Decoupling from international food safety standards: how small-scale indigenous farmers cope with conflicting institutions to ensure market participation
- 51 Downloads
Although inclusion in formal value chains extends the prospect of improving the livelihoods of rural small-scale producers, such a step is often contingent on compliance with internationally-promoted food safety standards. Limited research has addressed the challenges this represents for small rural producers who, grounded in culturally-embedded food safety conceptions, face difficulties in complying. We address this gap here through a multiple case study involving four public school feeding programs that source meals from local rural providers in the Bolivian Altiplan. Institutional logics theory is used to describe public food safety regulations and to compare them to food safety conceptions in the local indigenous Aymara rural setting. We identify a value-based conflict that leads to non-compliance of formal food safety rules that jeopardizes the participation of small farmers in the market. These include: (1) partial adoption of formal rules; (2) selective adoption of convenient rules; and (3) ceremonial adoption to avoid compliance. Decoupling strategies allow local actors to largely disregard the formal food safety regulations while accommodating traditional cultural practices and continuing to access the market. However, these practices put the long-term sustainability of the farmers’ participation in potentially favorable opportunities at risk.
KeywordsSmall-scale producers Institutional logics Food safety regulations Local food systems School feeding programs Bolivia
Bovine spongiform encephalopathy
- E. coli
Micro and small enterprise
Bolivian National Service of Agricultural Safety and Food Safety
We are grateful to the smallholders, SME owner-managers, and municipality officials for their time and openness. We also highly appreciate the helpful comments and suggestions provided by three anonymous reviewers. This research was funded by Danish International Development Agency (DANIDA), under the Project ANDESCROP No. 104. Dan. 8-1203.
- Dennis, C., J. M. Aguilera, and S. Morton. 2009. Technologies shaping the future. In Papers from the First Global Agro-Industries Forum (GAIF) by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), the United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) and the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) (pp. 92-135). New Delhi, India, 8-11 April 2008. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
- FAO/WHO. 2006. Understanding the Codex Alimentarius. Rome: FAO. ftp://ftp.fao.org/codex/Publications/understanding/Understanding_EN.pdf. Accessed 12 June 2015.
- FAO/WHO. 2007. Working principles for risk analysis for food safety for application by governments. CAC/GL 62-2007. Rome: FAO. http://www.fao.org/3/a-a1550t.pdf. Accessed 5 June 2015.
- FAO/WHO. 2016. Understanding the Codex Alimentarius. http://www.fao.org/fao-who-codexalimentarius/about-codex/understanding-codex/en/. Accessed 5 August 2016.
- Food, Safety Network. 2009. Safe preparation and storage of aboriginal traditional/country foods: A review. http://www.ncceh.ca/sites/default/files/Aboriginal_Foods_Mar_2009.pdf. Accessed 10 January 2018.
- Friedland, R. 2012. Book review: P.H. Thornton, W. Ocasio, and M. Lounsbury. 2012. The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure, and process. Management 15 (5): 583–595.Google Scholar
- Friedland, R., and R. Alford. 1991. Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices and institutional contradictions. In The new institutionalism in organizational analysis, eds. W. Powell, and J. Paul, 232–266. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- INE, Instituto Nacional de Estadistica. 2005. Atlas de Municipios (Atlas of Municipalities). Instituto Nacional de Estadistica, La Paz.Google Scholar
- Johnson, M. 1986. Food and culture among Bolivia Aymara, symbolic expressions of social relations. Uppsala: Almquist and Wiksell International.Google Scholar
- Josling, T. 2008. The institutional framework for food regulation and trade. Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development 4 (1): 1–15.Google Scholar
- McMichael, P. 2013. Historicizing food sovereignty: A food regime perspective. In Food sovereignty: A critical dialogue. Conference paper 13:1–30. International Conference, Yale University. September 14–15, 2013.Google Scholar
- Miles, M. B., and A. M. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Morgan, K., and R. Sonnino. 2008. The school food revolution: Public food and the challange of sustainable development. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
- Nestle, M. 2003. Safe food: Bacteria, biotechnology, and bioterrorism. California studies in food and culture. vol. 5. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Okello, J., and S. Swinton. 2007. Compliance with international food safety standards in Kenya’s green bean industry: Comparison of a small- and a large-scale farm producing for export. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 29 (2): 269–285.Google Scholar
- Parker, J., R. S. Wilson, J. T. LeJeune, and D. Doohan. 2012. Including growers in the food safety conversation: Enhancing the design and implementation of food safety programming based on farm and marketing needs of fresh fruit and vegetable producers. Agriculture and Human Values 29 (3): 303–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sage, C. 2007. Bending science to match their convictions: Hygienist conceptions of food safety as a challenge to alternative food enterprises in Ireland. In Alternative food geographies, eds. D. Maye, L. Holloway, and M. Kneafsey, 203–222. London: Elsevier Ltd.Google Scholar
- Scott, W. R. 2008. Institutions and organizations: Ideas and interests. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Thornton, P. H. 2004. Markets from culture: Institutional logics and organizational decisions in higher education publishing. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Thornton, P. H., W. Ocasio, and M. Lounsbury. 2015. The institutional logics perspective. In Emerging trends in the social and behavioral sciences: An interdisciplinary, searchable, and linkable resource, eds. R. A. Scott, and S. M. Kosslyn, 1–22. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- van den Berg, P. J. 1989. La tierra no da así no más: Los ritos agrícolas en la religión de los Aymara-cristianos de los Andes [in Spanish]. Amsterdam: Centrum voor Studie en Documentatie van Latijns Amerika (CEDLA).Google Scholar
- Weber, M.  1978. Economy and society: An outline of interpretive Sociology. eds. G. Roth, and C. Wittich. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Yin, R. K. 2009. Case study research: Design and methods. 4th ed. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar