AIDS and Behavior

, Volume 18, Issue 10, pp 1955–1969

A Mixed-Methods Study of Condom Use and Decision Making Among Adolescent Gay and Bisexual Males

  • Brian Mustanski
  • L. Zachary DuBois
  • Tonya L. Prescott
  • Michele L. Ybarra
Original Paper


Young men who have sex with men have the highest rates of new HIV infections in the U.S., but they have been understudied relative to other populations. As a formative step for the development of a text messaging HIV prevention intervention, this mixed methods study aimed to understand how adolescent gay and bisexual males (AGBM) make decisions about condom use and factors that may differ based on age, sexual experience, and rural versus urban residency. Four online, asynchronous focus groups were conducted with 75 14–18 year old AGBM across the U.S. Qualitative analyses uncovered themes related to relationship influences on condom use (e.g. marriage, trust), access issues, and attitudes and experiences that both encouraged as well as discouraged condom use. Mixed methods analyses explored differences between groups in endorsement of themes. For example, younger and sexually experienced participants were more likely to report the cost of condoms was prohibitive and sexually experienced and rural youth were more likely to describe being influenced by emotional aspects of the relationship. These data highlight both opportunities for as well as the importance of tailoring HIV prevention programs for sub-groups of AGBM.


Condom decision-making HIV prevention MSM Adolescents Mixed-methods 


  1. 1.
    Mustanski BS, Newcomb ME, Du Bois SN, Garcia SC, Grov C. HIV in young men who have sex with men: a review of epidemiology, risk and protective factors, and interventions. J Sex Res. 2011;48:218–53.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    CDC. Vital signs: HIV infection, testing, and risk behaviors among youths—United States. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2012;61:971–6.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    CDC. Compendium of evidence-based HIV prevention interventions. 2013; Accessed 10/07/2013.
  4. 4.
    Grant RM, Lama JR, Anderson PL, et al. Preexposure chemoprophylaxis for HIV prevention in men who have sex with men. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:2587–99.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hart T, Peterson JL, Community Intervention Trial for Youth Study T. Predictors of risky sexual behavior among young African American men who have sex with men. Am J Public Health. 2004;94:1122–4.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mustanski B, Newcomb ME, Clerkin EM. Relationship characteristics and sexual risk-taking in young men who have sex with men. Health Psychol. 2011;30:597–605.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Thiede H, Valleroy LA, MacKellar DA, et al. Regional patterns and correlates of substance use among young men who have sex with men in 7 US urban areas. Am J Public Health. 2003;93:1915–21.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bingham TA, Harawa NT, Johnson DF, Secura GM, MacKellar DA, Valleroy LA. The effect of partner characteristics on HIV infection among African American men who have sex with men in the Young Men’s Survey, Los Angeles, 1999–2000. AIDS Educ Prev. 2003;15:39–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Miller RL, Reed SJ, McNall MA, Forney JC. The effect of trauma on recent inconsistent condom use among young black gay and bisexual men. J HIV/AIDS Soc Serv. 2013;12:349–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dudley MG, Rostosky SS, Korfhage BA, Zimmerman RS. Correlates of high-risk sexual behavior among young men who have sex with men. AIDS Educ Prev. 2004;16:328–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shafii T, Stovel K, Davis R, Holmes K. Is condom use habit forming? Condom use at sexual debut and subsequent condom use. Sex Transm Dis. 2004;31:366–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Robertson A, Levin ML. AIDS knowledge, condom attitudes, and risk-taking sexual behavior of substance-abusing juvenile offenders on probation or parole. AIDS Educ Prev. 1999;11:450–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lawrence JS, Scott CP. Examination of the relationship between African American adolescents’ condom use at sexual onset and later sexual behavior: implications for condom distribution programs. AIDS Educ Prev. 1996;8:258–66.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hendriksen ES, Pettifor A, Lee SJ, Coates TJ, Rees HV. Predictors of condom use among young adults in South Africa: the Reproductive Health and HIV Research Unit National Youth Survey. Am J Public Health. 2007;97:1241–8.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shafii T, Stovel K, Holmes K. Association between condom use at sexual debut and subsequent sexual trajectories: a longitudinal study using biomarkers. Am J Public Health. 2007;97:1090–5.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hatzenbuehler ML. Social factors as determinants of mental health disparities in LGB populations: implications for public policy. Soc Issues Policy Rev. 2010;4:31–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Poon CS, Saewyc EM. Out yonder: sexual-minority adolescents in rural communities in British Columbia. Am J Public Health. 2009;99:118–24.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hall HI, Li J, McKenna MT. HIV in predominantly rural areas of the United States. J Rural Health. 2005;21:245–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    D’Augelli AR. Coming out in community psychology: personal narrative and disciplinary change. Am J Community Psychol. 2003;31:343–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    D’Augelli AR, Hart MM. Gay women, men, and families in rural settings: toward the development of helping communities. Am J Community Psychol. 1987;15:79–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Oswald RF, Culton LS. Under the rainbow: rural gay life and its relevance for family providers. Fam Relat. 2003;52:72–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Stroup J, Glass J, Cohn TJ. The adjustment to U.S. rural college campuses for bisexual students in comparison to gay and lesbian students: an exploratory study. J Bisex. 2014;14:94–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bell J. Why embarrassment inhibits the acquisition and use of condoms: a qualitative approach to understanding risky sexual behaviour. J Adolesc. 2009;32:379–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Garside R, Ayres R, Owen M, Pearson VA, Roizen J. Anonymity and confidentiality: rural teenagers’ concerns when accessing sexual health services. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2002;28:23–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mustanski B. Ethical and regulatory issues with conducting sexuality research with LGBT adolescents: a call to action for a scientifically informed approach. Arch Sex Behav. 2010;40:673–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mustanski B, Newcomb M, Garofalo R. Mental health of lesbian, gay, and bisexual youth: a developmental resiliency perspective. J Gay Lesbian Soc Serv. 2011;23:204–25.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Patton MQ. Qualitative research & evaluation methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2001.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hadden L, Zdeb M. A well-kept SAS® secret. 31st Annual SAS® Users Groups International Conference (SUGI 31). San Francisco, CA 2006.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fisher JD, Fisher WA, Williams SS, Malloy TE. Empirical tests of an information-motivation-behavioral skills model of AIDS-preventive behavior with gay men and heterosexual university students. Health Psychol. 1994;13:238–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Dedoose: Web application for managing, analyzing, and presenting qualitative and mixed method data. [computer program]. Version 4.5.91. Los Angeles, CA: SocioCultural Research Consultants, LLC.; 2012.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Co; 1967.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Carey MA, Smith MW. Capturing the group effect in focus groups: a special concern in analysis. Qual Health Res. 1994;4:123–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ryan GW, Bernard HR. Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods. 2003;15:85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    MacQueen KM, McLellan E, Kay K, Milstein B. Codebook development for team-based qualitative analysis. Field Methods. 1998;10:31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    De Vries H, Elliot MN, Kanouse DE, Teleki SS. Using pooled kappa to summarize interrater agreement across many items. Field Methods. 2008;20:10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1994.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Axinn WG, Pearce LD. Mixed method data collection strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Boardman F, Griffiths F, Kokanovic R, Potiriadis M, Dowrick C, Gunn J. Resilience as a response to the stigma of depression: a mixed methods analysis. J Affect Disord. 2011;135:267–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    DeHaan S, Kuper LE, Magee JC, Bigelow L, Mustanski BS. The interplay between online and offline explorations of identity, relationships, and sex: a mixed-methods study with LGBT youth. J Sex Res. 2013;50:421–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Magee JC, Bigelow L, Dehaan S, Mustanski BS. Sexual health information seeking online: a mixed-methods study among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender young people. Health Educ Behav. 2012;39:276–89.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Mustanski B, Lyons T, Garcia S. Internet use and sexual health of young men who have sex with men: a mixed-methods study. Arch Sex Behav. 2011;40:289–300.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Diclemente RJ. Predictors of HIV-preventive sexual behavior in a high-risk adolescent population: the influence of perceived peer norms and sexual communication on incarcerated adolescents’ consistent use of condoms. J Adolesc Health. 1991;12:385–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Pedlow CT, Carey MP. Developmentally appropriate sexual risk reduction interventions for adolescents: rationale, review of interventions, and recommendations for research and practice. Ann Behav Med. 2004;27:172–84.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Mustanski B, Newcomb ME, DuBois SN, Garcia SC, Grov C. HIV in young men who have sex with men: a review of epidemiology, risk and protective factors, and interventions. J Sex Res. 2011;48:218–53.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Ronis ST, LeBouthillier DM. University students’ attitudes toward purchasing condoms. Can J Hum Sex. 2013;22:86–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Burke RC, Wilson J, Bernstein KT, et al. The NYC condom: use and acceptability of New York City’s branded condom. Am J Public Health. 2009;99:2178–80.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Cohen DA, Farley TA, Bedimo-Etame JR, et al. Implementation of condom social marketing in Louisiana, 1993 to 1996. Am J Public Health. 1999;89:204–8.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Cohen D, Scribner R, Bedimo R, Farley TA. Cost as a barrier to condom use: the evidence for condom subsidies in the United States. Am J Public Health. 1999;89:567–8.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    CDC. High-impact HIV prevention: CDC’s approach to reducing HIV infections in the United States: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention; Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention; 2011.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Newcomb ME, Ryan DT, Garofalo R, Mustanski B. The effects of sexual partnership and relationship characteristics on three sexual risk variables in young men who have sex with men. Arch Sex Behav. 2014;43:61–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Choi KH, Han CS, Hudes ES, Kegeles S. Unprotected sex and associated risk factors among young Asian and Pacific Islander men who have sex with men. AIDS Educ Prev. 2002;14:472–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Hart T, Peterson JL, Community Intervention Trial for Youth Study Team. Predictors of risky sexual behavior among young African American men who have sex with men. Am J Public Health. 2004;94:1122–4.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Stueve A, O’Donnell L, Duran R, San Doval A, Geier J. Being high and taking sexual risks: findings from a multisite survey of urban young men who have sex with men. AIDS Educ Prev. 2002;14:482–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Davidovich U, de Wit JB, Stroebe W. Behavioral and cognitive barriers to safer sex between men in steady relationships: implications for prevention strategies. AIDS Educ Prev. 2004;16:304–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Theodore PS, Duran RE, Antoni MH, Fernandez MI. Intimacy and sexual behavior among HIV-positive men-who-have-sex-with-men in primary relationships. AIDS Behav. 2004;8:321–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Zea MC, Reisen CA, Poppen PJ, Bianchi FT. Unprotected anal intercourse among immigrant Latino MSM: the role of characteristics of the person and the sexual encounter. AIDS Behav. 2009;13:700–15.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    CDC. Prevalence and awareness of HIV infection among men who have sex with men: 21 cities, United States. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2008;2010(59):1201–7.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Stephenson R, Sullivan PS, Salazar LF, Gratzer B, Allen S, Seelbach E. Attitudes towards couples-based HIV testing among MSM in three US cities. AIDS Behav. 2011;15(Suppl 1):S80–7.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    CDC. Couples HIV Testing and Counseling. 2013; Accessed 10 Jan 2014.
  61. 61.
    Brown LK, DiClemente R, Crosby R, et al. Condom use among high-risk adolescents: anticipation of partner disapproval and less pleasure associated with not using condoms. Public Health Rep. 2008;123:601–7.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Randolph ME, Pinkerton SD, Bogart LM, Cecil H, Abramson PR. Sexual pleasure and condom use. Arch Sex Behav. 2007;36:844–8.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Albarracin D, Ho RM, McNatt PS, et al. Structure of outcome beliefs in condom use. The Project RESPECT Study Group. Health Psychol. 2000;19:458–68.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Choi KH, Rickman R, Catania JA. What heterosexual adults believe about condoms. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:406–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Tanner WM, Pollack RH. The effect of condom use and erotic instructions on attitudes toward condoms. J Sex Res. 1988;25:537–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    WHO. Defining sexual health: Report of a technical consultation on sexual health. 2006; Accessed 13 Jan 2014.
  67. 67.
    Mustanski B, Greene GJ, Ryan D, Whitton SW. Feasibility, acceptability, and initial efficacy of an online sexual health promotion program for LGBT youth: The Queer Sex Ed intervention. J Sex Res 2014. doi:10.1080/00224499.2013.867924.
  68. 68.
    Duncan C, Miller DM, Borskey EJ, Fomby B, Dawson P, Davis L. Barriers to safer sex practices among African American college students. J Natl Med Assoc. 2002;94:944–51.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Grossman C, Hadley W, Brown LK, et al. Adolescent sexual risk: factors predicting condom use across the stages of change. AIDS Behav. 2008;12:913–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Thompson SC, Kyle D, Swan J, Thomas C, Vrungos S. Increasing condom use by undermining perceived invulnerability to HIV. AIDS Educ Prev. 2002;14:505–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Frasca T, Ventuneac A, Balan I, Carballo-Dieguez A. Inner contradictions among men who bareback. Qual Health Res. 2012;22:946–56.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Dufour A, Alary M, Otis J, et al. Correlates of risky behaviors among young and older men having sexual relations with men in Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Omega Study Group. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2000;23:272–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Gruber E, Chambers CV. Cognitive development and adolescent contraception: integrating theory and practice. Adolescence. 1987;22:661–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Elkind D. Egocentrism in adolescence. Child Dev. 1967;38(4):1025–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Pequegnat W. Family and HIV/AIDs: cultural and contextual issues in prevention and treatment. New York: Springer; 2011.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Mustanski B, Hunter J. Parents as agents of HIV prevention for gay, lesbian, and bisexual youth. In: Pequegnat W, Bell C, editors. Family and HIV/AIDS: cultural and contextual issues in prevention and treatment. New York: Springer; 2011 Chapter 12.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Garofalo R, Mustanski B, Donenberg G. Parents know and parents matter; is it time to develop family-based HIV prevention programs for young men who have sex with men? J Adolesc Health. 2008;43:201–4.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Mustanski B, Newcomb M, Garofalo R. Mental health of lesbian, gay, and bisexual youth: a developmental resiliency perspective. J Gay Lesbian Soc Serv. 2011;23:204–25.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Garofalo R, Herrick A, Mustanski BS, Donenberg GR. Tip of the iceberg: young men who have sex with men, the Internet, and HIV risk. Am J Public Health. 2007;97:1113–7.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Fox FE, Morris M, Rumsey N. Doing synchronous online focus groups with young people: methodological reflections. Qual Health Res. 2007;17:539–47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brian Mustanski
    • 1
  • L. Zachary DuBois
    • 1
  • Tonya L. Prescott
    • 2
  • Michele L. Ybarra
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Medical Social SciencesNorthwestern University Feinberg School of MedicineChicagoUSA
  2. 2.Center for Innovative Public Health ResearchSan ClementeUSA

Personalised recommendations