What difference does income make for Community Supported Agriculture (CSA) members in California? Comparing lower-income and higher-income households
In the U.S. there has been considerable interest in connecting low-income households to alternative food networks like Community Supported Agriculture (CSA). To learn more about this possibility we conducted a statewide survey of CSA members in California. A total of 1149 members from 41 CSAs responded. Here we answer the research question: How do CSA members’ (1) socioeconomic and demographic backgrounds, (2) household conditions potentially interfering with membership, and (3) CSA membership experiences vary between lower-income households (LIHHs) and higher-income households (HIHHs)? We divided members into LIHHs (making under $50,000 annually) and HIHHs (making over $50,000 annually). We present comparisons of LIHHs’ and HIHHs’ (1) employment, race/ethnicity, household composition and education, use of food support, and enjoyment of food-related activities; (2) conditions interfering with membership and major life events; and (3) sources of information influencing decision to join, reasons for joining, ratings of importance of and satisfaction with various CSA attributes, gaps between importance of and satisfaction with various CSA attributes, valuing of the share and willingness to pay more, and impacts of membership. We find that LIHHs are committed CSA members, often more so than HIHHs, and that CSA members in California are disproportionately white, but that racial disproportionality decreases as incomes increase. We conclude by considering: (1) the economic risks that LIHHs face in CSA membership, (2) the intersection of economic risks with race/ethnicity and cultural coding in CSA; and (3) the possibilities of increasing participation of LIHH in CSA.
KeywordsCommunity Supported Agriculture Lower-income households Higher-income households Race and ethnicity Disproportionality Consumption
Alternative food networks
Community Supported Agriculture
Lower-income household (for our purposes, those with annual earnings under $50,000)
Higher-income households (for our purposes, those with annual earnings over $50,000)
We thank the numerous CSA member households and CSA farmers who kindly participated in this research. We are also thankful to the papers’ reviewers and the journal editor for their helpful comments that greatly improved the paper. This work would not have been possible without a competitive grant Dr. Galt received from University of California’s Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources.
- Alkon, A.H. 2012. Black, white, and green: Farmers markets, race, and the green economy. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
- Alkon, A.H., and J. Agyeman. 2011. Introduction: The food movement as polyculture. In Cultivating food justice: Race, class, and sustainability, ed. A.H. Alkon, and J. Agyeman, 1–20. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Andreatta, S.L., M. Rhyne, and N. Dery. 2008. Lessons learned from advocating CSAs for low-income and food insecure households. Southern Rural Sociology 23(1): 116–148.Google Scholar
- Boulé, D. 2012. Beyond black and white: Understanding the sociocultural dimensions of “healthy” food access in South Sacramento. Master’s thesis, Community Development Graduate Group. Davis, CA: University of California.Google Scholar
- Bradley, K., and R.E. Galt. 2014. Practicing food justice at Dig Deep Farms and Produce, East Bay Area, California: Self-determination as a guiding value and intersections with foodie logics. Local Environment: The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability 19(2): 172–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Brown, S., and C. Getz. 2011. Farmworker food insecurity and the production of hunger in California. In Cultivating food justice: Race, class, and sustainability, ed. A.H. Alkon, and J. Agyeman, 121–146. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- De Winter, J.C.F., and D. Dodou. 2010. Five-point Likert items: t test versus Mann–Whitney–Wilcoxon. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 15(11): 1–12.Google Scholar
- Galt, R.E. 2011. Counting and mapping Community Supported Agriculture in the United States and California: Contributions from critical cartography/GIS. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies 10(2): 131–162.Google Scholar
- Green, J.J., E.M. Green, and A.M. Kleiner. 2011. From the past to the present: Agricultural development and black farmers in the American South. In Cultivating food justice: Race, class, and sustainability, ed. A.H. Alkon, and J. Agyeman, 47–64. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Guthman, J. 2011. Weighing in: Obesity, food justice, and the limits of capitalism, California studies in food and culture. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Harper, A.B. 2011. Vegans of color, racialized embodiment, and problematics of the “exotic”. In Cultivating food justice: Race, class, and sustainability, ed. A.H. Alkon, and J. Agyeman, 223–238. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Henderson, E., and R. Van En. 2007. Sharing the harvest: A citizen’s guide to Community Supported Agriculture, Rev. expanded ed. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green.Google Scholar
- Johnson, B., B. Thorn, B. McGill, A. Suchman, M. Mendelson, K.L. Patlan, B. Freeman, R. Gotlieb, and P. Connor. 2013. WIC participant and program characteristics 2012: Final report. Alexandria, VA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service.Google Scholar
- Legislative Analyst’s Office. 2014. CalFresh program overview. Sacramento, CA: Legislative Analyst’s Office.Google Scholar
- McClintock, N. 2011. From industrial garden to food desert: Demarcated devaluation in the Flatlands of Oakland, California. In Cultivating food justice: Race, class, and sustainability, ed. A.H. Alkon, and J. Agyeman, 89–120. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- National Center for Children in Poverty. 2015. California: Demographics of low-income children. Columbia University. http://www.nccp.org/profiles/CA_profile_6.html. Accessed 12 Nov 2015.
- Perez, J., P. Allen, and M. Brown. 2003. Community Supported Agriculture on the central coast: The CSA member experience. Santa Cruz, CA: Center for Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, University of California.Google Scholar
- Tegtmeier, E., and M. Duffy. 2005. Community Supported Agriculture (CSA) in the Midwest United States: A regional characterization. Ames, IA: Leopold Center, Iowa State University.Google Scholar
- U.S. Census Bureau. 2014a. American community survey 1-year estimates. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. http://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=ACS_14_1YR_B19001&prodType=table. Accessed 28 Sept 2015.
- U.S. Census Bureau. 2014b. American FactFinder: California. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. http://factfinder2.census.gov/. Accessed 15 Nov 2015.
- U.S. Census Bureau. 2015. California: State and County QuickFacts. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/06000.html. Accessed 23 Nov 2015.
- U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. 2015. 2014 poverty guidelines. Washington, DC: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation. http://aspe.hhs.gov/2014-poverty-guidelines. Accessed 8 Oct 2015.
- White, M.M. 2010. Shouldering responsibility for the delivery of human rights: A case study of the D-Town Farmers of Detroit. Race/Ethnicity: Multidisciplinary Global. Contexts 3(2): 189–211.Google Scholar
- White, M.M. 2011b. Sisters of the soil: Urban gardening as resistance in Detroit. Race/Ethnicity: Multidisciplinary Global. Contexts 5(1): 13–28.Google Scholar
- Zepeda, L., and J. Li. 2006. Who buys local food? Journal of Food Distribution Research 37(3): 1–11.Google Scholar