Advertisement

Agriculture and Human Values

, Volume 35, Issue 4, pp 853–865 | Cite as

“Conservative” ideology and the politics of local food

  • Andrew DaveyEmail author
Article

Abstract

Analysis of conservative political participation in local food initiatives tends to be critical and dismissive, positing this participation as self-serving, individualistic, exclusionary, nativist, or reactionary. While there are nefarious aspects to certain forms of conservative local food politics, my research at three farmers’ markets in the Upper Midwest reveals that self-identified conservatives can and do hold more nuanced positions. Those with whom I met recognize the need for both local and broader change, are concerned about marginalized and struggling people, are troubled by the impacts of conventional agriculture on the health of farmers, consumers, and other species, and are humble and willing to listen to other perspectives. Most analyses of food systems miss these nuanced perspectives because they approach American political ideology through a rigid left–right binary. Using more fluid approaches to understanding political ideology can create room for recognizing the complexity and diversity of views pigeon-holed under the label of “conservatism.” Along with these different approaches, a politics of empathy and mutual respect across ideological difference can help reveal common values, concerns, and aspirations for changing the food system. Recognizing these commonalities can help build a broader base of support for food system transformation.

Keywords

Local food Political ideology Conservatism Farmers’ markets 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to all the participants in this study who were willing to share their time, perspectives, and experiences with me, and the many advisors, colleagues, and reviewers who helped greatly improve this article over time. I am also thankful to the Trewartha Graduate Research Fund through the University of Wisconsin-Madison’s Department of Geography for helping to fund this research.

References

  1. Allitt, P. 1993. Catholic intellectuals and conservative politics in America, 1950–1985. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Allitt, P. 2009. The conservatives: Ideas and personalities throughout American history. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bell, M. 2004. Farming for us all: Practical agriculture & the cultivation of sustainability. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bouma-Prediger, S. 2002. For the beauty of the earth: A Christian vision for creation care. Ada: Baker Academic.Google Scholar
  5. Bowman, M. 2018. Christian: The politics of a word in America. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cramer, K.J. 2016. The politics of resentment: Rural consciousness in Wisconsin and the rise of Scott Walker. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dreher, R. 2006. Crunchy cons: How Birkenstocked Burkeans, gun-loving organic gardeners, evangelical free-range farmers, hip homeschooling mamas, rightwing nature lovers, and their diverse tribe of countercultural conservatives plan to save America (or at least the Republican party). New York: Crown Forum.Google Scholar
  8. DuPuis, M., and D. Goodman. 2005. Should we go ‘home’ to eat? Toward a reflexive politics of localism. Journal of Rural Studies 21 (3): 359–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Festing, H. 1998. Farmers’ markets: An American success story. Bath: Eco-Logic Books.Google Scholar
  10. Francis, P. 2015. Encyclical letter Laudato Si’ of the holy father Francis: On care for our common home. http://w2.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/encyclicals/documents/papa-francesco_20150524_enciclica-laudato-si.html. Accessed 1 May 2018.
  11. Freeden, M. 1996. Ideologies and political theory: A conceptual approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Freeden, M. 2003. Ideology: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Freeden, M. 2013. The morphological analysis of ideology. In The Oxford handbook of political ideologies, ed. Michael Freeden, Lyman Tower Sargent, and Marc Stears, 115–137. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Galt, R.E. 2013. The moral economy is a double-edged sword: Explaining farmers’ earnings and self-exploitation in community-supported agriculture. Economic Geography 89 (4): 341–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gibson-Graham, J.K. 1996. The end of capitalism (as we knew it): A feminist critique of political economy. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  16. Gibson-Graham, J.K. 2006. A postcapitalist politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  17. Gillespie, G., et al. 2007. Farmers’ markets as keystones in rebuilding local and regional food systems. In Remaking the North American food system: Strategies for sustainability, ed. C. Hinrichs, and T. Lyson, 65–83. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  18. Gottfried, P. 2007. Conservatism in America: Making sense of the American right. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gough, R. 1997. Farming the cutover: A social history of northern Wisconsin, 1900–1940. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
  20. Griffin, M., and E. Frongillo. 2003. Experiences and perspectives of farmers from Upstate New York farmers’ markets. Agriculture and Human Values 20: 189–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gunnell, J.G. 2004. Imagining the American polity: Political science and the discourse of democracy. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Gunnell, J.G. 2013. Social science and ideology: The case of behavioralism in American political science. In The Oxford handbook of political ideologies, ed. M. Freeden, L.T. Sargent, and M. Stears, 73–89. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Guthman, J. 2004. Agrarian dreams: The paradox of organic farming in California. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  24. Guthman, J. 2007. Commentary on teaching food: Why I am fed up with Michael Pollan et al. Agriculture and Human Values 24: 261–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hinrichs, C.C. 2000. Embeddedness and local food systems: Notes on two types of direct agricultural market. Journal of Rural Studies 16 (3): 295–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hochschild, A.R. 2016. Strangers in their own land: Anger and mourning on the American right. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  27. Holloway, L., and M. Kneafsey. 2000. Reading the space of the farmers’ market: A preliminary investigation from the UK. Sociologia Ruralis 40 (3): 285–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kloppenburg, J., J. Hendrickson, and G.W. Stevenson. 1996. Coming in to the foodshed. Agriculture and Human Values 13 (3): 33–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lyson, T. 2004. Civic agriculture: Reconnecting farm, food, and community. Medford: Tufts University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Maynard, J.L. 2013. A map of the field of ideological analysis. Journal of Political Ideologies 18 (3): 299–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McFague, S. 2008. A new climate for theology: God, the world, and global warming. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
  32. Noll, M.A. 1994. The scandal of the evangelical mind. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing.Google Scholar
  33. O’Sullivan, N. 2013. Conservatism. In The Oxford handbook of political ideologies, ed. M. Freeden, L.T. Sargent, and M. Stears, 293–311. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Santmire, H. Paul. 2000. Nature reborn: The ecological and cosmic promise of Christian theology. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
  35. Schnell, S.M. 2013. Food miles, local eating, and community supported agriculture: Putting local food in its place. Agriculture and Human Values 30 (4): 615–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Smith, C. 2000. Christian America? What evangelicals really want. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  37. Sommer, R. 1989. Farmers’ markets as community events. In Public spaces and spaces, ed. I. Altman, and E.H. Zube., New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  38. Stevenson, G.W., et al. 2007. Warrior, builder, and weaver work: Strategies for changing the food system. In Remaking the North American food system: Strategies for sustainability, ed. C. Hinrichs, and T. Lyson, 33–62. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  39. Taylor, S.M. 2007. Green sisters: A spiritual ecology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Theokritoff, E. 2009. Living in God’s creation: Orthodox perspectives on ecology. Yonkers: St Vladimir’s Seminary Press.Google Scholar
  41. Treier, S., and D.S. Hillygus. 2009. The nature of political ideology in the contemporary electorate. Public Opinion Quarterly 73 (4): 679–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. White, M.M. 2011. Environmental reviews and case studies: D-Town Farm: African American resistance to food insecurity and the transformation of Detroit. Environmental Practice 13.4: 406–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wilkinson, K.K. 2012. Between God and green: How evangelicals are cultivating a middle ground on climate change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Winders, B. 2009. The politics of food supply: US agricultural policy in the world economy. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Wong, E. 2010. China begins emergency check of dairy products. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/03/world/asia/03china.html. Accessed 1 May 2018.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeographyUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations