Advertisement

Recalling, Sharing and Participating in a Social Media Intervention Promoting HIV Testing: A Longitudinal Analysis of HIV Testing Among MSM in China

  • Bolin Cao
  • Pooja T. Saha
  • Sequoia I. Leuba
  • Haidong Lu
  • Weiming Tang
  • Dan Wu
  • Jason Ong
  • Chuncheng Liu
  • Rong Fu
  • Chongyi Wei
  • Joseph D. TuckerEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

Social media interventions may enhance HIV services among key populations, including men who have sex with men (MSM). This longitudinal analysis examined the effect of recalling, sharing, and participating in different components of a social media intervention on HIV testing among MSM. The social media intervention included six images/texts and information about an online local community contest to promote testing. Of the 1033 men, they recalled a mean of 2.7 out of six images and shared an average of one image online. 34.5% of men recalled information on the online local community contest and engaged in a mean of 1.3 contest. Recalling images/texts (aOR = 1.13, 95% CI 1.02–1.25) and recalling a local contest (aOR = 1.59, 95% CI 1.13–1.24) were associated with facility-based HIV testing. This study has implications for the development and evaluation of social media interventions to promote HIV testing.

Keywords

HIV MSM China Social media Intervention 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Support of this work was provided by the National Institutes of Health (National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases1R01AI114310); UNC-South China STD Research Training Centre (Fogarty International Centre 1D43TW009532); UNC Center for AIDS Research (National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases 5P30AI050410); National Social Science Foundation of China (18CXW017);Shenzhen U Grant (18QNFC46); Guangdong Youth Talent Project (2017WQNCX129); and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to the MeSH Consortium (BMGF-OPP1120138). This publication was also supported by Grant Number UL1TR001111 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) at the National Institutes of Health. We also thank Drs. Kumi M. Smith, Hongyun Fu and Tiarney Ritchwood for their suggestions on earlier version of this manuscript.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflicts of interest

We declare no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Supplementary material

10461_2019_2392_MOESM1_ESM.docx (138 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 138 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Taggart T, Grewe ME, Conserve DF, Gliwa C, Roman Isler M. Social media and HIV: A systematic review of uses of social media in HIV communication. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17:e248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hightow-Weidman LB, Muessig KE. New media challenges and opportunities. Sex Transm Infect. 2017;93:309–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cao B, Gupta S, Wang J, Hightow-Weidman LB, Muessig KE, Tang W, et al. Social media interventions to promote HIV testing, linkage, adherence, and retention: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19:e394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rhodes SD, McCoy TP, Tanner AE, Stowers J, Bachmann LH, Nguyen AL, et al. Using social media to increase HIV testing among gay and bisexual men, other men who have sex with men, and transgender persons: Outcomes from a randomized community trial. Clin Infect Dis Oxford Univ Press. 2016;62:1450–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Young SD, Cumberland WG, Nianogo R, Menacho LA, Galea JT, Coates T. The HOPE social media intervention for global HIV prevention in Peru: a cluster randomised controlled trial. Lancet HIV. 2015;2:e27–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cao B, Liu C, Durvasula M, Tang W, Pan S, Saffer AJ, et al. Social media engagement and HIV testing among men who have sex with men in China: a nationwide cross-sectional survey. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19:e251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Anand T, Nitpolprasert C, Ananworanich J, Pakam C, Nonenoy S, Jantarapakde J, et al. Innovative strategies using communications technologies to engage gay men and other men who have sex with men into early HIV testing and treatment in Thailand. J Virus Erad Mediscr. 2015;1:111–5.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Taggart T, Grewe ME, Conserve DF, Gliwa C, Roman Isler M. Social media and HIV: a systematic review of uses of social media in HIV communication. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17:e248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    World Health Organization. WHO| HIV testing services [Internet]. WHO. World Health Organization 2017. https://www.who.int/hiv/topics/vct/about/en/. Accessed 7 Apr 2018.
  10. 10.
    Joint UN Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS). 90–90–90—An ambitious treatment target to help end the AIDS epidemic | UNAIDS [Internet]. 2014. http://www.unaids.org/en/resources/documents/2017/90-90-90. Accessed 14 Feb 2017.
  11. 11.
    Muessig KE, Nekkanti M, Bauermeister J, Bull S, Hightow-Weidman LB. A systematic review of recent smartphone, Internet and Web 2.0 interventions to address the HIV continuum of care. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2015;12:173–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tso L, Tang W, Li H, Yan H, Tucker J. Social media interventions to prevent HIV: a review of interventions and methodological considerations. Curr Opin Psychol. 2016;9:6–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Brady M, Nardone A, Buenaventura E, Qureshi F, Edwardes D, Kelly P, et al. Home HIV sampling linked to national HIV testing campaigns: a novel approach to improve HIV diagnosis. HIV Med. 2014;15:7–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Elliot E, Rossi M, McCormack S, McOwan A. Identifying undiagnosed HIV in men who have sex with men (MSM) by offering HIV home sampling via online gay social media: a service evaluation. Sex Transm Infect. 2016;92:470–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Huang E, Marlin RW, Medline A, Young SD, Daniels J. Cost-effectiveness of HIV self-testing promotion through GrindrTM, a smartphone social networking application. Sex Transm Infect. 2015;91:A226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Robert N, Holden J, et al. Health promotion ‘on steroids’: the value of an experiential approach to promote rapid HIV testing in NSW, Australia. Public Heal Res Pract. 2015;25:e2521522.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bauermeister JAJA, Pingel ES, Jadwin-Cakmak L, Harper GW, Horvath K, Weiss G, et al. Acceptability and preliminary efficacy of a tailored online HIV/STI testing intervention for young men who have sex with men: The Get Connected! Program. AIDS Behav. 2015;19:1860–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hyden C. “Heads or Tails” Online interactive graphic novel for HIV/STI prevention: Content development and opportunities for adaptation. Youth + Health + Technology Conf. 2015.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jones M, Aderogba K, Drunis L. Providing rapid HIV testing in their homes for men who have sex with men, recruited via social media. HIV Med. 2015;16:50–1.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Anand T, Nitpolprasert C, Kerr SJ. Factors influencing and associated with the decision to join in Thailand’ s first online supervised HIV self-testing and counseling initiative. 2016. pp. 3–4.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tang W, Han L, Best J, Zhang Y, K. M, Kim J, et al. Crowdsourcing HIV testing: a pragmatic, non-inferiority randomized controlled trial in China. UNAIDS-WHO Expert Consult. 2015.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Munro T, Rabiem L, Gray J. Accessing gay men: transitioning from physical venues to online spaces. Present. Int. AIDS Soc. AIDS Conf. Durban, South Africa; 2016.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ko YY, Hsieh HH, Wang CC, Lee C, Chen LL, Chung CC, et al. Effects of internet popular opinion leaders (ipol) among internet-using men who have sex with men. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15:1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lasewell DH. The structure and function of communication in society. Commun Ideas. 1948;37:215–28.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gold J, Pedrana AE, Sacks-Davis R, Hellard ME, Chang S, Howard S, et al. A systematic examination of the use of Online social networking sites for sexual health promotion. BMC Public Health 2011;11:583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tucker JD, Cao B, Li H, Tang S, Tang W, Wong NS, et al. Social Media Interventions to Promote HIV Testing. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;63:282–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Schnall R, Travers J, Rojas M, Carballo-Diéguez A. eHealth interventions for HIV prevention in high-risk men who have sex with men: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16:e134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Koestner R, Powers TA, Milyavskaya M, Carbonneau N, Hope N. Goal internalization and persistence as a function of autonomous and directive forms of goal support. J Pers. 2015;83:179–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rimer BK, Kreuter MW. Advancing tailored health communication: a persuasion and message effects perspective. J Commun. 2006;56:184–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Houts PS, Doak CC, Doak LG, Loscalzo MJ. The role of pictures in improving health communication: a review of research on attention, comprehension, recall, and adherence. Pat Educ Couns. 2006;61:173–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    McMullan M. Patients using the Internet to obtain health information: how this affects the patient–health professional relationship. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;63:24–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rimer BK, Kreuter MW. Advancing tailored health communication: A persuasion and message effects perspective. J Commun. 2006;56:S184–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Muench F, Baumel A. More than a text message: dismantling digital triggers to curate behavior change in patient-centered health interventions. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19:e147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Tang W, Wei C, Cao B, Wu D, Li KT, Lu H, et al. Crowdsourcing to expand HIV testing among men who have sex with men in China: A closed cohort stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial. PLoS Med. 2018;15:e1002645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    TDR. TDR | Crowdsourcing in Health and Health Research: A Practical Guide. WHO [Internet]. World Health Organization; 2018. http://www.who.int/tdr/publications/year/2018/crowdsourcing-practical-guide/en/. Accessed 14 Nov 2018.
  36. 36.
    Reilly KH, Neaigus A, Shepard CW, Cutler BH, Sweeney MM, Rucinski KB, et al. It’s Never Just HIV : exposure to an HIV prevention media campaign and behavior change among men who have sex with men participating in the National HIV Behavioral Surveillance System in New York City. LGBT Heal. 2016;3:314–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Horvath KJ, Rosser BRS, Remafedi G. Sexual risk taking among young internet-using men who have sex with men. Am J Public Health. 2008;98:1059–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sun CJ, Stowers J, Miller C, Bachmann LH, Rhodes SD. Acceptability and feasibility of using established geosocial and sexual networking mobile applications to promote HIV and STD testing among men who have sex with men. AIDS Behav. 2015;19:543–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wakefield MA, Loken B, Hornik RC. Use of mass media campaigns to change health behaviour. Lancet. 2010;376:1261–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Lauby JL, Smith PJ, Stark M, Person B, Adams J. A community-level HIV prevention intervention for inner-city women: results of the women and infants demonstration projects. Am J Public Heal. 2000;9090:216–22.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Cox D, Cox AD. Beyond first impressions the effects of repeated exposure on consumer liking of visually complex and simple product designs. J Acad Mark Sci. 2002;30:119–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Cacioppo JT, Petty RE. Effects of message repetition and position on cognitive response, recall, and persuasion. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1979;37:97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Kontos E, Blake KD, Chou WYS, Prestin A. Predictors of eHealth usage insights on the digital divide from the Health Information National Trends Survey. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16:172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kelly JA, St Lawrence JS, Diaz YE, Stevenson LY, Hauth AC, Brasfield TL, et al. HIV risk behavior reduction following intervention with key opinion leaders of population: an experimental analysis. Am J Public. 1991;81:168–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Cho KW, Neely JH. The roles of encoding strategies and retrieval practice in test-expectancy effects. Memory. 2017;25:626–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Tversky B. Encoding processes in recognition and recall. Cogn Psychol. 1973;5:275–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Noar SM, Hall MG, Francis DB, Ribisl KM, Pepper JK, Brewer NT. Pictorial cigarette pack warnings: a meta-analysis of experimental studies. Tob Control. 2016;25:341–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Lochbuehler K, Mercincavage M, Tang KZ, Dana Tomlin C, Cappella JN, Strasser AA. Effect of message congruency on attention and recall in pictorial health warning labels. Tob Control. 2017;27:266–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bolin Cao
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Pooja T. Saha
    • 4
  • Sequoia I. Leuba
    • 4
  • Haidong Lu
    • 4
  • Weiming Tang
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  • Dan Wu
    • 2
    • 3
  • Jason Ong
    • 3
    • 5
  • Chuncheng Liu
    • 6
  • Rong Fu
    • 7
  • Chongyi Wei
    • 8
  • Joseph D. Tucker
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
    • 9
    Email author
  1. 1.Shenzhen UniversityShenzhenChina
  2. 2.University of North Carolina – Project ChinaGuangzhouChina
  3. 3.SESH (Social Entrepreneurship to Spur Health)GuangzhouChina
  4. 4.University of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA
  5. 5.London School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineLondonUK
  6. 6.University of California San DiegoSan DiegoUSA
  7. 7.Guangzhou Center of Disease Control and PreventionGuangzhouChina
  8. 8.Rutgers UniversityPiscatawayUSA
  9. 9.Guangdong Provincial Skin Diseases and STI ControlGuangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations