Advertisement

Preferences for Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Service Delivery Among Female Sex Workers in Malawi: A Discrete Choice Experiment

  • Kathryn E. LancasterEmail author
  • Thandie Lungu
  • Agatha Bula
  • Jaclyn M. Shea
  • Abigail Shoben
  • Mina C. Hosseinipour
  • Racquel E. Kohler
  • Irving F. Hoffman
  • Vivian F. Go
  • Carol E. Golin
  • Stephanie B. Wheeler
  • William C. Miller
Original Paper

Abstract

Female sex workers (FSW) in Malawi have among the highest HIV prevalence estimates worldwide. Daily oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an effective HIV prevention method, yet preferences for PrEP delivery among FSW are lacking. Eight focus group discussions, a literature review, and cognitive interviews were conducted to identify modifiable PrEP delivery attributes and inform discrete-choice experiment (DCE) development for FSW in Lilongwe. Enrolled FSW received an interviewer-assisted DCE. Data were analyzed using mixed logit regression. Dispensing location was most preferred, followed by the provision of additional services. Women preferred receiving PrEP at family planning clinics or non-governmental organization run drop-in centers. Cervical cancer screening was the most preferred additional service, while pregnancy testing and partner risk reduction counseling were less valued. This study was the first study to examine PrEP delivery preferences in Malawi using DCE—a powerful elicitation tool to apply to other key populations at risk for HIV.

Keywords

Pre-exposure prophylaxis Sex workers Women Africa 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge Dylane Davis, Emmanuel Zalira, the Family Planning Association of Malawi, and UNC Project Malawi for their contributions and support to this project. We are also grateful to the participants who courageously shared their time, thoughts, and stories. This work was supported by the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Center for AIDS Research, an NIH funded program (P30 AI50410).

Author Contributions

KEL and TL had overall responsibility for implementing the study, and conceived and designed the study, analyzed the data, and led the manuscript writing. KEL, TL, MCH, VFG, CEG, SBW, and WCM contributed to developing the study concept and design. TL, AG, and JS contributed to data collection. JS, AS, and REK assisted with data analysis and results interpretation. JS, AS, MCH, REK, IFH, VGO, CEG, SBW, and WCM contributed to drafting the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript critically for intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final draft of the submitted manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Center for AIDS Research, an NIH funded program (P30 AI50410).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

Authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human subjects were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    World Health Organization (WHO). Prevention and treatment of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections for sex workers in low- and middle-income countries: Recommendations for a public health approach. Geneva, Switzerland; 2013.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baral S, Beyrer C, Muessig K, Poteat T, Wirtz AL, Decker MR, et al. Burden of HIV among female sex workers in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2012.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Matovu J, Ssebadduka B. Sexual risk behaviours, condom use and sexually transmitted infection treatment-seeking behaviours among female sex workers and truck drivers in Uganda. Int J STD AIDS. 2012;23(4):267–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Scorgie F, Chersich MF, Ntaganira I, Gerbase A, Lule F, Lo YR. Socio-demographic characteristics and behavioral risk factors of female sex workers in sub-saharan Africa: a systematic review. AIDS Behav. 2012;16(4):920–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vuylsteke B, Semdé G, Sika L, Crucitti T, Traoré VE, Buvé A, et al. HIV and STI Prevalence among Female Sex Workers in Côte d’Ivoire: Why Targeted Prevention Programs Should Be Continued and Strengthened. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(3):e32627.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zachariah R, Spielmann M, Harries A, Nkhoma W, Chantulo A, Arendt V. Sexually transmitted infections and sexual behaviour among commercial sex workers in a rural district of Malawi. Int J STD AIDS. 2003;14(3):185–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lancaster KE, Powers KA, Lungu T, Mmodzi P, Hosseinipour MC, Chadwick K, et al. The HIV Care Continuum among Female Sex Workers: a Key Population in Lilongwe, Malawi. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(1):e0147662.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    President of the Republic of Malawi. 2012 Global AIDS Response Progress Report: Malawi Country Report for 2010 and 2011. 2012.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Family Planning Association of Malawi. Counting the uncatchables: Report of the situation analysis of the magnitude, behavioral patterns, contributing factors, current interventions and impact of sex work in HIV prevention in Malawi. Lilongwe: Family Planning Association of Malawi; 2011.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Baeten JM, Donnell D, Ndase P, Mugo NR, Campbell JD, Wangisi J, et al. Antiretroviral prophylaxis for HIV prevention in heterosexual men and women. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(5):399–410.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Thigpen MC, Kebaabetswe PM, Paxton LA, Smith DK, Rose CE, Segolodi TM, et al. Antiretroviral preexposure prophylaxis for heterosexual HIV transmission in Botswana. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(5):423–34.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bekker LG, Johnson L, Cowan F, Overs C, Besada D, Hillier S, et al. Combination HIV prevention for female sex workers: what is the evidence? Lancet. 2015;385(9962):72–87.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Murnane PM, Celum C, Mugo N, Campbell JD, Donnell D, Bukusi E, et al. Efficacy of preexposure prophylaxis for HIV-1 prevention among high-risk heterosexuals: subgroup analyses from a randomized trial. AIDS. 2013;27(13):2155–60.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kahle EM, Hughes JP, Lingappa JR, John-Stewart G, Celum C, Nakku-Joloba E, et al. An empiric risk scoring tool for identifying high-risk heterosexual HIV-1-serodiscordant couples for targeted HIV-1 prevention. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013;62(3):339–47.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Marrazzo JM, Ramjee G, Richardson BA, Gomez K, Mgodi N, Nair G, et al. Tenofovir-based preexposure prophylaxis for HIV infection among African women. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(6):509–18.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Van Damme L, Corneli A, Ahmed K, Agot K, Lombaard J, Kapiga S, et al. Preexposure prophylaxis for HIV infection among African women. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(5):411–22.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gomez GB, Eakle R, Mbogua J, Akpomiemie G, Venter WDF, Rees H. Treatment And Prevention for female Sex workers in South Africa: protocol for the TAPS Demonstration Project. BMJ Open. 2016;6(9):e011595.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ware NC, Wyatt MA, Haberer JE, Baeten JM, Kintu A, Psaros C, et al. What’s love got to do with it? Explaining adherence to oral antiretroviral pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV-serodiscordant couples. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2012;59(5):463–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    O’Laughlin KN, Wyatt MA, Kaaya S, Bangsberg DR, Ware NC. How treatment partners help: social analysis of an African adherence support intervention. AIDS Behav. 2012;16(5):1308–15.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    van der Straten A, Stadler J, Montgomery E, Hartmann M, Magazi B, Mathebula F, et al. Women’s experiences with oral and vaginal pre-exposure prophylaxis: the VOICE-C qualitative study in Johannesburg, South Africa. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(2):e89118.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Guest G, Shattuck D, Johnson L, Akumatey B, Clarke EE, Chen PL, et al. Changes in sexual risk behavior among participants in a PrEP HIV prevention trial. Sex Transm Dis. 2008;35(12):1002–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fearon E, Phillips A, Mtetwa S, Chabata ST, Mushati P, Cambiano V, et al. How can programmes better support female sex workers to avoid HIV infection in Zimbabwe? A prevention cascade analysis. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2019;81(1):24.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lancaster KE, Cernigliaro D, Zulliger R, Fleming PF. HIV care and treatment experiences among female sex workers living with HIV in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. Afr J AIDS Res. 2016;15(4):377–86.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mangham LJ, Hanson K, McPake B. How to do (or not to do)… Designing a discrete choice experiment for application in a low-income country. Health Policy Plan. 2009;24(2):151–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lancaster KJ. A new approach to consumer theory. J Polit Econ. 1966;74(2):132–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    McFadden D. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. 1973.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pfarr C, Schmid A, Schneider U. Using discrete choice experiments to understand preferences in health care. Dev Health Econ Public Policy. 2014;12:27–48.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Street DJ, Burgess L. The construction of optimal stated choice experiments: theory and methods. New York: Wiley; 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Muhlbacher AC, Stoll M, Mahlich J, Nubling M. Patient preferences for HIV/AIDS therapy—a discrete choice experiment. Health Econ Rev. 2013;3(1):14.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Minnis AM, Browne EN, Boeri M, Agot K, van der Straten A, Ahmed K, et al. Young Women’s stated preferences for biomedical HIV prevention: results of a discrete choice experiment in Kenya and South Africa. JAIDS J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2019;80(4):394–403.