AIDS and Behavior

, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 271–276 | Cite as

Awareness and Attitudes Regarding Microbicides and Nonoxynol-9 use in a Probability Sample of Gay Men

  • Alex Carballo-Diéguez
  • Lucia F. O’Sullivan
  • Peter Lin
  • Curtis Dolezal
  • Lance Pollack
  • Joseph Catania
ORIGINAL PAPER

Abstract

A household probability sample of 879 adult gay and other men who have sex with men in San Francisco underwent phone interviews. Approximately, half reported recent unprotected anal intercourse (UAI). Yet, lubricant use was high, a behavior that may facilitate future adoption of topical microbicide delivered by a lubricant gel. Despite warnings against Nonoxynol-9 (N-9), 26% of respondents reported still using it. Microbicide awareness was higher among men reporting UAI than among consistent condom users. Scenarios presenting microbicides “as effective as condoms,” “nearly as effective,” or “less effective but better than nothing” produced wide variability in willingness to use them, which may have implications for microbicide acceptability. HIV-infected men and those who reported UAI showed greater microbicide acceptance.

Keywords

Microbicides Nonoxynol-9 Gay men MSM Condoms 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The Urban Men’s Health Study was supported by National Institute of Mental Health grant R01-MH54320 and California State Office on AIDS contract 01-16085 (Principal Investigator, Joseph A. Catania). The authors acknowledge the support of a center grant from NIMH P50-MH43520 (HIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral Studies; Center Director, Anke A. Ehrhardt) and a postdoctoral training grant that supported Dr. Lin (T32 MH19139). They thank Ivan Balan for his helpful comments.

References

  1. Adam, B. D., Husbands, W., Murray, J., & Maxwell, J. (2005). AIDS optimism, condom fatigue, or self-esteem? Explaining unsafe sex among gay and bisexual men. The Journal of Sex Research, 42, 238–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alliance for Microbicide Development. (2005). The microbicide quarterly, July/December. Accessed on January 26, 2006 www.microbicide.org/publications.Google Scholar
  3. Carballo-Diéguez, A., & Bauermeister, J. (2004). “Barebacking”: Intentional condomless anal sex in HIV-risk contexts: Reasons for and against it. Journal of Homosexuality, 47, 1–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carballo-Dieguez, A., Stein, Z., Saez, H., Dolezal, C., Nieves-Rosa, L., & Diaz, F. (2000). Frequent use of lubricants for anal sex among men who have sex with men: The HIV prevention potential of a microbicidal gel. American Journal of Public Health, 90, 1117–1121.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Catania, J. A., Osmond, D., Stall, R. D., Pollack, L., Paul, J. P., Blower, S. et al. (2001). The continuing HIV epidemic among men who have sex with men. American Journal of Public Health, 91, 907–914.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2000). August 4, 2000. Letter issued from the Department of Health and Human Services. Accessed March 11, 2005 www.cdc.gov/hib/pubs/mmwr/mmwr11aug00.pdf.Google Scholar
  7. Gross, M., Buchbinder, S. P., Celum, C., Heagerty, P., & Seage, G. R. III. (1998). Rectal microbicides for US gay men: Are clinical trials needed? Are they feasible? Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 25, 296–302.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Halkitis, P. N., & Parsons, J. T. (2003) Intentional unsafe sex (barebacking) among HIV-positive gay men who seek sexual partners on the Internet. AIDS Care, 15, 367–378.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kalichman, S. C. (2000). HIV transmission risk behaviors of men and women living with HIV-AIDS: Prevalence, predictors, and emerging clinical interventions. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 7, 32–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mansergh, G., Crepaz, N., Murphy, S., Miller, L. C., & Appleby, P. R. (2000). Future HIV prevention options for men who have sex with men: Intention to use a potential microbicide during anal intercourse. AIDS and Behavior, 4, 279–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Morin, S. F., Vernon, K., Harcourt, J. J., Steward, W. T., Volk, J., Riess, T. H. et al. (2003). Why HIV infections have increased among men who have sex with men and what to do about it: Finding from California focus groups. AIDS & Behavior, 7, 353–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Phillips, D. M., & Zacharopoulos, V. R. (1998). Nonoxynol-9 enhances rectal infections by herpes simplex virus in mice. Contraception, 57, 341–348.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pollack, L. M., Osmond, D. H., Paul, J. P., & Catania, J. A. (2005). Evaluation of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s HIV behavioral surveillance of men who have sex with men: Sampling issues. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 32, 581–589.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rader, M., Marks, G., Mansergh, G., Crepaz, N., Miller, L. C., Appleby, P. R. et al. (2001). Preferences about the characteristics of future HIV prevention products among men who have sex with men. AIDS Education & Prevention, 13, 149–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Stephenson, J. (2000). Widely used spermicide may increase, not decrease, risk of HIV transmission. JAMA, 284, 949.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Westat (2003). Urban men’s health study—3: Methods report. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  17. Wolitski, R. J., Valdiserri, R. O., Denning, P. H., & Levine, W. C. (2001) Are we headed for a resurgence of the HIV epidemic among men who have sex with men? American Journal of Public Health, 91, 883–888.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alex Carballo-Diéguez
    • 1
  • Lucia F. O’Sullivan
    • 1
  • Peter Lin
    • 1
  • Curtis Dolezal
    • 1
  • Lance Pollack
    • 2
  • Joseph Catania
    • 2
  1. 1.HIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral Studies at New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia UniversityNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Center for AIDS Prevention StudiesUniversity of California San FranciscoSan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations