Agriculture and Human Values

, Volume 34, Issue 2, pp 435–452 | Cite as

What difference does income make for Community Supported Agriculture (CSA) members in California? Comparing lower-income and higher-income households

  • Ryan E. Galt
  • Katharine Bradley
  • Libby Christensen
  • Cindy Fake
  • Kate Munden-Dixon
  • Natasha Simpson
  • Rachel Surls
  • Julia Van Soelen Kim
Article

Abstract

In the U.S. there has been considerable interest in connecting low-income households to alternative food networks like Community Supported Agriculture (CSA). To learn more about this possibility we conducted a statewide survey of CSA members in California. A total of 1149 members from 41 CSAs responded. Here we answer the research question: How do CSA members’ (1) socioeconomic and demographic backgrounds, (2) household conditions potentially interfering with membership, and (3) CSA membership experiences vary between lower-income households (LIHHs) and higher-income households (HIHHs)? We divided members into LIHHs (making under $50,000 annually) and HIHHs (making over $50,000 annually). We present comparisons of LIHHs’ and HIHHs’ (1) employment, race/ethnicity, household composition and education, use of food support, and enjoyment of food-related activities; (2) conditions interfering with membership and major life events; and (3) sources of information influencing decision to join, reasons for joining, ratings of importance of and satisfaction with various CSA attributes, gaps between importance of and satisfaction with various CSA attributes, valuing of the share and willingness to pay more, and impacts of membership. We find that LIHHs are committed CSA members, often more so than HIHHs, and that CSA members in California are disproportionately white, but that racial disproportionality decreases as incomes increase. We conclude by considering: (1) the economic risks that LIHHs face in CSA membership, (2) the intersection of economic risks with race/ethnicity and cultural coding in CSA; and (3) the possibilities of increasing participation of LIHH in CSA.

Keywords

Community Supported Agriculture Lower-income households Higher-income households Race and ethnicity Disproportionality Consumption 

Abbreviations

AFNs

Alternative food networks

CSA

Community Supported Agriculture

LIHH

Lower-income household (for our purposes, those with annual earnings under $50,000)

HIHH

Higher-income households (for our purposes, those with annual earnings over $50,000)

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the numerous CSA member households and CSA farmers who kindly participated in this research. We are also thankful to the papers’ reviewers and the journal editor for their helpful comments that greatly improved the paper. This work would not have been possible without a competitive grant Dr. Galt received from University of California’s Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources.

References

  1. Alkon, A.H. 2012. Black, white, and green: Farmers markets, race, and the green economy. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
  2. Alkon, A.H., and J. Agyeman. 2011. Introduction: The food movement as polyculture. In Cultivating food justice: Race, class, and sustainability, ed. A.H. Alkon, and J. Agyeman, 1–20. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  3. Alkon, A.H., D. Block, K. Moore, C. Gillis, N. DiNuccio, and N. Chavez. 2013. Foodways of the urban poor. Geoforum 48: 126–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andreatta, S.L., M. Rhyne, and N. Dery. 2008. Lessons learned from advocating CSAs for low-income and food insecure households. Southern Rural Sociology 23(1): 116–148.Google Scholar
  5. Boulé, D. 2012. Beyond black and white: Understanding the sociocultural dimensions of “healthy” food access in South Sacramento. Master’s thesis, Community Development Graduate Group. Davis, CA: University of California.Google Scholar
  6. Bradley, K., and R.E. Galt. 2014. Practicing food justice at Dig Deep Farms and Produce, East Bay Area, California: Self-determination as a guiding value and intersections with foodie logics. Local Environment: The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability 19(2): 172–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bradley, K., and H. Herrera. 2016. Decolonizing food justice: Naming, resisting, and researching colonizing forces in the movement. Antipode 48(1): 97–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, S., and C. Getz. 2011. Farmworker food insecurity and the production of hunger in California. In Cultivating food justice: Race, class, and sustainability, ed. A.H. Alkon, and J. Agyeman, 121–146. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  9. Cone, C.A., and A. Myhre. 2000. Community-supported agriculture: A sustainable alternative to industrial agriculture? Human Organization 59(2): 187–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cooley, J.P., and D.A. Lass. 1998. Consumer benefits from Community Supported Agriculture membership. Review of Agricultural Economics 20(1): 227–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cox, R., L. Holloway, L. Venn, L. Dowler, J.R. Hein, M. Kneafsey, and H. Tuomainen. 2008. Common ground? Motivations for participation in a community-supported agriculture scheme. Local Environment: The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability 13(3): 203–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De Winter, J.C.F., and D. Dodou. 2010. Five-point Likert items: t test versus Mann–Whitney–Wilcoxon. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 15(11): 1–12.Google Scholar
  13. DeLind, L.B. 1999. Close encounters with a CSA: The reflections of a bruised and somewhat wiser anthropologist. Agriculture and Human Values 16(1): 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. DeLind, L.B., and A.E. Ferguson. 1999. Is this a women’s movement? The relationship of gender to community-supported agriculture in Michigan. Human Organization 58(2): 190–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Durrenberger, E.P. 2002. Community Supported Agriculture in central Pennsylvania. Culture & Agriculture 24(2): 42–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dyck, B. 1997. Build in sustainable development and they will come: A vegetable field of dreams. British Food Journal 99(9): 325–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Forbes, C.B., and A.H. Harmon. 2008. Buying into Community Supported Agriculture: Strategies for overcoming income barriers. Journal of Hunger & Environmental Nutrition 2(2–3): 65–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Galt, R.E. 2011. Counting and mapping Community Supported Agriculture in the United States and California: Contributions from critical cartography/GIS. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies 10(2): 131–162.Google Scholar
  19. Galt, R.E. 2013. The moral economy is a double-edged sword: Explaining farmers’ earnings and self-exploitation in Community Supported Agriculture. Economic Geography 89(4): 341–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Galt, R.E., K. Bradley, L. Christensen, J. Van Soelen Kim, and R. Lobo. 2015. Eroding the community in Community Supported Agriculture (CSA): Competition’s effects in alternative food networks in California. Sociologia Ruralis. doi: 10.1111/soru.12102.Google Scholar
  21. Green, J.J., E.M. Green, and A.M. Kleiner. 2011. From the past to the present: Agricultural development and black farmers in the American South. In Cultivating food justice: Race, class, and sustainability, ed. A.H. Alkon, and J. Agyeman, 47–64. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  22. Guthman, J. 2008a. Bringing good food to others: Investigating the subjects of alternative food practice. Cultural Geographies 15(4): 431–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Guthman, J. 2008b. “If they only knew”: Color blindness and universalism in California alternative food institutions. The Professional Geographer 60(3): 387–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Guthman, J. 2011. Weighing in: Obesity, food justice, and the limits of capitalism, California studies in food and culture. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  25. Harper, A.B. 2011. Vegans of color, racialized embodiment, and problematics of the “exotic”. In Cultivating food justice: Race, class, and sustainability, ed. A.H. Alkon, and J. Agyeman, 223–238. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  26. Henderson, E., and R. Van En. 2007. Sharing the harvest: A citizen’s guide to Community Supported Agriculture, Rev. expanded ed. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green.Google Scholar
  27. Hersey, J., J. Anliker, C. Miller, R.M. Mullis, S. Daugherty, S. Das, C.R. Bray, P. Dennee, M. Sigman-Grant, and H.O. Thomas. 2001. Food shopping practices are associated with dietary quality in low-income households. Journal of Nutrition Education 33: S16–S26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hinrichs, C.C., and K.S. Kremer. 2002. Social inclusion in a Midwest local food system project. Journal of Poverty 6(1): 65–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Johnson, B., B. Thorn, B. McGill, A. Suchman, M. Mendelson, K.L. Patlan, B. Freeman, R. Gotlieb, and P. Connor. 2013. WIC participant and program characteristics 2012: Final report. Alexandria, VA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service.Google Scholar
  30. Kato, Y. 2013. Not just the price of food: Challenges of an urban agriculture organization in engaging local residents. Sociological Inquiry 83(3): 369–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kirkland, A. 2011. The environmental account of obesity: A case for feminist skepticism. Signs 36(2): 463–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kolodinsky, J.M., and L.L. Pelch. 1997. Factors influencing the decision to join a Community Supported Agriculture (CSA) farm. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 10(2/3): 129–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lang, K.B. 2005. Expanding our understanding of Community Supported Agriculture (CSA): An examination of member satisfaction. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 26(2): 61–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Legislative Analyst’s Office. 2014. CalFresh program overview. Sacramento, CA: Legislative Analyst’s Office.Google Scholar
  35. McClintock, N. 2011. From industrial garden to food desert: Demarcated devaluation in the Flatlands of Oakland, California. In Cultivating food justice: Race, class, and sustainability, ed. A.H. Alkon, and J. Agyeman, 89–120. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  36. National Center for Children in Poverty. 2015. California: Demographics of low-income children. Columbia University. http://www.nccp.org/profiles/CA_profile_6.html. Accessed 12 Nov 2015.
  37. O’Hara, S., and S. Stagl. 2001. Global food markets and their local alternatives: A socio-ecological economic perspective. Population and Environment 22(6): 533–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Perez, J., P. Allen, and M. Brown. 2003. Community Supported Agriculture on the central coast: The CSA member experience. Santa Cruz, CA: Center for Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, University of California.Google Scholar
  39. Pole, A., and M. Gray. 2013. Farming alone? What’s up with the “C” in Community Supported Agriculture. Agriculture and Human Values 30(1): 85–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pole, A., and A. Kumar. 2015. Segmenting CSA members by motivation: Anything but two peas in a pod. British Food Journal 117(5): 1488–1505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Russell, W.S., and L. Zepeda. 2008. The adaptive consumer: Shifting attitudes, behavior change and CSA membership renewal. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 23(2): 136–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schnell, S.M. 2007. Food with a farmer’s face: Community-supported agriculture in the United States. Geographical Review 97(4): 550–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Slocum, R. 2006. Anti-racist practice and the work of community food organizations. Antipode 38(2): 327–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Slocum, R. 2007. Whiteness, space and alternative food practice. Geoforum 38(3): 520–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tegtmeier, E., and M. Duffy. 2005. Community Supported Agriculture (CSA) in the Midwest United States: A regional characterization. Ames, IA: Leopold Center, Iowa State University.Google Scholar
  46. U.S. Census Bureau. 2014a. American community survey 1-year estimates. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. http://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=ACS_14_1YR_B19001&prodType=table. Accessed 28 Sept 2015.
  47. U.S. Census Bureau. 2014b. American FactFinder: California. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. http://factfinder2.census.gov/. Accessed 15 Nov 2015.
  48. U.S. Census Bureau. 2015. California: State and County QuickFacts. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/06000.html. Accessed 23 Nov 2015.
  49. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. 2015. 2014 poverty guidelines. Washington, DC: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation. http://aspe.hhs.gov/2014-poverty-guidelines. Accessed 8 Oct 2015.
  50. White, M.M. 2010. Shouldering responsibility for the delivery of human rights: A case study of the D-Town Farmers of Detroit. Race/Ethnicity: Multidisciplinary Global. Contexts 3(2): 189–211.Google Scholar
  51. White, M.M. 2011a. D-Town farm: African American resistance to food insecurity and the transformation of Detroit. Environmental Practice 13(4): 406–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. White, M.M. 2011b. Sisters of the soil: Urban gardening as resistance in Detroit. Race/Ethnicity: Multidisciplinary Global. Contexts 5(1): 13–28.Google Scholar
  53. Wright, K.B. 2005. Researching Internet-based populations: Advantages and disadvantages of online survey research, online questionnaire authoring software packages, and web survey services. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00259.x.Google Scholar
  54. Zepeda, L., and J. Li. 2006. Who buys local food? Journal of Food Distribution Research 37(3): 1–11.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ryan E. Galt
    • 1
  • Katharine Bradley
    • 2
  • Libby Christensen
    • 3
  • Cindy Fake
    • 4
  • Kate Munden-Dixon
    • 5
  • Natasha Simpson
    • 6
  • Rachel Surls
    • 7
  • Julia Van Soelen Kim
    • 8
  1. 1.Department of Human EcologyUniversity of California, DavisDavisUSA
  2. 2.SIT/World Learning, Inc.BrattleboroUSA
  3. 3.Department of Agricultural and Resource EconomicsColorado State UniversityFort CollinsUSA
  4. 4.University of California Cooperative Extension, Nevada CountyGrass ValleyUSA
  5. 5.Geography Graduate GroupUniversity of California, DavisDavisUSA
  6. 6.Community Development Graduate GroupUniversity of California, DavisDavisUSA
  7. 7.University of California Cooperative Extension, Los Angeles CountyAlhambraUSA
  8. 8.University of California Cooperative Extension, Marin CountyNovatoUSA

Personalised recommendations