Sexual Venue Choice and Sexual Risk-Taking Among Substance-Using Men Who have Sex with Men
- 251 Downloads
Commercial sex venues (CSVs) and public sex environments (PSEs) offer men who have sex with men (MSM) sexual privacy and anonymity. Sociodemographic characteristics (e.g., race/ethnicity, sexual identity, age, HIV status) are correlated with individuals’ choice of sexual venue, potentially suggesting environmental associations with both sociodemographics and sexual risk. From March 2005 through March 2012, 1298 substance-using MSM provided information on their most recent sexual encounter; iterative logit models estimated associations between sociodemographics and sexual venue, and/or whether sexual venue was associated with sexual risk-taking while controlling for sociodemographics. More than a third of participants’ most recent sexual encounters took place in either a PSE (23.0%) or a CSV (11.3%); anonymous, HIV-serodiscordant, and/or sex while on methamphetamine and/or marijuana was significantly more likely to occur in CSVs/PSEs than in a private location, even when controlling for sociodemographics. Findings demonstrate that socioenvironmental factors were associated with sexual risk-taking among high-risk, urban MSM.
KeywordsMen who have sex with men (MSM) Commercial sex venues Public sex environment HIV Sexual risk
This study was supported by the Los Angeles County, Department of Public Health, Division of HIV and STD Programs (formerly Office of AIDS Programs and Policy) contracts #H700861 and PH#001039, and the City of West Hollywood, Department of Human Services, Social Services Division. Dr. Reback acknowledges additional support from the National Institute of Mental Health (P30 MH58107).
Complaince with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
All procedures in the study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable standards.
As the data were collected during the implementation of a service program and not a research study, no written informed consent was required.
- 3.Keogh PG, Weatherburn P. Tales from the backroom: anonymous sex and HIV risk in London’s commercial gay sex venues. Venereology. 2000;13(4):150–5.Google Scholar
- 8.Humphreys L. Tearoom trade: impersonal sex in public places. Hawthorne: Aldine de Gruyter; 1975.Google Scholar
- 11.Newman PA, Lee S-J, Roungprakhon S, Tepjan S. Demographic and behavioral correlates of HIV risk among men and transgender women recruited from gay entertainment venues and community-based organizations in Thailand: implications for HIV prevention. Prev Sci. 2012;13(5):483–92.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 15.Weatherburn P, Davies P, Hickson F, Hartley M. A class apart: the social stratification of HIV infection among homosexually active men. London: Trust TH; 1999.Google Scholar
- 18.Colfax G, Coates TJ, Husnik MMJ, Huang Y, Buchbinder S, Koblin B, et al. Longitudinal patterns of methamphetamine, popper (amyl nitrite), and cocaine use and high-risk sexual behavior among a cohort of San Francisco men who have sex with men. J Urban Health. 2005;82(1):i62–70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 38.Reback CJ. The social construction of a gay drug. 1997. http://friendscommunitycenter.org/reports.html.
- 40.Diaz RM. Latino gay men and HIV: culture, sexuality, and risk behavior. New York: Routledge; 2013.Google Scholar
- 43.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV among gay and bisexual men. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2015.Google Scholar