Advertisement

AIDS and Behavior

, Volume 18, Issue 3, pp 452–463 | Cite as

Associations Between Injection Risk and Community Disadvantage Among Suburban Injection Drug Users in Southwestern Connecticut, USA

  • Robert HeimerEmail author
  • Russell Barbour
  • Wilson R. Palacios
  • Lisa G. Nichols
  • Lauretta E. Grau
Original Paper

Abstract

Increases in drug abuse, injection, and opioid overdoses in suburban communities led us to study injectors residing in suburban communities in southwestern Connecticut, US. We sought to understand the influence of residence on risk and injection-associated diseases. Injectors were recruited by respondent-driven sampling and interviewed about sociodemographics, somatic and mental health, injection risk, and interactions with healthcare, harm reduction, substance abuse treatment, and criminal justice systems. HIV, hepatitis B and C (HBV and HCV) serological testing was also conducted. Our sample was consistent in geographic distribution and age to the general population and to the patterns of heroin-associated overdose deaths in the suburban towns. High rates of interaction with drug abuse treatment and criminal justice systems contrasted with scant use of harm reduction services. The only factors associated with both dependent variables—residence in less disadvantaged census tracts and more injection risk—were younger age and injecting in one’s own residence. This contrasts with the common association among urban injectors of injection-associated risk behaviors and residence in disadvantaged communities. Poor social support and moderate/severe depression were associated with risky injection practices (but not residence in specific classes of census tracts), suggesting that a region-wide dual diagnosis approach to the expansion of harm reduction services could be effective at reducing the negative consequences of injection drug use.

Keywords

Injection drug use Suburbs Injection risk Community disadvantage index Harm reduction Substance abuse treatment Criminal justice 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a grant from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (1R01DA023408). Dr. Palacios was supported by a diversity supplement awarded to this Grant. The authors would especially like to thank John Hamilton, Joann Montgomery, and the staff at the Center for Human Services, part of the Recovery Network of Programs, who arranged for many of the seeds to contact our study. The authors also wish to thank Amisha Patel who performed the serological testing.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

References

  1. 1.
    Cicero TJ, Surratt H, Inciardi JA, Munoz A. Relationship between therapeutic use and abuse of opioid analgesics in rural, suburban, and urban locations in the United States. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2007;16:827–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Calefati J. Heroin hits the suburbs-hard. A sad trail of abuse is spreading beyond the Northeast’s inner cities. US News World Rep. 2008;145:27–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kline A, Mammo A, Culleton R, et al. Trends in injection drug use among persons entering addiction treatment—New Jersey, 1992–1999. MMWR. 2001;50:378–81.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Subramaniam GA, Stitzer MA. Clinical characteristics of treatment-seeking prescription opioid vs. heroin-using adolescents with opioid use disorder. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009;101:13–9.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Thorpe LE, Bailey SL, Huo D, Monterosso ER, Ouellet LJ. Injection-related risk behaviors in young urban and suburban injection drug users in Chicago (1997–1999). J AIDS. 2001;27:71–8.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    National Survey on Drug Use & Health. U. S. Department of Health & Human Services. 2011. http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/nsduh/reports.htm. Accessed 27 Sept 2011.
  7. 7.
    Johnston LD, O’Malley PM, Bachman JG, Schulenberg JE. Monitoring the future: national survey results on drug use, 1975–2010. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan; 2011.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Luthar SS, Goldstein AS. Substance use and related behaviors among suburban late adolescents: the importance of perceived parent containment. Dev Psychopathol. 2008;20:591–614.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    McMahon TJ, Luthar SS. Patterns and correlates of substance use among affluent, suburban high school students. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2006;35:72–89.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Watson CA, Weng CX, French T, et al. Substance abuse treatment utilization, HIV risk behaviors, and recruitment among suburban injection drug users in Long Island, New York. AIDS Behav. 2013. doi: 10.1007/s10461-013-0512-2.
  11. 11.
    Green TC, Grau LE, Colon N, Carver HW, Kinzly ML, Heimer R. Trends in fatal opioid intoxications in Connecticut: 1997–2007. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2011;115:221–8.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Boardman JD, Finch BK, Ellison CG, Williams DR, Jackson JS. Neighborhood disadvantage, stress, and drug use among adults. J Health Soc Behav. 2001;42:151–65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ford JM, Beveridge AA. Varieties of substance use and visible drug problems: individual and neighborhood factors. J Drug Issues. 2006;36:377–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Galea S, Rudenstine S, Vlahov D. Drug use, misuse, and the urban environment. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2005;24:127–36.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pratt TC, Cullen FT. Assessing macro-level predictors and theories of crime: a meta-analysis. Crime Justice Rev Res. 2005;32:373–450.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bluthenthal RN, Do DP, Finch B, Martinez A, Edlin BR, Kral AH. Community characteristics associated with HIV risk among injection drug users in the San Francisco Bay Area: a multilevel analysis. J Urban Health. 2007;84:653–66.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Watters JK, Bluthenthal RN, Kral AH. HIV seroprevalence in injection drug users. JAMA. 1995;273:1178.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Heckathorn D. Respondent driven sampling II: deriving valid population estimates from chain-referral samples of hidden populations. Soc Probl. 2002;49:11–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Heckathorn DD. Respondent-driven sampling; a new approach to the study of hidden populations. Soc Probl. 1997;44:174–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Salganik MJ, Heckathorn DD. Sampling and estimation in hidden populations using respondent-driven sampling. Sociol Methodol. 2004;34:193–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    National Institute on Drug Abuse. Risk behavior assessment. Rockville: NIDA; 1991.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Heimer R, Clair S, Grau LE, Bluthenthal RN, Marshall PA, Singer M. Hepatitis-associated knowledge is low and risks are high among HIV-aware injection drug users in three US cities. Addiction. 2002;97:1277–87.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Heimer R, Grau LE, Curtin E, Khoshnood K, Singer M. Should HIV testing programs for urban injection drug users be expanded? Am J Public Health. 2006;97:110–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Heimer R, Khoshnood K, Bigg D, Guydish J, Junge B. Syringe use and re-use: effects of syringe exchange programs in four cities. J AIDS. 1998;18(suppl. 1):S37–44.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Niccolai LM, Toussova OV, Verevochkin SV, Barbour R, Heimer R, Kozlov AP. High HIV prevalence, suboptimal HIV testing, and low knowledge of HIV-positive serostatus among injection drug users in St. Petersburg, Russia. AIDS Behav. 2010;14:932–41.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Niccolai LM, Verevochkin SV, Toussova OV, et al. Estimates of HIV incidence among drug users in St. Petersburg, Russia: continued growth of a rapidly expanding epidemic. Eur J Pub Health. 2011;21:613–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    McLellan AT, Luborsky L, O’Brien CP, Woody GE. An improved diagnostic instrument for substance abuse patients, the addiction severity index. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1980;168:26–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Stoffelmayr BE, Mavis BE, Kasim RM. The longitudinal stability of the addiction severity index. J Subst Abuse Treat. 1994;11:373–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Radloff LS. The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas. 1977;1:385–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Beck AT, Epstein N, Brown G, Steer RA. An inventory for measuring anxiety: psychometric properties. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1988;56:893–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Beck AT, Steer RA. Beck anxiety inventory manual. San Antonio: The Psychological Corp., Harcourt Brace & Co.; 1993.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bradley KA, DeBenedetti AF, Volk RJ, Williams EC, Frank D, Kivlahan DR. AUDIT-C as a brief screen for alcohol misuse in primary care. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2007;31:1208–17.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bush K, Kivlahan DR, McDonnell MB, Fihn SD, Bradley KA. The AUDIT alcohol consumption questions (AUDIT-C): an effective brief screening test for problem drinking. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:1789–95.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Cleeland CS. Measurement of pain by subjective report. In: Chapman CR, Loeser JD, editors. Advances in pain research and therapy: issues in pain management, vol. 12. New York: Raven Press; 1989. p. 391–403.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Keller S, Bann CM, Didd SL, Schein J, Mendoza TR, Cleeland CS. Validity of the brief pain inventory for use in documenting the outcomes of patients with noncancer pain. Clin J Pain. 2004;20:309–18.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zimet GD, Dahlem NW, Zimet SG, Farley GK. The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. J Pers Assess. 1988;52:30–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Iguchi M, Ober A, Berry S, et al. Simultaneous recruitment of drug users and men who have sex with men in the United States and Russia using respondent driven sampling: sampling methods and implications. J Urban Health. 2009;86(Suppl 1):5–31.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Volz E, Heckathorn DD. Probability based estimation theory for respondent-driven sampling. J Off Stat. 2008;24:79–97.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Lauritsen JL. The social ecology of violent victimization: individual and contextual effects in the NCVS. J Quant Criminol. 2001;17:3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. The Socioeconomic Mapping and Resource Topography (SMART) System. Washington, D.C.: U. S. Department of Justice; 2010. http://www.smartgis.info/smart/About.aspx. Accessed 26 June, 2013.
  41. 41.
    Lauritsen JL, Heimer K. Violent victimization among males and economic conditions: the vulnerability of race and ethnic minorities. Criminol Public Policy. 2010;9:665–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Autom Control. 1974;19:716–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Galbraith S, Daniel JA, Vissel B. A study of clustered data and approaches to its analysis. J Neurosci. 2010;30:10601–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Hardin J, Hibble J. Generalized estimating equations. New York: Chapman & Hall/CRC; 2003.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Pan W. Akaike’s information criterion in generalized estimating equations. Biometrics. 2001;57:120–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Hocking D. R script to calculate QIC for Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) Model Selection, 2012. http://danieljhocking.wordpress.com/2012/03/24/r-script-to-calculate-qic-for-generalized-estimating-equation-gee-model-selection/. Last Accessed 25 June 2013.
  47. 47.
    Buchanan D, Tooze JA, Shaw S, Kinzly M, Heimer R, Singer M. Demographic, HIV risk behavior, and health status characteristics of “crack” cocaine injectors compared to other injection drug users in three New England cities. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2006;81:221–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Heimer R, Grau LE, Singer M, et al. Hepatitis B virus prevalence and vaccination rates among Hispanic injection drug users participating in a vaccination campaign operated at syringe exchange programs. J Drug Issues. 2008;38:335–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Des Jarlais DC, Arasteh K, Friedman SR. HIV among drug users at Beth Israel Medical Center, New York City, the first 25 years. Subst Use Misuse. 2011;46:131–9.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Mark HD, Nanda J, Davis-Vogel A, et al. Profiles of self-reported HIV-risk behaviors among injection drug users in methadone maintenance treatment, detoxification, and needle exchange programs. Public Health Nurs. 2006;23:11–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Fuller CM, Galea S, Caceres W, Blaney S, Sisco S, Vlahov D. Multilevel community-based intervention to increase access to sterile syringes among injection drug users through pharmacy sales in New York City. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(1):117–24.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Mitty JA, Bazerman LB, Selwyn K, Beckwith CG, Zaller ND, Rich JD. Decrease in the proportion of injecting drug use-related HIV/AIDS in Massachusetts, New York, Connecticut, and Rhode Island. AIDS Read. 2008;18:596–600.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Kaplan E. Needles that kill: modeling human immuno-deficiency virus transmission via shared drug injection equipment in shooting galleries. Rev Infect Dis. 1989;11:289–98 (erratum Rev Infect Dis 211: 672).Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Kaplan EH, Heimer R. A circulation theory of needle exchange. AIDS. 1994;8:567–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Mills S, Saidel T, Magnani R, Brown T. Surveillance and modelling of HIV, STI, and risk behaviours in concentrated HIV epidemics. Sex Transm Infect. 2004;80(Suppl 2):ii57–ii62.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Perucci CA, Abeni D, Arca M, Davoli M, Pugliese A. Modelling the HIV and AIDS epidemic among drug injectors. In: Ball A, Stimson GV, Des Jarlais DC, editors. Drug injecting and HIV infection: global dimensions and local responses. London: UCL Press; 1998.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Short LJ, Bell DM. Risk of occupational infection with blood-borne pathogens in operating and delivery room settings. Am J Infect Control. 1993;21:343–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Pollack HA and Heimer R. The impact and cost-effectiveness of methadone maintenance treatment in preventing HIV and hepatitis C. Chapter 17 In: Weissing L, Jager JC, editors. Impact and costs of hepatitis C in injecting drug users in the European Union. Lisbon: European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction; 2003, pp. 345–67.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Vickerman P, Hickman M, Judd A. Modelling the impact on HCV transmission of reducing syringe sharing: London case study. Int J Epidemiol. 2007;36:396–405.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    The Ohio Substance Abuse Monitoring Network. Highlights of Statewide Drug Use Trends: January 2005–June 2005. Columbus, OH: Wright State University, University of Akron. 2005. http://www.odadas.state.oh.us/public/OsamHome.aspx. Last Accessed 25 June 2013.
  61. 61.
    Young AM, Havens JR. Transition from first illicit drug use to first injection drug use among rural Appalachian drug users: a cross-sectional comparison and retrospective survival analysis. Addiction. 2012;107:597–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Grau LE, Dasgupta N, Phinney A, et al. Illicit use of opiates: is OxyContin® a “gateway drug”? Am J Addict. 2007;16:166–73.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Meade CS, McDonald LJ, Weiss RD. HIV risk behavior in opioid dependent adults seeking detoxification treatment: an exploratory comparison of heroin and oxycodone users. Am J Addict. 2009;18:289–93.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    U. S. Census Bureau. Census 2000 summary file 3. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau; 2000.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Gile KJ, Johnston LG, Salganik M. Diagnostics for respondent-driven sampling. arXiv. 2012:1–41.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Newman JC, Des Jarlais DC, Turner CF, Gribble J, Cooley P, Paone D. The differential effects of face-to-face and computer interview modes. Am J Public Health. 2002;92:294–7.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Turner CF, Ku L, Rogers SM, Lindberg LD, Pleck JH, Sonenstein FL. Adolescent sexual behavior, drug use, and violence: increased reporting with computer survey technology. Science. 1998;280:867–73.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Heimer
    • 1
    Email author
  • Russell Barbour
    • 2
  • Wilson R. Palacios
    • 3
  • Lisa G. Nichols
    • 4
  • Lauretta E. Grau
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases and the Center for Interdisciplinary Research on AIDSYale University School of Public HealthNew HavenUSA
  2. 2.The Center for Interdisciplinary Research on AIDSYale University School of Public HealthNew HavenUSA
  3. 3.Department of Criminology, College of Arts and SciencesUniversity of South FloridaTampaUSA
  4. 4.Department of Internal MedicineYale School of MedicineNew HavenUSA

Personalised recommendations