Advertisement

Crystal Clear with Active Visualization: Understanding Medication Adherence Among Youth Living with HIV

  • Joan ChristodoulouEmail author
  • Sue Ellen Abdalian
  • Annie S. K. Jones
  • Georgia Christodoulou
  • Stephen L. PentoneyJr.
  • Mary Jane Rotheram-Borus
Original Paper

Abstract

Adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART) among youth remains low. We piloted an adapted active visualization device that demonstrates how ART works in the body. Youth living with HIV were randomized to: (1) standard care (n = 14) or the (2) adapted active visualization intervention (n = 14) and 71% of the sample (n = 19) were re-assessed on viral load, adherence behaviors, and illness perceptions 2.5 months later. Intervention youth had lower viral loads, reported less difficulty in adhering to ART, and more motivation and control over their HIV than standard care at follow-up. Active visualization may be an acceptable tool to address ART adherence among youth.

Keywords

Youth living with HIV Antiretroviral therapy Medication adherence Multisensory learning Viral load 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Funding was provided by UCLA Center for HIV Identification, Prevention and Treatment Services and National Institute of Mental Health (Grant No: T32MH109205).

References

  1. 1.
    Kim SH, Gerver SM, Fidler S, Ward H. Adherence to antiretroviral therapy in adolescents living with HIV: systematic review and meta-analysis. AIDS. 2014;28(13):1945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
    MacDonell K, Naar-King S, Huszti H, Belzer M. Barriers to medication adherence in behaviorally and perinatally infected youth living with HIV. AIDS. 2013;17(1):86–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shams L, Seitz AR. Benefits of multisensory learning. Trends Cogn Sci. 2008;12(11):411–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jones AS, Petrie KJ. I can see clearly now: using active visualisation to improve adherence to ART and PrEP. AIDS Behav. 2017;21(2):335–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jones AS, Coetzee B, Kagee A, Fernandez J, Cleveland E, Thomas M, Petrie KJ. The use of a brief, active visualisation intervention to improve adherence to antiretroviral therapy in non-adherent patients in South Africa. AIDS Behav. 2018;26:1–9.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Broadbent E, Petrie KJ, Main J, Weinman J. The brief illness perception questionnaire. J Psychosom Res. 2006;60:631–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Broadbent E, Wilkes C, Koschwanez H, Weinman J, Norton S, Petrie KJ. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the brief illness perception questionnaire. Psychol Health. 2015;30(11):1361–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Horne R, Chapman SC, Parham R, Freemantle N, Forbes A, Cooper V. Understanding patients’ adherence-related beliefs about medicines prescribed for long-term conditions: a meta-analytic review of the necessity-concerns framework. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(12):e80633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Perera AI, Thomas MG, Moore JO, Faasse K, Petrie KJ. Effect of a smartphone application incorporating personalized health-related imagery on adherence to antiretroviral therapy: a randomized clinical trial. AIDS Patient Care STDs. 2014;28(11):579–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hertzog MA. Considerations in determining sample size for pilot studies. Res Nurs Health. 2008;31(2):180–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tversky A, Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science. 1981;211(4481):453–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychiatry & Biobehavioral SciencesSemel Institute, University of California Los AngelesLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.School of MedicineTulane UniversityNew OrleansUSA
  3. 3.Department of Psychological Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health SciencesUniversity of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand
  4. 4.Keck School of MedicineUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  5. 5.Organovo, Inc.San DiegoUSA

Personalised recommendations