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Terris-Prestholt F, Hanson K, MacPhail C, Vickerman P, Rees H, Watts C. How much demand for New HIV prevention technologies can we really expect? Results from a discrete choice experiment in South Africa. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(12):e83193.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Quaife M, Eakle R, Cabrera Escobar MA, Vickerman P, Kilbourne-Brook M, Mvundura M, et al. Divergent preferences for HIV prevention: a discrete choice experiment for multipurpose HIV prevention products in South Africa. Med Decis Mak. 2018;38(1):120–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ye L, Wei S, Zou Y, Yang X, Abdullah AS, Zhong X, et al. HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis interest among female sex workers in Guangxi, China. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(1):e86200.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wheelock A, Eisingerich AB, Ananworanich J, Gomez GB, Hallett TB, Dybul MR, et al. Are Thai MSM willing to take PrEP for HIV prevention? An analysis of attitudes, preferences and acceptance. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(1):e54288.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bridges JF, Hauber AB, Marshall D, Lloyd A, Prosser LA, Regier DA, et al. Conjoint analysis applications in health—a checklist: a report of the ISPOR good research practices for conjoint analysis task force. Value Health. 2011;14(4):403–13.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hauber AB, Gonzalez JM, Groothuis-Oudshoorn CG, Prior T, Marshall DA, Cunningham C, et al. Statistical methods for the analysis of discrete choice experiments: a report of the ISPOR conjoint analysis good research practices task force. Value Health. 2016;19(4):300–15.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Reed Johnson F, Lancsar E, Marshall D, Kilambi V, Muhlbacher A, Regier DA, et al. Constructing experimental designs for discrete-choice experiments: report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Experimental Design Good Research Practices Task Force. Value Health. 2013;16(1):3–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kohler RE, Gopal S, Lee CN, Weiner BJ, Reeve BB, Wheeler SB. Breast cancer knowledge, behaviors, and preferences in Malawi: implications for early detection interventions from a discrete choice experiment. J Glob Oncol. 2017;3(5):480–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Marshall D, Bridges JF, Hauber B, Cameron R, Donnalley L, Fyie K, et al. Conjoint analysis applications in health—how are studies being designed and reported?: An update on current practice in the published literature between 2005 and 2008. Patient. 2010;3(4):249–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Herce ME, Miller WM, Bula A, Edwards JK, Sapalalo P, Lancaster KE, et al. Achieving the first 90 for key populations in sub-Saharan Africa through venue-based outreach: challenges and opportunities for HIV prevention based on PLACE study findings from Malawi and Angola. J Int AIDS Soc. 2018;21(Suppl 5(Suppl Suppl 5)):e25132.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    World Health Organization. Guideline on when to start ART and on PrEP for HIV. Geneva: WHO; 2015.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Malawi National AIDS Commission. National HIV prevention strategy: 2015-2020. Malawi: Lilonwe; 2015.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    The Secretary for Health and Population. Malawi HIV policy updates: the Government of Malawi’s Commitment and plan to reach HIV epidemic control through 90-90-90 in Malawi by 2020. Lilongwe: The Secretary for Health and Population; 2019.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Rendina HJ, Whitfield THF, Grov C, Starks TJ, Parsons JT. Distinguishing hypothetical willingness from behavioral intentions to initiate HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP): findings from a large cohort of gay and bisexual men in the U.S. Soc Sci Med. 2017;172:115–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Gorman SE, Martinez JM, Olson J. An assessment of HIV treatment outcomes among utilizers of semi-mobile clinics in rural Kenya. AIDS Care. 2015;27(5):665–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Nakanwagi S, Matovu JKB, Kintu BN, Kaharuza F, Wanyenze RK. Facilitators and barriers to linkage to HIV care among female sex workers receiving HIV testing services at a community-based organization in Periurban Uganda: a qualitative study. J Sex Transm Dis. 2016;2016:7673014.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Campos PE, Buffardi AL, Carcamo CP, Garcia PJ, Buendia C, Chiappe M, et al. Reaching the unreachable: providing STI control services to female sex workers via mobile team outreach. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(11):e81041.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Mulongo S, Kapila G, Hatton T, Canagasabey D, Arney J, Kazadi T, et al. Applying innovative approaches for reaching men who have sex with men and female sex workers in the Democratic Republic of Congo. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2015;68(Suppl 2):S248–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Ministry of Health Malawi. National Cervical Cancer Control Strategy: 2016-2020 Lilongwe, Malawi2017. https://malawi.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/resource-pdf/National_Cervical_Cancer_Strategy_A5_30Oct17_WEB.pdf.
  51. 51.
    Vlassoff M, et al. Benefits of meeting the contraceptive needs of Malawian women, In Brief. New York: Guttmacher Institute; 2014.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    United Nations Foundation. Family Planning 2020: Malawi. https://www.familyplanning2020.org/malawi.
  53. 53.
    Scorgie F, Nakato D, Harper E, Richter M, Maseko S, Nare P, et al. ‘We are despised in the hospitals’: sex workers’ experiences of accessing health care in four African countries. Cult Health Sex. 2013;15(4):450–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Lafort Y, Greener R, Roy A, Greener L, Ombidi W, Lessitala F, et al. Sexual and reproductive health services utilization by female sex workers is context-specific: results from a cross-sectional survey in India, Kenya, Mozambique and South Africa. Reprod Health. 2017;14(1):13.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kathryn E. Lancaster
    • 1
    Email author
  • Thandie Lungu
    • 2
  • Agatha Bula
    • 2
  • Jaclyn M. Shea
    • 3
  • Abigail Shoben
    • 4
  • Mina C. Hosseinipour
    • 2
    • 5
  • Racquel E. Kohler
    • 6
  • Irving F. Hoffman
    • 5
  • Vivian F. Go
    • 3
  • Carol E. Golin
    • 3
    • 5
  • Stephanie B. Wheeler
    • 7
  • William C. Miller
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Epidemiology, College of Public HealthThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA
  2. 2.University of North Carolina Project-MalawiLilongweMalawi
  3. 3.Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public HealthThe University of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA
  4. 4.Division of Biostatistics, College of Public HealthThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA
  5. 5.Division of Infectious Diseases, School of MedicineThe University of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA
  6. 6.Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public HealthBostonUSA
  7. 7.Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public HealthThe University of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations