Advertisement

AIDS and Behavior

, Volume 19, Supplement 1, pp 16–23 | Cite as

Critique and Lessons Learned from using Multiple Methods to Estimate Population Size of Men who have Sex with Men in Ghana

  • Silas Quaye
  • H. Fisher Raymond
  • Kyeremeh Atuahene
  • Richard Amenyah
  • John Aberle-Grasse
  • Willi McFarland
  • Angela El-Adas
  • Ghana Men Study Group
Original Paper

Abstract

Population size estimation of key populations at risk of HIV is essential to every national response. We implemented population size estimation of men who have sex with men (MSM) in Ghana using a three-stage approach within the 2011 Ghana Men’s Study: during the study’s formative assessment, the larger integrated bio-behavioral surveillance (IBBS) survey; and during the stakeholder meeting. We used six methods in combination within the three-stage approach (literature review, mapping with census, unique object multiplier, service multiplier, wisdom of the crowd, and modified Delphi) to generate size estimates from 16 locations (4 IBBS survey sites and 12 other locations) and used the estimates from the 16 sites to extrapolate the total MSM population size of Ghana. We estimated the number of MSM in Ghana to be 30,579 with a plausible range of 21,645–34,470. The overall estimate suggests that the prevalence of MSM in Ghana is 0.48 % of the adult male population. Lessons learned are shared to inform and improve applications of the methods in future studies.

Keywords

Men who have sex with men Africa Population size estimates 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research has been supported by the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) through the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Ghana Country Office under the terms of Cooperative Agreement Number 5U2GPS001469-03. The authors would like to thank Dr. Fazle Khan, Dr. Celia Woodfill and all reviewers for helpful comments on the manuscript. The views expressed in this manuscript do not necessarily reflect the official views of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

References

  1. 1.
    Beyrer C, Karim A. The changing epidemiology of HIV in 2013. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2013;8:306–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    UNAIDS. Global report: UNAIDS Report on the Global AIDS Epidemic. UNAIDS, Geneva. 2012.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Smith AD, Tapsoba P, Peshu N, Sanders EJ, Jaffe HW. Men who have sex with men and HIV/AIDS in sub-Saharan Africa. Lancet. 2009;374:416–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS. Practical guidelines for intensifying HIV prevention: towards universal access. Geneva 2007.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gutierrez J, McPherson S, Fakoya A, Matheou A, Bertozzi SM. Community-based prevention leads to an increase in condom use and a reduction in sexually transmitted infections (STIs) among men who have sex with men (MSM) and female sex workers (FSW): the Frontiers Prevention Project (FPP) evaluation results. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:497–508.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Herbst JH, Beeker C, Mathew A, et al. The effectiveness of individual, group, and community level HIV behavioral risk reduction interventions for adult men who have sex with men: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2007 Apr;32(4 Suppl):S38–67.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Johnston LG, Prybylski D, Raymond H. Fisher, Mirzazadeh A, Manopaiboon C, McFarland W. Incorporating the service multiplier method in respondent-driven sampling surveys to estimate the size of hidden and hard-to-reach populations: case studies from around the world. Sex Transm Dis. 2013;40(4):304–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    FHI Impact, USAID, UNAIDS, WHO, UNDP. Estimating the size of populations at risk for HIV: issues and methods. Genova: UNAIDS; 2003. p. 03–36E.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Beyrer C, Baral SD, van Griensven F, et al. HIV in men who have sex with men: Global epidemiology of HIV infection in men who have sex with men. Lancet. 2012;380:367–77.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Aberle-Grasse J, McFarland W, El-Adas A, Quaye S, et al. HIV prevalence and correlates of infection among MSM: 4 areas in Ghana, the Ghana Men’s Health Study 2010–2011, in 20th Conference on Retroviral and Opportunistic Infections, March 3–6, 2013. Atlanta, GA: Ghana Men’s Health Study; 2013.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Okal J, Geibel S, Muraguri N, et al. Estimates of the size of key populations at risk for HIV infection: men who have sex with men, female sex workers and injecting drug users in Nairobi. Kenya. Sex Transm Infect. 2013;89:366–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pietersma S, de Vries M, van den Akker-van ME. Domains of quality of life: results of a three-stage Delphi consensus procedure among patients, family of patients, clinicians, scientists and the general public. Qual Life Res 2013. doi:  10.1007/s11136-013-0578-3.
  13. 13.
    Cáceres C, Konda K, Pecheny M, Chatterjee A, Lyerla R. Estimating the number of men who have sex with men in low and middle income countries. Sex Transm Infect. 2006; 82(Suppl 3):iii3–iii9.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Faran E, Blanchard J, Zaheer HA, Reza T, Holte-McKenzie M. The HIV/AIDS Surveillance Project mapping approach: an innovative approach for mapping and size estimation for groups at a higher risk of HIV in Pakistan. AIDS. 2010;24(suppl 2):S77–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    UNAIDS/WHO Working Group on Global HIV/AIDS and STI Surveillance. Estimating the Size of Populations Most at Risk to HIV Infection: Participant Manual. Genova: UNAIDS; 2010.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lorenz J, Rauhut H, Schweitzer F, Helbing D. How social influence can undermine the wisdom of crowd effect. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108(22):9020–5.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lee MD, Zhang S, Shi J. The wisdom of the crowd playing the price is right. Mem Cogn. 2011;39:914–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hsu C, Sandford BA. The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus. Pract Assess Res Eval. 2007; 12(10). http://preoline.net/getvn. Accessed 18 Aug 2013.
  19. 19.
    Raymond HF, Bereknyei S, Berglas N, et al. Estimating population size, HIV prevalence and HIV incidence among men who have sex with men in San Francisco: A case example of triangulation methods. STI. 2013;89(5):383–7.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Muraguri N, Temmerman M, Geibel S. A decade of research involving men who have sex with men in sub-Saharan Africa: current knowledge and future directions. SAHARA-J 2012; 9(3):137–147.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    UNAIDS/WHO Working Group on Global HIV/AIDS and STI Surveillance. Guidelines on Estimating the Size of Populations Most at Risk to HIV. Genova: WHO; 2010.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York (outside the USA) 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Silas Quaye
    • 1
  • H. Fisher Raymond
    • 2
    • 3
  • Kyeremeh Atuahene
    • 4
  • Richard Amenyah
    • 5
  • John Aberle-Grasse
    • 6
  • Willi McFarland
    • 2
    • 3
  • Angela El-Adas
    • 4
  • Ghana Men Study Group
  1. 1.Division of Global HIV/AIDS, Center for Global HealthCenters for Disease Control and PreventionAccraGhana
  2. 2.Global Health Sciences, Prevention and Public Health GroupUniversity of California, San FranciscoSan FranciscosUSA
  3. 3.San Francisco Department of Public HealthSan FranciscoUSA
  4. 4.Ghana AIDS CommissionAccraGhana
  5. 5.UNAIDS-Technical Support FacilityWest and Central AfricaWest Africa
  6. 6.Division of Global HIV/AIDS, Center for Global HealthCenters for Disease Control and PreventionAtlantaGeorgia

Personalised recommendations