AIDS and Behavior

, Volume 17, Issue 8, pp 2577–2587 | Cite as

Context Matters: The Moderating Role of Bar Context in the Association Between Substance Use During Sex and Condom Use Among Male Clients of Female Sex Workers in Tijuana, Mexico

  • Eileen V. Pitpitan
  • Karla D. Wagner
  • David Goodman-Meza
  • Shirley J. Semple
  • Claudia Chavarin
  • Steffanie A. Strathdee
  • Thomas L. Patterson
Original Paper

Abstract

Tijuana is situated on Mexico’s northern border with the U.S., where sex work is quasi-legal. Whereas previous work has focused on the risk behaviors of female sex workers (FSWs), less is known about the risk behaviors of their male clients. Further, research has not examined structural factors as moderators of the association between substance use and condom use, including the contexts in which sex takes place. The purpose of the current study is to examine whether having sex with FSWs in a bar moderates the link between alcohol intoxication during sex and condom use. We recruited 375 male clients of FSWs in Tijuana, Mexico from San Diego, California and Tijuana. Using computer assisted interviewing, we surveyed participants on their alcohol use, condom use, and physical contexts of sex with FSWs in the past 4 months. Results showed that more frequent intoxication during sex with FSWs is associated with more unprotected sex, but only among clients having sex with FSWs in a bar context. Results point to potential reasons for inconsistent condom use with FSWs in this context, including lower risk perceptions of sex with FSWs in bars. Future research should examine structural factors that underlie clients’ risk behavior in bars in order to inform structural-level HIV prevention interventions.

Keywords

HIV risk Male clients Female sex workers Alcohol use Risk environment Structural interventions 

Resumen

Tijuana esta situada en la frontera de México con los Estados Unidos, donde el trabajo sexual es cuasi-legal. Mientras trabajos previos se han enfocado sobre las conductas de riesgo de trabajadoras sexuales (TS), menos se sabes sobre las conductas de riesgo de sus clientes masculinos. Mas aun, las investigaciones no han examinado a los factores estructurales como moderadores de la asociación entre el uso de sustancias y el uso del condón, incluyendo los contextos en el cual la relación sexual se da. El objetivo del presente estudio es de examinar si el tener sexo en con una TS en un bar modera la asociación entre la intoxicación con alcohol y el uso del condón. Reclutamos 375 clientes masculino de TS en Tijuana, México provenientes de San Diego, California y Tijuana. Utilizando entrevistas asistidas por computadora, encuestamos a los participantes en relación a su uso de alcohol, uso de condones y contextos físicos de su relación sexual con TS en los últimos cuatro meses. Los resultados demostraron que la intoxicación con alcohol con mayor frecuencia durante el sexo con TS esta asociado con mayor de sexo sin protección, pero solo dentro del contexto de aquellos clientes que tienen relaciones sexuales con TS dentro de un bar. Los resultados apuntan hacia las razones potenciales del uso inconsistente de condones con TS en este contexto, incluyendo menores percepciones de riesgos de tener relaciones sexuales con TS en bares. Investigaciones futuras deberán examinar los factores estructurales que subyacen las conductas de riesgo en bares para poder informar intervenciones de prevención de VIH a nivel estructural.

Palabras clave

Riesgo de VIH clientes masculinos trabajadoras sexuales uso de alcohol ambiente de riesgo intervenciones estructurales 

References

  1. 1.
    Vigilancia Epidemiológica de casos de VIH/SIDA en México. Registro Nacional de Cases de SIDA Actualización (CENSIDA). Mexico: CENSIDA; 2012.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Iñiguez-Stevens E, Brouwer KC, Hogg RS, et al. Estimating the 2006 prevalence of HIV by gender and risk groups in Tijuana, Mexico. Gac Med Mex. 2009;145(3):189–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Strathdee SA, Magis-Rodriguez C. Mexico’s evolving HIV epidemic. JAMA. 2008;300(5):571–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    HIV/AIDS Surveillance in California. California Department of Public Health; 2012. Available at: http://www.cdph.ca.gov/data/statistics/Documents/SSSemiAnnualRptJune2012.pdf. Accessed 5 Sept 2012.
  5. 5.
    Border Crossing: U.S.–Mexico Border Crossing Data. U.S. Department of Transportations. Available at: http://www.bts.gov/programs/international/border_crossing_entry_data/us_mexico/pdf/entire.pdf#search=Border%20crossing%20statistics%20US%20Mexico. Accessed 5 Sept 2012.
  6. 6.
    Brouwer KC, Strathdee SA, Magis-Rodríguez C, et al. Estimated numbers of men and women infected with HIV/AIDS in Tijuana, Mexico. J Urban Health. 2006;83(2):299–307.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Talbott JR. Size matters: the number of prostitutes and the global HIV/AIDS pandemic. PLoS One. 2007;2(6):e543.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Patterson TL, Volkmann T, Gallardo M, et al. Identifying the HIV transmission bridge: which men are having unsafe sex with female sex workers and with their own wives or steady partners? J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2012;60(4):414–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rissel CE, Richters J, Grulich AE, De Visser RO, Smith AMA. Sex in Australia: experiences of commercial sex in a representative sample of adults. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2003;27(2):191–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Day S, Ward H, Perrotta L. Prostitution and risk of HIV: male partners of female prostitutes. BMJ. 1993;307(6900):359–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Patterson TL, Goldenberg S, Gallardo M, et al. Correlates of HIV, sexually transmitted infections, and associated high-risk behaviors among male clients of female sex workers in Tijuana, Mexico. AIDS. 2009;23(13):1765–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Goldenberg SM, Gallardo Cruz M, Strathdee SA, et al. Correlates of unprotected sex with female sex workers among male clients in Tijuana, Mexico. Sex Transm Dis. 2010;37(5):319–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    De Graaf R, Vanwesenbeeck I, Van Zessen G, Straver CJ, Visser JH. Alcohol and drug use in heterosexual and homosexual prostitution, and its relation to protection behaviour. AIDS Care. 1995;7(1):35–47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stueve A, O’Donnell L, Duran R, San Doval A, Geier J. Being high and taking sexual risks: findings from a multisite survey of urban young men who have sex with men. AIDS Educ Prev. 2002;14(6):482–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Clatts MC, Goldsamt LA, Yi H. Club drug use among young men who have sex with men in NYC: a preliminary epidemiological profile. Subst Use Misuse. 2005;40(9–10):1317–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Clatts MC, Goldsamt LA, Yi H. Drug and sexual risk in four men who have sex with men populations: evidence for a sustained HIV epidemic in New York City. J Urban Health. 2005;82(1 Suppl 1):i9–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Newcomb ME, Clerkin EM, Mustanski B. Sensation seeking moderates the effects of alcohol and drug use prior to sex on sexual risk in young men who have sex with men. AIDS Behav. 2011;15(3):565–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Li Q, Li X, Stanton B. Alcohol use among female sex workers and male clients: an integrative review of global literature. Alcohol Alcohol. 2010;45(2):188–99.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kalichman SC, Simbayi LC, Jooste S, Cain D. Frequency, quantity, and contextual use of alcohol among sexually transmitted infection clinic patients in Cape Town, South Africa. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2007;33(5):687–98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rhodes T. The risk environment’: a framework for understanding and reducing drug-related harm. Int J Drug Policy. 2002;13(2):85–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rhodes T. Risk environments and drug harms: a social science for harm reduction approach. Int J Drug Policy. 2009;20(3):193–201.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Strathdee SA, Lozada R, Pollini RA, et al. Individual, social, and environmental influences associated with HIV infection among injection drug users in Tijuana, Mexico. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2008;47(3):369–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Morisky DE, Malow RM, Tiglao TV, et al. Reducing sexual risk among Filipina female bar workers: effects of a CBPR-developed structural and network intervention. AIDS Educ Prev. 2010;22(4):371–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Urada L, Morisky D, Hernandez L, Strathdee S. Social and structural factors associated with consistent condom use among female entertainment workers trading sex in the Philippines. AIDS Behav. 2013;17(2):523–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Goldenberg SM, Strathdee SA, Gallardo M, et al. “Over here, it’s just drugs, women and all the madness”: the HIV risk environment of clients of female sex workers in Tijuana,Mexico. Soc Sci Med. 2011;72(7):1185–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Stueve A, O’Donnell LN, Duran R, San Doval A, Blome J. Time-space sampling in minority communities: results with young Latino men who have sex with men. Am J Public Health. 2001;91(6):922–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    MacKellar D, Valleroy L, Karon J, Lemp G, Janssen R. The Young Men’s survey: methods for estimating HIV seroprevalence and risk factors among young men who have sex with men. Public Health Rep. 1996;111(Suppl 1):138–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Meneses-Gaya C, Zuardi AW, Loureiro SR, et al. Is the full version of the AUDIT really necessary? Study of the validity and internal construct of its abbreviated versions. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2010;34(8):1417–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Napper LE, Fisher DG, Reynolds GL, Johnson ME. HIV risk behavior self-report reliability at different recall periods. AIDS Behav. 2010;14(1):152–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Goldenberg SM, Strathdee SA, Gallardo M, et al. How important are venue-based HIV risks among male clients of female sex workers? A mixed methods analysis of the risk environment in nightlife venues in Tijuana, Mexico. Health Place. 2011;17(3):748–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Larios SE, Lozada R, Strathdee SA, et al. An exploration of contextual factors that influence HIV risk in female sex workers in Mexico: the Social Ecological Model applied to HIV risk behaviors. AIDS Care. 2009;21(10):1335–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kalichman SC, Simbayi LC, Kaufman M, Cain D, Jooste S. Alcohol use and sexual risks for HIV/AIDS in sub-Saharan Africa: systematic review of empirical findings. Prev Sci. 2007;8(2):141–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Cain D, Pare V, Kalichman SC, et al. HIV risks associated with patronizing alcohol serving establishments in South African Townships, Cape Town. Prev Sci. 2012;13(6):627–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Crosby RA. Condom use as a dependent variable: measurement issues relevant to HIV prevention programs. AIDS Educ Prev. 1998;10(6):548–57.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Dowling-Guyer S, Johnson ME, Fisher DG, et al. Reliability of drug users’ self-reported HIV risk behaviors and validity of self-reported recent drug use. Assessment. 1994;1(4):383–92.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Needle R, Fisher DG, Weatherby N, et al. Reliability of self-reported HIV risk behaviors of drug users. Psychol Addict Behav. 1995;9(4):242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eileen V. Pitpitan
    • 1
  • Karla D. Wagner
    • 1
  • David Goodman-Meza
    • 1
  • Shirley J. Semple
    • 1
  • Claudia Chavarin
    • 1
  • Steffanie A. Strathdee
    • 1
  • Thomas L. Patterson
    • 2
  1. 1.Division of Global Public Health, Department of MedicineUniversity of California San Diego, School of MedicineLa JollaUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychiatryUniversity of California San DiegoLa JollaUSA

Personalised recommendations