AIDS and Behavior

, Volume 16, Issue 4, pp 872–881

Understanding the HIV/AIDS Epidemic in Transgender Women of Lima, Peru: Results from a Sero-Epidemiologic Study Using Respondent Driven Sampling

  • Alfonso Silva-Santisteban
  • H. Fisher Raymond
  • Ximena Salazar
  • Jana Villayzan
  • Segundo Leon
  • Willi McFarland
  • Carlos F. Caceres
Original Paper

Abstract

In Latin America, transgender women (transwomen or male to female transgenders) have been included in MSM research but without addressing their specific needs in terms of the HIV/AIDS. We present results of the first seroepidemiologic study designed for transwomen in Peru. We conducted a study using respondent driven sampling to recruit transwomen from Lima. Our survey explored sociodemographic characteristics, gender enhancement procedures and sexual behavior. In addition, we conducted laboratory based HIV, genital herpes (HSV2) and syphilis testing. A total of 450 transwomen were recruited between April and July 2009. HIV prevalence was 30%, HSV2: 79% and syphilis: 23%. Sex-work was the main economic activity (64%). Gender enhancement procedures were reported by 70% of the population. Multivariable analysis showed HIV infection to be associated with being older than 35 recent, syphilis infection and HSV2 infection. Transwomen are the group most vulnerable to HIV/AIDS in Peru.

Keywords

Transgender women Respondent-driven sampling Lima-Peru 

Resumen

En Latinoamérica, las mujeres trans (personas trans de masculino a femenino) han sido incluídas en la investigación con población HSH sin abordar sus necesidades específicas en relación a la epidemia de VIH/SIDA. Presentamos los resultados del primer estudio sero-epidemiológico diseñado para mujeres trans en el Perú. Utilizamos un diseño transversal con respondent driven sampling (RDS). Las características socio-demográficas de la población, los procesos de transformación del cuerpo y las conductas sexuales fueron exploradas a través de una entrevista. Se realizaron pruebas de laboratorio para VIH, herpes genital (HSV2) y sífilis. Un total de 450 mujeres trans fueron enroladas en Lima entre abril y junio del 2009. La prevalencia de VIH encontrada fue de 30%, HSV2: 79% y sífilis: 23%. El trabajo sexual fue la principal actividad económica reportada (64%). Los procesos de modificación del cuerpo fueron reportados por el 70% de la población. El análisis mutivariable asoció la infección por VIH a una edad mayor a 35 años, la infección reciente por sífilis y la infección con HSV2. Este estudio muestra que las mujeres trans constituyen la población con mayor vulnerabilidad al VIH en el Perú.

Palabras claves

Mujeres trans Muestreo guiado por participantes Lima Perú 

References

  1. 1.
    Caceres CF, Aggleton P, Galea JT. Sexual diversity, social inclusion and HIV/AIDS. AIDS. 2008;22(Suppl 2):S45–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Caceres CF. HIV among gay and other men who have sex with men in Latin America and the Caribbean: a hidden epidemic? AIDS. 2002;16(Suppl 3):S23–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sanchez J, Lama JR, Kusunoki L, et al. HIV-1, sexually transmitted infections, and sexual behavior trends among men who have sex with men in Lima, Peru. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2007;44(5):578–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    van Griensven F, de Lind van Wijngaarden JW, Baral S, Grulich A. The global epidemic of HIV infection among men who have sex with men. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2009;4(4):300–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tabet S, Sanchez J, Lama J, et al. HIV, syphilis and heterosexual bridging among Peruvian men who have sex with men. AIDS. 2002;16(9):1271–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Clements-Nolle K, Marx R, Guzman R, Katz M. HIV prevalence, risk behaviors, health care use, and mental health status of transgender persons: implications for public health intervention. Am J Public Health. 2001;91(6):915–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nemoto T, Operario D, Keatley J, Han L, Soma T. HIV risk behaviors among male-to-female transgender persons of color in San Francisco. Am J Public Health. 2004;94(7):1193–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nuttbrock L, Hwahng S, Bockting W, et al. Lifetime risk factors for HIV/sexually transmitted infections among male-to-female transgender persons. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2009;52:417–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pisani E, Girault P, Gultom M, et al. HIV, syphilis infection, and sexual practices among transgenders, male sex workers, and other men who have sex with men in Jakarta, Indonesia. Sex Transm Infect. 2004;80(6):536–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Herbst JH, Jacobs ED, Finlayson TJ, McKleroy VS, Neumann MS, Crepaz N. Estimating HIV prevalence and risk behaviors of transgender persons in the United States: a systematic review. AIDS Behav. 2008;12(1):1–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Caceres CF, Mendoza W, Konda K, Lescano A. Nuevas Evidencias para las políticas y programs de salud en VIH/SIDA e infecciones de transmisión sexual en el Perú. Lima: UPCH; 2007.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Caceres CF, Giron JM, Sandoval C, et al. Implementation effects of GFATM-supported HIV/AIDS projects on the health sector, civil society, affected communities in Peru–2007. Glob Public Health. 2004;13:1–19.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Melendez RM, Pinto R. ‘It’s really a hard life’: love, gender and HIV risk among male-to-female transgender persons. Cult Health Sex. 2007;9(3):233–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ramirez-Valles J, Garcia D, Campbell RT, Diaz RM, Heckathorn DD. HIV infection, sexual risk behavior, and substance use among Latino gay and bisexual men and transgender persons. Am J Public Health. 2008;98(6):1036–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sevelius JM, Reznick OG, Hart SL, Schwarcz S. Informing interventions: the importance of contextual factors in the prediction of sexual risk behaviors among transgender women. AIDS Educ Prev. 2009;21(2):113–27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wilson EC, Garofalo R, Harris DR, Belzer M. Sexual risk taking among transgender male-to-female youths with different partner types. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(8):1500–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Salazar, X. Resultados de los grupos focales con trabajadoras sexuales travestis sobre el trabajo sexual y los clientes. Lima, 2008.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    De Santis JP. HIV infection risk factors among male-to-female transgender persons: a review of the literature. J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 2009;20(5):362–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Silva-Santisteban A, Salazar X. Informe final de mapeo y encuesta sociodemográfica del trabajo sexual en cuatro ciudades del Perú. Lima: UNFPA; 2009.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Caceres CF, Segura E, Silva-Santisteban A, et al. Non-conforming gender identification as determinant of lower HIV care access among people living with HIV in Peru: the HIV, economic flows and globalization study [WEPE0766]. Presented at AIDS 2010—XVIII International AIDS Conference.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Salazar X, Villayzan J. Outlines for multisectorial work with transgender populations, human rights, sex work and HIV/AIDS. Lima: IEESDEH, UNFPA; 2010.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Heckathorn DD. Respondent driven sampling: a new approach to the study of hidden populations. Soc Probl. 1997;44(2):174–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Johnston LG, Khanam R, Reza M, et al. The effectiveness of respondent driven sampling for recruiting males who have sex with males in Dhaka, Bangladesh. AIDS Behav. 2008;12(2):294–304.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lane T, Raymond HF, Dladla S, et al. High HIV prevalence among men who have sex with men in Soweto, South Africa: results from the Soweto men’s study. AIDS Behav. 2011;15(3):626–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Malekinejad M, Johnston LG, Kendall C, Kerr LR, Rifkin MR, Rutherford GW. Using respondent-driven sampling methodology for HIV biological and behavioral surveillance in international settings: a systematic review. AIDS Behav. 2008;12(4 Suppl):S105–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Magnani R, Sabin K, Saidel T, Heckathorn D. Review of sampling hard-to-reach and hidden populations for HIV surveillance. AIDS. 2005;19(Suppl 2):S67–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Salganik MJ. Variance estimation, design effects, and sample size calculations for respondent-driven sampling. J Urban Health. 2006;83(6 Suppl):i98–112.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Larsen SA, Steiner BM, Rudolph AH. Laboratory diagnosis and interpretation of tests for syphilis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1995;8(1):1–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Heckathorn D. Extensions of respondent-driven sampling: analyzing continuous variables and controlling for differential recruitment. Sociol Methodol. 2007;37:151–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ruan S, Yang H, Zhu Y, et al. Rising HIV prevalence among married and unmarried among men who have sex with men: Jinan, China. AIDS Behav. 2009;13(4):671–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Corey L, Wald A, Celum CL, Quinn TC. The effects of herpes simplex virus-2 on HIV-1 acquisition and transmission: a review of two overlapping epidemics. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2004;35(5):435–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lama JR, Lucchetti A, Suarez L, et al. Association of herpes simplex virus type 2 infection and syphilis with human immunodeficiency virus infection among men who have sex with men in Peru. J Infect Dis. 2006;194(10):1459–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zetola NM, Bernstein KT, Wong E, Louie B, Klausner JD. Exploring the relationship between sexually transmitted diseases and HIV acquisition by using different study designs. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2009;50(5):546–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Snowden JM, Konda KA, Leon SR, et al. Recent syphilis infection prevalence and risk factors among male low-income populations in coastal Peruvian cities. Sex Transm Dis. 2010;37(2):75–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Konda KA, Klausner JD, Lescano AG, et al. The epidemiology of herpes simplex virus type 2 infection in low-income urban populations in coastal Peru. Sex Transm Dis. 2005;32(9):534–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Program collaboration and service integration: enhancing the prevention and control of HIV/AIDS, viral hepatitis, sexually transmitted diseases, and tuberculosis in the United States. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2009.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hall HI, An Q, Hutchinson AB, Sansom S. Estimating the lifetime risk of a diagnosis of the HIV infection in 33 states, 2004–2005. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2008;49(3):294–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Parker R, Aggleton P. HIV and AIDS-related stigma and discrimination: a conceptual framework and implications for action. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57(1):13–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kosenko KA. Contextual influences on sexual risk-taking in the transgender community. J Sex Res. 2010;24:1–12.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Lombardi EL, Wilchins RA, Priesing D, Malouf D. Gender violence: transgender experiences with violence and discrimination. J Homosex. 2001;42(1):89–101.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Lombardi E. Varieties of transgender/transsexual lives and their relationship with transphobia. J Homosex. 2009;56(8):977–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Infante C, Sosa-Rubi SG, Cuadra SM. Sex work in Mexico: vulnerability of male, travesti, transgender and transsexual sex workers. Cult Health Sex. 2009;11(2):125–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Nuttbrock L, Hwahng S, Bockting W, et al. Lifetime risk factors for HIV/sexually transmitted infections among male-to-female transgender persons. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2009;52(3):417–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Bockting WO, Robinson BE, Rosser BR. Transgender HIV prevention: a qualitative needs assessment. AIDS Care. 1998;10(4):505–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Garofalo R, Deleon J, Osmer E, Doll M, Harper GW. Overlooked, misunderstood and at-risk: exploring the lives and HIV risk of ethnic minority male-to-female transgender youth. J Adolesc Health. 2006;38(3):230–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Nemoto T, Operario D, Keatley J, Villegas D. Social context of HIV risk behaviours among male-to-female transgenders of colour. AIDS Care. 2004;16(6):724–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Berrill KT, Herek GM. Primary and secondary victimization in anti-gay hate crimes: official response and public policy. J Interpers Violence. 1990;5:401–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Operario D, Soma T, Underhill K. Sex work and HIV status among transgender women: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2008;48(1):97–103.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Wimonsate W, Naorat S, Varangrat A, et al. Risk behavior, hormone use, surgical history and HIV infection among transgendered persons (TG) in Thailand, 2005 [MOPE0349]. Presented at AIDS 2006—XVI International AIDS Conference.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Newfield E, Hart S, Dibble S, Kohler L. Female-to-male transgender quality of life. Qual Life Res. 2006;15(9):1447–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Gagizi E, Ferreira E, Abbate MC. Biosecurity on using industrial liquid silicon and female sexual hormones by transvestis and transgenders in São Paulo City, Brazil [CDC1677]. Presented at AIDS 2006—XVI International AIDS Conference.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Hage JJ, Kanhai RC, Oen AL, van Diest PJ, Karim RB. The devastating outcome of massive subcutaneous injection of highly viscous fluids in male-to-female transsexuals. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107(3):734–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Heckathorn DD. Respondent driven sampling II: deriving valid population estimates from chain-referral samples of hiddenpopulations. Soc Probl. 2002;49(1):11–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Burt RD, Hagan H, Sabin K, Thiede H. Evaluating respondent-driven sampling in a major metropolitan area: comparing injection drug users in the 2005 Seattle area national HIV behavioral surveillance system survey with participants in the RAVEN and Kiwi studies. Ann Epidemiol. 2010;20(2):159–67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alfonso Silva-Santisteban
    • 1
  • H. Fisher Raymond
    • 2
  • Ximena Salazar
    • 1
  • Jana Villayzan
    • 1
    • 3
  • Segundo Leon
    • 1
  • Willi McFarland
    • 2
  • Carlos F. Caceres
    • 1
  1. 1.Unit of Health, Sexuality and Human DevelopmentCayetano Heredia University School of Public HealthLima 18Peru
  2. 2.San Francisco Department of Public HealthSan FranciscoUSA
  3. 3.Red Trans PeruLimaPeru

Personalised recommendations