AIDS and Behavior

, 13:564 | Cite as

The Use of the Diaphragm Instead of Condoms in a Phase III Diaphragm Trial

  • Ariane van der Straten
  • Helen Cheng
  • Jie Moore
  • Deborah Kacanek
  • Kelly Blanchard
  • Guy De Bruyn
  • Gita Ramjee
  • Tsungai Chipato
  • Elizabeth T. Montgomery
  • Nancy Padian
  • The MIRA Team
Original Paper

Abstract

The MIRA trial assessed whether providing diaphragm, lubricant gel, and condoms (intervention) compared with condoms alone (control) could reduce HIV incidence among 5,039 Southern African women. Compared with the control group, the cumulative proportion of last sex acts protected by any method was higher in the intervention group (OR = 1.33; 95% CI 1.18, 1.49); however, only 36.3% of last sex acts were protected by both a male condom and a diaphragm, whereas 36.6% were protected by a diaphragm only. Product substitution (ever deciding to use a diaphragm instead of a condom in the previous 3 months) was reported at every visit by 22.4%, at some visits by 60.7%, and at none of the visits by 16.8% of these women. Women at greater risk for infection through their own or their partner’s behavior or who believed the diaphragm protected against HIV were more likely to report product substitution at every visit.

Keywords

Vaginal diaphragm Condoms HIV/STI prevention Product substitution Africa Female-initiated methods 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the women who participated in this study. For A. van der Straten, H. Cheng, N. Padian and E. Montgomery, most work for this study was conducted at the University of California San Francisco, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences. Special thanks to Stephen Shiboski for statistical advice, and Caitlin Gerdts for review and editorial assistance. The MIRA trial was funded through a grant from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (#21082).

References

  1. Auvert, B., Taljaard, D., Lagarde, E., Sobngwi-Tambekou, J., Sitta, R., & Puren, A. (2005). Randomized, controlled intervention trial of male circumcision for reduction of HIV infection risk: The ANRS 1265 Trial. PLoS Medicine, 2(11), e298. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020298.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bailey, R. C., Moses, S., Parker, C. B., Agot, K., Maclean, I., Krieger, J. N., et al. (2007). Male circumcision for HIV prevention in young men in Kisumu, Kenya: A randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 369(9562), 643–656. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60312-2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Behets, F., Turner, A., Van Damme, K., Rabenja, N., Ravelomanana, N., Zeller, K., et al. (2005). Acceptability and feasibility of continuous diaphragm use among sex workers in Madagascar. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 81(6), 472–476. doi: 10.1136/sti.2005.015107.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Behets, F., Van Damme, K., Turner, A., Rabenja, N., Ravelomanana, N., Raharinivo, M., et al. (2008). Evidence-based planning of a randomized controlled trial on diaphragm use for prevention of sexually transmitted infections. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 35(3), 238–242.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buck, J., Kang, M. S., van der Straten, A., Khumalo-Sakutukwa, G., Posner, S., & Padian, N. (2005). Barrier method preferences and perceptions among Zimbabwean women and their partners. AIDS and Behavior, 9(4), 415–422. doi: 10.1007/s10461-005-9013-2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cassell, M. M., Halperin, D. T., Shelton, J. D., & Stanton, D. (2006). Risk compensation: The Achilles’ heel of innovations in HIV prevention? British Medical Journal, 332(7541), 605–607. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7541.605.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chacham, A., Diniz, S., Maia, M., Falati, A., & Mirim, L. (2007). Sexual and reproductive health needs of sex workers: Two feminist projects in Brazil. Reproductive Health Matters, 15(29), 108–118. doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080(07)29292-4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coker, A. (2007). Does physical intimate partner violence affect sexual health? A systematic review. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 8(2), 149–177. doi: 10.1177/1524838007301162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Foss, A. M., Vickerman, P. T., Heise, L., & Watts, C. H. (2003). Shifts in condom use following microbicide introduction: Should we be concerned? AIDS (London England), 17(8), 1227–1237. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200305230-00015.Google Scholar
  10. Gray, R. H., Kigozi, G., Serwadda, D., Makumbi, F., Watya, S., Nalugoda, F., et al. (2007). Male circumcision for HIV prevention in men in Rakai, Uganda: A randomised trial. Lancet, 369(9562), 657–666. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60313-4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gregson, S., Garnett, G. P., Nyamukapa, C. A., Hallett, T. B., Lewis, J. J., Mason, P. R., et al. (2006). HIV decline associated with behavior change in eastern Zimbabwe. Science, 311(5761), 664–666. doi: 10.1126/science.1121054.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Guest, G., Johnson, L., Burke, H., Rain-Taljaard, R., Severy, L., von Mollendorf, C., et al. (2007). Changes in sexual behavior during a safety and feasibility trial of a microbicide/diaphragm combination: An integrated qualitative and quantitative analysis. AIDS Education and Prevention, 19(4), 310–320. doi: 10.1521/aeap.2007.19.4.310.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jewell, N., Van der Straten, A., Montgomery, E., Rosenblum, M., & Padian, N. (2007). Authors reply: Diaphragms and lubricant gel for prevention of HIV. Lancet, 370, 1823–1824. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61766-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kacanek, D., Dennis, A., Montgomery, L., Sahin Hodoglugil, N., Morar, N., Mtetwa, S., et al. (2008). Contextual Influences on Use of the Diaphragm and Gel without Condoms in the Methods for Improving Reproductive Health in Africa (MIRA) Trial. Paper presented at the AIDS 2008 International Conference, Mexico City, Mexico.Google Scholar
  15. Kalichman, S., Simbayi, L., Kaufman, M., Cain, D., & Jooste, S. (2007). Alcohol use and sexual risks for HIV/AIDS in sub-Saharan Africa: Systematic review of empirical findings. Prevention Science, 8(2), 141–151. doi: 10.1007/s11121-006-0061-2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kang, M. S., Buck, J., Padian, N., Posner, S. F., Khumalo-Sakutukwa, G., & van der Straten, A. (2007). The importance of discreet use of the diaphragm to Zimbabwean women and their partners. AIDS and Behavior, 11(3), 443–451. doi: 10.1007/s10461-006-9190-7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kleinschmidt, I., Maggwa, B. N., Smit, J., Beksinska, M. E., & Rees, H. (2003). Dual protection in sexually active women. South African Medical Journal, 93(11), 854–857.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Koo, H. P., Woodsong, C., Dalberth, B. T., Viswanathan, M. N., & Simons-Rudolph, A. (2005). Context of acceptability of topical microbicides: Sexual relationships. The Journal of Social Issues, 61(1), 67–93. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-4537.2005.00394.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lagakos, S., & Gable, A. (2008a). Challenges to HIV prevention—Seeking effective measures in the absence of a vaccine. The New England Journal of Medicine, 358(15), 1543–1545. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0802028.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lagakos, S., & Gable, A. (Eds.). (2008b). Methodological Challenges in Biomedical HIV Prevention Trials. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. Retrieved October 20, 2008, from http://www.nap.edu/catalog/12056.html.
  21. Maharaj, P. (2001). Obstacles to negotiating dual protection: Perspectives of men and women. African Journal of Reproductive Health, 5(3), 150–161. doi: 10.2307/3583332.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Maharaj, P., & Cleland, J. (2004). Condom use within marital and cohabiting partnerships in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Studies in Family Planning, 35(2), 116–124. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2004.00013.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mantell, J. E., Morar, N. S., Myer, L., & Ramjee, G. (2006). “We have our protector”: Misperceptions of protection against HIV among participants in a microbicide efficacy trial. American Journal of Public Health, 96(6), 1073–1077. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.047514.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mantell, J. E., Stein, Z. A., & Susser, I. (2008). Women in the time of AIDS: Barriers, bargains, and benefits. AIDS Education and Prevention, 20(2), 91–106. doi: 10.1521/aeap.2008.20.2.91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mattson, C. L., Campbell, R. T., Bailey, R. C., Agot, K., Ndinya-Achola, J. O., & Moses, S. (2008). Risk Compensation Is Not Associated with Male Circumcision in Kisumu, Kenya: A Multi-Faceted Assessment of Men Enrolled in a Randomized Controlled Trial. PLoS ONE, 3(6), e2443. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002443.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Montgomery, C. M., Lees, S., Stadler, J., Morar, N. S., Ssali, A., Mwanza, B., et al. (2008). The role of partnership dynamics in determining the acceptability of condoms and microbicides. AIDS Care, 20(6), 733–740. doi: 10.1080/09540120701693974.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Morroni, C., Smit, J., McFadyen, L., Mqhayt, M., & Beksinska, M. (2003). Dual protection against sexually transmitted infections and pregnancy in South Africa. African Journal of Reproductive Health, 7(2), 13–19. doi: 10.2307/3583208.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Okal, J., Stadler, J., Ombidi, W., Jao, I., Luchters, S., Temmerman, M., et al. (2008). Secrecy, disclosure and accidental discovery: Perspectives of diaphragm users in Mombasa, Kenya. Culture, Health & Sexuality: An International Journal for Research. Intervention and Care, 10(1), 13–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Orner, P., Harries, J., Cooper, D., Moodley, J., Hoffman, M., Becker, J., et al. (2006). Challenges to microbicide introduction in South Africa. Social Science and Medicine, 63(4), 968–978. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.02.019.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ott, M. A., Adler, N. E., Millstein, S. G., Tschann, J. M., & Ellen, J. M. (2002). The trade-off between hormonal contraceptives and condoms among adolescents. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 34(1), 6–14. doi: 10.2307/3030227.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Padian, N. S., van der Straten, A., Ramjee, G., Chipato, T., de Bruyn, G., Blanchard, K., et al. (2007). Diaphragm and lubricant gel for prevention of HIV acquisition in southern African women: A randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 370(9583), 251–261. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60950-7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Posner, S. F., van der Straten, A., Kang, M. S., Padian, N., & Chipato, T. (2005). Introducing diaphragms into the mix: What happens to male condom use patterns? AIDS and Behavior, 9(4), 443–449. doi: 10.1007/s10461-005-9016-z.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Santelli, J. S., Warren, C. W., Lowry, R., Sogolow, E., Collins, J., Kann, L., et al. (1997). The use of condoms with other contraceptive methods among young men and women. Family Planning Perspectives, 29(6), 261–267. doi: 10.2307/2953414.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Trussell, J., & Dominik, R. (2005). Will microbicide trials yield unbiased estimates of microbicide efficacy? Contraception, 72(6), 408–413. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2005.06.063.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ulin, P. R. (1992). African women and AIDS: Negotiating behavioral change. Social Science and Medicine, 34(1), 63–73. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(92)90068-2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. van der Straten, A., Moore, J., Napierala, S., Clouse, K., Mauk, C., Hammond, N., et al. (2008a). Consistent use of a combination product versus a single product in a safety trial of the diaphragm and microbice in Harare, Zimbabwe. Contraception, 77(6), 435–443. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2008.02.013.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. van der Straten, A., Moore, J., Shiboski, S., Montgomery, E., de Bruyn, G., Ramjee, G., et al. (2008b). Patterns and predictors of adherence in a phase III trial in sub-Saharan Africa: a Trajectory Analysis. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes (in press).Google Scholar
  38. Zablotska, I., Gray, R., Serwadda, D., Nalugoda, F., Kigozi, G., Sewankambo, N., et al. (2006). Alcohol use before sex and HIV acquisition: A longitudinal study in Rakai, Uganda. AIDS (London, England), 20(8), 1191–1196. doi: 10.1097/01.aids.0000226960.25589.72.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ariane van der Straten
    • 1
    • 2
  • Helen Cheng
    • 1
  • Jie Moore
    • 3
  • Deborah Kacanek
    • 4
  • Kelly Blanchard
    • 4
  • Guy De Bruyn
    • 5
  • Gita Ramjee
    • 6
  • Tsungai Chipato
    • 7
  • Elizabeth T. Montgomery
    • 1
  • Nancy Padian
    • 1
  • The MIRA Team
    • 8
  1. 1.Women’s Global Health ImperativeRTI InternationalSan FranciscoUSA
  2. 2.Center for AIDS Prevention Studies, Department of MedicineUniversity of California San FranciscoSan FranciscoUSA
  3. 3.Department of OBGYNUniversity of California San FranciscoSan FranciscoUSA
  4. 4.Ibis Reproductive HealthCambridgeUSA
  5. 5.Perinatal HIV Research UnitUniversity of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa
  6. 6.HIV Prevention Research UnitMedical Research CouncilDurbanSouth Africa
  7. 7.UZ-UCSF Collaborative Research ProgrammeUniversity of ZimbabweHarareZimbabwe
  8. 8.San FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations