Advertisement

AIDS and Behavior

, Volume 11, Issue 6, pp 812–821 | Cite as

Young Urban Women’s Patterns of Unprotected Sex with Men Engaging in HIV Risk Behaviors

  • Rachel JonesEmail author
  • Marsha Oliver
Original Paper

Abstract

This study explored reasons women engaged in unprotected sex with male partners they distrusted and perceived to engage in HIV risk behaviors. Seven focus groups were held in public housing and neighborhood centers in the urban Northeast with 43 African American and Latina women. Content analysis was conducted by open and axial coding. Barrett’s theory of power as knowing participation in change and sex script theory guided interpretation. Results indicated that Patterns of Unprotected Sex is a usual practice to maintain hope, sensuality, intimacy, strategic gain, and stability with a male partner. In low power sex scripts the salient risks of HIV were buried under an awareness of oneself as having to satisfy a man and accept cheating. High power sex scripts involved women’s awareness of themselves as worthy of self care with diverse choices. High power scripts can be integrated into normative sex scripts as exemplars of more powerful ways of being and acting to reduce HIV risk.

Keywords

Women HIV sexual risk Focus groups Power Sex scripts Sexual pressure Trust 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by a RO3 grant, NR009349, to the first author from the National Institute of Nursing Research and a Busch Biomedical Research Grant from Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey. The authors gratefully acknowledge the women who shared their stories and those among them who practice and inspire others with their high power scripts.

References

  1. Barrett, E. A. M. (1998). A Rogerian practice methodology for health patterning. Nursing Science Quarterly, 11, 136–138.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bauman, L. J., & Berman, R. (2005). Adolescent relationships and condom use: Trust, love and commitment. AIDS and Behavior, 9(2), 211–222.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bowleg, L., Lucas, K. J., & Tschann, J. M. (2004). The ball was always in his court: An exploratory analysis of relationship scripts, sexual scripts, and condom use among African American women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 70–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2006). HIV/AIDS surveillance in women. Retrieved October 30, 2006, from http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/women/surveillance.htm.
  5. Crabtree, B. F., & Miller, W. C. (1999). Doing qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Diekman, A. B., McDonald, M., & Gardner, W. L. (2000). Love means never having to be careful: The relationship between reading romance novels and safe sex behavior. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 179–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dolcini, M. M., & Catania, J. A. (2000). Psychosocial profiles of women with risky sexual partners: National AIDS Behavioral Surveys (NABS). AIDS and Behavior, 4, 297–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Emmers-Sommer, T. M., & Allen, M. (2005). Safer sex in personal relationships: The role of sexual scripts in HIV infection and prevention. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.Google Scholar
  9. Fiske, S. T. (1982). Schema-triggered affect: Applications to social perception. In S. T. Fiske (Ed.), Affect and cognition: The seventeenth annual Carnegie symposium on cognition (pp. 55–78). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  10. Fiske, S. T. (2004). Social beings: A core motives approach to social psychology. Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
  11. Hynie, M., Lydon, J. E., Cote, S., & Weiner, S. (1998). Relational sexual scripts and women’s condom use: The importance of internalized norms. Journal of Sex Research, 35, 370–380.Google Scholar
  12. Jones, R. (2004). Relationships of sexual imposition, dyadic trust, and sensation seeking with sexual risk behavior in young urban women. Research in Nursing and Health, 27, 185–197.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jones, R. (2006a). The reliability and validity of the sexual pressure scale. Research in Nursing and Health, 29, 281–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jones, R. (2006b). Sex scripts and power: A framework to explain urban women’s HIV sexual risk with male partners. Nursing Clinics of North America, 41(3), 425–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kalichman, S. C., & Rompa, D. (1995). Sexual sensation seeking and sexual compulsivity scales: Reliability, validity, and predicting HIV risk behavior. Journal of Personality Assessment, 65, 586–601.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kidd, P. S., & Parshall, M. B. (2000). Getting the focus and the group: Enhancing analytical rigor in focus group research. Qualitative Health Research, 10(3), 293–308.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. King, J. L. (2004). On the down low: A journey into the lives of “straight” Black men who sleep with men. New York: Broadway Books.Google Scholar
  18. Krahe, B. (2000). Sexual scripts and heterosexual aggression. In T. E. H. M. Trautner (Ed.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp.273–292). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
  19. Mallory, C., & Noerager Stern, P. (2000). Awakening as a change process among women at risk for HIV who engage in survival sex. Qualitative Health Research, 10(5), 581–594.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Metts, S., & Spitzberg, B. H. (1996). Sexual communication in interpersonal contexts: A script-based approach. In B. R. Burleson (Ed.), Communication yearbook (Vol. 19, pp. 49–91). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  21. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  22. Morgan, D. L. (1997). Focus groups as qualitative research (2nd ed.). Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  23. Morokoff, P. J., Quina, K., Harlow, L. L., Whitmire, L., Grimley, D. M., Gibson, P. R. et al. (1997). Sexual Assertiveness Scale (SAS) for women: Development and validation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 790–804.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Palmgreen, P., Donohew, L., Lorch, E. P., Hoyle, R. H., & Stephenson, M. T. (2001). Television campaigns and adolescent marijuana use: Test of sensation seeking targeting. American Journal of Public Health, 91, 292–296.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Parsons, J. T., Vicioso, K. J., Punzalan, J. C., Halkitis, P. N., Kutnick, A., & Velasquez, M. M. (2004). The impact of alcohol use on the sexual scripts of HIV-Positive men who have sex with men. The Journal of Sex Research, 41(2), 160–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. H. (1986). Sexual scripts: Permanence and change. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 15(2), 97–120.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Singer, J. L., & Salovey, P. (1991). Organized knowledge structure and personality: Person schemas, self schemas, prototypes, and scripts. In M. J. Horowitz (Ed.), Person schemas and maladaptive interpersonal patterns (pp. 33–79). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  28. Smith, C. A., & Kirby, L. D. (2000). Consequences require antecedents: Toward a process model of emotion elicitation. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition (2nd ed., pp. 83–106). NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Sobo, E. J. (1995). Choosing unsafe sex: AIDS risk denial among disadvantaged women. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  30. Stacy, A. W., Newcomb, M. D., & Ames, S. L. (2000). Implicit cognition and HIV risk behavior. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 23(5), 475–499.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of NursingRutgers, the State University of NJNewarkUSA

Personalised recommendations