Advertisement

AIDS and Behavior

, Volume 24, Issue 1, pp 257–273 | Cite as

New Measures for Research on Men Who Have Sex with Men and for At-Risk Heterosexuals: Tools to Study Links Between Structural Interventions or Large-Scale Social Change and HIV Risk Behaviors, Service Use, and Infection

  • S. R. FriedmanEmail author
  • E. R. Pouget
  • M. Sandoval
  • G. K. Nikolopoulos
  • P. Mateu-Gelabert
  • D. Rossi
  • J. D. Auerbach
Original Paper

Abstract

Large-scale structural interventions and “Big Events” like revolutions, wars and major disasters can affect HIV transmission by changing the sizes of at-risk populations, making high-risk behaviors more or less likely, or changing contexts in which risk occurs. This paper describes new measures to investigate hypothesized pathways that could connect macro-social changes to subsequent HIV transmission. We developed a “menu” of novel scales and indexes on topics including norms about sex and drug injecting under different conditions, experiencing denial of dignity, agreement with cultural themes about what actions are needed for survival or resistance, solidarity and other issues. We interviewed 298 at-risk heterosexuals and 256 men who have sex with men in New York City about these measures and possible validators for them. Most measures showed evidence of criterion validity (absolute magnitude of Pearson’s r ≥ 0.20) and reliability (Cronbach’s alpha ≥ 0.70). These measures can be (cautiously) used to understand how macro-changes affect HIV and other risk. Many can also be used to understand risk contexts and dynamics in more normal situations. Additional efforts to improve and to replicate the validation of these measures should be conducted.

Keywords

HIV/AIDS Big events Structural interventions Risk environments Measures development 

Resumen

Las intervenciones estructurales a gran escala y los “Grandes Eventos”, como revoluciones, guerras y desastres mayores, pueden afectar la transmisión de VIH al cambiar el tamaño de las poblaciones en riesgo, hacer que las conductas de alto riesgo sean más o menos probables, o cambiar los contextos en los que se produce el riesgo. Este documento describe nuevas medidas para investigar vías hipotéticas que podrían conectar cambios macro-sociales con una posterior transmisión del VIH. Desarrollamos un “menú” de escalas e índices novedosos sobre temas que incluyen normas sobre el sexo y la inyección de drogas en diferentes condiciones, experimentar negación de la dignidad, acuerdo con temas culturales sobre qué acciones son necesarias para la supervivencia o la resistencia, la solidaridad y otros temas. Entrevistamos a 298 heterosexuales en riesgo y a 256 hombres que tienen sexo con hombres en la ciudad de Nueva York sobre estas medidas y sus posibles validadores. La mayoría de las medidas mostraron evidencia de validez de criterio (magnitud absoluta de r ≥ 0.20 de Pearson) y confiabilidad (alfa de Cronbach ≥ 0.70). Estas medidas pueden usarse (con cautela) para comprender cómo los cambios macroeconómicos afectan el VIH y otros riesgos. Muchas de estas medidas también pueden usarse para comprender contextos de riesgo y dinámicas en situaciones más normales. Se deben realizar esfuerzos adicionales para mejorar y replicar la validación de estas medidas.

Notes

Funding

This research was supported by NIH Grants R01DA031597, P30DA011041, and DP1DA034989. The International AIDS Society (IAS) and the National Institute on Drug Abuse supported the post-doc fellowship of GN. We also acknowledge support from the University of Buenos Aires Grants UBACyT 20020130100790BA and UBACyT 20020100101021. The views presented in this paper represent only the authors and not the funding agencies.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflicts of interest

The authors (Friedman, Samuel R; Pouget, Enrique R, Sandoval, Milagros; Rossi, Diana; Mateu-Gelabert, Pedro; Nikolopoulos, Georgios K; Schneider, John A; Smyrnov, Pavlo; Stall, Ron D) all declare that they have no competing interests.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Research Involving Human Participants and Animals

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committees and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Supplementary material

