AIDS and Behavior

, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp 1288–1295

Unprotected Receptive Anal Intercourse Among Men Who have Sex with Men in Brazil

  • Gustavo Machado Rocha
  • Lígia Regina Franco Sansigolo Kerr
  • Ana Maria de Brito
  • Ines Dourado
  • Mark Drew Crosland Guimarães
Original Paper

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess factors associated with unprotected receptive anal intercourse (URAI) in a sample of MSM recruited by respondent driven sampling in Brazil. Among 3,449 participants, 36.5 % reported URAI. Final logistic model indicated that living with a male partner, illicit drug use, having stable partnership, having sex with men only, having few friends encouraging condom use, and high self-perceived risk for HIV infection were characteristics independently associated with URAI. Intervention strategies should focus on the role of anal sex practices on HIV transmission, address illicit drug use, stigma and expansion of HIV testing and care.

Keywords

HIV Sexual behavior Vulnerable populations Brazil 

References

  1. 1.
    Ministry of Health. Health Surveillance Secretariat. Department of STD, aids and viral hepatitis. UNGASS – HIV/Aids, Brazilian Answer 2008–2009. Country Progression Report. Brasília; 2010. Portuguese.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baggaley RF, White RG, Boily MC. HIV transmission risk through anal intercourse: systematic review, meta-analysis and implications for HIV prevention. Int J Epidemiol. 2010;39:1048–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beyrer C, Baral SD, van Griensven F, et al. Global epidemiology of HIV infection in men who have sex with men. Lancet. 2012;380(9839):367–77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gondim RC, Kerr LRFS, Werneck GL, Macena RHM, Pontes MK, Kendall C. Risky sexual practices among men who have sex with men in Northeast Brazil: results from four sequential surveys. Cad Saude Publica. 2009;25(6):1390–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fisher JD, Fisher WA. Changing AIDS-risk behavior. Psychol Bull. 1992;111(3):455–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kerr LS, Mota RS, Kendall C, et al. HIV among MSM in a large middle-income country. AIDS. 2013;27(3):427–435.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Heckathorn DD. Respondent-driven sampling: a new approach to the study of hidden populations. Soc Probl. 1997;44(2):174–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Szwarcland CL, Souza PRB Jr, Damacena GN, Barbosa A Jr, Kendall C. Analysis of data collected by RDS among sex workers in 10 Brazilian cities, 2009: estimation of the prevalence of HIV, variance, and design effect. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2011;57(Suppl. 3):S129–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brazil. Ministry of Health. Health Surveillance Secretariat. Department of STD, aids and viral hepatitis. [Survey of Knowledge, Attitud8es and Practices related to STD and AIDS of the Brazilian Population aged 15 to 64 years old, 2008]. Brasília: Ministry of Health; 2011.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Guy RJ, Wand H, Wilson DP, et al. Using population attributable risk to choose HIV prevention strategies in men who have sex with men. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:247.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Leigh BC, Stall R. Substance use and risky sexual behavior for exposure to HIV: issues in methodology, interpretation and prevention. Am Psychol. 1993;48(10):1035–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gile KJ, Handcock MS. Respondent-driven sampling: as assessment of current methodology. Sociol Methodol. 2010;40(1):285–327.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gustavo Machado Rocha
    • 1
  • Lígia Regina Franco Sansigolo Kerr
    • 2
  • Ana Maria de Brito
    • 3
  • Ines Dourado
    • 4
  • Mark Drew Crosland Guimarães
    • 5
  1. 1.Campus Centro-Oeste Dona LinduFederal University of São João Del-ReiDivinópolisBrazil
  2. 2.Department of Community HealthFederal University of CearáFortalezaBrazil
  3. 3.Aggeu Magalhães Research CenterOswaldo Cruz FoundationRecifeBrazil
  4. 4.Institute of Collective HealthFederal University of BahiaSalvadorBrazil
  5. 5.Department of Preventive and Social MedicineFederal University of Minas GeraisBelo HorizonteBrazil

Personalised recommendations