Advertisement

FASTing in the mid-west?: A theoretical assessment of ‘feminist agrifoods systems theory’

  • Wynne WrightEmail author
  • Alexis Annes
Article
  • 30 Downloads

Abstract

In this article, we assess the generalizability of the feminist agrifood systems (FAST) model developed by Sachs et al. (The rise of women farmers and sustainable agriculture, University of Iowa Press, Iowa City, 2016). We ask to what extent might these findings generated from the study of Pennsylvania women farmers be generalized to other regions of the U.S. We define and situate the FAST theory to the Michigan, U.S. context in order to better understand how the shifts in agriculture and women’s roles in the U.S. based on our data, align or depart with that experienced by women farmers in the northeast. We find that there are many similarities in the experiences of these two populations, but there are also some differences. Five primary differences in the two populations are articulated. Michigan women farmers appear to (1) struggle to assert the identity of a farmer; (2) struggle to access land via inheritance; (3) are income dependent on males; (4) often work in value-added production that does not challenge traditionally-coded ‘women’s work’; and (5) perpetuate on-farm education/networks based on nostalgia which may further the distance between producers and consumers. We conclude with a brief discussion of what may account for these differences.

Keywords

Feminist agrifoods systems theory Gender Michigan Pennsylvania Women 

Abbreviation

FAST

Feminist agrifoods systems theory

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research has been supported by Michigan AgBio Research at Michigan State University. We thank the anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on a previous version of this paper. We are also grateful to Carolyn Sachs, Mary Barbercheck, Kathryn Brasier, Nancy Kiernan and Anna Terman for providing the exciting foundation of agrifoods systems theory which catalyzed this work. Any shortcomings are the responsibility of the authors.

References

  1. Allen, P., and C. Sachs. 2007. Women and food chains: The gendered politics of food. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food 15 (1): 1–23.Google Scholar
  2. Brandth, B. 2002. On the relationship between feminism and farm women. Agriculture and Human Values 19 (2): 107–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brandth, B., and M.S. Haugen. 2010. Doing farm tourism: The intertwining practices of gender and work. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 35 (2): 426–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brandth, B., and M.S. Haugen. 2014. Embodying the rural idyll in farm tourist hosting. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism 14 (2): 101–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Crenshaw, K. 1991. Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review 43 (6): 1241–1299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Devine, J. 2013. On behalf of the family farm: Iowa farm women’s activism since 1945. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. England, P. 2005. Emerging theories of care work. Annual Review of Sociology 31: 381–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Garcia-Ramon, M.D., G. Ca´noves, and N. Valdovinos. 1995. Farm tourism, gender and the environment in Spain. Annals of Tourism Research 22 (2): 267–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hochschild, A. 1983. The managed heart. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  10. Little, J. 2002. Rural geography: Rural gender identity and the performance of masculinity and femininity in the countryside. Progress in Rural Geography 26 (5): 665–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. MacTavish, D.G., and H.J. Loether. 2002. Experimentation in sociological social psychology. In Sociological perspectives on social psychology, ed. K.S. Cook, G.A. Fine, and J.S. House, 629–649. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  12. Pilgeram, R., and B. Amos. 2015. Beyond ‘inherit it or marry it’: Exploring how women engaged in sustainable agriculture access farmland. Rural Sociology 80 (1): 16–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Sachs, C.E. 1983. The invisible farmers. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allanheld.Google Scholar
  14. Sachs, C.E., and M. Alston. 2010. Global shifts, sedimentations and imaginaries. Signs: Journal of Women, Culture and Society 35 (2): 277–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sachs, C.E., M.E. Barbercheck, K.J. Brasier, N.E. Kiernan, and A.R. Terman. 2016. The rise of women farmers and sustainable agriculture. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Saugeres, L. 2002. ’She’ not really a woman, she’s half man’: Gendered discourses of embodiment in a French farming community. Women’s Studies International Forum 25 (6): 641–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Scott, S.L. 1996. Drudges, helpers and team players: Oral historical accounts of farm work in Appalachian Kentucky. Rural Sociology 61 (2): 209–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Shisler, R.C., and J. Sbicca. 2019. Agriculture as carework: The contradictions of performing femininity in a male-dominated occupation. Society and Natural Resources 32 (8): 875–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Shortall, S. 1992. Power analysis and farm wives: An empirical study of the power relationships affecting women on Irish farms. Sociologia Ruralis 32 (4): 431–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Shortall, S. 2014. Farming, identity and well-being: Managing changing gender roles within western European farm families. Anthropological Notebooks 20 (3): 67–81.Google Scholar
  21. Trauger, A. 2004. ‘Because they can do the work’: Women farmers and sustainable agriculture. Gender, Place and Culture 11 (2): 289–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. USDA (U.S. Department of Agriculture). 2012. 2012 census report, vol. 1. Washington, DC: USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service. http://www.agcensus.usda.gov/Publications/2012/index.php. Accessed 2 Feb 2019.
  23. USDA (U.S. Department of Agriculture). 2017. 2017 census report, vol. 1. Washington, DC: USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service. 2019. http://www.agcensus.usda.gov/Publications/2002/index.php. Accessed 11 Apr 2019.
  24. van der Ploeg, J. 2011. The new peasantries. Struggles for autonomy and sustainability in an era of empire and globalization. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  25. Whatmore, S. 1991a. Farming women: Gender work and family enterprise. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Whatmore, S. 1991b. Life cycle or patriarchy? Gender divisions in family farming. Journal of Rural Studies 7 (1/2): 71–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Witz, A., C. Warhurst, and D. Nickson. 2003. The labour of aesthetics and the aesthetics of organization. Organization 10 (1): 33–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wright, W., and A. Annes. 2014. Farm women and agritourism: Representing a new rurality. Sociologia Ruralis 54 (4): 477–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wright, W., and A. Annes. 2016. Farm women and the empowerment potential in value-added agriculture. Rural Sociology 81 (4): 545–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Yarwood, R. 2005. Beyond the rural: Images, countryside change and geography. Geography 90 (1): 19–31.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dept. of Community Sustainability, Dept. of SociologyMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA
  2. 2.UMR LISST – Dynamiques Rurales, INP-PURPANToulouse Cedex 3France

Personalised recommendations