Evaluating Physicians’ Intention to Discriminate Against Patients Living with HIV in Malaysia
People with HIV (PWH) in Malaysia experience high levels of stigma, which may act as a barrier to accessing healthcare. Stigma against PWH in medical settings is understudied in Malaysia. In the present study, we examine factors associated with physicians’ intention to discriminate against PWH in Malaysia. A cross-sectional online survey was emailed to all 1431 physicians at two major university hospitals in Malaysia; 568 (39.6%) participants completed the survey and were included in this analysis. Measures included intention to discriminate against PWH, stigma-related constructs, and socio-demographic characteristics. Multivariate linear regression was used to identify factors associated with intention to discriminate against PWH. Participants were comprised of women (53.5%), Malays (43.1%), and Chinese (35.0%) with nearly 10 years of clinical experience. Most participants were from non-surgical specialties (77.6%). The final multivariate linear regression showed that physicians who expressed greater discriminatory intent against PWH also expressed more negative feelings toward PWH, more HIV-related shame, were more fearful of HIV, and believed that PWH do not deserve good care. Physicians from surgical-based specialties were also significantly more likely to endorse discriminatory intent toward PWH. Stigma and intentions to discriminate against a class of patients, including PWH, can undermine engagement in care, which is central to international HIV prevention and treatment strategies. Interventions that reduce stigma toward PWH among physicians are crucial to ensuring equitable and stigma-free healthcare.
KeywordsHIV Discrimination Stigma Malaysia Physicians Healthcare
This research was funded by a University of Malaya Postgraduate Research Grant (PO059-2015B), Grants from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (K01 DA038529 for JAW, K01 DA042881 for VAE, and K24 DA017072 for FLA) and the Ministry of Higher Education High Impact Research Grant (E000001-200001 for AK).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 1.UNAIDS. UNAIDS Global AIDS Update 2016. 2016. http://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/media_asset/global-AIDS-update-2016_en.pdf Accessed 11 Nov 2016.
- 2.Ministry of Health Malaysia. The Global AIDS Response Progress Report 2016: Malaysia. 2016. http://www.moh.gov.my/images/gallery/Report/Malaysia%20GARPR%202016_Final.pdf Accessed 1 Sept 2018.
- 3.Ministry of Health Malaysia. Results from the integrated biobehavioral survey: 2018 [unpublished data]. Kuala Lumpur: Ministry of Health; 2018.Google Scholar
- 5.Wickersham JA, Gibson BA, Bazazi AR, et al. Prevalence of Human immunodeficiency virus and sexually transmitted infections among cisgender and transgender women sex workers in greater Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: results From a respondent-driven sampling study. Sex Transm Dis. 2017;44(11):663–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.World Health Organization. Guideline on when to start antiretroviral therapy and on pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. Retrieved December 20, 2016, from: http://www.who.int/hiv/pub/guidelines/earlyrelease-arv/en/2015.
- 7.World Health Organization. Global HIV/AIDS Response: Epidemic update and health sector progress towards Universal Access: Progress report 2011. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. Retrieved February 20, 2016, http://www.who.int/hiv/pub/progress_report2011/en/2011.
- 8.Goffman E. Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. 1st Touchstone Edition ed. New York: Simon & Schuster; 1963.Google Scholar
- 12.Bogart LM, Wagner GJ, Green HD Jr, Mutchler MG, Klein DJ, McDavitt B. Social network characteristics moderate the association between stigmatizing attributions about hiv and non-adherence among black americans living with HIV: a longitudinal assessment. Ann Behav Med. 2015;49(6):865–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Fishben M, Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading: Addison-Wesley; 1975.Google Scholar
- 24.Ferro EG, Culbert GJ, Wickersham JA, et al. Physician Decisions to Defer Antiretroviral Therapy in Key Populations: Implications for Reducing Human Immunodeficiency Virus Incidence and Mortality in Malaysia. Open forum infectious diseases. Winter 2017;4(1):ofw219.Google Scholar
- 27.Pettigrew TF, Tropp LR. How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta-analytic tests of three mediators. Eur J Social Pscychol. 2008;38:22–34.Google Scholar
- 30.Allport GW. The nature of prejudice. Cambridge: Perseus Books; 1954.Google Scholar