayben JK, Hartman C, Kallen MA, Giordano TP. Conspiracy beliefs about HIV infection are common but not associated with delayed diagnosis or adherence to care. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2008;22(9):753–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bogart LM, Thorburn S. Are HIV/AIDS conspiracy beliefs a barrier to HIV prevention among African Americans? J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2005;38(2):213–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Altice FL, Mostashari F, Friedland GH. Trust and the acceptance of and adherence to antiretroviral therapy. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2001;28(1):47–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Whetten K, Leserman J, Whetten R, et al. Exploring lack of trust in care providers and the government as a barrier to health service use. Am J Public Health. 2006;96(4):716–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Quinn KG, Dickson-Gomez J, Zarwell M, Pearson B, Lewis M. “A gay man and a doctor are just like, a recipe for destruction”: how racism and homonegativity in healthcare settings influence PrEP uptake among young Black MSM. AIDS Behav. 2019;23(7):1951–63. Scholar
  22. 22.
    Corbin J, Strauss A. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2015.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Saldana J. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2016.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101. Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dangerfield DT, Ober AJ, Smith LR, Shoptaw S, Bluthenthal RN. Exploring and adapting a conceptual model of sexual positioning practices and sexual risk among HIV-negative black men who have sex with men. J Sex Res. 2018. Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cohen MS, Chen YQ, McCauley M, et al. Antiretroviral therapy for the prevention of HIV-1 transmission. N Engl J Med. 2016. Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rodger AJ, Cambiano V, Bruun T, et al. Sexual activity without condoms and risk of HIV transmission in serodifferent couples when the HIV-positive partner is using suppressive antiretroviral therapy. J Am Med Assoc. 2016. Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bavinton BR, Pinto AN, Phanuphak N, et al. Viral suppression and HIV transmission in serodiscordant male couples: an international, prospective, observational, cohort study. Lancet HIV. 2018. Scholar
  29. 29.
    Smith DK. By race/ethnicity, blacks have the highest number needing PrEP in the United States, 2018. In: CROI. Boston, MA; 2018. Accessed 24 Nov 2019.
  30. 30.
    Huang H, Zhu W, Smith DK, Harris N, Hoover KW. HIV preexposure prophylaxis by race and ethnicity—United States, 2014–2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018;67:1147–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Quinn K, Bowleg L, Dickson-Gomez J. “The fear of being Black plus the fear of being gay”: the effects of intersectional stigma on PrEP use among young Black gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men. Soc Sci Med. 2019. Scholar
  32. 32.
    Petroll AE, Mosack KE. Physician awareness of sexual orientation and preventive health recommendations to men who have sex with men. Sex Transm Dis. 2011;38(1):63–7. Scholar
  33. 33.
    Gilbert KL, Ray R, Siddiqi A, et al. Visible and invisible trends in black men’s health: pitfalls and promises for addressing racial, ethnic, and gender inequities in health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2016;37:295–311. Scholar
  34. 34.
    Milam J, Jain S, Dubé MP, et al. Sexual risk compensation in a pre-exposure prophylaxis demonstration study among individuals at risk of HIV. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2019. Scholar
  35. 35.
    Eaton LA, Matthews DD, Bukowski LA, et al. Elevated HIV prevalence and correlates of PrEP use among a community sample of Black men who have sex with men. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2018;79(3):339–46. Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hightow-Weidman LB, Magnus M, Beauchamp G, et al. Incidence and correlates of STIs among black men who have sex with men participating in the HPTN 073 PrEP study. Clin Infect Dis. 2019. Scholar
  37. 37.
    Millett G, Peterson J, Wolitski R, Stall R. Greater risk for HIV infection of black men who have sex with men: a critical literature review. Am J Public Health. 2006;96(6):1007–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Calabrese SK, Earnshaw VA, Underhill K, Hansen NB, Dovidio JF. The impact of patient race on clinical decisions related to prescribing HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP): assumptions about sexual risk compensation and implications for access. AIDS Behav. 2014;18(2):226–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Gandhi M, Spinelli MA, Mayer KH. Addressing the sexually transmitted infection and HIV syndemic. JAMA. 2019;321(14):1356–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Race K. Click here for HIV status: shifting templates of sexual negotiation. Emot Space Soc. 2010. Scholar
  41. 41.
    Parsons JT, Schrimshaw EW, Wolitski RJ, et al. Sexual harm reduction practices of HIV-seropositive gay and bisexual men: serosorting, strategic positioning, and withdrawal before ejaculation. AIDS. 2005. Scholar
  42. 42.
    Golub SA, Tomassilli JC, Parsons JT. Partner serostatus and disclosure stigma: implications for physical and mental health outcomes among HIV-positive adults. AIDS Behav. 2009. Scholar
  43. 43.
    Bourne A, Hickson F, Keogh P, Reid D, Weatherburn P. Problems with sex among gay and bisexual men with diagnosed HIV in the United Kingdom. BMC Public Health. 2012. Scholar
  44. 44.
    Rohleder P, McDermott DT, Cook R. Experience of sexual self-esteem among men living with HIV. J Health Psychol. 2017. Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kinsler JJ, Wong MD, Sayles JN, Davis C, Cunningham WE. The effect of perceived stigma from a health care provider on access to care among a low-income HIV-positive population. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2007;21(8):584–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Sayles JN, Wong MD, Kinsler JJ, Martins D, Cunningham WE. The association of stigma with self-reported access to medical care and antiretroviral therapy adherence in persons living with HIV/AIDS. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24(10):1101–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Logie C, Gadalla TM. Meta-analysis of health and demographic correlates of stigma towards people living with HIV. AIDS Care. 2009. Scholar
  48. 48.
    Mahajan AP, Sayles JN, Patal VA, et al. Stigma in the HIV/AIDS epidemic: a review of the literature and recommendations for the way forward. AIDS. 2008;22(Suppl 2):S67–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Simbayi LC, Kalichman S, Strebel A, Cloete A, Henda N, Mqeketo A. Internalized stigma, discrimination, and depression among men and women living with HIV/AIDS in Cape Town, South Africa. Soc Sci Med. 2007;64(9):1823–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Quinn K, Voisin DR, Bouris A, et al. Multiple dimensions of stigma and health related factors among young black men who have sex with men. AIDS Behav. 2017;21(1):207–16. Scholar
  51. 51.
    Hosek SG, Rudy B, Landovitz RJ, et al. An HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) demonstration project and safety study for young MSM. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2016;74(1):1. Scholar
  52. 52.
    Serota DP, Rosenberg ES, Lockard AM, et al. Beyond the biomedical: preexposure prophylaxis failures in a cohort of young black men who have sex with men in Atlanta, Georgia. Clin Infect Dis. 2018. Scholar
  53. 53.
    Smith DK, Toledo L, Smith DJ, Adams MA, Rothenberg R. Attitudes and program preferences of African–American urban young adults about pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). AIDS Educ Prev. 2012;24(5):408–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Chicago PrEP Working Group. PrEP4Love. AIDS Foundation of Chicago. Published 2018. Accessed 19 Nov 2019.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Biello KB, Oldenburg CE, Mitty JA, et al. The “Safe Sex” conundrum: anticipated stigma from sexual partners as a barrier to PrEP use among substance using MSM engaging in transactional sex. AIDS Behav. 2017;21(1):300–6. Scholar
  56. 56.
    Golub SA. PrEP stigma: implicit and explicit drivers of disparity. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2018;15:190–7. Scholar
  57. 57.
    Cahill S, Taylor SW, Elsesser SA, Mena L, Hickson DM, Mayer KH. Stigma, medical mistrust, and perceived racism may affect PrEP awareness and uptake in black compared to white gay and bisexual men in Jackson, Mississippi and Boston, Massachusetts. AIDS Care. 2017;29(11):1351–8. Scholar
  58. 58.
    Harper GW, Jadwin-Cakmak L, Cherenak E, Wilson P. Critical consciousness-based HIV prevention interventions for black gay and bisexual male youth. Am J Sex Educ. 2019;14(1):109–133. Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral MedicineMedical College of Wisconsin, Center for AIDS Intervention ResearchMilwaukeeUSA
  2. 2.School of PharmacyUniversity of Missouri-Kansas CityKansas CityUSA
  3. 3.Wayne State University School of MedicineDetroitUSA

Personalised recommendations