A Conceptual Model of Dyadic Coordination in HIV Care Engagement Among Couples of Black Men Who Have Sex with Men: A Qualitative Dyadic Analysis
Among Black men who have sex with men (MSM), HIV incidence is disproportionately high and HIV care engagement is disproportionately low. There may be important opportunities to leverage the primary relationship to improve engagement in HIV care and treatment among Black MSM couples. Using dyadic qualitative analysis of semi-structured, one-on-one interviews, we explored dyadic aspects of HIV care engagement among 14 Black MSM couples in which at least one partner was HIV-positive and identified as a Black cisgender man. Findings showed that men varied in how involved they were in their HIV-positive partner’s care and treatment, and in how they reciprocated their partner’s involvement. Patterns of dyadic HIV care engagement supported a conceptual model of dyadic coordination that describes Black MSM relationships in terms of two conceptual dimensions of dyadic HIV care engagement, and guides future intervention designs with Black MSM couples.
KeywordsHIV Black men who have sex with men Primary romantic relationship HIV care engagement Couples Dyadic coordination
J.Y. Tan was supported by a National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Mentored Research Scientist Award (K01 MH106416). A.A. Conroy was supported by a NIMH Mentored Research Scientist Award (K01 MH107331).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
All the authors declared that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the UCSF Committee of Human Research/Institutional Review Board, and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in this study.
- 16.Campbell C, Hoff C, Kolber J, Chakravarty D, Neilands T, Grisham K. PrEP uptake, dyadic decision-making, and condom use among HIV-negative men in committed same-sex male relationships. In: Presented at National HIV Prevention Conference; December 6–9, Atlanta, 2015.Google Scholar
- 30.Lieber E, Weisner T, Taylor J. Dedoose software. California: Sociocultural Research Consultants; 2011.Google Scholar
- 34.Conroy A, Comfort M, Darbes LA, Johnson MO, Van Oosterhout JJG, Mkandawire J. Exploring linkages between couple functioning and adherence to ART in malawi: a dyadic perspective”. Oral presentation to be given at the AIDS impact 13th international conference, Cape Town, South Africa, 13–15 November 2017.Google Scholar
- 36.Pratto F, Lee I, Tan JY, Pitpitan E. Power basis theory: A psycho-ecological approach to power. In: Dunning D, editor. Social motivation. New York: Psychology Press; 2010.Google Scholar
- 37.Tan JY, Conroy AA, Lee IC, Pratto F. Leveraging power in intimate partner relationships: a power bases perspective. In: Agnew CR, Harman JJ, editors. Power in close relationships. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2017.Google Scholar
- 39.Schwartz SR, Nowak RG, Orazulike I, et al. The immediate effect of the same-sex marriage prohibition act on stigma, discrimination, and engagement on HIV prevention and treatment services in men who have sex with men in Nigeria: analysis of prospective data from the TRUST cohort. Lancet HIV. 2015;2(7):e299–306.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar