AIDS and Behavior

, Volume 14, Issue 1, pp 25–28 | Cite as

The Evidence for the Role of Concurrent Partnerships in Africa’s HIV Epidemics: A Response to Lurie and Rosenthal

Article

References

  1. 1.
    SADC. Expert think tank meeting on HIV prevention in high-prevalence countries in southern Africa: report. www.sadc.int/archives/read/news/802 (2006). Accessed 25 June 2009.
  2. 2.
    UNAIDS, Harvard AIDS Prevention Research Project, World Bank. Strategic considerations for communications on multiple and concurrent partnerships within broader HIV prevention in Southern Africa. www.unaidsrstesa.org (2008). Accessed 25 June 2009.
  3. 3.
    Lurie MN, Rosenthal S. Concurrent partnerships as a driver of the HIV epidemic in sub-Saharan Africa: the evidence is limited. AIDS Behav. 2009; doi:10.1007/s10461-009-9583-5.
  4. 4.
    Potts M, Halperin DT, Kirby D, Swidler A, Marseille E, Klausner JD, et al. Reassessing HIV prevention. Science. 2008;320(5877):749–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mah TL, Halperin DT. Concurrent sexual partnerships and the HIV epidemics in Africa: evidence to move forward. AIDS Behav. 2008; doi:10.1007/s10461-008-9433-x).
  6. 6.
    Halperin DT, Epstein H. Concurrent sexual partnerships help to explain Africa’s high HIV prevalence: Implications for prevention. Lancet. 2004;364(9428):4–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Caraël M. Sexual behaviour. In: Cleland JG, Ferry B, editors. Sexual behaviour and AIDS in the developing world. London: Taylor & Francis, World Health Organization; 1995.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Morris M. Partnership networks and HIV: global consequences of local decisions. In: NIH Advisory Council Meeting, June 2003.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gourvenec D, Taruberekera N, Mochaka O, Kasper T. Multiple concurrent partnerships among men and women aged 15–34 in Botswana—baseline study. www.psi.org/hiv/tools/index.html (2007). Accessed 25 June 2009.
  10. 10.
    Harrison A, Cleland J, Frohlich J. Young people’s sexual partnerships in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: patterns, contextual influences, and HIV risk. Stud Fam Plann. 2008;39(4):295–308.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Campbell M, Mullins J, Hughes J, Deng W, Raugi D, Sorensen S, et al. Determination of transmission linkage in the partners in prevention study. In: 5th IAS conference on HIV pathogenesis, treatment and prevention, Cape Town, South Africa, 19–22 July 2009.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wellings K, Collumbien M, Slaymaker E, Singh S, Hodges Z, Patel D, et al. Sexual behaviour in context: a global perspective. Lancet. 2006;368(9548):1706–28.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Morris M. Concurrent partnerships and syphilis persistence: new thoughts on an old puzzle. Sex Transm Dis. 2001;28(9):504–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Potterat JJ, Zimmerman-Rogers H, Muth SQ, Rothenberg RB, Green DL, Taylor JE, et al. Chlamydia transmission: concurrency, reproduction number, and the epidemic trajectory. Am J Epidemiol. 1999;150(12):1331–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Drumright LN, Gorbach PM, Holmes KK. Do people really know their sex partners? Concurrency, knowledge of partner behavior, and sexually transmitted infections within partnerships. Sex Transm Dis. 2004;31(7):437–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Koumans E, Farley T, Gibson J, Langley C, Ross M, McFarlane M, et al. Characteristics of persons with syphilis in areas of persisting syphilis in the United States: sustained transmission associated with concurrent partnerships. Sex Transm Dis. 2001;28(9):497–503.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Guwatudde D, Wabwire-Mangen F, Eller LA, Eller M, McCutchan F, Kibuuka H, et al. Relatively low HIV infection rates in rural Uganda, but with high potential for a rise: a cohort study in Kayunga District, Uganda. PLoS ONE. 2009;4(1):e4145.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gregson S, Nyamukapa CA, Garnett GP, Mason PR, Zhuwau T, Caraël M, et al. Sexual mixing patterns and sex-differentials in teenage exposure to HIV infection in rural Zimbabwe. Lancet. 2002;359(9321):1896–903.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mishra V, Bignami-Van Assche S. Concurrent sexual partnerships and HIV infection: evidence from national population-based surveys. DHS Working Paper No. 62. www.measuredhs.com/pubs/ (2009). Accessed 20 June 2009.
  20. 20.
    Leclerc-Madlala S. Cultural scripts for multiple and concurrent partnerships in southern Africa: why HIV prevention needs anthropology. Sex Health. 2009;6:103–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Soul City Institute Regional Programme. Multiple and concurrent sexual partnerships in Southern Africa: a ten country research report. www.soulcity.org/za (2008). Accessed 25 June 2009.
  22. 22.
    Shelton JD. Why multiple sex partners? Lancet. 2009;374(9687):367–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    UNAIDS Reference Group on Estimates Modelling and Projections. Consultation on concurrent sexual partnerships: recommendations from a meeting held in Nairobi, Kenya. http://www.epidem.org/publications.htm (2009). Accessed 25 June 2009.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Office of HIV/AIDSUnited States Agency for International DevelopmentWashington, DCUSA
  2. 2.Department of Global Health and PopulationHarvard School of Public HealthBostonUSA
  3. 3.Washington, DCUSA

Personalised recommendations