AIDS and Behavior

, Volume 17, Issue 9, pp 3024–3033

How Can We Improve Online HIV and STD Prevention for Men Who Have Sex with Men? Perspectives of Hook-Up Website Owners, Website Users, and HIV/STD Directors

  • Dan Wohlfeiler
  • Jennifer Hecht
  • Jonathan Volk
  • H. Fisher Raymond
  • Tom Kennedy
  • Willi McFarland
Original Paper


Internet-based interventions have potential to reduce HIV and STD transmission among men who meet male sexual partners online. From November 2009 to May 2010 we surveyed dating and hook-up website users (n = 3,050), website owners (n = 18), and health department HIV/STD directors (n = 81) to identify structural and behavioral prevention interventions that could be implemented online and which a majority of website users were willing to use, owners were willing to implement, and HIV/STD directors perceived to be effective. A majority of each of the three stakeholder groups agreed on the following: (1) automated HIV/STD testing reminders, (2) local STD test site directories, (3) links to sex-positive safe sex videos, (4) access to sexual health experts, (5) profile options to include safer sex preference, (6) chat rooms for specific sexual interests, (7) filtering partners by their profile information, and (8) anonymous e-card partner notification for STD exposure. Findings help build consensus about how to prioritize resources for implementing online HIV and STD prevention interventions and highlight differences between stakeholders to guide future discussion about how to advance prevention efforts.


HIV prevention STD prevention Internet Men who have sex with men Sexual networks Structural interventions 


  1. 1.
    McFarlane M, Bull SS, Rietmeijer CA. The Internet as a newly emerging risk environment for sexually transmitted diseases. JAMA. 2000;284(4):443–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Elford J, Bolding G, Davis M, Sherr L, Hart G. Web-based behavioral surveillance among men who have sex with men: a comparison of online and offline samples in London, UK. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2004;35(4):421–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Benotsch EG, Kalichman S, Cage M. Men who have met sex partners via the internet: prevalence, predictors, and implications for HIV prevention. Arch Sex Behav. 2002;31(2):177–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Klausner JD, Wolf W, Fischer-Ponce L, Zolt I, Katz MH. Tracing a syphilis outbreak through cyberspace. JAMA. 2000;284(4):447–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    California Department of Public Health Sexually Transmitted Disease Control Branch. State of California syphilis elimination surveillance data. 2009.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Al-Tayyib AA, McFarlane M, Kachur R, Rietmeijer C. Finding sex partners on the internet: what is the risk for sexually transmitted infections? Sexually transmitted infections. JAMA. 2008;300:520–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    O’Leary C, Kerndt P. Syphilis and HIV in sexual networks of men who have sex with men (MSM) in Los Angeles County, California. Chicago: National STD Prevention Conference; 2008.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wohlfeiler D, Potterat JJ. Using gay men’s sexual networks to reduce sexually transmitted disease (STD)/human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission. Sex Transm Dis. 2005;32(Suppl 10):S48–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chiasson MA, Hirshfield S, Remien RH, Humberstone M, Wong T, Wolitski RJ. A comparison of on-line and off-line sexual risk in men who have sex with men: an event-based on-line survey. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2007;44(2):235–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bull S, Pratte K, Whitesell N, Rietmeijer C, McFarlane M. Effects of an internet-based intervention for HIV prevention: the Youthnet trials. AIDS Behav. 2009;13(3):474–87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chiasson MA, Shaw FS, Humberstone M, Hirshfield S, Hartel D. Increased HIV disclosure three months after an online video intervention for men who have sex with men (MSM). AIDS care. 2009;21(9):1081–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Herbst JH, Sherba RT, Crepaz N, Deluca JB, Zohrabyan L, Stall RD, et al. A meta-analytic review of HIV behavioral interventions for reducing sexual risk behavior of men who have sex with men. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2005;39(2):228–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Johnson WD, Hedges LV, Ramirez G, Semaan S, Norman LR, Sogolow E, et al. HIV prevention research for men who have sex with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2002;30(Suppl 1):S118–29.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Institute of Medicine. No time to lose: getting more from HIV prevention. Washington: National Academy. 2001; xxiii.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sanchez T, Finlayson T, Drake A, Behel S, Cribbin M, Dinenno E, et al. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) risk, prevention, and testing behaviors–United States, National HIV Behavioral Surveillance System: men who have sex with men, November 2003–April 2005. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2006;55(6):1–16.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gates G. Same-sex couples and the gay, lesbian, bisexual population: new estimates from the American Community Survey. (2006). Accessed 12 Nov 2012.
  17. 17.
    Bull SS, McFarlane M, King D. Barriers to STD/HIV prevention on the Internet. Health Educ Res. 2001;16(6):661–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Levine D, Rebchook G, Curotto A. the development of an online structural HIV prevention intervention for MSM. National HIV Prevention Conference: Atlanta; 2007.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hooper S, Rosser BR, Horvath KJ, Oakes JM, Danilenko G. An online needs assessment of a virtual community: what men who use the internet to seek sex with men want in internet-based HIV prevention. AIDS Behav. 2008;12(6):867–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bowen AM, Horvath K, Williams ML. A randomized control trial of internet-delivered HIV prevention targeting rural MSM. Health Educ Res. 2007;22(1):120–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mimiaga MJ, Fair AD, Tetu AM, Novak DS, Vanderwarker R, Bertrand T, et al. Acceptability of an internet-based partner notification system for sexually transmitted infection exposure among men who have sex with men. Am J Public Health. 2008;98(6):1009–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lieb SM, Fallon SJ, Friedman SR, Thompson DR, Gates GJ, Liberti TM, et al. Statewide estimation of racial/ethnic populations of men who have sex with men in the U.S. Public Health Reports. 2011;126(1):60–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wohlfeiler D, Ellen J. The limits of behavioral interventions for HIV prevention. In: Cohen L, Chávez V, Chehimi S, editors. Prevention is primary: strategies for community well-being. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2010. p. 352–70.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kerani RP, Fleming M, DeYoung B, Golden MR. A randomized, controlled trial of in SPOT and patient-delivered partner therapy for gonorrhea and chlamydial infection among men who have sex with men. Sex Transm Dis. 2011;38(10):941–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rietmeijer CA, Westergaard B, Mickiewicz TA, Richardson D, Ling S, Sapp T, et al. Evaluation of an online partner notification program. Sex Transm Dis. 2011;38(5):359–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Plant A, Rotblatt H, Montoya JA, Rudy ET, Kerndt PR. Evaluation of an Internet partner notification service. Sex Transm Dis. 2012;39(5):341–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mathews C, Coetzee N, Zwarenstein M, Lombard C, Guttmacher S, Oxman A, Schmid G. Strategies for partner notification for sexually transmitted diseases. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;4:CD002843.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Institute of Medicine (U.S.), Committee for the Study of the Future of Public Health. The future of public health. Washington: National Academy. 1988; xii.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dan Wohlfeiler
    • 1
  • Jennifer Hecht
    • 2
  • Jonathan Volk
    • 3
    • 4
  • H. Fisher Raymond
    • 4
  • Tom Kennedy
    • 2
  • Willi McFarland
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive SciencesUniversity of California at San FranciscoSan FranciscoUSA
  2. 2.STOP AIDS ProjectSan Francisco AIDS FoundationSan FranciscoUSA
  3. 3.Division of Infectious DiseasesUniversity of California at San FranciscoSan FranciscoUSA
  4. 4.San Francisco Department of Public HealthSan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations