The Relationship Between Discrimination and Missed HIV Care Appointments Among Women Living with HIV
Receiving regular HIV care is crucial for maintaining good health among persons with HIV. However, racial and gender disparities in HIV care receipt exist. Discrimination and its impact may vary by race/ethnicity and gender, contributing to disparities. Data from 1578 women in the Women’s Interagency HIV Study ascertained from 10/1/2012 to 9/30/2016 were used to: (1) estimate the relationship between discrimination and missing any scheduled HIV care appointments and (2) assess whether this relationship is effect measure modified by race/ethnicity. Self-reported measures captured discrimination and the primary outcome of missing any HIV care appointments in the last 6 months. Log-binomial models accounting for measured sources of confounding and selection bias were fit. For the primary outcome analyses, women experiencing discrimination typically had a higher prevalence of missing an HIV care appointment. Moreover, there was no statistically significant evidence for effect measure modification by race/ethnicity. Interventions to minimize discrimination or its impact may improve HIV care engagement among women.
KeywordsHIV Social discrimination Outpatient care Women Health status disparities
Data in this manuscript were collected by the Women’s Interagency HIV Study (WIHS). The contents of this publication are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). WIHS (Principal Investigators): UAB-MS WIHS (Mirjam-Colette Kempf and Deborah Konkle-Parker), U01-AI-103401; Atlanta WIHS (Ighovwerha Ofotokun and Gina Wingood), U01-AI-103408; Bronx WIHS (Kathryn Anastos and Anjali Sharma), U01-AI-035004; Brooklyn WIHS (Howard Minkoff and Deborah Gustafson), U01-AI-031834; Chicago WIHS (Mardge Cohen and Audrey French), U01-AI-034993; Metropolitan Washington WIHS (Seble Kassaye), U01-AI-034994; Miami WIHS (Margaret Fischl and Lisa Metsch), U01-AI-103397; UNC WIHS (Adaora Adimora), U01-AI-103390; Connie Wofsy Women’s HIV Study, Northern California (Ruth Greenblatt, Bradley Aouizerat, and Phyllis Tien), U01-AI-034989; WIHS Data Management and Analysis Center (Stephen Gange and Elizabeth Golub), U01-AI-042590; Southern California WIHS (Joel Milam), U01-HD-032632 (WIHS I—WIHS IV). The WIHS is funded primarily by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), with additional co-funding from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), the National Cancer Institute (NCI), the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), and the National Institute on Mental Health (NIMH). Targeted supplemental funding for specific projects is also provided by the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR), the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA), the National Institute on Deafness and other Communication Disorders (NIDCD), and the NIH Office of Research on Women’s Health. WIHS data collection is also supported by UL1-TR000004 (UCSF CTSA), UL1-TR000454 (Atlanta CTSA), P30-AI-050410 (UNC CFAR), and P30-AI-027767 (UAB CFAR).
This study was funded by the National Institutes of Health Grants U01-AI-103401, U01-AI-103408, U01-AI-035004, U01-AI-031834, U01-AI-034993, U01-AI-034994, U01-AI-103397, U01-AI-103390, U01-AI-034989, U01-AI-042590, U01-HD-032632, UL1-TR000004, UL1-TR000454, P30-AI-050410, and P30-AI-027767.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 2.Giordano TP, White AC Jr, Sajja P, Graviss EA, Arduino RC, Adu-Oppong A, et al. Factors associated with the use of highly active antiretroviral therapy in patients newly entering care in an urban clinic. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndrom (1999). 2003;32(4):399–405.Google Scholar
- 3.Mugavero MJ, Lin HY, Allison JJ, Giordano TP, Willig JH, Raper JL, et al. Racial disparities in HIV virologic failure: do missed visits matter? J Acquir Immune Defic Syndrom (1999). 2009;50(1):100–8.Google Scholar
- 8.Cohen JK, Santos G-M, Moss NJ, Coffin PO, Block N, Klausner JD. Regular clinic attendance in two large San Francisco HIV primary care settings. Aids Care-Psychol Soc-Med Asp Aids/Hiv. 2016;28(5):579–84.Google Scholar
- 11.Rothman RE, Kelen GD, Harvey L, Shahan JB, Hairston H, Burah A, et al. Factors associated with no or delayed linkage to care in newly diagnosed human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1-infected patients identified by emergency department-based rapid HIV screening programs in two urban EDs. Acad Emerg Med. 2012;19(5):497–503.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Jary David, Jary Julia. Collins Dictionary of Sociology. 4th ed. London: Collins; 2006.Google Scholar
- 21.Britt-Spells AM, Slebodnik M, Sands LP, Rollock D. Effects of perceived discrimination on depressive symptoms among black men residing in the united states: a meta-analysis. Am J Men’s Health. 2018;12(1):52–63.Google Scholar
- 24.Pence BW, Mills JC, Bengtson AM, Gaynes BN, Breger TL, Cook RL, et al. Association of increased chronicity of depression with hiv appointment attendance, treatment failure, and mortality among HIV-infected adults in the United States. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018;75(4):379–85.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 26.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Estimated HIV incidence and prevalence in the United States, 2010–2015. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2018.Google Scholar
- 34.Gilbert PA, Zemore SE. Discrimination and drinking: a systematic review of the evidence. Soc Sci Med (1982). 1982;2016(161):178–94.Google Scholar
- 37.Williams DR. Measuring Discrimination Resource 2016 [Available from: https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/davidrwilliams/files/measuring_discrimination_resource_june_2016.pdf
- 40.Radloff LS. The CES-D Scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas. 1977;1(3):385–401.Google Scholar
- 41.Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Lowe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(10):1092–7.Google Scholar
- 43.US Department of Health and Human Services U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2015–2020Dietary guidelines for Americans. Washington: US Department of Health and Human Services U.S. Department of Agriculture; 2015.Google Scholar
- 46.Robins JM, Hernan MA, Brumback B. Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology. Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass). 2000;11(5):550–60.Google Scholar
- 47.VanderWeele TJ. Marginal structural models for the estimation of direct and indirect effects. Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass). 2009;20(1):18–26.Google Scholar
- 48.Hernan MA, Robins JM. Causal inference. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC; 2019.Google Scholar