HIV Testing Among Internet-Using MSM in the United States: Systematic Review
Regular HIV testing enables early identification and treatment of HIV among at-risk men who have sex with men (MSM). Characterizing HIV testing needs for Internet-using MSM informs development of Internet-facilitated testing interventions. In this systematic review we analyze HIV testing patterns among Internet-using MSM in the United States who report, through participation in an online study or survey, their HIV status as negative or unknown and identify demographic or behavioral risk factors associated with testing. We systematically searched multiple electronic databases for relevant English-language articles published between January 1, 2005 and December 16, 2014. Using meta-analysis, we summarized the proportion of Internet-using MSM who had ever tested for HIV and the proportion who tested in the 12 months preceding participation in the online study or survey. We also identified factors predictive of these outcomes using meta-regression and narrative synthesis. Thirty-two studies that enrolled 83,186 MSM met our inclusion criteria. Among the studies reporting data for each outcome, 85 % (95 % CI 82–87 %) of participants had ever tested, and 58 % (95 % CI 53–63 %) had tested in the year preceding enrollment in the study, among those for whom those data were reported. Age over 30 years, at least a college education, use of drugs, and self-identification as being homosexual or gay were associated with ever having tested for HIV. A large majority of Internet-using MSM indicated they had been tested for HIV at some point in the past. A smaller proportion—but still a majority—reported they had been tested within the year preceding study or survey participation. MSM who self-identify as heterosexual or bisexual, are younger, or who use drugs (including non-injection drugs) may be less likely to have ever tested for HIV. The overall findings of our systematic review are encouraging; however, a subpopulation of MSM may benefit from targeted outreach. These findings indicate unmet needs for HIV testing among Internet-using MSM and identify subpopulations that might benefit from targeted outreach, such as provision of HIV self-testing kits.
KeywordsHomosexuality Male Bisexuality HIV testing Internet Social media Systematic review Meta-analysis
This work was funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention under contract 200-2010-37417 awarded to MANILA Consulting Group, Inc.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
None of the authors declare any potential conflicts of interest.
The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
- 1.CDC, diagnoses of HIV infection in the United States and dependent areas, 2014. HIV surveillance report http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/library/reports/surveillance/cdc-hiv-surveillance-report-us.pdf. Accessed 26 May 2016
- 2.CDC, CDC Fact Sheet: HIV among gay and bisexual men. https://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/newsroom/docs/factsheets/cdc-msm-508.pdf. Accessed 26 May 2016
- 11.EMIS 2010: The European Men-Who-Have-Sex-With-Men Internet Survey. Findings from 38 Countries. http://ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications/_layouts/forms/Publication_DispForm.aspx?List=4f55ad51-4aed-4d32-b960-af70113dbb90&ID=760 2013; European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control.
- 13.The Joanna Briggs Institute, Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer’s Manual: 2011 edition. 2011: The Joanna Briggs Institute.Google Scholar
- 14.Raudenbush SJ. Analyzing effect sizes: random-effects models. In: Cooper H, Hedges LV, Valentine JC, editors. The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. New York: The Russell Sage Foundation; 2009. p. 295–316.Google Scholar
- 16.Shadish WR, Haddock CK. Combining estimates of effect sizes. In: Cooper H, Hedges LV, Valentine JC, editors. The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 2009. p. 257–77.Google Scholar
- 17.Harbord RM, Higgins, JPT. Meta-regression in Stata. http://www.stata-journal.com/sjpdf.html?articlenum=sbe23_1. Stata J, 2008; 8(4):493–519.
- 43.Wagenaar BH, Christiansen-Lindquist L, Khosropour C, Salazar LF, Benbow N, Prachand N, Sineath RC, Stephenson R, Sullivan PS. Willingness of US men who have sex with men (MSM) to participate in Couples HIV Voluntary Counseling and Testing (CVCT). PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e42953.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 53.Navejas, M. Sexual risk among men who have sex with men with online sex partners in New York city: Insight using the centers for disease control and prevention’s Web-Based HIV Behavioral Surveillance and national HIV Behavioral Surveillance. 2013, ProQuest Information & Learning: US.Google Scholar
- 56.Ryan, CL, Bauman, K. Educational Attainment in the United States: 2015. https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2016/demo/p20-578.pdf. 2016: U.S. Census Bureau.
- 57.USPHS, United States Public Health Service. Preexposure prophylaxis for the prevention of HIV infection in the United States—2014 clinical practice guideline. http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/prepguidelines2014.pdf 2014.
- 59.CDC, Men Who Have Sex With Men—National HIV Behavioral Surveillance, 20 U.S. Cities, 2014. HIV Surveillance Special Report 15. http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/library/reports/surveillance/cdc-hiv-hssr-nhbs-msm-2014.pdf Accessed 22 June 2016.
- 60.Kwan CK, Rose, CE, Brooks JT, Marks G, Sionean C., HIV Testing Among Men at Risk for Acquiring HIV Infection Before and After the 2006 CDC Recommendations. http://www.publichealthreports.org/issueopen.cfm?articleID=3505 Accessed 26 May 2016; 131: p. 311–319.
- 62.Conway DP, Holt M, Couldwell DL, Smith DE, Davies SC, McNulty A, Keen P, Cunningham P, Guy R. Barriers to HIV testing and characteristics associated with never testing among gay and bisexual men attending sexual health clinics in Sydney. J Int AIDS Soc. 2015;18:20221.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 66.Blas MM, AlvaI, Carcamo CP, Cabello R, Goodreau SM, Kimball AM, Kurth AE. Effect of an online video-based intervention to increase HIV testing in men who have sex with men in Peru. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2862715/. PLoS One. 2010; 5(5): e10448.
- 68.CDC, CDC Fact Sheet. HIV Among Youth. http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/group/age/youth/. Accessed 24 June 2016.
- 70.Mustanski B, Lyons T, Garcia SC. Internet use and sexual health of young men who have sex with men: a mixed-methods study. http://www.impactprogram.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/Mustanski-Lyons-Garcia-2010.pdf Accessed 24 June 2016. Arch Sex Behav, 2010.
- 71.National Alliance of State and Territorial AIDS Directors. Reaching them where they are: a guide for using online and social media to conduct sexual health outreach with youth. http://hiv.rutgers.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/YouthSocialMediaGuidance-1.pdf. Accessed 24 June 2016. 2012.
- 73.Elliot E, Rossi M, McCormack S, McOwan A. Identifying undiagnosed HIV in men who have sex with men (MSM) by offering HIV home sampling via online gay social media: a service evaluation. Sex Transm Infect, 2016. ePub ahead of print.Google Scholar
- 74.Grov C, Cain D, Whitfield TH, Rendina HJ, Pawsob M, Ventuneac A, Parsons JT. Recruiting a U.S. national sample of HIV-negative gay and bisexual men to complete at-home self-administered HIV/STI testing and surveys: challenges and Opportunities. Sex Res Soc Policy. 2016;13(1):1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 75.Chavez RP, M.R, Wesolowski LG, Freeman A, Higa DH, Raiford J, Johnson WD, Margolis A, Belcher L, Ethridge S, Borkowf CB, Owen SM, McNaughten AD, Branson BM, Evaluation of rapid HIV self-testing among men who have sex with men (MSM) in high prevalence cities: the eSTAMP Project. Poster Presentation at 2015 HIV diagnostics conference. Atlanta GA March 21-24, 2016. https://custom.cvent.com/ADE0EB81B3184D618E2FB8340F1EC28E/files/1a95ece7f4af40708a553b9df48f03ea.pdf