Comfort Relying on HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis and Treatment as Prevention for Condomless Sex: Results of an Online Survey of Australian Gay and Bisexual Men
- 311 Downloads
HIV-negative and untested gay and bisexual men from Victoria, Australia (n = 771) were surveyed during August–September 2016 about their comfort having condomless sex with casual male partners in scenarios in which pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) or treatment as prevention were used. Men not using PrEP were most comfortable with the idea of condomless sex with HIV-negative partners (31%), followed by partners using PrEP (23%). PrEP users were more comfortable with the idea of condomless sex with these partner types (64 and 72%, respectively). Very few men not taking PrEP were comfortable with condomless sex with HIV-positive partners (3%), even with undetectable viral loads (6%). PrEP users were more comfortable with condomless sex with HIV-positive partners (29%), and those with undetectable viral loads (48%). Being on PrEP, having recent condomless sex with casual partners or a HIV-positive regular partner were independently associated with comfort having condomless sex.
KeywordsAttitudes Condoms Diffusion of innovations theory HIV treatment Men who have sex with men Pre-exposure prophylaxis
We thank all the gay and bisexual men who participated in the study. We also thank Jason Asselin for his contributions to survey design and data management.
The Victorian Department of Health provided funding for this research. The Centre for Social Research in Health receives funding from the Australian Government Department of Health. The Burnet Institute receives funding from the Victorian Department of Health for surveillance projects. Mark Stoové was supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Career Development Fellowship and Research Fellowship. Alisa Pedrana was supported by a NHMRC Early Career Fellowship. No pharmaceutical grants were received for this study.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
All procedures were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Alfred Health Human Research Ethics Committee (Project 62/16) and the National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia).
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 1.World Health Organization. Consolidated guidelines on the use of antiretroviral drugs for treating and preventing HIV infection: recommendations for a public health approach. 2nd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016.Google Scholar
- 2.Commonwealth of Australia. Seventh National HIV Strategy 2014–2017. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Health; 2014.Google Scholar
- 3.NSW Ministry of Health. NSW HIV strategy 2016–2020. Sydney: NSW Health; 2015.Google Scholar
- 4.United front to expand PrEP in Queensland [press release]. Brisbane: Queensland Government, 12th February 2016.Google Scholar
- 5.One step closer to eliminating HIV [press release]. Melbourne: State Government of Victoria, 30th January 2016.Google Scholar
- 6.The Kirby Institute. HIV, viral hepatitis and sexually transmissible infections in Australia: Annual Surveillance Report 2016. Sydney: The Kirby Institute, UNSW Australia; 2016.Google Scholar
- 16.Weinstein ND, Sandman PM, Blalock SJ. The precaution adoption process model. In: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K, editors. Health behavior and health education: theory, research and practice. 4th ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2008. p. 123–47.Google Scholar
- 18.Rogers E. Diffusion of innovations. 3rd ed. New York: The Free Press; 1983.Google Scholar
- 21.Kennedy CE, Bernard LJ, Muessig KE, Konda KA, Akl EA, Lo Y-R, et al. Serosorting and HIV/STI infection among HIV-negative MSM and transgender people: a systematic review and meta-analysis to inform WHO guidelines. J Sex Transm Dis. 2013;2013:8.Google Scholar
- 22.Montaño DE, Kasprzyk D. Theory of reasoned action, theory of planned behavior, and the integrated behavioral model. In: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K, editors. Health behavior and health education: theory, research and practice. 4th ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2008. p. 67–96.Google Scholar
- 23.Lee E, Mao L, Lea T, McKenzie T, Batrouney C, Allan B, et al. Gay community periodic survey: Melbourne 2017. Sydney: Centre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Australia; 2017.Google Scholar
- 27.Hull P, Mao L, Kolstee J, Duck T, Feeney L, Prestage G, et al. Gay community periodic survey: Sydney 2016. Sydney: Centre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Australia; 2016.Google Scholar
- 28.Lee E, Mao L, McKenzie T, Batrouney C, West M, Prestage G, et al. Gay community periodic survey: Melbourne 2016. Sydney: Centre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Australia; 2016.Google Scholar
- 30.Hojilla JC, Koester KA, Cohen SE, Buchbinder S, Ladzekpo D, Matheson T, et al. Sexual behavior, risk compensation, and HIV prevention strategies among participants in the San Francisco PrEP demonstration project: a qualitative analysis of counseling notes. AIDS Behav. 2016;20(7):1461–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Murphy D. Early experience of PrEP in Australia. In: Mao L, Adam P, Treloar C, de Wit J, editors. Annual report of trends in behaviour: HIV/AIDS, hepatitis and sexually transmissible infections in Australia 2016. Sydney: UNSW Australia; 2016. p. 27–8.Google Scholar