Advertisement

AIDS and Behavior

, Volume 22, Supplement 1, pp 26–34 | Cite as

The Relationship Between Risk Perception and Frequency of HIV Testing Among Men Who Have Sex with Men and Transgender Women, Lima, Peru

  • S. K. Vargas
  • K. A. Konda
  • S. R. Leon
  • B. Brown
  • J. D. Klausner
  • C. Lindan
  • C. F. Caceres
Article

Abstract

HIV infections in Peru are concentrated among men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women (TW). HIV testing rates among them remain low, delaying entrance into care. We assessed the prevalence of frequent HIV testing (at least every 6 months) and associated factors among 310 MSM and TW who attend sexual health clinics in Lima, Peru, and who reported that they were HIV seronegative or unaware of their status. Only 39% of participants tested frequently, and 22% had never tested; 29% reported that they were at low or no risk for acquiring HIV. Reporting low or no risk for acquiring HIV was associated with frequent testing (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR] = 1.53, 95% CI 1.13–2.08); those reporting unprotected anal sex were less likely to test frequently (aPR = 0.66, 95% CI 0.50–0.87). HIV prevalence was 12% and did not vary by risk perception categories. This at-risk population tests infrequently and may not understand the risk of having unprotected sex.

Keywords

HIV MSM HIV testing Risk perception Peru 

Resumen

Las infecciones por el VIH en el Perú se concentran entre hombres-que-tienen-sexo-con-hombres (HSH) y mujeres transgénero (MT). El tamizaje de VIH entre ellos se mantiene bajo, retrasando la atención y el cuidado. Se evaluó la prevalencia de “tamizaje frecuente” para VIH (hacerse la prueba al menos cada 6 meses) y factores asociados en 310 HSH/MT que se atendieron en clínicas de salud sexual en Lima, Perú, y reportaron ser VIH-negativo o desconocer su status. Sólo 39% de los participantes reportaron tamizaje frecuente y 22% nunca se realizó una prueba de VIH. 29% reportó sentirse en bajo riesgo o no sentirse en riesgo de adquirir VIH. Reportar bajo o ningún riesgo de contraer VIH estuvo asociado al tamizaje frecuente (razón de prevalencia ajustada [RPa]: 1,53; IC del 95%: 1.13 a 2.8); Reportar sexo anal sin protección disminuye el tamizaje frecuente (RPa: 0,66; IC del 95%: 0,50-0,87). La prevalencia total de VIH fue 12% y no varió según las categorías de percepción de riesgo. Esta población en riesgo no se realiza tamizaje frecuentemente y quizá no comprenden el riesgo de tener sexo sin protección.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI099727-01).The authors express appreciation for the assistance of the PICASSO project staff at the Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, and the staff of the Epicentro Clinic and Barton MoH Center. We also wish to acknowledge all the participants of the PICASSO Cohort. This article was partially prepared as part of the activities of the Masters in Epidemiologic Research offered jointly by the Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia (UPCH) and NAMRU-6, Peru. This program is part of the Grant 2D43 TW007393 ‘‘Peru Infectious Diseases Epidemiology Research Training Consortium’’, sponsored by the Fogarty International Center of the US National Institutes of Health (NIH/FIC). We wish to acknowledge the support from the University of California, San Francisco’s International Traineeships in AIDS Prevention Studies (US National Institute of Mental Health, R25 MH064712) and from the Starr Foundation Scholarship Fund. The authors are thankful for the support and guidance received from the faculty and fellow students of the program.

Funding

This study was funded by NIH/NIAID R-01 study #1R01AI099727-01.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Ministerio de Salud, Peru [Ministry of Health, Peru] Centro Nacional De Epidemiología, Prevención Y Control De Enfermedades. Situación del VIH/SIDA en el Perú Boletín Epidemiológico Mensual MARZO 2017. 2017.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alarcon JO, Pun M, Gutierrez C, et al. Estimation and analysis of HIV incidence in the adult population in Peru: results of application of the MoT mathematical model. Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica. 2012;29(4):452–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sanchez J, Lama JR, Kusunoki L, et al. HIV-1, sexually transmitted infections, and sexual behavior trends among men who have sex with men in Lima. Peru. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2007;44(5):578–85.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Passaro RC, Haley CA, Sanchez H, Vermund SH, Kipp AM. High HIV prevalence and the internet as a source of HIV-related service information at a community-based organization in Peru: a cross-sectional study of men who have sex with men. BMC Public Health. 2016;16(1):871.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Silva-Santisteban A, Raymond HF, Salazar X, et al. Understanding the HIV/AIDS epidemic in transgender women of Lima, Peru: results from a sero-epidemiologic study using respondent driven sampling. AIDS Behav. 2012;16(4):872–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Castillo R, Konda KA, Leon SR, et al. HIV and sexually transmitted infection incidence and associated risk factors among high-risk MSM and male-to-female transgender women in Lima, Peru. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2015;69(5):567–75.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sanchez J, Lama JR, Peinado J, et al. High HIV and ulcerative sexually transmitted infection incidence estimates among men who have sex with men in Peru: awaiting for an effective preventive intervention. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2009;51(suppl 1):S47–51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ministerio de Salud, Peru [Ministry of Health, Peru]. Norma Técnica de Salud para la Vigilancia Epidemiológica en Salud Pública de la Infección por el Virus de la Inmunodefiiencia Humana (VIH) y de las Infecciones de Transmisión Sexual (ITS) en el Perú. Lima, Peru; 2015.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tabet S, Sanchez J, Lama J, et al. HIV, syphilis and heterosexual bridging among Peruvian men who have sex with men. AIDS. 2002;16(9):1271–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lee SW, Deiss RG, Segura ER, et al. A cross-sectional study of low HIV testing frequency and high-risk behaviour among men who have sex with men and transgender women in Lima, Peru. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:408.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Adam PC, de Wit JB, Toskin I, et al. Estimating levels of HIV testing, HIV prevention coverage, HIV knowledge, and condom use among men who have sex with men (MSM) in low-income and middle-income countries. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2009;52(suppl 2):S143–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Clark JL, Konda KA, Silva-Santisteban A, et al. Sampling methodologies for epidemiologic surveillance of men who have sex with men and transgender women in Latin America: an empiric comparison of convenience sampling, time space sampling, and respondent driven sampling. AIDS Behav. 2014;18(12):2338–48.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nagaraj S, Segura ER, Peinado J, et al. A cross-sectional study of knowledge of sex partner serostatus among high-risk Peruvian men who have sex with men and transgender women: implications for HIV prevention. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:181.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Santos GM, Beck J, Wilson PA, et al. Homophobia as a barrier to HIV prevention service access for young men who have sex with men. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013;63(5):e167–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    MacKellar DA, Valleroy LA, Secura GM, et al. Perceptions of lifetime risk and actual risk for acquiring HIV among young men who have sex with men. AIDS Behav. 2007;11(2):263–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fan W, Yin L, Qian HZ, et al. HIV risk perception among HIV negative or status-unknown men who have sex with men in China. Biomed Res Int. 2014.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/232451.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nelson KM, Thiede H, Hawes SE, et al. Why the wait? Delayed HIV diagnosis among men who have sex with men. J Urban Health. 2010;87(4):642–55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Deiss RG, Leon SR, Konda KA, et al. Characterizing the syphilis epidemic among men who have sex with men in Lima, Peru to identify new treatment and control strategies. BMC Infect Dis. 2013;13:426.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ministerio de Salud, Peru [Ministry of Health, Peru]. Directiva sanitaria N° 030-MINSA/DGSP-v.01 “Directiva Sanitaria Para la Atención Médica Periódica a las/os Trabajadoras/es Sexuales y HSH.” 2009.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Barros AJ, Hirakata VN. Alternatives for logistic regression in cross-sectional studies: an empirical comparison of models that directly estimate the prevalence ratio. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2003;3:21.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Coutinho LM, Scazufca M, Menezes PR. Methods for estimating prevalence ratios in cross-sectional studies. Rev Saude Publica. 2008;42(6):992–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). HIV testing among men who have sex with men—21 cities, United States, 2008. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011;60(21):694–9.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Perez-Brumer AG, Konda KA, Salvatierra HJ, et al. Prevalence of HIV, STIs, and risk behaviors in a cross-sectional community- and clinic-based sample of men who have sex with men (MSM) in Lima, Peru. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(4):e59072.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Blas MM, Alva IE, Cabello R, Carcamo C, Kurth AE. Risk behaviors and reasons for not getting tested for HIV among men who have sex with men: an online survey in Peru. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(11):e27334.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hoenigl M, Anderson CM, Green N, Mehta SR, Smith DM, Little SJ. Repeat HIV-testing is associated with an increase in behavioral risk among men who have sex with men: a cohort study. BMC Med. 2015;13:218.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Williams-Roberts H, Chang Y, Losina E, Freedberg KA, Walensky RP. Frequent HIV testing among participants of a routine HIV testing program. Virulence. 2010;1(2):68–71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Konda KA, Castillo R, Leon SR, et al. HIV status communication with sex partners and associated factors among high-risk MSM and transgender women in Lima, Peru. AIDS Behav. 2017;21(1):152–62.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    MacKellar DA, Valleroy LA, Secura GM, et al. Unrecognized HIV infection, risk behaviors, and perceptions of risk among young men who have sex with men: opportunities for advancing HIV prevention in the third decade of HIV/AIDS. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2005;38(5):603–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Golub SA, Gamarel KE. The impact of anticipated HIV stigma on delays in HIV testing behaviors: findings from a community-based sample of men who have sex with men and transgender women in New York City. AIDS Patient Care STDs. 2013;27(11):621–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Krueger EA, Chiu CJ, Menacho LA, Young SD. HIV testing among social media-using Peruvian men who have sex with men: correlates and social context. AIDS Care. 2016;28(10):1301–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Valenzuela C, Ugarte-Gil C, Paz J, et al. HIV stigma as a barrier to retention in HIV care at a general hospital in Lima, Peru: a case-control study. AIDS Behav. 2015;19(2):235–245 J Int AIDS Soc. 2016;19(3 suppl 2):20799.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Napper LE, Fisher DG, Reynolds GL. Development of the perceived risk of HIV scale. AIDS Behav. 2012;16(4):1075–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Chow JY, Konda KA, Borquez A, et al. Peru’s HIV care continuum among men who have sex with men and transgender women: opportunities to optimize treatment and prevention. Int J STD AIDS. 2016;27(12):1039–48.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lipsitz MC, Segura ER, Castro JL, et al. Bringing testing to the people—benefits of mobile unit HIV/syphilis testing in Lima, Peru, 2007–2009. Int J STD AIDS. 2014;25(5):325–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Volk JE, Lippman SA, Grinsztejn B, et al. Acceptability and feasibility of HIV self-testing among men who have sex with men in Peru and Brazil. Int J STD AIDS. 2016;27(7):531–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Blas MM, Menacho LA, Alva IE, Cabello R, Orellana ER. Motivating men who have sex with men to get tested for HIV through the internet and mobile phones: a qualitative study. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(1):e54012.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Young SD, Cumberland WG, Nianogo R, Menacho LA, Galea JT, Coates T. The HOPE social media intervention for global HIV prevention in Peru: a cluster randomised controlled trial. Lancet HIV. 2015;2(1):e27–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Fonner VA, Denison J, Kennedy CE, O’Reilly K, Sweat M. Voluntary counseling and testing (VCT) for changing HIV-related risk behavior in developing countries. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;9:CD001224.PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Cohen MS, Chen YQ, McCauley M, et al. Prevention of HIV-1 infection with early antiretroviral therapy. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(6):493–505.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Das M, Chu PL, Santos GM, et al. Decreases in community viral load are accompanied by reductions in new HIV infections in San Francisco. PLoS ONE. 2010;5(6):e11068.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Montaner JS, Lima VD, Harrigan PR, et al. Expansion of HAART coverage is associated with sustained decreases in HIV/AIDS morbidity, mortality and HIV transmission: the “HIV Treatment as Prevention” experience in a Canadian setting. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(2):e87872.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Earnshaw VA, Chaudoir SR. From conceptualizing to measuring HIV stigma: a review of HIV stigma mechanism measures. AIDS Behav. 2009;13(6):1160–77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Grossman CI, Stangl AL. Editorial: global action to reduce HIV stigma and discrimination. J Int AIDS Soc. 2013;16(3 suppl 2):18881.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Berkley-Patton JY, Moore E, Berman M, et al. Assessment of HIV-related stigma in a US faith-based HIV education and testing intervention. J Int AIDS Soc. 2013;16(3 suppl 2):18644.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Jain A, Nuankaew R, Mongkholwiboolphol N, et al. Community-based interventions that work to reduce HIV stigma and discrimination: results of an evaluation study in Thailand. J Int AIDS Soc. 2013;16(3 suppl 2):18711.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    van der Elst EM, Smith AD, Gichuru E, et al. Men who have sex with men sensitivity training reduces homoprejudice and increases knowledge among Kenyan healthcare providers in coastal Kenya. J Int AIDS Soc. 2013;16(suppl 3):18748.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Salazar X, Núnez-Curto A, Villayzán J, et al. How Peru introduced a plan for comprehensive HIV prevention and care for transwomen. J Int AIDS Soc. 2016;19(3 suppl 2):20790.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. K. Vargas
    • 1
    • 6
  • K. A. Konda
    • 2
    • 5
  • S. R. Leon
    • 1
  • B. Brown
    • 3
  • J. D. Klausner
    • 2
  • C. Lindan
    • 4
  • C. F. Caceres
    • 5
  1. 1.Laboratory of Sexual Health, Center for Interdisciplinary Research on Sexuality, AIDS and SocietyUniversidad Peruana Cayetano HerediaLimaPeru
  2. 2.Program in Global Health, Division of Infectious Diseases, David Geffen School of MedicineUniversity of California Los AngelesLos AngelesUSA
  3. 3.Center for Healthy Communities, School of MedicineUniversity of California RiversideRiversideUSA
  4. 4.Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Global Health SciencesUniversity of California San FranciscoSan FranciscoUSA
  5. 5.Unit of Health, Sexuality and Human Development, Center for Interdisciplinary Research on Sexuality, AIDS and SocietyUniversidad Peruana Cayetano HerediaLimaPeru
  6. 6.Laboratorio de Salud Sexual, Laboratorios de Investigación y Desarrollo (LID)Universidad Peruana Cayetano HerediaLima 31Peru

Personalised recommendations