Agriculture and Human Values

, Volume 33, Issue 3, pp 563–574 | Cite as

Farmers’ strategies as building block for rethinking sustainable intensification

  • Diana Suhardiman
  • Mark Giordano
  • Lilao Leebouapao
  • Oulavanh Keovilignavong
Article
First Online:
Accepted:

Abstract

Agricultural intensification, now commonly referred to as sustainable intensification, is presented in development discourse as a key means to simultaneously improve food security and reduce rural poverty without harming the environment. Taking a village in Laos as a case study, we show how government agencies and farmers could perceive the idea of agricultural intensification differently. The study illustrates how farmers with the opportunities for groundwater use typically choose to grow vegetables and high valued cash crops rather than intensify rice production. This contrasts with government and donor supported efforts to promote rice intensification as a means to increase food security and reduce rural poverty. The article’s main message is that farmers’ differing strategies are related to a variety of household characteristics and that farmers’ strategies should be central to the current discussion on sustainable intensification.

Keywords

Rice intensification Agricultural groundwater use Farming strategies Laos 

Abbreviations

AMP

Agricultural master plan

GoL

Government of Laos

MAF

Ministry of agriculture and forestry

References

  1. Amin, S. 2011. Food sovereignty: A struggle for convergence in diversity. In Food movements unite! strategies to transform our food systems, ed. E. Holt-Gimenez, ix. Oakland, CA: Food First Books.Google Scholar
  2. Baulcombe, D., I. Crute, B. Davies, J. Dunwell, M. Gale, J. Jones, J. Pretty, and W. Sutherland. 2009. Reaping the benefits: Science and the sustainable intensification of global agriculture. RS Policy Document. London: The Royal Society.Google Scholar
  3. Bernstein, H. 2008. Agrarian questions from transition to globalization. In Peasants and globalization: Political economy, rural transformation, and the agrarian question, ed. H. Akram Lodhi, and C. Kay, 239–261. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Bernstein, H. 2004. Changing before our very eyes: Agrarian questions and the politics of land in capitalism today. Journal of Agrarian Change 4(1–2): 190–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bertini, C., and D. Glickman. 2008. Renewing American leadership in the fight against global hunger and poverty. The Chicago initiative on global agricultural development. Chicago: Chicago Council on Global Affairs.Google Scholar
  6. Blankinship, D.G. 2012. Gates defend focus on high-tech agriculture. Associated Press 24: 12–22.Google Scholar
  7. Bonanno, A. 1991. The restructuring of the agricultural and food system: Social and economic equity in the reshaping of the agrarian question and the food question. Agriculture and Human Values 8(4): 72–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bouahom, B., L. Douangsavanh, and J. Rigg. 2004. Building sustainable livelihoods in Laos: Untangling farm from non-farm, progress from distress. Geoforum 35(2004): 607–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burawoy, M. 1991. The extended case method. In Ethnography unbound: Power and resistance in the modern metropolis, ed. M. Burawoy, 271–287. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  10. Byres, T.J. 1996. Capitalism from above and capitalism from below. An essay in comparative political economy. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Campbell, B.M., P. Thornton, R. Zougmore, P. van Asten, and L. Lipper. 2014. Sustainable intensification: What is its role in climate smart agriculture? Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 8: 39–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cassman, K.G., and P.L. Pingali. 1995. Intensification of irrigated rice systems: Learning from the past to meet future challenges. GeoJournal 35(3): 299–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Collier, P. 2008. The politics of hunger: How illusion and greed fan the food crisis. Foreign Affairs 187: 67–79.Google Scholar
  14. Conforti, P. 2010. Looking ahead in world food and agriculture. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
  15. Conway, G. 2001. The doubly green revolution: Balancing food, poverty, and environmental needs in the 21st century? In Tradeoffs or synergies?, ed. D.R. Lee, and C.B. Barrett, 17–33. Wallingford, UK: CAB International.Google Scholar
  16. Conway, G. 1997. The doubly Green revolution. UK: Penguin books.Google Scholar
  17. Das, R.J. 2002. The green revolution and poverty: A theoretical and empirical examination of the relation between technology and society. Geoforum 33: 55–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Davies, W.P. 2003. An historical perspective from the green revolution to the gene revolution. Nutrition Reviews 61(6): 124–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Evenson, R.E., and D. Gollin. 2003. Assessing the impact of the green revolution, 1960 to 2000. Science 300(5620): 758–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. FAO. 2011. The state of food insecurity in the world: How does international price volatility affect domestic economies and food security?. http://www.fao.org/docrep/014/i2330e/.
  21. FAO. 1990. Sustainable intensification of rice production for food security in the near future. A summary report.Google Scholar
  22. FAO, World Bank, and IRRI. 2012. Lao’s people democratic republic rice policy study.Google Scholar
  23. Feder, G., R.E. Just, and D. Zilberman. 1985. Adoption of agricultural innovations in developing countries: A survey. Economic development and cultural change. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1153228.
  24. Feder, G., and D.L. Umali. 1993. The adoption of agricultural innovation: A review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 43(3–4): 215–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Freebairn, D. 1995. Did the green revolution concentrate incomes? A quantitative study of research reports. World Development 23: 265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Garnett, T., M.C. Appleby, A. Balmford, I.J. Bateman, T.G. Benton, P. Bloomer, B. Burlingame, M. Dawkins, L. Dolan, D. Fraser, M. Herrero, I. Hoffmann, P. Smith, P.K. Thornton, C. Toulmin, S.J. Vermeulen, and H.C. Godfray. 2013. Sustainable intensification in agriculture: Premises and policies. Science 341(6141): 33–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Government of Laos. 2010a. Laos’ seventh national socio-economic development plan (2011–2015).Google Scholar
  28. Government of Laos. 2010b. Strategy for agricultural development 2011–2020. Sector framework vision and goals: Agriculture and forestry for sustainable development, food, and income security. Ministry of agriculture and forestry: Final draft 15 Sep 2010.Google Scholar
  29. Government of Laos. 2004. National growth and poverty eradication strategy.Google Scholar
  30. Harris, J. 1991. The green revolution in North Arcot: Economic trends, household mobility, and the politics of an awkward class. In The green revolution reconsidered, ed. P.B. Hazell, and C. Ramaswamy, 57–84. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Harris, J. 1988. Capitalism and peasant production: The green revolution in India. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Hazell, P.B.R. 2009. The Asian green revolution. IFPRI discussion paper 00911. November 2009. Washington, DC: IFPRI.Google Scholar
  33. Holt-Gimenez, E., and M. Altieri. 2013. Agroecology, food sovereignty, and the new green revolution. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 37(1): 90–102.Google Scholar
  34. Holt-Gimenez, E., R. Patel, and A. Shattuck. 2009. Food rebellions! Crisis and the hunger for justice. Oakland, CA: Food First Books.Google Scholar
  35. Hüsken, F., and B. White. 1989. Java: Social differentiation, food production, and agrarian control. In Agrarian transformations: Local processes and the state in Southeast Asia, ed. G. Hart, A. Turton, and B. White, 235–265. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  36. Johannsen, S.S., and P. Armitage. 2010. Agricultural practice and the effects of agricultural land use on water quality. Freshwater Forum 28: 45–59.Google Scholar
  37. Khush, G. 1999. Green revolution: Preparing for the 21st century. Genome 42: 646–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lee, D. 2005. Agricultural sustainability and technology adoption: Issues and policies for developing countries. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 87(5): 1325–1334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Long, N. 2001. Development sociology: Actor perspectives. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Loos, J., D.J. Abson, M.J. Chappell, J. Hanspach, F. Mikulcak, M. Tichit, and J. Fischer. 2014. Putting meaning back into sustainable intensification. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 12: 356–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. MAF (Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry). 2014. Agriculture strategy 2025 and vision 2030. Vientiane Capital.Google Scholar
  42. MAF (Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry). 2013. Mid-term report of agriculture and forestry development plan 2011–2015. Vientiane Capital.Google Scholar
  43. McClung, C.R. 2014. Making hunger yield. Science 344(6185): 699–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Manivong, V., R. Cramb, and J. Newby. 2014. Rice and remittances: Crop intensification versus labor migration in Southern Laos. Human Ecology 42(3): 367–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Meena, R.N., L. Yadav, Y.K. Ghilotia, and R.K. Meena. 2013. Food security and agricultural sustainability: An impact of Green Revolution. Environment and Ecology 31(2C): 1190–1197.Google Scholar
  46. Mollinga, P.P. 1998. On the waterfront: Water distribution, technology, and agrarian change in a south Indian canal irrigation system. Ph.D. thesis, Wageningen University, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
  47. Mosse, D. 2004. Is good policy unimplementable? Reflections on the ethnography of aid policy and practice. Development and Change 35(4): 639–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Newby J.C., V. Manivong, and R.A. Cramb. 2013. Intensification of lowland rice-based farming systems in Laos in the context of diversified rural livelihoods. Paper presented at the 57th AARES Annual Conference, Sydney, Australia, 5–8 Feb 2013.Google Scholar
  49. OECD. 2001. Adoption of technologies for sustainable farming systems. Wageningen Workshop Proceedings, Wageningen, 4–7 July 2000.Google Scholar
  50. Ogada, M.J., G. Mwabu, and D. Muchai. 2014. Farm technology adoption in Kenya: A simultaneous estimation of inorganic fertilizer and improved maize variety adoption decisions. Agricultural and food economics doi: 10.1186/s40100-014-0012-3.
  51. Patel, R. 2013. The long green revolution. Journal of Peasant Studies 40(1): 1–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Patnaik, U. 1986. The agrarian question and the development of capitalism in India. Economic and Political Weekly 21(8): 781–793.Google Scholar
  53. Pretty, J., C. Toulmin, and S. Williams. 2011. Sustainable intensification in African agriculture. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 9(1): 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rigg, J. 2006. Land, farming, livelihoods, and poverty: Rethinking the links in the rural South. World Development 34(1): 180–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Röling, N., and E. van de Fliert. 1994. Transforming extension for sustainable agriculture: The case of integrated pest management in rice in Indonesia. Agriculture and Human Values 11(2–3): 96–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sackloham, S., and E. Baudran. 2005. Using agrarian system analysis to understand agriculture. In Improving livelihoods in the uplands of Lao PDR, 218–225. Vientiane: NAFRI, NAFES, and NUoL.Google Scholar
  57. Snyder, K.A., and B. Cullen. 2014. Implications of sustainable agricultural intensification for family farming in Africa: Anthropological perspectives. Anthropological Notebooks 20(3): 9–29.Google Scholar
  58. Stevenson, J.R., N. Villoria, D. Byerlee, T. Kelley, and M. Maredia. 2013. Green revolution research saved an estimated 18 to 27 million hectares from being brought into agricultural production. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110(21): 8363–8368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Struik, P.C., T.W. Kuyper, L. Brussaard, and C. Leeuwis. 2014. Deconstructing and unpacking scientific controversies in intensification and sustainability: Why the tensions in concepts and values? Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 8: 80–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Vanlauwe, B., D. Coyne, J. Gochowski, S. Hauser, J. Huising, C. Masso, G. Nziguheba, M. Schut, and P. van Asten. 2014. Sustainable intensification and the African smallholder farmer. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 8: 15–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Von Braun, J. 2007. The world food situation: New driving forces and required actions. Washington DC: IFPRI.Google Scholar
  62. White, B., and G. Wiradi. 1989. Agrarian and non-agrarian bases of inequality in nine Javanese villages. In Agrarian transformations: Local processes and the state in southeast Asia, ed. G. Hart, A. Turton, and B. White, 266–302. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  63. Winarno, Y.T. 1995. State intervention and farmer creativity: Integrated pest management among rice farmers in Subang, West Java. Agriculture and Human Values 12(4): 47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Winders, B. 2009. The vanishing free market: The formation and spread of the British and US food regimes. Journal of Agrarian Change 9: 315–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wittman, H.K., A.A. Desmarais, and N. Wiebe. 2010. Food sovereignty: Reconnecting food, nature, and community. Oakland, CA: Food First Books.Google Scholar
  66. World Bank. 2007. World development report 2008: Agriculture for development. Washington DC: The World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Yesuf, M., and G. Kohlin. 2008. Market imperfections and farm technology adoption decision: A case study from the highland of Ethiopia. Environment for Development Discussion Paper Series, March 2008.Google Scholar
  68. Yin, R.K. 1994. Case study research: Design and methods. London/New Delhi: Sage Publication/Thousand Oaks.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Diana Suhardiman
    • 1
  • Mark Giordano
    • 2
  • Lilao Leebouapao
    • 3
  • Oulavanh Keovilignavong
    • 1
  1. 1.International Water Management InstituteVientianeLao People’s Democratic Republic
  2. 2.Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign ServiceGeorgetown UniversityWashingtonUSA
  3. 3.Mekong Development CentreVientianeLao People’s Democratic Republic

Personalised recommendations