Advertisement

Agriculture and Human Values

, Volume 31, Issue 2, pp 273–284 | Cite as

“Some are more fair than others”: fair trade certification, development, and North–South subjects

  • Lindsay Naylor
Article

Abstract

At the same time as fair trade certified products are capturing an increasing market share, a growing number of scholars and practitioners are raising serious questions about who benefits from certification. Through a critique of north–south narratives, this paper draws on contemporary themes in fair trade scholarship to draw out different ways of thinking about fair trade outside of the dichotomous north–south framing. I argue that, through the creation of fair trade subjects of the “global north” and “global south,” certification has normalized and naturalized dichotomous power relations. The primary concern of this paper is to demonstrate the problems with situating certification and scholarship in the north–south binary and to push examination toward a more nuanced analysis of how certification and development are shaped in-place. This intervention is important for assisting with stepping away from long-standing debates regarding the effectiveness of certification, and additionally in contributing to critical thinking on economic development more broadly.

Keywords

Fair trade Development Global north–south Certification Geopolitics 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I am thankful to Alec Murphy and Lise Nelson for their helpful comments on drafts of this paper. Thank you as well to Joe Jasper for discussing, at length, the common themes of fair trade. I am also grateful to Brad Simantel for drafting Fig. 1.

References

  1. Agnew, J. 2010. Still trapped in territory? Geopolitics 15: 779–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agnew, J. 1999. Mapping political power beyond state boundaries: Territory, identity, and movement in world politics. Millennium 28: 499–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bacon, C. 2010. Who decides what is fair in fair trade? The agri-environmental governance of standards, access, and price. Journal of Peasant Studies 37: 111–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bacon, C. 2008. Confronting the coffee crisis: Fair trade, sustainable livelihoods, and ecosystems in Mexico and Central America. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barratt Brown, M. 1993. Fair trade: Reform and realities in the international trading system. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  6. Becchetti, L., and B. Huybrechts. 2007. The dynamics of fair trade as a mixed-form market. Journal of Business Ethics 81: 733–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blowfield, M. 1999. Ethical trade: A review of developments and issues. Third World Quarterly 20: 753–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blowfield, M.E., and C. Dolan. 2010. Fairtrade facts and fancies: What Kenyan Fairtrade tea tells us about business’ role as development agent. Journal of Business Ethics 93: 143–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bowes, J. 2011. The fair trade revolution. London and New York: Pluto.Google Scholar
  10. Brown, S., and C. Getz. 2008. Towards domestic fair trade? Farm labor, food localism, and the “family scale” farm. GeoJournal 73: 11–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bryant, R.L., and M.K. Goodman. 2004. Consuming narratives: The political ecology of “alternative” consumption. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 29: 344–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Buck, D., C. Getz, and J. Guthman. 1997. Organic farming: Social movement or capitalist appropriation?—From farm to table: The organic vegetable commodity chain of Northern California. Sociologia Ruralis 37: 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Davies, I.A., B. Doherty, and S. Knox. 2009. The rise and stall of a fair trade pioneer: The Cafédirect story. Journal of Business Ethics 92: 127–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dirlik, A. 2007. Global South: Predicament and promise. Global South 1: 12–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dolan, C.S. 2010. Virtual moralities: The mainstreaming of Fairtrade in Kenyan tea fields. Geoforum 41: 33–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Earley, M. 2012. Fair trade is dead. Just Coffee Cooperative. http://www.justcoffee.coop/blog/%5Buser%5D/2012/01/13/fair_trade_is_dead. Accessed 14 January 2012.
  17. Elson, D. 1999. Socializing markets, not market socialism. In Necessary and unnecessary utopias: Socialist register 2000, ed. L. Panitch, and C. Leys, 67–85. Halifax: Fernwood Press.Google Scholar
  18. Escobar, A. 2004. Beyond the Third World: Imperial globality, global coloniality, and anti-globalization social movements. Third World Quarterly 25: 207–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Escobar, A. 1995. Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the Third World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Fair Trade USA. 2012. Fair trade for all. http://www.fairtradeusa.org/fair_trade_for_all. Accessed 13 September 2012.
  21. Fair Trade USA. 2010. What is fair trade USA and what does it do? http://www.fairtradeusa.org/what-is-fair-trade/faq. Accessed 29 October 2012.
  22. Fisher, C. 2007. Selling coffee, or selling out? Evaluating different ways to analyze the Fair-Trade system. Culture & Agriculture 29: 78–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fisher, E. 2009. Introduction: The policy trajectory of fair trade. Journal of International Development 21: 985–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fisher, J. 2010. No alternative: Participation, inequality, and the meanings of fair trade in Nicaragua. PhD Dissertation, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR.Google Scholar
  25. FLO (Fairtrade International). 2011. Fairtrade standard for small producer organizations. Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
  26. FLO (Fairtrade International). 2007. Generic Fairtrade standard for small producer organizations. Bonn, Germany: Fairtrade Labeling Organizations International.Google Scholar
  27. Freidberg, S. 2003a. Cleaning up down South: Supermarkets, ethical trade, and African horticulture. Social & Cultural Geography 4: 27–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Freidberg, S. 2003b. Culture, conventions and colonial constructs of rurality in south–north horticultural trades. Journal of Rural Studies 19: 97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fridell, G. 2004. The fair trade network in historical perspective. Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d’études du développement 25: 411–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fridell, G. 2006. Fair trade and neoliberalism: Assessing emerging perspectives. Latin American Perspectives 33: 8–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fridell, G. 2007a. Fair trade coffee: The prospects and pitfalls of market-driven social justice. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  32. Fridell, G. 2007b. Fair-Trade coffee and commodity fetishism: The limits of market-driven social justice. Historical Materialism 15: 79–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Frundt, H.J. 2009. Fair bananas! Farmers, workers, and consumers strive to change an industry. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
  34. Getz, C., and A. Shreck. 2006. What organic and fair trade labels do not tell us: Towards a place-based understanding of certification. International Journal of Consumer Studies 30: 490–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Goodman, M.K. 2004. Reading fair trade: Political ecological imaginary and the moral economy of fair trade foods. Political Geography 23: 891–915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gould, N.J. 2003. Fair trade and the consumer interest: A personal account. International Journal of Consumer Studies 27: 341–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Guthman, J. 1998. Regulating meaning, appropriating nature: The codification of California organic agriculture. Antipode 30: 135–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Guthman, J. 2004. Agrarian dreams: The paradox of organic farming in California. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  39. Guthman, J. 2007. The Polanyian way? Voluntary food labels as neoliberal governance. Antipode 39: 456–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Howard, P.H., and D. Jaffee. 2013. Tensions between firm size and sustainability goals: Fair trade coffee in the United States. Sustainability 5: 72–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hudson, I., and M. Hudson. 2003. Removing the veil? Commodity fetishism, fair trade, and the environment. Organization Environment 16: 413–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hutchens, A. 2011. Playing games of governance: How and why fair trade pioneers evade corporate capture. Regulation & Governance 5: 221–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Independent Commission on International Development Issues. 1980. North–South, a programme for survival: Report of the independent commission on international development issues (Brandt report). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  44. Jaffee, D. 2007. Brewing justice: Fair trade coffee, sustainability, and survival. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  45. Jaffee, D. 2010. Fair trade standards, corporate participation, and social movement responses in the United States. Journal of Business Ethics 92: 267–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Jaffee, D., J.R. Kloppenburg, and M.B. Monroy. 2004. Bringing the “moral charge” home: Fair trade within the North and within the South. Rural Sociology 69: 169–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Jaffee, D., and P.H. Howard. 2010. Corporate cooptation of organic and fair trade standards. Agriculture and Human Values 27: 387–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Le Mare, A. 2008. The impact of fair trade on social and economic development: A review of the literature. Geography Compass 2: 1922–1942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Levi, M., and A. Linton. 2003. Fair trade: A cup at a time? Politics & Society 31: 407–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Li, T. 2007. The will to improve: Governmentality, development, and the practice of politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Low, W., and E. Davenport. 2005. Has the medium (roast) become the message? The ethics of marketing fair trade in the mainstream. International Marketing Review 22: 494–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lyon, S. 2006. Evaluating fair trade consumption: Politics, defetishization, and producer participation. International Journal of Consumer Studies 30: 452–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lyon, S. 2007. Maya coffee farmers and fair trade: Assessing the benefits and limitations of alternative markets. Culture & Agriculture 29: 100–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lyon, S. 2011. Coffee and community: Maya farmers and fair-trade markets. Boulder, CO: University Press of Colorado.Google Scholar
  55. Mansfield, B. 2003. “Imitation crab” and the material culture of commodity production. Cultural Geographies 10: 176–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Marx, Karl. 1977 [1867]. Capital: A critique of political economy (trans: Ben Fowkes). New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  57. Murphy, A.B. 2013. Advancing geographical understanding: Why engaging grand regional narratives matters. Dialogues in Human Geography 3: 131–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Mutersbaugh, T. 2005. Just-in-space: Certified rural products, labor of quality, and regulatory spaces. Journal of Rural Studies 21: 389–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Naylor, L. 2012. Food sovereignty and the politics of indigenous resistance in Chiapas, Mexico. Proceedings of the Congress of the Latin American Studies Association. San Francisco, CA. http://lasa.international.pitt.edu/members/congress-papers/lasa2012/files/32631.pdf.
  60. Neuman, W. 2011. A question of fairness. The New York Times 23 November 2011.Google Scholar
  61. Newhouse, K.D. 2011. Anti-politics movement. Dialectical Anthropology 35: 83–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Nicholls, A., and C. Opal. 2005. Fair trade: Market-driven ethical consumption. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  63. Orwell, G. 1954. Animal farm. New York: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
  64. ÓTuathail, G. 1996. Critical geopolitics: The politics of writing global space. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  65. Raynolds, L.T. 2000. Re-embedding global agriculture: The international organic and fair trade movements. Agriculture and Human Values 17: 297–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Raynolds, L.T. 2002. Consumer/producer links in fair trade coffee networks. Sociologia Ruralis 42: 404–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Raynolds, L.T. 2009. Mainstreaming fair trade coffee: From partnership to traceability. World Development 37: 1083–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Raynolds, L.T. 2012. Fair trade: Social regulation in global food markets. Journal of Rural Studies 28: 276–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Raynolds, L.T., D. Murray, and P.L. Taylor. 2004. Fair trade coffee: Building producer capacity via global networks. Journal of International Development 16: 1109–1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Raynolds, L.T., D.L. Murray, and J. Wilkinson. 2007. Fair trade: The challenges of transforming globalization. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  71. Renard, M.-C. 1999. The interstices of globalization: The example of fair coffee. Sociologia Ruralis 39: 484–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Renard, M.-C., and A. Loconto. 2013. Competing logics in the further standardization of fair trade: ISEAL and the Símbolo de Pequeños Productores. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food 20: 51–68.Google Scholar
  73. Ronchi, L. 2002. The impact of Fair Trade on producers and their organizations: A case study with Coocafé in Costa Rica. Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex, Sussex, UK.Google Scholar
  74. Schmelzer, M. 2010. Marketing morals, moralizing markets: Assessing the effectiveness of fair trade as a form of boycott. Management and Organizational History 5: 221–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Shreck, A. 2002. Just bananas? Fair trade banana production in the Dominican Republic. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food 10: 13–23.Google Scholar
  76. Shreck, A. 2005. Resistance, redistribution, and power in the fair trade banana initiative. Agriculture and Human Values 22: 17–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Slater, D. 1993. The geopolitical imagination and the enframing of development theory. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 18: 419–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Slater, D. 1997. Geopolitical imaginations across the North–South divide: Issues of difference, development and power. Political Geography 16: 631–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Small Producers Symbol (Símbolo de Pequeños Productores). 2010. Declaration of principles and values. 5 November 2010. http://www.tusimbolo.org/pdfs/Declaration_Principles_Values_V1.0_05-NOV-2010_T_17-DEC-2010.pdf. Accessed 10 October 2012.
  80. Small Producers Symbol (Símbolo de Pequeños Productores). 2012. Introduction. http://www.tusimbolo.org. Accessed 10 October 2012.
  81. Smith, E., and W. Loker. 2012. “We Know Our Worth”: Lessons from a fair trade coffee cooperative in Honduras. Human Organization 71: 87–98.Google Scholar
  82. Taylor, P.L. 2005. In the market but not of it: Fair trade coffee and forest stewardship council certification as market-based social change. World Development 33: 129–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Vanolo, A. 2010. The border between core and periphery: Geographical representations of the world system. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie 101: 26–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Varul, M.Z. 2008. Consuming the campesino. Cultural Studies 22: 654–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. West, P. 2010. Making the market: Specialty coffee, generational pitches, and Papua New Guinea. Antipode 42: 690–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Zinn, R. 2012. FWP’s statement on fair trade USA’s resignation from FLO. Issues and Challenges in Fair Trade for a Better World 4: 10–11.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeographyUniversity of OregonEugeneUSA

Personalised recommendations