10461_2019_2582_MOESM1_ESM.docx (80 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 79 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Friedman SR, Rossi D, Braine N. Theorizing “Big Events” as a potential risk environment for drug use, drug-related harm and HIV epidemic outbreaks. Int J Drug Policy. 2009;20:283–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Friedman SR, Sandoval M, Mateu-Gelabert P, Rossi D, Gwadz M, Dombrowski K, Smyrnov P, Vasylyeva T, Pouget ER, Perlman DC. Theory, measurement and hard times: some issues for HIV/AIDS research. AIDS Behav. 2013;7(6):1915–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pouget ER, Sandoval M, Nikolopoulos GK, Mateu-Gelabert P, Rossi D, Smyrnov P, Jones Y, Friedman SR, et al. Developing measures of pathways that may link macro social/structural changes with HIV epidemiology. AIDS Behav. 2016;20:1808.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-016-1291-3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nikolopoulos G, Sypsa V, Bonovas S, Paraskevis D, Malliori-Minerva M, Hatzakis A, Friedman SR. Big events in greece and HIV infection among people who inject drugs. Subst Use Misuse. 2015;50(7):825–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Flom PL, Friedman SR, Jose B, Curtis R, Sandoval M. Peer norms regarding drug use and drug selling among household youth in a low income “drug supermarket” urban neighborhood. Drugs. 2001;8:219–32.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Flom PL, Friedman SR, Jose B, Neaigus A, Curtis R. Recalled adolescent peer norms towards drug use in young adulthood in a low-income, minority urban neighborhood. J Drug Issues. 2001;31:425–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pawlowicz MP, Zunino SD, Rossi D, Touzé G, Wolman G, Bolyard M, Sandoval M, Flom PL, Mateu-Gelabert P, Friedman SR. Drug use and peer norms among youth in a high-risk drug use neighborhood in Buenos Aires. Drugs. 2010;17(5):544–59.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Friedman SR, Pouget ER, Sandoval M, Rossi D, Mateu-Gelabert P, Nikolopoulos GK, Schneider JA, Smyrnov P, Stall RD. Interpersonal attacks on the dignity of members of HIV key populations: a descriptive and exploratory study. AIDS Behav. 2017;21(9):2561–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Friedman S, Rossi D, Ralón G. Dignity denial and social conflicts. Rethink Marx. 2015;27(1):65–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Friedman SR, Pouget ER, Sandoval M, Jones Y, Mateu-Gelabert P. Formal and informal organizational activities of people who inject drugs in New York City: description and correlates. J Addict Dis. 2015;34(1):55–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Friedman SR, Pouget ER, Sandoval M, Jones Y, Nikolopoulos GK, Mateu-Gelabert P. Measuring altruistic & solidaristic orientations towards others among people who inject drugs. J Addict Dis. 2015;34:248–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Biradavolu MR, Blankenship KM, Jena A, Dhungana N. Structural stigma, sex work and HIV: contradictions and lessons learnt from a community-led structural intervention in southern India. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012;66(Suppl 2):95–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jeffries WL 4th, Gelaude DJ, Torrone EA, Gasiorowicz M, Oster AM, Spikes PS Jr, McCree DH, Bertolli J. Unhealthy environments, unhealthy consequences: experienced homonegativity and HIV infection risk among young men who have sex with men. Glob Public Health. 2015;7:1–14.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Latkin CA, Forman V, Knowlton A, Sherman S. Norms, social networks, and HIV-related risk behaviors among urban disadvantaged drug users. Soc Sci Med. 2003;56(3):465–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Blankenship KM, Reinhard E, Sherman SG, El-Bassel N. Structural interventions for HIV prevention among women who use drugs: a global perspective. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2015;69(Suppl 2):S140–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Latkin C, Donnell D, Celentano DD, Aramrattna A, Liu TY, Vongchak T, Wiboonnatakul K, Davis-Vogel A, Metzger D. Relationships between social norms, social network characteristics, and HIV risk behaviors in Thailand and the United States. Health Psychol. 2009;28(3):323–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Latkin C, Donnell D, Liu TY, Davey-Rothwell M, Celentano D, Metzger D. The dynamic relationship between social norms and behaviors: the results of an HIV prevention network intervention for injection drug users. Addiction. 2013;108(5):934–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Latkin CA. The phenomenological, social network, social norms, and economic context of substance use and HIV prevention and treatment: a poverty of meanings. Subst Use Misuse. 2015;50(8/9):1165–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wagner KD, Lankenau SE, Palinkas LA, Richardson JL, Chou CP, Unger JB. The perceived consequences of safer injection: an exploration of qualitative findings and gender differences. Psychol Health Med. 2010;15(5):560–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. McGraw-Hill series in psychology. In: Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH, editors. Psychometric theory, vol. xxiv. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994. p. 752.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
  22. 22.
    Friedman SR, Bolyard M, KhanM MC, Sandoval M, Mateu-Gelabert P, Krauss B, Aral SO. Group sex events and HIV/STI risk in an Urban network. J Acq Immun Syn. 2008;49(4):440–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Friedman SR, Williams L, Young AM, Teubl J, Paraskevis D, Kostaki E, Latkin L, German G, Mateu-Gelabert P, Guarino H, Vasylyeva TI, Skaathun B, Schneider J, Korobchuk A, Smyrnov P, Nikolopoulos G. Network research experiences in New York and Eastern Europe: Lessons for the southern U.S. in understanding HIV transmission dynamics. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2018;15(3):283–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Friedman SR. Alienated labor and dignity denial in capitalist society. In: Berberoglu B, editor. Critical perspectives in sociology. Kendall/Hunt: Dubuque; 1991. p. 83–91.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hodson R. Dignity at work. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jacobson N. Dignity and health: a review. Soc Sci Med. 2007;64(2):292–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jacobson N. Dignity & health. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press; 2012.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Friedman SR, Cooper HLF, Osborne A. Structural and social contexts of HIV risk among African-Americans. Am J Public Health. 2009;99:1002–8.  https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2008.140327.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Infectious Disease Research, National Development and Research Institutes, Inc.New YorkUSA
  2. 2.Center for Drug Use and HIV ResearchNew YorkUSA
  3. 3.Health and Nutrition Sciences, Brooklyn CollegeBrooklynUSA
  4. 4.Brooklyn Legal Service’s Corp A (Group Representation Unit)BrooklynUSA
  5. 5.Medical SchoolUniversity of CyprusNicosiaCyprus
  6. 6.University of Buenos Aires and Intercambios Civil AssociationBuenos AiresArgentina
  7. 7.Medicine, University of California San FranciscoSan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations