AIDS and Behavior

, Volume 18, Issue 2, pp 285–296 | Cite as

Acceptability of Smartphone Application-Based HIV Prevention Among Young Men Who Have Sex With Men

  • Ian W. HollowayEmail author
  • Eric Rice
  • Jeremy Gibbs
  • Hailey Winetrobe
  • Shannon Dunlap
  • Harmony Rhoades
Original Paper


Young men who have sex with men (YMSM) are increasingly using mobile smartphone applications (“apps”), such as Grindr, to meet sex partners. A probability sample of 195 Grindr-using YMSM in Southern California were administered an anonymous online survey to assess patterns of and motivations for Grindr use in order to inform development and tailoring of smartphone-based HIV prevention for YMSM. The number one reason for using Grindr (29 %) was to meet “hook ups.” Among those participants who used both Grindr and online dating sites, a statistically significantly greater percentage used online dating sites for “hook ups” (42 %) compared to Grindr (30 %). Seventy percent of YMSM expressed a willingness to participate in a smartphone app-based HIV prevention program. Development and testing of smartphone apps for HIV prevention delivery has the potential to engage YMSM in HIV prevention programming, which can be tailored based on use patterns and motivations for use.


YMSM HIV Prevention Technology Mobile Smartphone Grindr 


Los hombres que mantienen relaciones sexuales con hombres (YMSM por las siglas en inglés de Young Men Who Have Sex with Men) están utilizando más y más aplicaciones para teléfonos inteligentes (smartphones), como Grindr, para encontrar parejas sexuales. En el Sur de California, se administró de forma anónima un sondeo en internet a una muestra de probabilidad de 195 YMSM usuarios de Grindr, para evaluar los patrones y motivaciones del uso de Grindr, con el fin de utilizar esta información para el desarrollo y personalización de prevención del VIH entre YMSM con base en teléfonos inteligentes. La principal razón para utilizar Grindr (29 %) es para buscar encuentros sexuales casuales (hook-ups). Entre los participantes que utilizan tanto Grindr como otro sitios de citas online, un mayor porcentaje estadísticamente significativo utilizó los sitios de citas online para encuentros casuales sexuales (42 %) comparado con Grindr (30 %). Un setenta porciento de los YMSM expresó su disposición para participar en programas de prevención del VIH con base en teléfonos inteligentes. El desarrollo y evaluación de aplicaciones para teléfonos inteligentes para el suministro de prevención del VIH tiene el potencial de involucrar a los YMSM en la programación de la prevención del VIH, que puede ser adaptada según los patrones y motivaciones de uso.



Writing and revision of this manuscript was supported by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (F31DA031648) and the National Institute of Mental Health (P30MH058107) of the National Institutes of Health. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute on Drug Abuse, the National Institute of Mental Health, or the National Institutes of Health. The authors wish to thank Anamika Barman-Adhikari for her assistance with study design and measure selection, Adam Carranza and Alex Lee for their assistance with survey programming and data collection, Joshua Rusow for his assistance with manuscript preparation and Felipe Osorno for his assistance with Spanish translation. The authors would also like to acknowledge the insightful and practical commentary of the young men who were part of the Community Advisory Board for this research.


  1. 1.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV and AIDS among gay and bisexual men. 2012. Accessed 28 Nov 2013.
  2. 2.
    Prejean J, Song R, Hernandez A, et al. Estimated HIV incidence in the United States, 2006–2009. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(8):e17502. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017502.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Orellana ER, Picciano JF, Roffman RA, Swanson F, Kalichman SC. Correlates of nonparticipation in an HIV prevention program for MSM. AIDS Educ Prev. 2006;18(4):348–61. doi: 10.1521/aeap.2006.18.4.348.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Iguchi MY, Ober AJ, Berry SH, et al. Simultaneous recruitment of drug users and men who have sex with men in the United States and Russia using respondent-driven sampling: sampling methods and implications. J Urban Health. 2009;86(1):5–31. doi: 10.1007/s11524-009-9365-4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Koblin BA, Chesney MA, Husnik MJ, et al. High-risk behaviors among men who have sex with men in 6 US cities: baseline data from the EXPLORE study. Am J Public Health. 2003;93(6):926–32. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.93.6.926.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Harper GW. Sex isn’t that simple: culture and context in HIV prevention interventions for gay and bisexual male adolescents. Am Psychol. 2007;62(8):806. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.62.8.806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mustanski B, Garofalo R, Herrick A, Donenberg G. Psychosocial health problems increase risk for HIV among urban young men who have sex with men: preliminary evidence of a syndemic in need of attention. Ann Behav Med. 2007;34(1):37–45. doi: 10.1007/BF02879919.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mustanski BS, Newcomb ME, Du Bois SN, Garcia SC, Grov C. HIV in young men who have sex with men: a review of epidemiology, risk and protective factors, and interventions. J Sex Res. 2011;48(2–3):218–53. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2011.558645.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Amirkhanian YA, Kelly JA, Kabakchieva E, McAuliffe TL, Vassileva S. Evaluation of a social network HIV prevention intervention program for young men who have sex with men in Russia and Bulgaria. AIDS Educ Prev. 2003;15(3):205–20. doi: 10.1521/aeap. Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hays RB, Rebchook GM, Kegeles SM. The Mpowerment Project: community-building with young gay and bisexual men to prevent HIV. Am J Community Psychol. 2003;31(3–4):301–12. doi: 10.1023/A:1023966905973.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Remafedi G. Cognitive and behavioral adaptations to HIV/AIDS among gay and bisexual adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 1994;15(2):142–8. doi: 10.1016/1054-139X(94)90541-X.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kegeles SM, Hays RB, Coates TJ. The Mpowerment Project: a community-level HIV prevention intervention for young gay men. Am J Public Health. 1996;86(8):1129–36. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.86.8_Pt_1.1129.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Holloway IW, Cederbaum J, Ajayi A, Shoptaw S. Where are the young men in HIV prevention efforts? Comments on HIV prevention programs and research from young men who have sex with men in Los Angeles County. J Prim Prev. 2012;33(5–6):271–8. doi: 10.1007/s10935-012-0282-z.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Seal DW, Kell JA, Bloom FR, et al. HIV prevention with young men who have sex with men: what young men themselves say is needed. AIDS Care. 2000;12(1):5–26. doi: 10.1080/09540120047431.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lenhart A, Purcell K, Smith A, Zickuhr K. Social media and young adults. 2010. Accessed 8 Apr 2013.
  16. 16.
    Kubicek K, Carpineto J, McDavitt B, et al. Integrating professional and folk models of HIV risk: YMSM’s perceptions of high-risk sex. AIDS Educ Prev. 2008;20(3):220–38. doi: 10.1521/aeap.2008.20.3.220.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kubicek K, Carpineto J, McDavitt B, Weiss G, Kipke M. Use and perceptions of the internet for sexual information and partners: a study of young men who have sex with men. Arch Sex Behav. 2011;40(4):803–16. doi: 10.1007/s10508-010-9666-4.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mustanski B, Lyons T, Garcia SC. Internet use and sexual health of young men who have sex with men: a mixed-methods study. Arch Sex Behav. 2011;40(2):289–300. doi: 10.1007/s10508-009-9596-1.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kingdon MJ, Storholm ED, Halkitis PN, et al. Targeting HIV prevention messaging to a new generation of gay, bisexual, and other young men who have sex with men. J Health Commun. 2013;18(3):325–42. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2012.727953.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bauermeister JA, Giguere R, Carbello-Dieguez A, Ventuneac A, Eisenburg A. Perceived risks and protective strategies employed by young men who have sex with men (YMSM) when seeking online sexual partners. J Health Commun. 2010;15(6):679–90. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2010.499597.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bauermeister JA, Leslie-Santana M, Johns MM, Pingel E, Eisenberg A. Mr. right and Mr. right now: romantic and casual partner-seeking online among young men who have sex with men. AIDS Behav. 2011;15(2):261–72. doi: 10.1007/s10461-010-9834-5.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Garofalo R, Herrick A, Mustanski BS, Donenberg GR. Tip of the iceberg: young men who have sex with men, the internet, and HIV risk. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(6):1113–7. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.075630.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Liau A, Millett G, Marks G. Meta-analytic examination of online sex-seeking and sexual risk behavior among men who have sex with men. Sex Transm Infect. 2006;33(9):576–84. doi: 10.1097/01.olq.0000204710.35332.c5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mustanski BS. Are sexual partners met online associated with HIV/STI risk behaviours? Retrospective and daily diary data in conflict. AIDS Care. 2007;19(6):822–7. doi: 10.1080/09540120701237244.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chiasson MA, Hirshfield S, Remien RH, et al. A comparison of on-line and off-line sexual risk in men who have sex with men: an event-based on-line survey. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2007;44(2):235–43. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e31802e298c.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jenness SM, Neaigus A, Hagan H, et al. Reconsidering the internet as an HIV/STD risk for men who have sex with men. AIDS Behav. 2010;14(6):1353–61. doi: 10.1007/s10461-010-9769-x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kim AA, Kent C, McFarland W, Klausner JD. Cruising on the internet highway. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2001;28(1):89–93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Horvath KJ, Rosser BR, Remafedi G. Sexual risk taking among young internet-using men who have sex with men. Am J Public Health. 2008;98(6):1059–67. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.111070.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rosser BR, Oakes JM, Horvath KJ, et al. HIV sexual risk behavior by men who use the Internet to seek sex with men: results of the Men’s INTernet Sex Study-II (MINTS-II). AIDS Behav. 2009;13(3):488–98. doi: 10.1007/s10461-009-9524-3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bauermeister JA. Romantic ideation, partner-seeking, and HIV risk among young gay and bisexual men. Arch Sex Behav. 2012;41(2):431–40. doi: 10.1007/s10508-011-9747-z.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Dragowski EA, Halkitis PN, Moeller RW, Siconolfi DE. Social and sexual contexts explain sexual risk taking in young gay, bisexual, and other young men who have sex with men, ages 13–29 years. J HIV AIDS Soc Serv. 2013;12(2):236–55. doi: 10.1080/15381501.2013.793058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bailey JV, Murray E, Rait G, Mercer CH, Morris RW, Peacock R. Computer-based interventions for sexual health promotion: systematic review and meta analysis. Int J STD AIDS. 2012;23(6):408–13. doi: 10.1258/ijsa.2011.011221.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Noar SM. Computer technology-based interventions in HIV prevention: state of the evidence and future directions for research. AIDS Care. 2011;23(5):525–33. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2010.516349.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ybarra ML, Bull SS. Current trends in internet and cell phone-based HIV prevention and intervention programs. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2007;4(4):201–7. doi: 10.1007/s11904-007-0029-2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bowen AM, Williams ML, Daniel CM, Clayton S. Internet based HIV prevention research targeting rural MSM: feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy. J Behav Med. 2008;31(6):463–77. doi: 10.1007/s10865-008-9171-6.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Chiasson MA, Shaw FS, Humberstone M, Hirschfield S, Hartel D. Increased HIV disclosure 3 months after an online video intervention for men who have sex with men (MSM). AIDS Care. 2009;21(9):1081–9. doi: 10.1080/09540120902730013.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Carpenter KM, Stoner SA, Mikko AN, Dhanak LP, Parsons JT. Efficacy of a web-based intervention to reduce sexual risk in men who have sex with men. AIDS Behav. 2010;14(3):549–57. doi: 10.1007/s10461-009-9578-2.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Bourne C, Knight V, Guy R, Wand H, Lu H, McNulty A. Short message service reminder intervention doubles sexually transmitted/HIV re-testing rates among men who have sex with men. Sex Transm Infect. 2011;87(3):229–31. doi: 10.1136/sti.2010.048397.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Juzang I, Fortune T, Black S, Wright E, Bull S. A pilot programme using mobile phones for HIV prevention. J Telemed Telecare. 2011;17(3):150–3. doi: 10.1258/jtt.2010.091107.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Reback CJ, Grant DL, Fletcher JB, et al. Text messaging reduces HIV risk behaviors among methamphetamine-using men who have sex with men. AIDS Behav. 2012;16(7):1993–2002. doi: 10.1007/s10461-012-0200-7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Landovitz RJ, Tseng C, Weissman M, et al. Epidemiology, sexual risk behavior, and HIV prevention practices of men who have sex with men using GRINDR in Los Angeles, California. J Urban Health. 2012;90(4):729–39. doi: 10.1007/s11524-012-9766-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Rice E, Holloway IW, Winetrobe H, et al. Sex risk among young men who have sex with men who use Grindr, a smartphone geosocial networking application. J AIDS Clinic Res. 2012;S4:005. doi: 10.4172/2155-6113.S4-005.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Grindr LLC. The world’s biggest mobile network of guys. 2013. Accessed 11 Nov 2013.
  44. 44.
    Burrell ER, Pines HA, Robbie E, et al. Use of the location-based social networking application GRINDR as a recruitment tool in rectal microbicide development research. AIDS Behav. 2012;16(7):1816–20. doi: 10.1007/s10461-012-0277-z.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kok G, Harterink P, Vriens P, de Zwart O, Hospers HJ. The gay cruise: developing a theory-and evidence-based Internet HIV-prevention intervention. Sex Res Soc Policy. 2006;3(2):52–67. doi: 10.1525/srsp.2006.3.2.52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    SPSS Statistics for Windows [computer software]. Version 19. Armonk (NY): IBM; 2010.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Hooper S, Rosser S, Horvath KJ, Oakes JM, Danilenko G. The Men’s INTernet Sex II (MINTS-II) Team. An online needs assessment of a virtual community: what men who use the internet to seek sex with men what in internet-based HIV prevention. AIDS Behav. 2008;12(6):867–75. doi: 10.1007/s10461-008-9373-5.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Muessig KE, Pike EC, Fowler B, et al. Putting prevention in their pockets: developing mobile phone-based HIV interventions for black men who have sex with men. AIDS Patient Care STDs. 2013;27(4):211–22. doi: 10.1089/apc.2012.0404.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Smith A. Smart phone ownership. 2013. Accessed 5 June 2013.
  50. 50.
    Istepanian RSH, Laxminarayn S, Pattichis CS. M-Health: emerging mobile health systems. Berlin: Springer; 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Fox S, Duggan M. Mobile health. 2013. Accessed 5 June 2013.
  52. 52.
    Eisenberg A, Bauermeister J, Pingel E, Johns M, Santana M. Achieving safety: safer sex, communication and desire among young gay men. J Adolesc Res. 2011;26(5):645–69. doi: 10.1177/0743558411402342.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Read S, Miller L, Appleby P, et al. Socially optimized learning in a virtual environment: reducing risky sexual behavior among men who have sex with men. Hum Commun Res. 2006;32(1):1–34. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2006.00001.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    National Association for County and City Health Officials. Statement of policy—use of the internet and other technologies for STI/HIV prevention and intervention activities. 2011. Accessed 5 June 2013.
  55. 55.
    United States Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Population Affairs. Affordable Care Act. 2013. Accessed 2 Aug 2013.
  56. 56.
    Hightow-Weidman LB, Fowler B, Kibe J, et al. development of a theory-based HIV/STI website for young black MSM. AIDS Educ Prev. 2011;23(1):1–12. doi: 10.1521/aeap.2011.23.1.1.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ian W. Holloway
    • 1
    Email author
  • Eric Rice
    • 2
  • Jeremy Gibbs
    • 2
  • Hailey Winetrobe
    • 2
  • Shannon Dunlap
    • 1
  • Harmony Rhoades
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Social Welfare, Luskin School of Public AffairsUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.School of Social WorkUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations