Advertisement

AIDS and Behavior

, Volume 18, Issue 3, pp 473–485 | Cite as

“People Knew They Could Come Here to Get Help”: An Ethnographic Study of Assisted Injection Practices at a Peer-Run ‘Unsanctioned’ Supervised Drug Consumption Room in a Canadian Setting

  • Ryan McNeil
  • Will Small
  • Hugh Lampkin
  • Kate Shannon
  • Thomas KerrEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

People who require help injecting are disproportionately vulnerable to drug-related harm, including HIV transmission. North America’s only sanctioned SIF operates in Vancouver, Canada under an exemption to federal drug laws, which imposes operating regulations prohibiting assisted injections. In response, the Vancouver Area Network of Drug Users (VANDU) launched a peer-run unsanctioned SIF in which trained peer volunteers provide assisted injections to increase the coverage of supervised injection services and minimize drug-related harm. We undertook qualitative interviews (n = 23) and ethnographic observation (50 h) to explore how this facility shaped assisted injection practices. Findings indicated that VANDU reshaped the social, structural, and spatial contexts of assisted injection practices in a manner that minimized HIV and other health risks, while allowing people who require help injecting to escape drug scene violence. Findings underscore the need for changes to regulatory frameworks governing SIFs to ensure that they accommodate people who require help injecting.

Keywords

Drug users Harm reduction HIV risk behaviors Supervised injecting facilities Peer-based interventions Risk environments Ethnography 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank VANDU and study participants for their contribution to the research. We also thank current and present staff at the British Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS for their research and administrative support. The study was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP–81171) and the US National Institutes of Health (R01DA033147). Ryan McNeil is supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council. Will Small and Thomas Kerr are supported by the Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research. Kate Shannon is supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research.

References

  1. 1.
    Degenhardt L, Bucello C, Mathers B, Briegleb C, Ali H, Hickman M, et al. Mortality among regular or dependent users of heroin and other opioids: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Addiction. 2011;106(1):32–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Degenhardt L, Singleton J, Calabria B, McLaren J, Kerr T, Mehta S, et al. Mortality among cocaine users: a systematic review of cohort studies. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2011;113(2–3):88–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wood E, Kerr T, Tyndall MW, Montaner JS. A review of barriers and facilitators of HIV treatment among injection drug users. AIDS. 2008;22(11):1247–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Aceijas C, Rhodes T. Global estimates of prevalence of HCV infection among injecting drug users. Int J Drug Pol. 2007;18(5):352–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mathers BM, Degenhardt L, Phillips B, Wiessing L, Hickman M, Strathdee SA, et al. Global epidemiology of injecting drug use and HIV among people who inject drugs: a systematic review. Lancet. 2008;372(9651):1733–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rhodes T. Risk environments and drug harms: a social science for harm reduction approach. Int J Drug Pol. 2009;20(3):193–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rhodes T, Singer M, Bourgois P, Friedman SR, Strathdee SA. The social structural production of HIV risk among injecting drug users. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61(5):1026–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rhodes T. The ‘risk environment’: a framework for understanding and reducing drug-related harm. Int J Drug Pol. 2002;13(2):85–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Strathdee SA, Hallett TB, Bobrova N, Rhodes T, Booth R, Abdool R, et al. HIV and risk environment for injecting drug users: the past, present, and future. Lancet. 2010;376(9737):268–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rhodes T, Wagner K, Strathdee SA, Shannon K, Davidson P, Bourgois P. Structural violence and structural vulnerability within the risk environment: theoretical and methodological perspectives for a social epidemiology of HIV risk among injection drug users and sex workers. In: O’Campo P, Dunn JR, editors. Rethinking social epidemiology: towards a science of change. New York: Springer; 2012. p. 205–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Quesada J, Hart LK, Bourgois P. Structural vulnerability and health: latino migrant laborers in the United States. Med Anthropol. 2011;30(4):339–62.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Richardson L, Wood E, Kerr T. The impact of social, structural and physical environmental factors on transitions into employment among people who inject drugs. Soc Sci Med. 2013;76:126–33.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Goldenberg SM, Strathdee SA, Gallardo M, Nguyen L, Lozada R, Semple SJ, et al. How important are venue-based HIV risks among male clients of female sex workers? A mixed methods analysis of the risk environment in nightlife venues in Tijuana, Mexico. Health Place. 2011;17(3):748–56.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rhodes T, Kimber J, Small W, Fitzgerald J, Kerr T, Hickman M, et al. Public injecting and the need for ‘safer environment interventions’ in the reduction of drug-related harm. Addiction. 2006;101(10):1384–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fast D, Small W, Wood E, Kerr T. Coming ‘down here’: young people’s reflections on becoming entrenched in a local drug scene. Soc Sci Med. 2009;69(8):1204–10.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cooper HL, Bossak BH, Tempalski B, Friedman SR, Des Jarlais DC. Temporal trends in spatial access to pharmacies that sell over-the-counter syringes in New York City health districts: relationship to local racial/ethnic composition and need. J Urban Health. 2009;86(6):929–45.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Small W, Rhodes T, Wood E, Kerr T. Public injection settings in Vancouver: physical environment, social context and risk. Int J Drug Pol. 2007;18(1):27–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Parkin S, Coomber R. Public injecting drug use and the social production of harmful practice in high-rise tower blocks (London, UK): a Lefebvrian analysis. Health Place. 2011;17(3):717–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rhodes T, Watts L, Davies S, Martin A, Smith J, Clark D, et al. Risk, shame and the public injector: a qualitative study of drug injecting in South Wales. Soc Sci Med. 2007;65(3):572–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bourgois P, Schonberg J. Righteous dopefiend. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2009.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bourgois P, Prince B, Moss A. The everyday violence of hepatitis C among young women who inject drugs in San Francisco. Hum Organ. 2004;63(3):253–64.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fairbairn N, Small W, Van Borek N, Wood E, Kerr T. Social structural factors that shape assisted injecting practices among injection drug users in Vancouver, Canada: a qualitative study. Harm Reduct J. 2010;7:20.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Epele ME. Gender, violence and HIV: women’s survival in the streets. Cult Med Psychiatr. 2002;26(1):33–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shannon K, Kerr T, Marshall BDL, Li K, Zhang R, Strathdee SA, et al. Survival sex work involvement as a primary risk factor for hepatitis C virus acquisition in drug-using youths in a Canadian setting. Arch Pediat Adol Med. 2010;164(1):61–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Shannon K, Rusch M, Shoveller J, Alexson D, Gibson K, Tyndall MW. Mapping violence and policing as an environmental–structural barrier to health service and syringe availability among substance-using women in street-level sex work. Int J Drug Pol. 2008;19(2):140–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    O’Connell JM, Kerr T, Li K, Tyndall MW, Hogg RS, Montaner JS, et al. Requiring help injecting independently predicts incident HIV infection among injection drug users. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2005;40(1):83–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wood E, Spittal PM, Kerr T, Small W, Tyndall MW, O’Shaughnessy MV, et al. Requiring help injecting as a risk factor for HIV infection in the Vancouver epidemic: implications for HIV prevention. Can J Public Health. 2003;94(5):355–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kral AH, Bluthenthal RN, Erringer EA, Lorvick J, Edlin BR. Risk factors among IDUs who give injections to or receive injections from other drug users. Addiction. 1999;94(5):675–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Miller CL, Johnston C, Spittal PM, Li K, Laliberte N, Montaner JS, et al. Opportunities for prevention: hepatitis C prevalence and incidence in a cohort of young injection drug users. Hepatology. 2002;36(3):737–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Maher L, Jalaludin B, Chant KG, Jayasuriya R, Sladden T, Kaldor JM, et al. Incidence and risk factors for hepatitis C seroconversion in injecting drug users in Australia. Addiction. 2006;101(10):1499–508.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wood E, Tyndall MW, Spittal PM, Li K, Kerr T, Hogg RS, et al. Unsafe injection practices in a cohort of injection drug users in Vancouver: could safer injecting rooms help? CMAJ. 2001;165(4):405–10.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Robertson AM, Vera AY, Gallardo M, Pollini RA, Patterson TL, Case P, et al. Correlates of seeking injection assistance among injection drug users in Tijuana, Mexico. Am J Addict. 2010;19(4):357–63.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Evans JL, Hahn JA, Page-Shafer K, Lum PJ, Stein ES, Davidson PJ, et al. Gender differences in sexual and injection risk behavior among active young injection drug users in San Francisco (the UFO Study). J Urban Health. 2003;80(1):137–46.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lloyd-Smith E, Rachlis BS, Tobin D, Stone D, Li K, Small W, et al. Assisted injection in outdoor venues: an observational study of risks and implications for service delivery and harm reduction programming. Harm Reduc J. 2010;7:6–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lloyd-Smith E, Wood E, Zhang R, Tyndall MW, Montaner JS, Kerr T. Risk factors for developing a cutaneous injection-related infection among injection drug users: a cohort study. BMC Pub Health. 2008;8:405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kerr T, Fairbairn N, Tyndall M, Marsh D, Li K, Montaner J, et al. Predictors of non-fatal overdose among a cohort of polysubstance-using injection drug users. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007;87(1):39–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Milloy MJ, Kerr T, Mathias R, Zhang R, Montaner JS, Tyndall M, et al. Non-fatal overdose among a cohort of active injection drug users recruited from a supervised injection facility. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2008;34(4):499–509.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Marshall BDL, Fairbairn N, Li K, Wood E, Kerr T. Physical violence among a prospective cohort of injection drug users: a gender-focused approach. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008;97(3):237–46.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Scheper-Hughes N. Death without weeping: the violence of everyday life in Brazil. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1992.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wright NM, Tompkins CN, Sheard L. Is peer injecting a form of intimate partner abuse? A qualitative study of the experiences of women drug users. Health Soc Care Community. 2007;15(5):417–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Tompkins CN, Sheard L, Wright NM, Jones L, Howes N. Exchange, deceit, risk and harm: the consequences for women of receiving injections from other drug users. Drugs Educ Prev Policy. 2006;13(3):281–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Shannon K, Kerr T, Allinott S, Chettiar J, Shoveller J, Tyndall MW. Social and structural violence and power relations in mitigating HIV risk of drug-using women in survival sex work. Soc Sci Med. 2008;66(4):911–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Epele ME. Scars, harm and pain: about being injected among drug using Latina women. J Ethn Subst Abuse. 2001;1(1):47–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Pearshouse R, Elliott R, Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network. A helping hand: legal issues related to assisted injection at supervised injection facilities. Toronto: Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network; 2007.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Wood RA, Wood E, Lai C, Tyndall MW, Montaner JS, Kerr T. Nurse-delivered safer injection education among a cohort of injection drug users: evidence from the evaluation of Vancouver’s supervised injection facility. Int J Drug Policy. 2008;19(3):183–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Fast D, Small W, Wood E, Kerr T. The perspectives of injection drug users regarding safer injecting education delivered through a supervised injecting facility. Harm Reduct J. 2008;5:32.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Small W, Wood E, Tobin D, Rikley J, Lapushinsky D, Kerr T. The injection support team: a peer-driven program to address unsafe injecting in a Canadian setting. Subst Use Misuse. 2012;47(5):491–501.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Wood E, Tyndall MW, Stoltz J, Small W, Zhang R, O’Connell J, et al. Safer injecting education for HIV prevention within a medically supervised safer injecting facility. Int J Drug Pol. 2005;16(4):281–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Woolford A. Tainted space: representations of injection drug-users and HIV/AIDS in Vancouver’s Downtown Eastside. BC Studies. 2001;129:27–50.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Strathdee SA, Patrick DM, Currie SL, Cornelisse PGA, Rekart ML, Montaner JSG, et al. Needle exchange is not enough: lessons from the Vancouver injecting drug use study. AIDS. 1997;11(8):F59–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Wood E, Kerr T. What do you do when you hit rock bottom? Responding to drugs in the city of Vancouver. Int J Drug Pol. 2006;17(2):55–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Wood E, Spittal PM, Small W, Kerr T, Li K, Hogg RS, et al. Displacement of Canada’s largest public illicit drug market in response to a police crackdown. CMAJ. 2004;170(10):1551–6.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Fairbairn N, Wood E, Small W, Stoltz JA, Li K, Kerr T. Risk profile of individuals who provide assistance with illicit drug injections. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2006;82(1):41–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Wood E, Kerr T, Lloyd-Smith E, Buchner C, Marsh DC, Montaner JS, et al. Methodology for evaluating insite: Canada’s first medically supervised safer injection facility for injection drug users. Harm Reduct J. 2004;1:9.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Kerr T, Tyndall M, Li K, Montaner J, Wood E. Safer injection facility use and syringe sharing in injection drug users. Lancet. 2005;366(9482):316–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Wood E, Tyndall MW, Montaner JS, Kerr T. Summary of findings from the evaluation of a pilot medically supervised safer injecting facility. Can Med Assoc J. 2006;175(11):1399–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Marshall BD, Milloy MJ, Wood E, Montaner JS, Kerr T. Reduction in overdose mortality after the opening of North America’s first medically supervised safer injecting facility: a retrospective population-based study. Lancet. 2011;377(9775):1429–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Milloy MJ, Kerr T, Tyndall M, Montaner J, Wood E. Estimated drug overdose deaths averted by North America’s first medically-supervised safer injection facility. PLoS ONE. 2008;3(10):e3351.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Small W, Shoveller J, Moore D, Tyndall M, Wood E, Kerr T. Injection drug users’ access to a supervised injection facility in Vancouver, Canada: the influence of operating policies and local drug culture. Qual Health Res. 2011;21(6):743–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Small W, Ainsworth L, Wood E, Kerr T. IDU perspectives on the design and operation of North America’s first medically supervised injection facility. Subst Use Misuse. 2011;46(5):561–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Kerr T, Oleson M, Tyndall MW, Montaner J, Wood E. A description of a peer-run supervised injection site for injection drug users. J Urban Health. 2005;82(2):267–75.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Wood E, Kerr T, Spittal PM, Small W, Tyndall MW, O’Shaughnessy MV, et al. An external evaluation of a peer-run “unsanctioned” syringe exchange program. J Urban Health. 2003;80(3):455–64.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Solai S, Dubois-Arber F, Benninghoff F, Benaroyo L. Ethical reflections emerging during the activity of a low threshold facility with supervised drug consumption room in Geneva, Switzerland. Int J Drug Policy. 2006;17(1):17–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Riddell C, Riddell R. Welfare checks, drug consumption, and health. J Hum Resour. 2006;XLI(1):138–61.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    QSR International. NVivo qualitative data analysis software. 2008.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Moore D, Fraser S. Putting at risk what we know: reflecting on the drug-using subject in harm reduction and its political implications. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62(12):3035–47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Ouellet LJ, Jimenez AD, Johnson WA, Wiebel WW. Shooting galleries and HIV disease: variations in places for injecting illicit drugs. Crime Delinquency. 1991;37(1):64–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Moore D. Governing street-based injecting drug users: a critique of heroin overdose prevention in Australia. Soc Sci Med. 2004;59(7):1547–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Kerr T, Wood E, Small D, Palepu A, Tyndall MW. Potential use of safer injecting facilities among injection drug users in Vancouver’s Downtown Eastside. Can Med Assoc J. 2003;169(8):759–63.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Bourgois P. Disciplining addictions: the bio-politics of methadone and heroin in the United States. Cult Med Psychiatr. 2000;24(2):165–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Fischer B, Turnbull S, Poland B, Haydon E. Drug use, risk and urban order: examining supervised injection sites (SISs) as ‘governmentality’. Int J Drug Policy. 2004;15(5–6):357–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    McLean K. The biopolitics of needle exchange in the United States. Crit Public Health. 2011;21(1):71–9.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Supreme Court of Canada. Canada (Attorney General) v. PHS Community Services Society. 2011;SCC 44 33556.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Boyd SC, Osborn B, MacPherson D. Raise shit! Social action saving lives. Halifax: Fernwood; 2009.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Small D, Palepu A, Tyndall MW. The establishment of North America’s first state sanctioned supervised injection facility: a case study in culture change. Int J Drug Pol. 2006;17(2):73–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Kerr T, Small W, Buchner C, Zhang R, Li K, Montaner J, et al. Syringe sharing and HIV incidence among injection drug users and increased access to sterile syringes. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(8):1449–53.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Moore D. ‘Workers’, ‘clients’ and the struggle over needs: understanding encounters between service providers and injecting drug users in an Australian city. Soc Sci Med. 2009;68(6):1161–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Sherman SG, Gann DS, Tobin KE, Latkin CA, Welsh C, Bielenson P. “The life they save may be mine”: diffusion of overdose prevention information from a city sponsored programme. Int J Drug Policy. 2009;20(2):137–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Mackenzie S, Pearson C, Frye V, Gómez CA, Latka MH, Purcell DW, et al. Agents of change: peer mentorship as HIV prevention among HIV-positive injection drug users. Subst Use Misuse. 2012;47(5):522–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Fairbairn N, Small W, Shannon K, Wood E, Kerr T. Seeking refuge from violence in street-based drug scenes: women’s experiences in North America’s first supervised injection facility. Soc Sci Med. 2008;67(5):817–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Mitchell D. The right to the city: social justice and the fight for public space. New York: Guilford Press; 2003.Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Beckett K, Herbert SK. Banished: the new social control in urban American. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010.Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Cooper H, Moore L, Gruskin S, Krieger N. The impact of a police drug crackdown on drug injectors’ ability to practice harm reduction: a qualitative study. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61(3):673–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    MacNeil J, Pauly B. Needle exchange as a safe haven in an unsafe world. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2011;30(1):26–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    McLean K. Needle exchange and the geography of survival in the South Bronx. Int J Drug Policy. 2012;23(4):295–302.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Parker J, Jackson L, Dykeman M, Gahagan J, Karabanow J. Access to harm reduction services in Atlantic Canada: implications for non-urban residents who inject drugs. Health Place. 2012;18(2):152–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ryan McNeil
    • 1
  • Will Small
    • 1
    • 2
  • Hugh Lampkin
    • 3
  • Kate Shannon
    • 1
    • 4
  • Thomas Kerr
    • 1
    • 4
    Email author
  1. 1.British Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDSSt. Paul’s HospitalVancouverCanada
  2. 2.Faculty of Health SciencesSimon Fraser UniversityBurnabyCanada
  3. 3.Vancouver Area Network of Drug Users (VANDU)VancouverCanada
  4. 4.Department of MedicineUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations