AIDS and Behavior

, Volume 12, Issue 6, pp 860–866 | Cite as

The Use of Rectal Douches among HIV-uninfected and Infected Men who Have Unprotected Receptive Anal Intercourse: Implications for Rectal Microbicides

  • Alex Carballo-DiéguezEmail author
  • José A. Bauermeister
  • Ana Ventuneac
  • Curtis Dolezal
  • Ivan Balan
  • Robert H. Remien
Original Paper


Although some rectal douches result in surface epithelium loss and potential increase of HIV transmission, men who have sex with men (MSM) continue to use them. We describe the prevalence of this practice among MSM engaging in unprotected receptive anal intercourse (URAI) in risky circumstances. A multiethnic sample with overrepresentation of HIV-negative MSM who had URAI in the previous year was recruited exclusively through the Internet. Participants were 105 MSM (78 HIV-negative, 27 HIV-positive). A total of 53% of HIV-negative and 96% of HIV-positive men douched in preparation for sex, most of them frequently or always, mainly for hygienic purposes. 27% of HIV-negative and 44% of HIV-positive douched after sex, partly believing douching protected from infections. Douching practices started around age 25. Regression analyses found the association between HIV status and douching occasions persisted after controlling for demographic characteristics and number of URAI occasions. Rectal douching in preparation for sex is common among men who practice URAI. This population could benefit from alternatives to condoms, such as rectal microbicides. Given the popularity of pre-coital douching and its frequency, a harmless rectal douche that could deliver a rectal microbicide could have great acceptability.


Receptive anal sex Douching Homosexual Gay Enema 


  1. Bienzle, U., Guggenmoos-Holzmann, I., Zwingenberger, K., Thommsen, R., Ritter, K., & Uy, A., et al. (1985). Lymphadenopathy and antibodies to HTLV-III in homosexual men Clinical, laboratory and epidemiological features. Journal of Molecular Medicine, 63, 597–602.Google Scholar
  2. Carballo-Diéguez, A., & Bauermeister, J. A. (2004). “Barebacking”: Intentional condomless anal sex in HIV-risk contexts: Reasons for and against it. Journal of Homosexuality, 47, 1–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carballo-Diéguez, A., Dowsett, G. A., Ventuneac, A., Remien, R. H., Balan, I., Dolezal, C., Luciano, O., & Lin, P. (2006). Cybercartography of popular Internet sites used by New York City men who have sex with men interested in bareback sex. AIDS Education & Prevention, 18(6), 475–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carballo-Diéguez, A., Exner, T., Dolezal, C., Pickard, R., Lin, P., & Mayer, K. H. (2007). Rectal microbicide acceptability: Results of a volume escalation trial. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 34(4), 224–229.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carballo-Diéguez, A., Stein, Z., Saez, H., Dolezal, C., Nieves-Rosa, L., & Diaz, F. (1999). Frequent use of lubricants for anal sex among men who have sex with men: the HIV prevention potential of a microbicidal gel. American Journal of Public Health, 90, 1117–1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Deininger, S., Müller, R., Guggenmoos-Holzmann, I., Laukamm-Josten, U., & Bienzle, U. (1990). Behavioral characteristics and laboratory parameters in homo- and bisexual men in West Berlin: An evaluation of five years of testing and counseling on AIDS. Journal of Molecular Medicine, 68, 906–913.Google Scholar
  7. Fuchs, E. J., Lee, L. A., Torbenson, M. S., Parsons, T. L., Bakshi, R. P., & Guidos, A. M., et al. (2007). Hyperosmolar sexual lubricant causes epithelial damage in the distal colon: Potential implication for HIV transmission. Journal of Infectious Diseases, 195(5), 703–710.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hylton, J., Hendrix, C., & Fuchs, E. (2004). An assessment of sexual practices affecting the feasibility of microbicide development among MSM. Oral Poster presented at Microbicides 2004, London.Google Scholar
  9. Koblin, B. A., Mayer, K., Mwatha, A., Brown-Peterside, P., Holt, R., & Marmor, M., et al. (2002). Douching practices among women at high risk of HIV infection in the United States: Implications for microbicide testing and use. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 29, 406–410.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Koziol, D. E., Saah, A. J., Odaka, N., & Munoz, A. (1993). A comparison of risk factors for human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis B virus infections in homosexual men. Annals of Epidemiology, 3, 434–441.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Martino, J. L., & Vermund, S. H. (2002). Vaginal douching: Evidence for risks or benefits to women’s health. Epidemiologic Reviews, 24, 109–124.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Moss, A. R., Osmond, D., Bacchetti, P., Chermann, J. C., Barre-Sinoussi, F., & Carlson, J. (1987). Risk factors for AIDS and HIV seropositivity in homosexual men. American Journal of Epidemiology, 125, 1035–1047.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Ndimbie, O. K., Kingsley, L. A., Nedjar, S., & Rinaldo, C. R. (1996). Hepatitis C virus infection in male homosexual cohort: Risk factor analysis. Genitourinary Medicine, 72, 213–216.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Ness, R. B., Hillier, S. L., Richter, H. E., Soper, D. E., Stamm, C., & Bass, D. C., et al. (2003). Why women douche and why they may or may not stop. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 30, 71–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Phillips, D., Taylor, C., Zacharopoulos, V., & Maguire, R. (2000). Nonoxynol-9 causes rapid exfoliation of sheets of rectal epithelium. Contraception, 62, 149–154.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Prentice, R. L., & Pyke, R. (1979). Logistic disease incidence models and case-control studies. Boimetrika, 66(3), 403–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Schmelzer, M., Schiller, L. R., Meyer, R., Rugari, S. M., & Case, P. (2004). Safety and effectiveness of large-volume enema solutions. Applied Nursing Research, 17, 265–274.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Schreeder, M. T., Thompson, S. E., Hadler, S. C., Berquist, K. R., Zaidi, A., & Maynard, J. E., et al. (1982). Hepatitis B in homosexual men: Prevalence of infection and factors related to transmission. Journal of Infectious Diseases, 146, 7–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Suarez, T., & Miller, J. (2001). Negotiating risks in context: A perspective on unprotected anal intercourse and barebacking among men who have sex with men—Where do we go from here? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 30, 287–300.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alex Carballo-Diéguez
    • 1
    Email author
  • José A. Bauermeister
    • 2
  • Ana Ventuneac
    • 2
  • Curtis Dolezal
    • 2
  • Ivan Balan
    • 2
  • Robert H. Remien
    • 2
  1. 1.HIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral StudiesNew York State Psychiatric InstituteNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.HIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral StudiesNew York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations