Advertisement

AIDS and Behavior

, Volume 11, Issue 4, pp 557–574 | Cite as

Development and Psychometric Evaluation of a Self-administered Questionnaire to Measure Knowledge of Sexually Transmitted Diseases

  • Beth C. Jaworski
  • Michael P. CareyEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

This research developed and evaluated a brief but comprehensive measure of knowledge about sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) for use in research and applied settings. Questionnaire construction involved a review of empirical precedents as well as qualitative work with STD experts (n = 6) and the target population (n = 40). Eighty-five items were piloted (n = 50) and tested (n = 391) with college students. Item- and test-level analyses identified items that were eliminated to shorten the questionnaire. Factor analyses revealed a two-factor model of STD knowledge, including a Cause/Cure factor and a General Knowledge factor. Six supplemental items were added to the final questionnaire for their public health value and resulted in the 27-item STD-Knowledge Questionnaire (STD-KQ). The STD-KQ demonstrated internal consistency (α = .86) and test–retest reliability (r = .88) over a brief period. Evidence for the validity of the STD-KQ was obtained through a comparison with a validated HIV knowledge questionnaire (Carey & Schroder, 2002); treatment outcome sensitivity was obtained in response to an educational program. Use of the STD-KQ will enable researchers and health educators to identify knowledge deficits, measure knowledge for theory testing, evaluate risk reduction programs, and assess treatment response in research and applied settings.

Keywords

STD HIV Knowledge Questionnaires Psychometrics 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by grant R01-MH54929 from the National Institute of Mental Health to Michael P. Carey.

References

  1. Becker, M. H. (Ed.). (1974). The health belief model and personal health behavior. Health Education Monographs, 2, 409–419.Google Scholar
  2. Bentler, P. M. (2005). EQS. (Version 6.1). Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.Google Scholar
  3. Bloom, B. S., Hastings, J. T., & Madaus, G. F. (1971). Handbook on formative and summative evaluation of student learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, E. J. (2000). AIDS-related risk behavior of young college students. Association of Black Nursing Faculty, 11, 37–43.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, M. B., & Bendetti, J. K. (1977). On the mean and variance of the tetrachoric correlation coefficient. Psychometrika, 42, 347–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bryan, A. D., Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1996). Increasing condom use: Evaluation of a theory-based intervention to prevent sexually transmitted diseases in young women. Health Psychology, 15, 371–382.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carey, M. P., Carey, K. B., Maisto, S. A., Gordon, C. M., Schroder, K. E. E., & Vanable, P. A. (2004). Reducing HIV-risk behavior among adults receiving outpatient psychiatric treatment: Results from a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 252–268.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carey, M. P., Braaten, L. S., Maisto, S. A., Gleason, J. R., Forsyth, A. D., Durant, L. E., & Jaworski, B. C. (2000). Using information, motivational enhancement, and skills training to reduce the risk of HIV infection for low-income urban women: A second randomized clinical trial. Health Psychology, 19, 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carey, M. P., Maisto, S. A., Kalichman, S. C., Forsyth, A. D., Wright, E. M., & Johnson, B. T. (1997). Enhancing motivation to reduce the risk of HIV infection for economically disadvantaged women. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 531–541.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carey, M. P., Morrison-Beedy, D., & Johnson, B. T. (1997). The HIV-Knowledge Questionnaire: Development and evaluation of a reliable, valid, and practical self-administered questionnaire. AIDS and Behavior, 1, 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carey, M. P., & Schroder, K. E. (2002). Development and psychometric evaluation of the brief HIV Knowledge Questionnaire. AIDS Education and Prevention, 14, 172–182.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2000). Tracking the hidden epidemics: Trends in STDs in the United States. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
  14. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2003). Summary of notifiable diseases—United States. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 50, 1–136.Google Scholar
  15. Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
  16. DeVellis, R. F. (2003). Guidelines in scale development. In L. Bickman and D. J. Rogers (Eds.), Applied social research methods series: Vol. 26. Scale development: Theory and applications (2nd ed., pp. 60–101). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  18. Fisher, J. D., & Fisher, W. A. (1992). Changing AIDS-risk behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 455–474.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Floyd, F. J., & Widaman, K. F. (1995). Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 7, 286–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Greenbaum, T. L. (2000). Moderating focus groups: A practical guide for group facilitation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  21. Haynes, S. N., Richard, D. C., & Kubany, E. S. (1995). Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological Assessment, 7, 238–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Institute of Medicine (1997). The hidden epidemic: Confronting sexually transmitted diseases. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  23. Jaworski, B. C., & Carey, M. P. (2001). Effects of a brief, theory-based STD-prevention program for female college students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 29, 417–425.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kalichman, S. (2003). The inside story on AIDS: Experts answer your questions. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  25. Kelly, J. A., St. Lawrence, J. S., Hood, H. V., & Brasfield, T. L. (1989). An objective test of AIDS risk behavior knowledge: Scale development, validation, and norms. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 20, 227–234.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. MacCallum, R. (1986). Specification searches in covariance structure modeling. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 107–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Miller, W. C., Ford, C. A., Morris, M., Handcock, M. S., Schmitz, J. L., & Hobbs, M. M., et al. (2004). Prevalence of chlamydial and gonococcal infections among young adults in the United States. Journal of the American Medical Association, 291, 2229–2236.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Morgan, D. L. (1998). The focus group guidebook. In D. L. Morgan & R. A. Krueger (Series Eds.), The Focus Group Kit: Vol 1. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  29. Olsson, U. (1979). Maximum likelihood estimation of the polychoric correlation coefficient. Psychometrika, 44, 443–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (1990). Model conditions for asymptotic robustness in the analysis of linear relations. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 10, 235–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In A. Von Eye & C. C. Clogg (Eds.), Analysis of latent variables in developmental research (pp. 399–419). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  32. Sawyer, R. G., & Smith, N. G. (1996). A survey of situational factors at first intercourse among college students. American Journal of Health Behavior, 20, 208–217.Google Scholar
  33. Ullman, J. B. (2001). Structural equation modeling. In Using Multivariate Statistics (4th ed., pp. 653–771). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  34. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2000). Healthy People 2010: National health promotion and disease prevention objectives. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
  35. Waltz, C. F., Strickland, O. L., & Lenz, E. R. (2004). Measurement in nursing and health research (3rd ed.). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  36. West, S. G., Finch, J. F., & Curran, P. J. (1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 56–75). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  37. Worthke, W. (1993). Nonpositive definite matrices in structural modeling. In K. A. Bollen, & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation modeling (pp. 294–316). Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  38. Yacobi, E., Tennant, C., Ferrante, J., Pal, N., & Roetzheim, R. (1999). University students’ knowledge and awareness of HPV. Preventive Medicine, 28, 535–541.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Health and BehaviorSyracuse UniversitySyracuseUSA
  2. 2.California State University San BernardinoSan BernardinoUSA

Personalised recommendations