HIV Prevention and Sex Behaviors as Organizing Mechanisms in a Facebook Group Affiliation Network Among Young Black Men Who Have Sex with Men
Online social networking sites (SNS)—the Internet-based platforms that enable connection and communication between users—are increasingly salient social environments for young adults and, consequently, offer tremendous opportunity for HIV behavioral research and intervention among vulnerable populations like young men who have sex with men (YMSM). Drawing from a cohort of 525 young Black MSM (YBMSM) living in Chicago, IL, USA April 2014–May 2015, we conducted social network analysis, estimating an exponential random graph model (ERGM) to model YBMSM’s group affiliations on Facebook in relation to their sex behaviors and HIV prevention traits. A group’s privacy setting—public, closed, or secret—was also modeled as a potential moderator of that relationship. Findings reveal that HIV positive individuals were more likely to affiliate with Facebook groups, while those who engaged in group sex were less likely to do so. When it came to the privacy of groups, we learned that HIV positive individuals tended not to belong to groups with greater privacy (e.g., closed and secret groups), while individuals who engaged in group sex and those who engaged in regular HIV testing were more likely to belong to those groups. Results also showed that individuals who engaged in condomless sex showed significant signs of clustering around the same set of groups. HIV positive individuals, on the other hand, were significantly less likely to demonstrate clustering. Implications for interventions and future research are discussed.
KeywordsHIV prevention Sex behaviors Social networking sites Social network analysis Young men who have sex with men
This work was conducted under the auspices of the uConnect Study Team. We would like to thank our partners at the National Opinion Research Center (NORC) at the University of Chicago Stuart Michaels, Ishida Robinson, Eve Zurawski, Billy Davis and Michelle Taylor for their invaluable support. We also thank study participants for their time and contribution to the study.
This work was supported in part by NIH Grants R01DA033875, R01MH100021 and R01DA039934.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
Dr. Lindsay Young declares she has no conflict of interest. Dr. Kayo Fujimoto declares that she has no conflict of interest. Dr. John Schneider declares that he has no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 1.CDC. HIV and Young Men who Have Sex with Men. 2014.Google Scholar
- 2.CDC. HIV Among African American Gay and Bisexual Men. 2016.Google Scholar
- 9.Perrin A. Social networking usage: 2005–2015. Pew Research Center; 2015.Google Scholar
- 10.Greenwood S, Perrin A, Duggan M. Social Media Update 2016. Washington, D.C.; 2016.Google Scholar
- 11.Taylor P. A survey of LGBT Americans: attitudes, experiences and values in changing times: Pew Research Center; 2013.Google Scholar
- 12.Gay and lesbian adults are reading and responding to more blogs than heterosexuals [Internet]. Harris Poll Interactive 2008.Google Scholar
- 19.Rice E, Holloway I, Winetrobe H, Rhoades H, Barman-Adhikari A, Gibbs J, et al. Sex risk among young men who have sex with men who use Grindr, a smartphone geosocial networking application. J AIDS Clin Res. 2012;S4:1–8.Google Scholar
- 21.Fujimoto K, Wang P, Ross MW, Williams ML. Venue-mediated weak ties in multiplex HIV transmission risk networks among drug-using male sex workers and associates. J Public Health. 2015;105(6):1128–35.Google Scholar
- 35.U.S. Census Bureau. 2005–2009 American community survey 5-year estimates. 2013. Retrieved on January 13, 2013 from http://www.census.gov/library/publications/time-series/statisticalabstracts.html.
- 40.Wang P. ERGM extensions: models for multiple networks and bipartite networks. Exponential random graph models for social networks: theory, method and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2013.Google Scholar
- 43.Robins G, Pattison P. Interdependencies and social processes: Dependence graphs and generalized dependence structures. In: Carrington PJ, Scott J, Wasserman S, editors. Models and methods in social network analysis, vol. 28. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2005. p. 192–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 46.Wang P, Robins G, Pattison P. PNet: a program for the simulation and estimation of exponential random graph models. Melbourne: University of Melbourne; 2006.Google Scholar
- 47.Wang P, Robins GL, Pattison PE, Koskinen JH. MPNet: program for the simulation and estimation of (p*) exponential random graph models for multilevel networks. Melbourne: The University of Melbourne, Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences; 2014.Google Scholar
- 53.Young LE, Schumm P, Alon L, Bouris A, Ferreira M, Hill B, et al. PrEP Chicago: a randomized controlled peer change agent intervention to promote the adoption of pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention among young Black men who have sex with men. Clin Trials. 2017.Google Scholar