Structural Network Position and Performance of Health Leaders Within an HIV Prevention Trial
The effectiveness of peer leaders in promoting health may depend on the position they occupy within their social networks. Using sociocentric (whole network) and behavioral data from the intervention arm of a cluster-randomized HIV prevention trial in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, we used generalized linear models with standardized predictors to examine the association between heath leaders’ baseline structural network position (i.e., in-degree and betweenness centrality) and their 12-month self-reported (1) confidence in educating network members about HIV and gender-based violence (GBV) and (2) number of past-week conversations about HIV and GBV. As in-degree centrality increased, leaders reported fewer HIV-related conversations. As betweenness centrality increased, leaders reported greater number of conversations about GBV. Network position was not significantly associated with confidence in discussing either topic. Our results suggest that peer leaders who occupy spaces between sub-groups of network members may be more effective in engaging their peers in sensitive or controversial topics like GBV than more popular peer leaders.
KeywordsNetwork position Popular opinion leader HIV prevention Tanzania
We wish to acknowledge the work and dedication of our study interviewers as well as our research team in Chapel Hill, NC and Dar es Salaam, Tanzania who coordinated the data collection and intervention activities for our trial including Mrema Noel Kilonzo, Dr. Kasubi Mabula, Gema Lambert, Deus Kajuna, Brenda Mkony, Joyce Kondela. We also thank the participants of our study for their contributions.
Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of Mental Health of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R01MH098690. Additionally, M. Mulawa is supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease under Award Number T32AI007392. M. Mulawa also received support from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development under Award Number R25HD079352. T. Yamanis received support from the National Institute on Drug Abuse under Award Number R25DA031608. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study
- 16.Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press; 1995.Google Scholar
- 20.Group NCHSPT. Results of the nimh collaborative HIV/sexually transmitted disease prevention trial of a community popular opinion leader intervention. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010;54(2):204–14.Google Scholar
- 28.Statistics for development (Internet). 2012. [cited May 6, 2015]. http://www.nbs.go.tz/nbs/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=597:population-distribution-by-enumeration-area-as-per-2002-population-and-housing-census&catid=57:censuses&Itemid=82.
- 29.Fleischman J. Gender-based violence and HIV: Emerging lessons from the pepfar initiative in Tanzania. Center for strategic and international studies. 2012.Google Scholar
- 30.Tanzania Commission for AIDS (TACAIDS) ZACZ, National Bureau of Statistics (NBS), Office of the Chief Government Statistician (OCGS), and ICF International. Tanzania HIV/AIDS and malaria indicator survey 2011-12. Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: TACAIDS, ZAC, NBS, OCGS, and ICF International.; 2013.Google Scholar
- 31.MoHCDGEC MoH NBS OCGS and ICF. Tanzania demographic and health survey and malaria indicator survey 2015-2016. Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, and Rockville, Maryland, USA: MoHCDGEC, MoH, NBS, OCGS, and ICF; 2016.Google Scholar
- 32.Kajula L, Balvanz P, Kilonzo MN, et al. Vijana vijiweni ii: a cluster-randomized trial to evaluate the efficacy of a microfinance and peer health leadership intervention for HIV and intimate partner violence prevention among social networks of young men in Dar es Salaam. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:113.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 35.Csardi G, Nepusz T. The igraph software package for complex network re- search. Interjournal, Complex Systems, 1695. http://www.Interjournal.Org/manuscript_. 2006.
- 36.Friedkin NE. A structural theory of social influence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006.Google Scholar
- 41.SAS Institute Inc. Sas® 9.4 cary, nc. 2011.Google Scholar
- 43.Orelien JG. Model fitting in proc genmod. 2001.Google Scholar
- 44.Holme P, Ghoshal G. The diplomat’s dilemma: maximal power for minimal effort in social networks. In: Gross T, Sayama H, editors. Adaptive networks. Understanding complex systems. Berlin: Springer; 2009. p. 269–88.Google Scholar