Advertisement

AIDS and Behavior

, Volume 23, Issue 1, pp 1–14 | Cite as

Project Nova: A Combination HIV Prevention and Microfinance Intervention for Women Who Engage in Sex Work and Use Drugs in Kazakhstan

  • Gaukhar Mergenova
  • Nabila El-Bassel
  • Tara McCrimmon
  • Assel Terlikbayeva
  • Sholpan Primbetova
  • Marion Riedel
  • Azamat Kuskulov
  • Carolina Velez-Grau
  • Susan S. WitteEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

Innovative combination HIV-prevention and microfinance interventions are needed to address the high incidence of HIV and other STIs among women who use drugs. Project Nova is a cluster-randomized, controlled trial for drug-using female sex workers in two cities in Kazakhstan. The intervention was adapted from prior interventions for women at high risk for HIV and tailored to meet the needs of female sex workers who use injection or noninjection drugs. We describe the development and implementation of the Nova intervention and detail its components: HIV-risk reduction, financial-literacy training, vocational training, and a matched-savings program. We discuss session-attendance rates, barriers to engagement, challenges that arose during the sessions, and the solutions implemented. Our findings show that it is feasible to implement a combination HIV-prevention and microfinance intervention with highly vulnerable women such as these, and to address implementation challenges successfully.

Keywords

HIV prevention Intervention science Microfinance Sex work Drug use 

Resumen

Existe la necesidad de una intervención innovadora que combine intervenciones de prevención del VIH y microfinanzas para manejar la alta incidencia de VIH u otras enfermedades de transmisión sexual con mujeres que usan drogas. Nova es un Ensayo Clínico Controlado Aleatorio Grupal para mujeres trabajadoras sexuales que usan drogas en dos ciudades en Kazakstán. La intervención fue adaptada de otras intervenciones anteriores dirigidas a mujeres con alto riesgo de contraer VIH y diseñada para satisfacer las necesidades de las mujeres trabajadoras sexuales que se inyectan o consumen drogas. Este documento describe el desarrollo y la implementación de la intervención Nova. Describimos los componentes de la intervención Nova, los cuales incluyen reducción del riesgo de VIH, entrenamiento en conocimiento financiero, entrenamiento vocacional, y programa de ahorros igualados. También describimos las tasas de asistencia a las sesiones, barreras para la participación, desafíos durante la implementación de las sesiones, y las soluciones implementadas. Los resultados muestran que es posible implementar una combinación de intervención de reducción del riesgo de VIH y micro-finanzas con mujeres altamente vulnerables y resolver problemas para manejar exitosamente los desafíos de la implementación.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the study participants who shared their time and experiences with Project Nova and the project staff who assisted with recruitment, data collection and project implementation. We would like to thank Republican Center on Prevention and Control of AIDS and Dr. Baiserkin, city AIDS center of Almaty, Temirtau and Karaganda for collaboration. We appreciate assistance in recruitment and support of our study participants of NGO “Moi Dom” and “Shapagat” in Temirtau, NGO “Doverie” in Almaty.

Funding

This study was funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), Grant No. R01 DA036514, to Drs. Nabila El-Bassel and Susan Witte (Multiple PIs). The funders had no involvement in the design of the study or in collection, analysis and interpretation of data.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of Columbia University’s IRB and the ethics committee of the Kazakhstan School of Public Health (KSPH), and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in this study.

References

  1. 1.
    Ministry of Healthcare of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Population size estimate of people who inject drugs (PWID) in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Almaty: Republican Center on Prevention and Control of AIDS; 2016.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ministry of Healthcare of the Republic of Kazakhstan. National report on the AIDS response. Almaty: Republican Center on Prevention and Control of AIDS; 2016.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    UNAIDS. UNAIDS report on the global AIDS epidemic. Geneva: Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS; 2010.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    UNAIDS. Global report: UNAIDS report on the global AIDS epidemic. Geneva: UNAIDS; 2013.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Baral S, Beyrer C, Muessig K, et al. Burden of HIV among female sex workers in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2012;12(7):538–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Baral S, Todd CS, Aumakhan B, Lloyd J, Delegchoimbol A, Sabin K. HIV among female sex workers in the Central Asian Republics, Afghanistan, and Mongolia: contexts and convergence with drug use. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013;132:S13–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pinkham S, Malinowska-Sempruch K. Women, harm reduction and HIV. Rep Health Matters. 2008;16(31):168–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stratford D, Mizuno Y, Williams K, Courtenay-Quirk C, O’Leary A. Addressing poverty as risk for disease: recommendations from CDC’s consultation on microenterprise as HIV prevention. Public Health Rep. 2008;123(1):9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shannon K, Kerr T, Allinott S, Chettiar J, Shoveller J, Tyndall MW. Social and structural violence and power relations in mitigating HIV risk of drug-using women in survival sex work. Soc Sci Med. 2008;66:911–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    El-Bassel N, Terlikbaeva A, Pinkham S. HIV and women who use drugs: double neglect, double risk. Lancet. 2010;376(9738):312–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rhodes T, Wagner K, Strathdee SA, Shannon K, Davidson P, Bourgois P. Structural violence and structural vulnerability within the risk environment: theoretical and methodological perspectives for a social epidemiology of HIV risk among injection drug users and sex workers. In: Rethinking Soc Epidemiology. Dordrecht: Springer; 2012. P. 205–230.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Blankenship KM, Koester S. Criminal law, policing policy, and HIV risk in female street sex workers and injection drug users. J Law Med Ethics. 2002;30(4):548–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wechsberg WM, Krupitsky E, Romanova T, et al. Double jeopardy—drug and sex risks among Russian women who inject drugs: initial feasibility and efficacy results of a small randomized controlled trial. Subst Abuse Treat Pr. 2012;7(1):1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    El-Bassel N, Strathdee SA, El Sadr WM. HIV and people who use drugs in central Asia: confronting the perfect storm. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013;132(1):S2–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dworkin SL, Blankenship K. Microfinance and HIV/AIDS prevention: assessing its promise and limitations. AIDS Behav. 2009;13(3):462–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kennedy CE, Fonner VA, O’Reilly KR, Sweat MD. A systematic review of income generation interventions, including microfinance and vocational skills training, for HIV prevention. AIDS Care. 2014;26(6):659–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Arrivillaga M, Salcedo JP. A systematic review of microfinance-based interventions for HIV/AIDS prevention. AIDS Educ Prev. 2014;26(1):13–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cui RR, Lee R, Thirumurthy H, Muessig KE, Tucker JD. Microenterprise development interventions for sexual risk reduction: a systematic review. AIDS Behav. 2013;17(9):2864–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pronyk PM, Kim JC, Abramsky T, et al. A combined microfinance and training intervention can reduce HIV risk behavior in young female participants. AIDS. 2008;22:1659–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Witte SS, Aira T, Tsai LC, et al. Efficacy of a savings-led microfinance intervention to reduce sexual risk for HIV among women engaged in sex work: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Public Health. 2015;105(3):e95–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sherman SG, German D, Cheng Y, Marks M, Bailey-Kloche M. The evaluation of the JEWEL project: an innovative economic enhancement and HIV prevention intervention study targeting drug using women involved in prostitution. AIDS Care. 2006;18(1):1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sherman SG, Srikrishnan AK, Rivett KA, Liu SH, Solomon S, Celentano DD. Acceptability of a microenterprise intervention among female sex workers in Chennai, India. AIDS Behav. 2010;14(3):649–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Frantz D. Drug use begetting AIDS in Central Asia. New York Times. August 5, 2001.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Buzurukov A. HIV/AIDS epidemic: time is running out for Central Asia. Central Asia/Caucasus Analyst. 2002.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    McCrimmon T, Witte S, Mergenova G, et al. Microfinance for women at high risk for HIV in Kazakhstan: study protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial. BMC Trials. 2008;19(1):187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: a social and cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1986.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bandura A. Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman; 1997.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Marlatt GA, Witkiewitz K. Update on harm-reduction policy and intervention research. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2010;6(1):591–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ti L, Kerr T. The impact of harm reduction on HIV and illicit drug use. Harm Reduct J. 2014;11(1):7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sherraden M. Stakeholding: notes on a theory of welfare based on assets. Soc Ser Rev. 1990;64(4):580–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sherraden M. Assets and the poor: a new American welfare policy. New York: M. E. Sharpe; 1991.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Oosterhoff P, Nguyen T, Pham N, Wright P, Hardon A. Can micro-credit empower HIV + women? An exploratory case study in Northern Vietnam. Womens Health Urban Life. 2008;7(1):40–55.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Amin R, Becker S. NGO-promoted microcredit programs and women’s empowerment in rural Bangladesh: quantitative and qualitative evidence. J Dev Areas. 1998;32(2):221–36.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ssewamala F, Sherraden M. Integrating saving into microenterprise programs for the poor: do institutions matter? Soc Ser Rev. 2004;78(3):404–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ssewamala FM, Chang-Keun H, Neilands T, Ismayilova L, Sperber E. The effect of economic assets on sexual risk taking intentions among orphaned adolescents in Uganda. Am J Public Health Rep. 2010;100(3):483–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ssewamala FM, Chang-Keun H, Neilands T. Asset ownership and health and mental health functioning among AIDS-orphaned adolescents: findings from a randomized clinical trial in rural Uganda. Soc Sci Med. 2009;69(2):191–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ssewamala FM, Alicea S, Bannon W, Ismayilova L. A novel economic intervention to reduce HIV risks among school-going AIDS-orphaned children in rural Uganda. J Adolesc Health. 2008;42(1):102–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Odek WO, Busza J, Morris CN, Cleland J, Ngugi EN, Ferguson AG. Effects of micro-enterprise services on HIV risk behavior among female sex workers in Kenya’s urban slums. AIDS Behav. 2009;13:449–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Karlan D, Valdivia M. Teaching entrepreneurship: impact of business training on microfinance clients and institutions. Rev Econ Stat. 2011;93(2):510–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    El-Bassel N, Gilbert L, Goddard-Eckrich D, et al. Efficacy of a group-based multimedia HIV prevention intervention for drug-involved women under community supervision: project worth. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(11):e111528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    El-Bassel N, Gilbert L, Terlikbayeva A, et al. Effects of a couple-based intervention to reduce risks for HIV, HCV, and STIs among drug-involved heterosexual couples in Kazakhstan: a randomized controlled trial. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2014;67(2):196–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Opportunities Microfinance. Global financial education program. Washington, DC: Microfinance Opportunities; 2002.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Tsai LC, Witte SS, Aira T, Riedel M, Offringa R, Chang M. Efficacy of a microsavings intervention in increasing income and reducing economic dependence upon sex work among women in Mongolia. Int Soc Work. 2015;61(1):6–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    El-Bassel N, Jemmott JB, Landis JR, et al. National Institute of Mental Health multisite Eban HIV/STD prevention intervention for African American HIV serodiscordant couples: a cluster randomized trial. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(17):1594–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    El-Bassel N, Witte SS, Gilbert L, et al. The efficacy of a relationship-based HIV/STD prevention program for heterosexual couples. Am J Public Health. 2003;93(6):963–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    World Bank. Global economic prospects: weak investments in uncertain times. Washington, DC: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/World Bank; 2017.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    WHO, UNFPA, UNAIDS, NSWP, Bank W, UNDP. Implementing comprehensive HIV/STI programmes with sex workers: practical approaches from collaborative interventions. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Network of Sex Work Projects. Policy brief: impact of criminalization of sex workers’ vulnerability to HIV and violence; 2017.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    El-Bassel N, Gilbert L, Witte S, Wu E, Chang M. Intimate partner violence and HIV among drug-involved women: contexts linking these two epidemics—challenges and implications for prevention and treatment. Subst Use Misuse. 2011;46(2–3):295–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Weaver TL, Gilbert L, El-Bassel N, Resnick HS, Noursi S. Identifying and intervening with substance-using women exposed to intimate partner violence: phenomenology, comorbidities, and integrated approaches within primary care and other agency settings. J Women’s Health. 2015;24(1):51–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gaukhar Mergenova
    • 1
  • Nabila El-Bassel
    • 1
    • 2
  • Tara McCrimmon
    • 1
    • 2
  • Assel Terlikbayeva
    • 1
  • Sholpan Primbetova
    • 1
  • Marion Riedel
    • 2
  • Azamat Kuskulov
    • 1
  • Carolina Velez-Grau
    • 1
    • 2
  • Susan S. Witte
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Global Health Research Center of Central AsiaAlmatyKazakhstan
  2. 2.Columbia University School of Social WorkNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations