“Some are more fair than others”: fair trade certification, development, and North–South subjects
At the same time as fair trade certified products are capturing an increasing market share, a growing number of scholars and practitioners are raising serious questions about who benefits from certification. Through a critique of north–south narratives, this paper draws on contemporary themes in fair trade scholarship to draw out different ways of thinking about fair trade outside of the dichotomous north–south framing. I argue that, through the creation of fair trade subjects of the “global north” and “global south,” certification has normalized and naturalized dichotomous power relations. The primary concern of this paper is to demonstrate the problems with situating certification and scholarship in the north–south binary and to push examination toward a more nuanced analysis of how certification and development are shaped in-place. This intervention is important for assisting with stepping away from long-standing debates regarding the effectiveness of certification, and additionally in contributing to critical thinking on economic development more broadly.
KeywordsFair trade Development Global north–south Certification Geopolitics
I am thankful to Alec Murphy and Lise Nelson for their helpful comments on drafts of this paper. Thank you as well to Joe Jasper for discussing, at length, the common themes of fair trade. I am also grateful to Brad Simantel for drafting Fig. 1.
- Barratt Brown, M. 1993. Fair trade: Reform and realities in the international trading system. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
- Bowes, J. 2011. The fair trade revolution. London and New York: Pluto.Google Scholar
- Earley, M. 2012. Fair trade is dead. Just Coffee Cooperative. http://www.justcoffee.coop/blog/%5Buser%5D/2012/01/13/fair_trade_is_dead. Accessed 14 January 2012.
- Elson, D. 1999. Socializing markets, not market socialism. In Necessary and unnecessary utopias: Socialist register 2000, ed. L. Panitch, and C. Leys, 67–85. Halifax: Fernwood Press.Google Scholar
- Escobar, A. 1995. Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the Third World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Fair Trade USA. 2012. Fair trade for all. http://www.fairtradeusa.org/fair_trade_for_all. Accessed 13 September 2012.
- Fair Trade USA. 2010. What is fair trade USA and what does it do? http://www.fairtradeusa.org/what-is-fair-trade/faq. Accessed 29 October 2012.
- Fisher, J. 2010. No alternative: Participation, inequality, and the meanings of fair trade in Nicaragua. PhD Dissertation, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR.Google Scholar
- FLO (Fairtrade International). 2011. Fairtrade standard for small producer organizations. Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
- FLO (Fairtrade International). 2007. Generic Fairtrade standard for small producer organizations. Bonn, Germany: Fairtrade Labeling Organizations International.Google Scholar
- Fridell, G. 2007a. Fair trade coffee: The prospects and pitfalls of market-driven social justice. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
- Frundt, H.J. 2009. Fair bananas! Farmers, workers, and consumers strive to change an industry. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
- Guthman, J. 2004. Agrarian dreams: The paradox of organic farming in California. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Independent Commission on International Development Issues. 1980. North–South, a programme for survival: Report of the independent commission on international development issues (Brandt report). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Jaffee, D. 2007. Brewing justice: Fair trade coffee, sustainability, and survival. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Lyon, S. 2011. Coffee and community: Maya farmers and fair-trade markets. Boulder, CO: University Press of Colorado.Google Scholar
- Marx, Karl. 1977 . Capital: A critique of political economy (trans: Ben Fowkes). New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
- Naylor, L. 2012. Food sovereignty and the politics of indigenous resistance in Chiapas, Mexico. Proceedings of the Congress of the Latin American Studies Association. San Francisco, CA. http://lasa.international.pitt.edu/members/congress-papers/lasa2012/files/32631.pdf.
- Neuman, W. 2011. A question of fairness. The New York Times 23 November 2011.Google Scholar
- Nicholls, A., and C. Opal. 2005. Fair trade: Market-driven ethical consumption. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
- Orwell, G. 1954. Animal farm. New York: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
- ÓTuathail, G. 1996. Critical geopolitics: The politics of writing global space. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
- Raynolds, L.T., D.L. Murray, and J. Wilkinson. 2007. Fair trade: The challenges of transforming globalization. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Renard, M.-C., and A. Loconto. 2013. Competing logics in the further standardization of fair trade: ISEAL and the Símbolo de Pequeños Productores. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food 20: 51–68.Google Scholar
- Ronchi, L. 2002. The impact of Fair Trade on producers and their organizations: A case study with Coocafé in Costa Rica. Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex, Sussex, UK.Google Scholar
- Shreck, A. 2002. Just bananas? Fair trade banana production in the Dominican Republic. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food 10: 13–23.Google Scholar
- Small Producers Symbol (Símbolo de Pequeños Productores). 2010. Declaration of principles and values. 5 November 2010. http://www.tusimbolo.org/pdfs/Declaration_Principles_Values_V1.0_05-NOV-2010_T_17-DEC-2010.pdf. Accessed 10 October 2012.
- Small Producers Symbol (Símbolo de Pequeños Productores). 2012. Introduction. http://www.tusimbolo.org. Accessed 10 October 2012.
- Smith, E., and W. Loker. 2012. “We Know Our Worth”: Lessons from a fair trade coffee cooperative in Honduras. Human Organization 71: 87–98.Google Scholar
- Zinn, R. 2012. FWP’s statement on fair trade USA’s resignation from FLO. Issues and Challenges in Fair Trade for a Better World 4: 10–11.Google Scholar