Advertisement

AIDS and Behavior

, Volume 15, Issue 7, pp 1579–1588 | Cite as

Role of Social Network Dimensions in the Transition to Injection Drug Use: Actions Speak Louder than Words

  • Nana Koram
  • Hongjie Liu
  • Jianhua Li
  • Jian Li
  • Jian Luo
  • Jennifer Nield
Original Paper

Abstract

The objective of this study was to examine the influences of social network factors, particularly social support and norms, in the transition from non-injection heroin and/or opiate use to heroin-injection, which is one of the leading causes of the spread of HIV/AIDS in China. Respondent-driven sampling was used to recruit young heroin and/or opiate users in an egocentric network study in Yunnan, China. Multivariate logistic regression using hierarchical combinations of candidate variables was used to analyze network factors for the injection transition. A total of 3,121 social network alters were reported by 403 egos with an average network size of eight. Fifty-eight percent of egos transitioned to heroin-injection from non-injection. This transition was associated with having a larger sex network size, a larger number of heroin injectors in one’s network, and a higher network density. The findings enhance our understanding of the influence of social network dimensions on the transition to injection drug use. Accordingly, the development of interventions for heroin and/or opiate users in China should consider social network characteristics.

Keywords

Social networks Heroin Transition HIV/AIDS China 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a research grant (R21 DA023893-01A1) from NIH-NIDA. It was awarded to Hongjie Liu and Jianhua Li. We are grateful to the staff from Yunnan Institute of Drug Abuse for their participation in the study, and to all the participants who gave so willingly of their time to provide the study data.

References

  1. 1.
    Wu Z, Wang Y. Introduction: China meets new AIDS challenges. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010;53(Suppl 1):S1–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wang L, Wang N, Li D, et al. The 2007 estimates for people at risk for and living with HIV in China: progress and challenges. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2009;50(4):414–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jia M, Luo H, Ma Y, et al. The HIV epidemic in Yunnan Province, China, 1989–2007. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010;53(Suppl 1):S34–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liu H, Grusky O, Li X, Ma E. Drug users: a potentially important bridge population in the transmission of sexually transmitted diseases, including AIDS, in China. Sex Transm Dis. 2006;33(2):111–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lu L, Fang Y, Wang X. Drug abuse in China: past, present and future. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2008;28(4):479–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lai S, Chen J, Celentano D, et al. Adoption of injection practices in heroin users in Guangxi Province, China. J Psychoact Drugs. 2000;32(3):285–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chamala D, Chamala J, Dabin W, Delin H, Rennes N. Transition to injection and sharing of needles/syringes: potential for HIV transmission among heroin users in Chengdu, China. Addict Behav. 2006;31(4):697–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Neaigus A, Friedman SR, Curtis R, et al. The relevance of drug injectors’ social and risk networks for understanding and preventing HIV infection. Soc Sci Med. 1994;38(1):67–78.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Phillips M, Pearson V. Coping in Chinese communities: the need for a research agenda. In: Bond M, editor. Chinese psychology. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press; 1996. p. 429–40.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Triandis H. Self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychoanal Rev. 1989;96(3):269–89.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wasserman S, Galaskiewicz J. Advances in social network analysis: research in the social and behavioral sciences. Thousands Oaks: Sage Publications; 1994.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Knowlton AR, Hua W, Latkin C. Social support networks and medical service use among HIV-positive injection drug users: implications to intervention. AIDS Care. 2005;17(4):479–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Miller M, Neaigus A. Networks, resources, and risk among women who use drugs. Soc Sci Med. 2001;52(6):967–78.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Valente T. Social network influences on adolescent substance use: an introduction. Connections. 2003;25(2):11–6.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hurd GS, Pattison EM, Llamas R. Models of social network intervention. Contemp Fam Ther. 1981;3(4):246–57.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cohen S, Wills TA. Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychol Bull. 1985;98(2):310–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zapka JG, Stoddard AM, McCusker J. Social network, support and influence: relationships with drug use and protective AIDS behavior. AIDS Educ Prev. 1993;5(4):352–66.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Friedman SR, Aral S. Social networks, risk-potential networks, health, and disease. J Urban Health. 2001;78(3):411–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991;50(2):179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Borsari B, Carey KB. Descriptive and injunctive norms in college drinking: a meta-analytic integration. J Stud Alcohol. 2003;64(3):331–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sheeran P, Abraham C, Orbell S. Psychosocial correlates of heterosexual condom use: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 1999;125(1):90–132.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hawkins WE, Latkin C, Mandel W, Oziemkowska M. Do actions speak louder than words? Perceived peer influences on needle sharing and cleaning in a sample of injection drug users. AIDS Educ Prev. 1999;11(2):122–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bravo MJ, Barrio G, de la Fuente L, Royuela L, Domingo L, Silva T. Reasons for selecting an initial route of heroin administration and for subsequent transitions during a severe HIV epidemic. Addiction. 2003;98(6):749–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Neaigus A, Miller M, Frajzyngier V, Friedman SR, Des Jarlais DC. Transitions to injecting drug use among non-injecting heroin users: social network influence and individual susceptibility. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2006;41(4):493–503.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Qian ZH, Vermund SH, Wang N. Risk of HIV/AIDS in China: subpopulations of special importance. Sex Transm Infect. 2005;81(6):442–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nurco DN, Bonito AJ, Lerner M, Balter MB. Studying addicts over time: methodology and preliminary findings. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1975;2(2):183–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hser YI, Anglin MD, McGlothlin W. Sex differences in addict careers. 1 Initiation of use. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1987;13(1–2):33–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Latkin CA, Forman V, Knowlton A. Concordance between drug users’ and their network members’ reported drug use and HIV status: implications to HIV prevention. In: Levy JA, Pescosolido BA, editors. Social network and health. Amsterdan: Elsevier Science Ltd; 2002. p. 151–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Anthony J, Vlahov D, Celentano D, et al. Self-report interview data for a study of HIV-1 infection among intravenous drug users: description of methods and preliminary evidence on validity. J Drug Issues. 1991;21(4):739–57.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Neaigus A, Friedman SR, Jose B, et al. High-risk personal networks and syringe sharing as risk factors for HIV infection among new drug injectors. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol. 1996;11(5):499–509.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Liu H, Feng T, Liu H, et al. Egocentric networks of Chinese men who have sex with men: network components, condom use norms and safer sex. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2009;23(10):885–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Norbeck JS, Lindsey AM, Carrieri VL. Further development of the Norbeck social support questionnaire: normative data and validity testing. Nurs Res. 1983;32(1):4–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Heckathorn DD. Extensions of respondent-driven sampling: analyzing continuous variables and controlling for differential recruitment. Sociol Methodol. 2007;37(1):151–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Jenness SM, Begier EM, Neaigus A, Murrill CS, Wendel T, Hagan H. Unprotected anal intercourse and sexually transmitted diseases in high-risk heterosexual women. Am J Public Health. 2011;101(4):745–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    van Ameijden EJ, Coutinho RA. Large decline in injecting drug use in Amsterdam, 1986–1998: explanatory mechanisms and determinants of injecting transitions. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001;55(5):356–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Valente TW. Network models and methods for studying the diffusion of innovations. In: Carrington PJ, Scott J, Wasserman W, editors. Models and methods in social network analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2005. p. 98–116.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Nock MK. Actions speak louder than words: an elaborated theoretical model of the social functions of self-injury and other harmful behaviors. Appl Prev Psychol. 2008;12:159–68.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Oosteveen T, Knibbe R, De Vries H. Social influences on young adults’ alcohol consumption: norms, modeling, pressure, socializing, and conformity. Addict Behav. 1996;21(2):187–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Davey-Rothwell MA, Latkin C, Tobin K. Longitudinal analysis of the relationship between perceived norms and sharing injection paraphernalia. AIDS Behav. 2010;14(4):878–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Lu X. An interface between individualistic and collectivistic orientations in Chinese cultural values and social relations. Howard J Commun. 1998;9:91–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Davey-Rothwell MA, Latkin CA. HIV-related communication and perceived norms: an analysis of the connection among injection drug users. AIDS Educ Prev. 2007;19(4):298–309.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Goel S, Salganik MJ. Assessing respondent-driven sampling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107(15):6743–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Kelly JA, St Lawrence JS, Diaz YE, et al. HIV risk behavior reduction following intervention with key opinion leaders of population: an experimental analysis. Am J Public Health. 1991;81(2):168–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nana Koram
    • 1
  • Hongjie Liu
    • 1
  • Jianhua Li
    • 2
  • Jian Li
    • 1
  • Jian Luo
    • 2
  • Jennifer Nield
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Epidemiology and Community HealthVirginia Commonwealth UniversityRichmondUSA
  2. 2.Yunnan Institute for Drug AbuseKunmingChina

Personalised recommendations