Advertisement

Agriculture and Human Values

, Volume 36, Issue 1, pp 49–59 | Cite as

Farmers framing fatherhood: everyday life and rural change

  • Berit BrandthEmail author
Article
  • 175 Downloads

Abstract

This article explores how farming fathers frame fatherhood according to time-specific ideals. Based on interviews with fathers and their adult sons in Norway, findings show clear differences between the two generations concerning how fathers engage with their children and justify their practices. For the older generation, the major frames are “complementary gender roles,” “good farming practices” and “farm succession.” The current generation frames their fathering practices in “involved fathering,” “changing childhoods” and “intensive parenting.” Considering where the frames come from, it is notable that the older generation refers to local cultural accounts of agriculture when justifying their fathering practices, while the frames used by the current generation are not farm related but refer to broader social and cultural accounts of their time. The framing perspective used in this article contributes to understanding the ideological transformation of agricultural fatherhood in a period in which the patriarchal contours of agriculture may be changing.

Keywords

Farming Fatherhood Family Framing Gender Rural change 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Many thanks to Grete Overrein and the anonymous reviewers of the journal.

References

  1. Alasuutari, P. 1996. Researching culture: Qualitative method and cultural studies. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Alston, M. 1998. Farm women and their work: Why is it not recognised? Journal of Sociology 34: 23–34.Google Scholar
  3. Andersson, E. 2017. Managing flexibility and expectations: Gendered experiences of spatial-temporal relations in Swedish family-based dairy farming. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food 23 (2): 77–97.Google Scholar
  4. Beck, U., and E. Beck-Gernsheim. 1995. The Normal Chaos of Love. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  5. Brandth, B. 2016. Rural masculinities and fathering practices. Gender, Place and Culture 23 (3): 435–450.Google Scholar
  6. Brandth, B. 2017. The co-location of home and work in two generations of farmers: What effects on fathering practices? Families, Relationships and Societies 6 (3): 341–356.Google Scholar
  7. Brandth, B., and E. Kvande, eds. 2013. Fedrekvoten og den farsvennlige velferdsstaten. Oslo: University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Brandth, B., and E. Kvande. 2018. Masculinity and fathering alone during parental leave. Men and Masculinities 21 (1): 72–90.Google Scholar
  9. Brandth, B., and G. Overrein. 2013. Resourcing children in a changing rural context. Fathering and farm succession in two generations of farmers. Sociologia Ruralis 53 (1): 95–111.Google Scholar
  10. Brannen, J. 2017. Approaches to the study of family life: Practices, context and narrative. In Family continuity and change. Contemporary European perspectives, eds. V. Česnuitytė, Lück, D. and Widmer, E.D., 9–31. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  11. Brannen, J., P. Moss, and A. Mooney. 2004. Working and caring over the Twentieth Century: Change and continuity in four-generation families. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  12. Bryant, L., and Pini, B.. 2011. Gender and rurality. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Burton, R. 2004. Seeing through the ‘good farmer’s’ eyes: Towards developing an understanding of the social symbolic value of ‘productivist’ behavior. Sociologia Ruralis 44 (2): 195–215.Google Scholar
  14. Coltart, C., and K. Henwood. 2015. On paternal subjectivity: a qualitative longitudinal and psychsocial case analysis on men’s classed positions and transitions to first-time fatherhood. Qualitative Research 12 (1): 35–52.Google Scholar
  15. Craig, L., A. Powell, and N. Cortis. 2012. Self-employment, work–family time and the gender division of labour. Work, Employment & Society 26 (5): 716–734.Google Scholar
  16. Creed, W. E. D., J. A. Langstraat, and M. A. Scully. 2002. A picture of the frame: Frame analysis as technique and as politics. Organizational Research Methods 5 (1): 34–55.Google Scholar
  17. Creighton, G., M. Brussoni, J. Oliffe, and L. Olsen. 2015. Fathers on child’s play: Urban and rural Canadian perspectives. Men and Masculinities 18 (5): 559–580.Google Scholar
  18. Dermott, E. 2008. Intimate fatherhood: A sociological analysis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Doherty, W. J., E. F. Kouneski, and M. F. Erickson. 1998. Responsible fathering: An overview and conceptual framework. Journal of Marriage and Family 60 (2): 277–292.Google Scholar
  20. Doucet, A. 2006. Do men mother? Toronto: Toronto University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Eerola, J. P., and J. Huttunen. 2011. Metanarrative of the ‘new father’ and narratives of young Finnish first-time fathers. Fathering 9 (3): 211–231.Google Scholar
  22. Elder, G. H., and R. Conger. 2000. Children of the land. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  23. Eydal, G. B., and T. Rostgaard. 2015. Fatherhood in the Nordic welfare states: Comparing care policies and practice. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  24. Farstad, G., and K. Stefansen. 2015. Involved fatherhood in the Nordic context: Dominant narratives, divergent approaches. NORMA: International Journal for Masculinity Studies 10 (1): 55–70.Google Scholar
  25. Ferree, M. M. 2012. Inequality, intersectionality and the politics of discourse: framing feminist alliances. In The discursive politics of gender equality: Stretching, bending and policy making, eds. E. Lombardo, Meier, P., and Verloo, M., 86–104. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Foucault, M. 1980. Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972/1977. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  27. Goffman, E. 1974. Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Gullestad, M. 1996. From obedience to negotiation: Dilemmas in the transmission of values between the generations in Norway. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 2 (1): 25–42.Google Scholar
  29. Harrington, M. 2006. Sport and leisure as contexts for fathering in Australian families. Leisure Studies 25 (2): 165–183.Google Scholar
  30. Haugen, M. S., and B. Brandth. 2015. When farm couples break up: Gendered moralities, gossip, and the fear of stigmatization in rural communities. Sociologia Ruralis 55 (2): 227–242.Google Scholar
  31. Haugen, M. S., and B. Brandth. 2017. Gender identities and divorce among farmers in Norway. In Gender and rural globalization: International perspectives on gender and rural development, eds. B. B. Bock, and S. Shortall, 185–197. Boston: CABI.Google Scholar
  32. Hays, S. 1996. The cultural contradictions of motherhood. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Hollekim, R. 2016. Contemporary discourses on children and parenting in Norway. An empirical study based on two cases. Ph.D. thesis. Bergen: University of Bergen.Google Scholar
  34. Jensen, A.-M. 2003. Fra nyttebarn til byttebarn? Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk.Google Scholar
  35. La Rossa, R. 1988. Fatherhood and social change. Family Relations 37 (4): 451–457.Google Scholar
  36. Little, J. 2002. Rural geography: Rural gender identity and the performance of masculinity and femininity in the countryside. Progress in Human Geography 26 (5): 665–670.Google Scholar
  37. Lombardo, E., P. Meier, and M. Verloo. 2012. Stretching and bending gender quality: A discursive politics approach. In The discursive politics of gender equality: Stretching, bending and policy making, eds. Lombardo, E., Meier, P., and Verloo, M., 1–18. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Marsiglio, W., K. Roy, and G. L. Fox, eds. 2005. Situated fathering: A focus on physical and social spaces. Landham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  39. McDonald, P., and E. Jeanes, eds. 2012. Men, wage work and family. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Melberg, K. 2005. Family farm transactions in Norway: Unpaid care across three farm generations. Journal of Comparative Family Studies 36 (3): 419–441.Google Scholar
  41. Miller, T. 2011. Making sense of fatherhood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Mooney, P. H., and S. A. Hunt. 1996. A repertoire of interpretations: Master frames and ideological continuity in U.S. agrarian mobilization. The Sociological Quarterly 37 (1): 177–197.Google Scholar
  43. Morman, M. T., and K. Floyd. 2006. Good fathering: Father and son perceptions of what it means to be a good father. Fathering 4 (2): 113–136.Google Scholar
  44. O’Brien, M., and K. Wall, eds. 2017. Comparative perspectives on work-life balance: Fathers on leave alone. London: Springer.Google Scholar
  45. O’Brien, M., B. Brandth, and E. Kvande. 2007. Father, work and family life: Global perspectives and new insights. Community, Work & Family 10 (4): 375–386.Google Scholar
  46. Peter, G., M. M. Bell, S. K. Jarnagin, and D. Bauer. 2005. Farm dads: Reconstructing fatherhood, the legacy of the land, and family in the fields of the midwest. In Situated fathering: A focus on physical and social spaces, eds. W. Marsiglio, K. Roy, and G. L. Fox, 235–254. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  47. Pini, B., and M.-L. Conway. 2017. Masculinity and fathering in the lives of rural men with a disability. Journal of Rural Studies 51: 267–274.Google Scholar
  48. Pini, B., B. Brandth, and J. Little, eds. 2015. Feminisms and ruralities. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  49. Plantin, L. L., S.-A. S. Månsson, and J. J. Kearney. 2003. Talking and doing fatherhood: On fatherhood and masculinity in Sweden and England. Fathering 1 (1): 3–26.Google Scholar
  50. Pleck, E. H., and J. H. Pleck. 1997. Fatherhood ideals in the United States: Historical dimensions. In The role of the father in child development, ed. M. E. Lamb, 33–48. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  51. Price, L., and N. Evans. 2009. From stress to distress: Conceptualizing the British family farming patriarchal way of life. Journal of Rural Studies 25: 1–11.Google Scholar
  52. Ranson, G. 2001. Men at work. Change—or no change?—in the era of the “New Father”. Men and Masculinities 4 (1): 3–26.Google Scholar
  53. Riessman, C. 2008. Narrative methods for the human sciences. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  54. Riley, M. 2009. ‘The next link in the chain’: Children, agri-cultural practices and the family farm. Children’s Geographies 7 (3): 245–260.Google Scholar
  55. Riley, M. 2014. Interviewing fathers and sons together: Exploring joint interviews in research on family farming. Journal of Rural Studies 36: 237–246.Google Scholar
  56. Riley, M. 2016. Still being the ‘good farmer’: (Non-)retirement and the preservation of farming identities in older age. Sociologia Ruralis 56 (1): 96–115.Google Scholar
  57. Saugeres, L. 2002. The cultural representation of the farming landscape: Masculinity, power and nature. Journal of Rural Studies 18 (4): 143–159.Google Scholar
  58. Shirani, F., K. Henwood, and C. Coltart. 2012. Meeting the challenges of intensive parenting culture: Gender, risk management and the moral parent. Sociology 46: 25–40.Google Scholar
  59. Shortall, S. 1999. Women and farming: Property and Power. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  60. Smith, D. 2005. Institutional ethnography: A sociology for people. Lanham: AltaMira.Google Scholar
  61. Smyth, C., and L. Craig. 2017. Conforming to intensive parenting ideals: Willingness, reluctance and social context. Families, Relationships and Societies 6 (1): 107–124.Google Scholar
  62. Snow, D. A. 2004/2008. Framing processes, ideology, and discursive fields. In The Blackwell companion to social movements, eds. D. A. Snow, Soule, S. A., and Kriesi, H., 380–412. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  63. Snow, D., and R. Benford. 1988. Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. International Social Movement Research 1: 197–217.Google Scholar
  64. Vuori, J. 2009. Men’s choices and masculine duties: Fathers in expert discussions. Men and Masculinities 12 (1): 45–72.Google Scholar
  65. Wall, G., and S. Arnold. 2007. How involved is involved fathering? An exploration of the contemporary culture of fatherhood. Gender and Society 21 (4): 508–527.Google Scholar
  66. Yarwood, G. A. 2011. The pick and mix of fathering identities. Fathering 9 (2): 150–168.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sociology and Political ScienceNorwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)TrondheimNorway

Personalised recommendations