AIDS and Behavior

, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp 41–51

Revisiting “Success”: Posttrial Analysis of a Gender-Specific HIV/STD Prevention Intervention

  • Shari L. Dworkin
  • Theresa Exner
  • Rita Melendez
  • Susie Hoffman
  • Anke A. Ehrhardt
Intervention Research

Alongside the recognized need to foster the development of innovative gender-specific HIV interventions, researchers face the urgent need to further understand how current interventions do or do not work. Few studies build posttrial qualitative analysis into standardized interview assessments in randomized controlled trials in order to bolster an assessment of how interventions work. The current investigation is a posttrial qualitative analysis carried out on a randomly selected subsample (N=180), representing 50% of women who participated in a 3-arm randomized controlled trial known as Project FIO (The Future Is Ours). FIO was a gender-specific HIV prevention intervention carried out with heterosexually active women in a high seroprevalence area of New York City. Posttrial qualitative results extend an understanding of the success of the trial (e.g., reductions in unsafe sex). Qualitative results reflect how the Modified AIDS Risk Reduction Model operated in the expected direction across experimental groups. Results also highlight women's empowerment narratives, reflecting the salience of bodily and sexual rights aspects of the intervention.

KEY WORDS:

Gender-specific HIV interventions posttrial analysis intervention impact methodological triangulation qualitative methods 

REFERENCES

  1. Altman, D. G. (1995). Sustaining interventions in community systems: On the relationship between researchers and communities. Health Psychology, 14, 526–536.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amaro, H. (1995). Love, sex, and power: Considering women's realities in HIV prevention. American Psychologist, 50, 437–447.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amaro, H., and Raj, A. (2000). On the margin: Power and women's HIV risk reduction strategies. Sex Roles, 42, 723–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson, G. L., and Prentice, R. L. (1999). Individually randomized intervention trials for disease prevention and control. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 8, 287–309.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baron, R. M., and Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berg, B. (2001). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  7. Bordo, S. (1993). Unbearable weight: Feminism, Western culture, and the body. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  8. Catania, J. A., Kegeles, S. M., and Coates, T. J. (1990). Towards an understanding of AIDS risk behavior: An AIDS risk reduction model. AIDS and Behavior, 2, 75–85.Google Scholar
  9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (1995). Update: AIDS among women— United States, 1994. Morbidity Mortality Weekly Report, 44, 81–84.Google Scholar
  10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2002). HIV and AIDS cases reported through December 2001. HIV/AIDS Surveillance Report, 13, 1–44.Google Scholar
  11. Collins, P. H. (1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Collins, P. H. (1999). Shifting the center: Race, class, and feminist theorizing about motherhood. In S. Coontz (Ed.), American families: A multicultural reader (pp. 197–217). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Connell, R. W. (1999). Making gendered people: Bodies, identities, sexualities. In M. M. Ferree, J. Lorber, and B. Hess (Eds.), Revisioning gender (pp. 449–471). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Connell, R. W., and Dowsett, G. (1999). “The unclean motion of the generative parts”: Frameworks in Western thought on sexuality. In R. Parker and P. Aggleton (Eds.), Culture, health, and sexuality: A reader (pp. 179–196). Philadelphia: Taylor and Francis Group.Google Scholar
  15. Denzin, N. K. (1978). Sociological methods: A source book. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  16. Dey, I. (1993). Qualitative data analysis: A user-friendly guide for social scientists. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Djulbegovic, B. (2001). Placebo-controlled trials. Annals of Internal Medicine, 135, 62–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Dowsett, G. (2002). Sexuality and gender: Diversity and difference. Paper presented at the VIV International AIDS meeting, Barcelona, Spain.Google Scholar
  19. Ehrhardt, A. A., Exner, T. M., Hoffman, S., Silberman, I., Leu, C.-S., Miller, S., and Levin, B. (2002a). A gender-specific HIV/STD risk reduction intervention for women in a healthcare setting: Short and long-term results of a randomized clinical trial. AIDS Care, 14, 147–161.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ehrhardt, A. A., Exner, T. M., Hoffman, S., Silberman, I., Yingling, S., and Adams-Skinner, J. (2002b). HIV/STD risk and sexual strategies among women family planning clients in New York: Project FIO. AIDS and Behavior, 6, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ehrhardt, A. A., Yingling, S., Zawadski, E., and Martinez-Ramirez, M. (1992). Prevention of heterosexual transmission of HIV: Barriers for women. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 5, 37–67.Google Scholar
  22. Eisenstein, Z. (1986). The radical future of liberal feminism. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Eitzen, D. S., and Baca-Zinn, M. (1995). Structural transformation and systems of inequality. In M. Andersen and P. H. Collins (Eds.), Race, class, and gender (pp. 202–206). New York: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  24. Exner, T. M., Gardos, P. S., Seal, D., and Ehrhardt, A. A. (1999). HIV sexual risk reduction interventions with heterosexual men: The forgotten group. AIDS and Behavior, 3, 347–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Firestone, S. (1970). The dialectic of sex. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  26. Friedan, B. (1974). The feminine mystique. New York: Dell.Google Scholar
  27. Fullilove, M. T., Fullilove, R. E., Haynes, K., and Gross, S. (1990). Black women and AIDS prevention: A view towards understanding the gender rules. The Journal of Sex Research, 27, 47–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gollub, E. L., Brown, E., Savouillan, M., Waterlot, J., and Coruble, G. (2002). A community-based safer sex intervention for women: Results of a pilot study in southeastern France. Culture, Health, and Sexuality, 4, 21–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hansen, W., and McNeal, R. (1997). How dare works: An examination of program effects on mediating variables. Health Education and Behavior, 24, 165–176.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Haug, F. (1987). Female sexualization. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  31. Heywood, L. (1998). Bodymakers: A cultural anatomy of women's bodybuilding. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Heywood, L., and Dworkin, S. L. (2003). Built to win: The female athlete as cultural icon. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  33. Jenkins, S. R. (2000). Introduction to the special issue: Defining gender, relationships, and power. Sex Roles, 42, 751–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Krull, J. L., and MacKinnon, D. P. (1999). Multilevel mediation modeling in group-based intervention studies. Evaluation Review, 23, 418–444.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lobo, C. M., Frijling, B. D., Hulscher, M. E., Braspenning, J. L., Grol, J. C., Prins, A. R. P., and van der Wouden, J. C. (2002). Organizing cardiovascular preventive care in general practice: Determinants of a successful intervention. Preventive Medicine, 35, 430–436.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lofland, J., and Lofland, L. H. (1995). Analyzing social settings: A guide to qualitative observation and analysis. Belmont, MA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  37. Logan, T. K., Cole, J., and Leukefeld, C. (2002). Women, sex, and HIV: Social and contextual factors, meta-analysis of published interventions, and implications for practice and research. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 851–885.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lorber, J. (2001). Gender inequality: Feminist theories and politics. Los Angeles: Roxbury.Google Scholar
  39. MacKinnon, C. (1989). Towards a feminist theory of the state. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  40. MacKinnon, D. P. (1994). Analysis of mediating variables in prevention and intervention research. NIDA Research Monograph, 139, 127–153.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. MacKinnon, D. P., Johnson, C. A., Pentz, M. A., Dwyer, J. H., Hansen, W. B., Flay, B. R., and Wang, E. (1991). Mediating mechanisms in a school-based drug prevention program: First year effects of the Midwestern prevention project. Health Psychology, 10, 164–172.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. MacKinnon, D. P., Weber, M. D., and Pentz, M. A. (1988). How do school-based drug prevention programs work and for whom? Drugs and Society, 3, 125–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Madriz, E. I. (1998). Using focus groups with lower socioeconomic Latina women. Qualitative Inquiry, 4, 114–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mane, P., and Aggleton, P. (2000). Cross-national perspectives on gender and power. In R. Parker, R. M. Barbosa, and P. Aggleton (Eds.), Framing the sexual subject: The politics of gender, sexuality, and power (pp. 104–116). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  45. Martin, E. (1987). The woman in the body: A cultural analysis of reproduction. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
  46. Messner, M. A. (1997). The politics of masculinity: Men in movements. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  47. Meyer-Bahlburg, H. F. L., and Gruen, R. S. (1992). Training manual for psychosexual interviewing. Unpublished paper, Columbia University, Department of Psychiatry, New York.Google Scholar
  48. Miles, M. B., and Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  49. Miller, W. L., and Crabtree, B. F. (2000). Clinical research. In N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 607–631). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  50. Millet, K. (1970). Sexual politics. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  51. Newman, T. B., Browner, T. B., Cummings, S. R., and Hulley, S. B. (2001). Designing an observational study: Cross-sectional and case-control studies. In S. B. Hully, S. R. Cummings, W. S. Browner, D. G. Norman Hearst, and T. B. Newman (Eds.), Designing clinical research (pp. 107–121). Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins.Google Scholar
  52. Ortiz-Torres, B., Williams, S. P., and Ehrhardt, A. A. (2003). Urban women's gender scripts: Implications for HIV. Culture, Health, and Sexuality, 5, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Parsons, H. M. (1974). What happened at Hawthorne? Science, 4128, 922–932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pulerwitz, J., Gortmaker, S. L., and Dejong, W. (2000). Measuring sexual relationship power in HIV/STD research. Sex Roles, 42, 637–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Reynolds, K. D., Yaroch, A. L., Franklin, F. A., and Maloy, J. (2002). Testing mediating variables in a school-based nutritional intervention program. Health Psychology, 21, 51–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free.Google Scholar
  57. Sandelowski, M. (1998). Using qualitative methods in intervention studies. Research in Nursing and Health, 9, 359–364.Google Scholar
  58. Schwartz, P., and Rutter, V. (1998). The gender of sexuality. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  59. Seal, D. W., and Ehrhardt, A. A. (2003). Masculinity and urban men: Perceived scripts for courtship, romantic, and sexual interactions with women. Culture, Health, and Sexuality, 5, 295–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Segal, L. (1994). Straight sex: Rethinking the politics of pleasure. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  61. Sherman, S. G., Gielen, A. C., and McDonnell, K. A. (2000). Power and attitudes among a sample of low-income, African American women: Implications for HIV/AIDS prevention. Sex Roles, 42, 283–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Simon, W., and Gagnon, J. (1999). Sexual scripts. In R. Parker and P. Aggleton (Eds.), Culture, society, and sexuality: A reader (pp. 29–38). London: UCL.Google Scholar
  63. Sormanti, M., Pereira, L., El-Bassel, N., Witte, S., and Gilbert, L. (2001). The role of community consultants in designing an HIV intervention. AIDS Education and Prevention, 13, 311–328.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Spradley, J. P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
  65. Thornton-Dill, B. (1988). Our mother's grief: Racial ethnic women and the maintenance of families. Journal of Family History, 13, 415–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wingood, G. M., and DiClemente, R. J. (1996). HIV sexual risk reduction interventions for women: A review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 12, 209–217.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Wingood, G. M., and DiClemente, R. J. (1998). Partner influences and gender-related factors associated with noncondom use among young adult African American women. American Journal of Community Psychology, 26, 29–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wingood, G. M., and DiClemente, R. J. (2000). Application of the theory of gender and power to examine HIV-related exposures, risk factors, and effective interventions for women. Health Education and Behavior, 27, 539–565.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shari L. Dworkin
    • 1
    • 2
    • 5
  • Theresa Exner
    • 1
    • 2
  • Rita Melendez
    • 4
  • Susie Hoffman
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Anke A. Ehrhardt
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.HIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral StudiesNew York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia UniversityNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychiatryColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA
  3. 3.Department of Epidemiology, Joseph L. Mailman School of Public HealthColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA
  4. 4.National Sexuality Resource CenterSan Francisco State UniversitySan FranciscoUSA
  5. 5.HIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral StudiesNew York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations