AIDS and Behavior

, Volume 12, Issue 2, pp 305–320

The Cognitive Escape Scale: Measuring HIV-related Thought Avoidance

  • Carol J. Nemeroff
  • Michael A. Hoyt
  • David M. Huebner
  • Rae Jean Proescholdbell
Original Paper

Abstract

Cognitive escape provides a model for examining the cognitive processes involved in escaping from thoughts of HIV/AIDS in a population of men who have sex with men (MSM). This investigation presents psychometric information and validation data on the Cognitive Escape Scale (CES), a measure of HIV-related cognitive avoidance. This study also examined the associations between the CES and self-report measures of theoretically related constructs, including HIV-related worry, sensation-seeking, depressive symptoms, perceived stress, and risky sexual behaviors. Participants were 709 MSM (71% White, 13% Latino, 8% African-American, 6% Native American; M age = 35). The CES measured HIV-related thought avoidance. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported a 3-factor structure to the CES, suggesting three strategies of cognitive escape: fatalism/short-term thinking, thought suppression/distraction, and alcohol/drug use. These factors are differentially related to several variables of interest including risky sexual behaviors. Although the CES is designed for use with both HIV negative and positive men, correlates differed between groups.

Keywords

Cognitive escape HIV AIDS Thought suppression Fatalism 

References

  1. Appleby, P. R., Marks, G., Ayala, A., Miller, L. C., Murphy, S., & Mansergh, G. (2005). Consideration of future consequences and unprotected anal intercourse among men who have sex with men. Journal of Homosexuality, 50, 119–133.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aspinwall, L. G., Kemeny, M. E., Taylor, S. E., Schneider, S. G., & Dudley, J. P. (1991). Psychosocial predictors of gay men’s AIDS risk-reduction behavior. Health Psychology, 10, 432–444.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beck, A. T., Rush, A. J., Shaw, B. F., & Emery, G. (1979). Cognitive therapy of depression. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  4. Billings, A. G., & Moos, R. H. (1981). The role of coping responses in attenuating the impact of stressful life events. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 4, 139–157.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  6. Borkovec, T. D., & Lyonfields, J. D. (1993). Worry: Thought suppression of emotional processing. In: H. W. Krohne (Ed.), Attention and avoidance: Strategies in coping with aversiveness (pp. 101–118). Seattle: Hogrefe and Huber.Google Scholar
  7. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: R. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Bryan, A. D., Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1997). Young women’s condom use: The influence of acceptance of sexuality, control over the sexual encounter, and perceived susceptibility to common STDs. Health Psychology, 16, 468–479.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cabaj, R. P. (2000). Substance abuse, internalized homophobia, and gay men and lesbians: Psychodynamic issues and clinical implications. Journal of Gay and Lesbian Psychotherapy, 3, 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (1999). Resurgent bacterial sexually transmitted disease among men who have sex with men: King County, Washington, 1997–1999. Morbidity Mortality Weekly Report, 48, 773–777.Google Scholar
  11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2001). No turning back: Addressing the HIV crisis among men who have sex with men. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Google Scholar
  12. Chen, S. Y., Gibson, S., Katz, M. H., Klausner, J. D., Dilley, J. W., Schwarcz, S. K., et al. (2002). Continuing increases in sexual risk behavior and sexually transmitted diseases among men who have sex with men: San Francisco, Calif, 1999–2001, USA. American Journal of Public Health, 92, 1387–1388.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24, 385–396.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Austin: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, Inc.Google Scholar
  15. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Davis, M. C. (1998). Psychosocial correlates of cardiovascular risk factors in young adults. Unpublished raw data.Google Scholar
  17. DiIorio, C., Parsons, M., Lehr, S., Adame, D., & Carlone, J. (1993). Factors associated with use of safer sex practices among college freshmen. Research in Nursing and Health, 16, 343–350.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ebata, A., & Moos, R. (1991). Coping and adjustment in distressed and healthy adolescents. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 12, 33–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Elford, J. (2004). HIV treatment optimism and high-risk sexual behavior among gay men: The attributable population risk: Comment. AIDS, 18, 2216–2217.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1984). Personal control and stress and coping processes: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 839–852.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gerrard, M., Gibbons, F. X., & Bushman, B. J. (1996). Relation between perceived vulnerability to HIV and precautionary sexual behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 19, 390–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Henson, J. M., Carey, M. P., Carey, K. B., & Maisto, S. A. (2006). Associations among health behaviors and time perspective in young adults: Model testing with boot-strapping replication. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 29, 127–137.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hojat, M., Zuckerman, M., Magee, M., Mangione, S., Nasca, T., Vergare, M., & Gonnella, J. S. (2005). Empathy in medical students as related to specialty interest, personality, and perceptions of mother and father. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 1205–1215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hoyt, M. A., Nemeroff, C. J., & Huebner, D. M. (2006). The effects of HIV-related thought suppression on sexual risk behavior: Cognitive escape in men who have sex with men. Health Psychology, 25, 455–461.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Huebner, D. M., & Davis, M. C. (2007). Perceived antigay discrimination and physical health outcomes. Health Psychology, 26, 627–634.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Huebner, D. M., Rebchook, G. M., & Kegeles, S. M. (2004). A longitudinal study of the association between treatment optimism and sexual risk behavior in young adult gay and bisexual men. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome, 37, 1514–1519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Janis, I. L., & Mann, L. (1977). Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice and commitment. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  29. Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (2005), LISREL 8.72: Structural equation modeling. Chicago: Scientific Software International Co.Google Scholar
  30. Kalichman, S. C., Cain, D., Weinhardt, L., Benotsch, E., Presser, K., Zweben, A., Bjodstrup, B., & Swain, G. R. (2005). Experimental components analysis of brief theory-based HIV/AIDS risk-reduction counseling for sexually transmitted infection patients. Health Psychology, 24, 198–208.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kalichman, S. C., Heckman, T., & Kelly, J. A. (1996). Sensation seeking as an explanation for the association between substance use and HIV-related risky sexual behavior. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 25, 141–154.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kalichman, S. C., Nachimson, D., Cherry, C., & Williams, E. (1998). Treatment advances and behavioral prevention setbacks: Preliminary assessment of reduced perceived threat of HIV/AIDS. Health Psychology, 17, 546–550.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Krohne, H. W. (1993). Attention and avoidance: Two central strategies in coping with aversivesness. In: H. W. Krohne (Ed.), Attention and avoidance: Strategies in coping with aversiveness (pp. 3–15). Seattle: Hogrefe and Huber.Google Scholar
  34. McAuliffe, T. L., Kelly, J. A., Sikkema, K. J., Murphy, D. A., Winett, R. A., Solomon, L. J., & Roffman, R. A. (1999). Sexual HIV risk behavior levels among young and older gay men outside of AIDS epicenters: Findings of a 16-city sample. AIDS and Behavior, 3, 111–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McDonald, R. P. (1985). Factor analysis and related methods. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  36. McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  37. McKirnan, D. J., Ostrow, D. G., & Hope, B. (1996). Sex, drugs and escape: A psychological model of HIV-risk sexual behaviours. AIDS Care, 8, 655–669.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McKirnan, D. J., Vanable, P. A., Ostrow, D. G., & Hope, B. (2001). Expectancies of sexual escape and sexual risk among drug and alcohol-involved gay and bisexual men. Journal of Substance Abuse, 13, 137–154.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Millsap, R. E. (2002). Structural equation modeling: A user’s guide. In: F. Drasgow & N. Schmitt (Eds.), Measuring and analyzing behavior in organizations (pp. 257–301). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  40. Ratzan S. (Ed.) (1993). AIDS: Effective health communication for the 90’s. Washington: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  41. Rohde, P., Lewinsohn, P. M., Tilson, M., & Seeley, J. R. (1990). Dimensionality of coping and its relation to depression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 499–511.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rosenstock, I. M., Strecher, V. J., & Becker, M. H. (1994). The Health Belief Model and HIV risk behavior change. In: R. J. DiClemente & J. L. Peterson (Eds.), Preventing AIDS: Theories and methods of behavioral interventions (pp. 5–24). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  43. Rothspan, S., & Read, S. J. (1996). Present versus future time perspective and HIV risk among heterosexual college students. Health Psychology, 15, 131–134.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. SPSS. (2005). SPSS 14.0 for Windows (Version 14.0) [Computer Software]. Chicago: Author.Google Scholar
  45. Tafoya, T. (2003). Native gay and lesbian issues: The two-spirited. In: D. C. Kimmel & L. D. Garnets (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on lesbian, gay, and bisexual experiences (2nd ed., pp. 401–409). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Taylor, R. L., & Hamilton, J. C. (1997). Preliminary evidence for the role of self-regulatory processes in sensation seeking. Anxiety, Stress and Coping: An International Journal, 10, 351–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Vanable, P. A., Ostrow, D. G., McKirnan, D. J., Taywaditep, K. J., & Hope, B.A. (2000). Impact of combination therapies on HIV risk perception and sexual risk among HIV-positive and HIV-negative gay and bisexual men. Health Psychology, 19, 134–145.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vicioso, K. J., Parsons, J. T., Nanin, J. E., Purcell, D. W., & Woods, W. J. (2005). Experiencing release: Sex environments and escapism for HIV-positive men who have sex with men. Journal of Sex Research, 42, 13–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vredenburg, K., Krames, L., & Flett, G. L. (1985). Reexamining the Beck Depression Inventory: The long and short of it. Psychological Reports, 56(3), 767–778.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Williams, M. L., Elwood, W. N., & Bowen, A. M. (2000). Escape from risk: A qualitative exploration of relapse to unprotected anal sex among men who have sex with men. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 11, 25–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wills, T. A., Sandy, J. M., & Yaeger, A. M. (2001). Time perspective and early-onset substance use: A model based on stress-coping theory. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 15, 118–125.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Witte, K., Meyer, G., & Martell, D. (2001). Effective health risk message: A step-by-step guide. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  53. Wegner, D. M., Schneider, D. J., Carter, S. R., & White, T. L. (1987). Paradoxical effects of thought suppression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 5–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zimbardo, P.G., & Boyd, J.N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable, individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1271–1288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Zimbardo, P. G., Keogh, K. A., & Boyd, J. N. (1997). Present time perspective as a predictor of risky driving. Personality and Individual Differences, 23, 1007–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zinbarg, R. E., Revelle, W., Yovel, I., & Li, W. (2005). Cronbach’s α, Revelle’s (, and McDonald’s ωH: Their relations with each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability. Psychometrika, 70, 123–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zuckerman, M. (1979). Sensation seeking: Beyond the optimal level of arousal. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  58. Zuckerman, M. (1994). Behavioral expressions and biosocial bases of sensation seeking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Zuckerman, M., Kuhlman, D. M., Joireman, J., Teta, P., & Kraft, M. (1993). A comparison of three structural models for personality: The big three, the big five, and the alternative five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 757–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carol J. Nemeroff
    • 1
    • 2
  • Michael A. Hoyt
    • 1
    • 3
  • David M. Huebner
    • 1
    • 4
  • Rae Jean Proescholdbell
    • 1
    • 5
  1. 1.Arizona State UniversityTempeUSA
  2. 2.Social and Behavioral Sciences ProgramLewiston-Auburn College of the University of Southern MainePortlandUSA
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyUniversity of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesUSA
  4. 4.Department of PsychologyUniversity of MarylandBaltimoreUSA
  5. 5.Center for Health PolicyDuke UniversityDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations