Social Network Strategies to Address HIV Prevention and Treatment Continuum of Care Among At-risk and HIV-infected Substance Users: A Systematic Scoping Review
Social network analysis (SNA) and social network-based interventions (SNI) are important analytical tools harnessing peer and family influences critical for HIV prevention and treatment among substance users. While SNA is an effective way to measure social network influences, SNI directly or indirectly involves network members in interventions. Even though these methods have been applied in heterogeneous ways, leading to extensive evidence-based practices, systematic reviews are however, lacking. We searched five bibliographic databases and identified 58 studies involving HIV in substance users that had utilized SNA or SNI as part of their methodology. SNA was used to measure network variables as inputs in statistical/mathematical models in 64 % of studies and only 22 % of studies used SNI. Most studies focused on HIV prevention and few addressed diagnosis (k = 4), care linkage and retention (k = 5), ART adherence (k = 2), and viral suppression (k = 1). This systematic review highlights both the advantages and disadvantages of social network approaches for HIV prevention and treatment and gaps in its use for HIV care continuum.
KeywordsSocial network analysis Social network intervention HIV prevention HIV care continuum Substance users
The authors would like to thank Librarian Janis Glover from Yale University for assistance with search strategy and comprehensive searches from the multiple databases. For this study, the authors DG (K01DA037794) and FLA (K24DA017072 and R01DA030768) were funded by the National Institute of Health.
This study was funded by the National Institute of Health (K01DA037794; K24DA017072 and R01DA030768).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
- 1.Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS. 90-90-90- An ambitious treatment target to help end the AIDS epidemic New York. 2014. http://www.unaids.org/en/resources/documents/2014/2090-2090-2090.
- 3.Cook C, Bridge J, McLean S, Phelan M, Barrett D. The funding crisis for harm reduction: donor retreat, government neglect and the way forward. London: International Harm Reduction Association; 2014.Google Scholar
- 7.Wu LT, Ling W, Burchett B, Blazer DG, Yang C, Pan JJ, et al. Use of item response theory and latent class analysis to link poly-substance use disorders with addiction severity, HIV risk, and quality of life among opioid-dependent patients in the Clinical Trials Network. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2011;118(2–3):186–93.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 67.Deering KN, Shannon K, Sinclair H, Parsad D, Gilbert E, Tyndall MW. Piloting a peer-driven intervention model to increase access and adherence to antiretroviral therapy and HIV care among street-entrenched HIV-positive women in Vancouver. AIDS Patient Care STDs. 2009;23(8):603–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 77.Li J, Liu H, Li J, Luo J, Koram N, Detels R. Sexual transmissibility of HIV among opiate users with concurrent sexual partnerships: an egocentric network study in Yunnan, China. Addiction. 2011;106(10):1780–7; discussion 1788–9.Google Scholar
- 83.Eritsyan K, Heimer R, Barbour R, Odinokova V, White E, Rusakova MM, et al. Individual-level, network-level and city-level factors associated with HIV prevalence among people who inject drugs in eight Russian cities: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2013;3(6):e002645.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 90.World Bank 2015. http://data.worldbank.org/about/country-and-lending-groups-Low_income.
- 98.Simmons N, Donnell D, Ou SS, Celentano DD, Aramrattana A, Davis-Vogel A, et al. Assessment of contamination and misclassification biases in a randomized controlled trial of a social network peer education intervention to reduce HIV risk behaviors among drug users and risk partners in Philadelphia, PA and Chiang Mai, Thailand. AIDS Behav. 2015;19(10):1818–27.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar