A Peer-Educator Network HIV Prevention Intervention Among Injection Drug Users: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial in St. Petersburg, Russia
- 386 Downloads
We evaluated the efficacy of a peer-educator network intervention as a strategy to reduce HIV acquisition among injection drug users (IDUs) and their drug and/or sexual networks. A randomized controlled trial was conducted in St. Petersburg, Russia among IDU index participants and their risk network participants. Network units were randomized to the control or experimental intervention. Only the experimental index participants received training sessions to communicate risk reduction techniques to their network members. Analysis includes 76 index and 84 network participants who were HIV uninfected. The main outcome measure was HIV sero-conversion. The incidence rates in the control and experimental groups were 19.57 (95 % CI 10.74–35.65) and 7.76 (95 % CI 3.51–17.19) cases per 100 p/y, respectively. The IRR was 0.41 (95 % CI 0.15–1.08) without a statistically significant difference between the two groups (log rank test statistic X2 = 2.73, permutation p value = 0.16). Retention rate was 67 % with a third of the loss due to incarceration or death. The results show a promising trend that this strategy would be successful in reducing the acquisition of HIV among IDUs.
KeywordsInjection drug users Russia HIV prevention Network
- 1.Global HIV/AIDS response––progress report 2011. Geneva: UNAIDS http://www.unaids.org/en/media/unaids/contentassets/documents/unaidspublication/2011/20111130_UA_Report_en.pdf (2011).
- 7.Verevochkin SV, Gagarina SN, Skochilov RV et al. High HIV incidence rate in St. Petersburg IDU cohort [TUPE346]. Paper presented at 6th IAS conference on HIV pathogenesis, treatment and prevention, in 6th IAS conference on HIV pathogenesis, treatment and prevention, Rome, Italy; 2011.Google Scholar
- 9.Rhodes T, Mikhailova L, Sarang A, Lowndes CM, Rylkov A, Khutorskoy M, Renton A. Situational factors influencing drug injecting, risk reduction and syringe exchange in Togliatti City, Russian Federation: a qualitative study of micro risk environment. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57(1):39–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.WHO/Europe website. http://www.euro.who.int/en/what-we-do/health-topics/communicable-diseases/hivaids/policy/injecting-drug-users-idu. Accessed on 04/15/2012.
- 12.Latkin C, Knowlton AR. Social network approaches to HIV prevention: implications to community impact and sustainability. In: Trickett EJ, Pequegnat W, editors. Community interventions and AIDS. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005. p. 105.Google Scholar
- 14.Rogers E. Diffusion of innovations, vol. 5th. New York: Free Press; 2003.Google Scholar
- 15.Bandura A. Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall; 1977.Google Scholar
- 16.Turner JC. Social comparison and social identity: some perspectives for intergroup behavior. Eur J Soc Psychol. 1978;5:5–34.Google Scholar
- 17.Festinger L. Conflict, decision and dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 1964.Google Scholar
- 18.Van Knippenberg D. Group norms, prototypicality, and persuasion. In: Terry DJ, Hogg MA, editors. Attitudes, behavior, and social context: the role of norms and group membership. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2000. p. 157.Google Scholar
- 19.Jannis LL, Mann L. Effectiveness of emotional role-playing in modifying smoking habits and attitudes. J Exp Res Pers. 1977;1:84–90.Google Scholar
- 20.Terry DJ, Hogg MA. Attitudes, behavior, and social context: the role of norms and group membership. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2000.Google Scholar
- 27.Latkin CA, Donnell D, Metzger D, Sherman S, Aramrattna A, Davis-Vogel A, Quan VM, Gandham S, Vongchak T, Perdue T, Celentano DD. The efficacy of a network intervention to reduce HIV risk behaviors among drug users and risk partners in Chiang Mai, Thailand and Philadelphia. USA Soc Sci Med. 2009;68(4):740–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar